Slashdot Mirror


Iran Bans State Bodies From Using Telegram App, Khamenei Shuts Account (reuters.com)

Iran banned government bodies on Wednesday from using the popular Telegram instant messaging app as Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's office said his account would shut down to protect national security, Iranian media reported. From a report: ISNA news agency did not give a reason for the government ban on the service which lets people send encrypted messages and has an estimated 40 million users in the Islamic Republic. The order came days after Russia -- Iran's ally in the Syrian war -- started blocking the app in its territory following the company's repeated refusal to give Russian state security services access to users' secret messages. Iran's government banned "all state bodies from using the foreign messaging app," according to ISNA.

38 comments

  1. Notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How oppressive regimes are the most nervous.

    1. Re:Notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt the Iranian people are really worried.

    2. Re:Notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the French? ;)

  2. Glad all these countries are banning it by brucekeller · · Score: 1, Funny

    Because I didn't even know about it until then... now that you can pirate stuff on it too? I might just use it. Thanks Russia and Iran!

  3. Well, duh... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wikipedia tells me that Telegram doesn't have prophet in mind. Iranians must have been offended by that.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:Well, duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia tells me that Telegram doesn't have prophet in mind. Iranians must have been offended by that.

      Probably not very many Iranians.

      Just the utter fucking medieval nutcases in charge.

  4. Domain Fronting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real story is that they've started using domain fronting so now the big cloud providers are getting all their shit blocked. I wonder who will blink first

  5. Don't tell them about Signal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the cool kids are using it (or are they?)

    https://medium.freecodecamp.org/why-i-asked-my-friends-to-stop-using-whatsapp-and-telegram-e93346b3c1f0

  6. Re:What Should Be Banned... by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...are the fucking ads on Slashdot that jank the screen up and down for 10 fucking seconds as the load.

    God Damned you Mother fucking Assholes.

    And if you were a nice person you’d have “Karma: Excellent” next to your handle and the option to “Disable Advertisng”. Whatever else you might say about Slashdot they are one of the few sites I’ve seen to offer that feature.

  7. "Supreme Leader" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously? That is his designation? Thought it was pain in the ass. Or subprime lender.

    Wonder how many Cisco and Huawei devices will be used in implementing this. Maybe Sandvine?

  8. Khameni is a furry?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow..

  9. I’m Impressed by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I’ve never been interested in the various “chat apps” like Twitter, Snapchat, etc. for privacy reasons but if Telegram has been kicked out of Russia and banned by the Iranians I think that I might have to give it a look.

    I can’t think of a better recommendation.

    1. Re: I’m Impressed by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      So, do you or do you not know that this certainly means that it's compromised by the NSA? You didn't reach that conclusion?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  10. Best endorsement ever by tirnacopu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Telegram couldn't have asked for better publicity than this. Not saying I would use their service myself (I trust Moxie Marlinspike's Signal more) but a headline like "neither Putin nor Khamenei have managed to break us" is pretty badass.
     

    1. Re:Best endorsement ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That the Russians and the Iranians seemingly don't have access is nice, but unless you are in Russia or Iran you don't have much to worry about from them. Your own government (or that of the USA if you are in an allied nation) is far more likely to do you direct harm than any foreign government. In fact, with the Russian agenda of sowing political discord they are undoubtedly more pro-free-speech than "western" governments when it comes to western citizens. Meanwhile the west has abandoned pretty much the entire bill of rights at this point in the name of fighting nebulous outside threats that - by their very definition - can never actually be defeated.

      The Russian government isn't the one demanding records of all my correspondence, tracking who I talk to and where I am 24/7. The wars on drugs/terror/people trafficking/immigration/organised crime/encryption/etc can never and will never be "won"; they are tricks to encourage us to accept abuses of our freedoms because we are led to believe they are short-term measures meant to deal with specific threats rather than permanent erosions of liberty for the benefits of entrenched power.

      Plus, if I were a nation state that had hacked a secure messaging protocol, the first thing I'd do is loudly condemn it as unhackable...

    2. Re:Best endorsement ever by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      What's up with uTox? Decentralized seems to be the way to go.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:Best endorsement ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Telegram violates the first rule of security, dont roll your own crypto. Its simply not known whether it is actually secure or not, it could be tomorrow that a vulnerability specific to Telegram is released, and as with any code there is going to be bugs.

    4. Re: Best endorsement ever by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      It means the NSA has broken it, fool. They wouldn't be quitting it otherwise.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:Best endorsement ever by quantic_oscillation7 · · Score: 1

      or maybe they did...

      and it serves them really well that sense of fase security.

  11. What ads are you bitching about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go hither and get thee an ad blocker.

  12. Makes sense by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

    Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's office said his account would shut down to protect national security

    This surely must mean that he was leaking state secrets through the messaging app. So kill the app, don't touch the leaker...

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  13. Does Russa have a .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. little lakey ? Yes: Iran.

  14. Re:What Should Be Banned... by gtall · · Score: 1

    Yes, and at least for me, the Disable Advertising automatically disables itself after some unspecified period of time. What's up with that?

  15. Use an ad blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The magical tool that disables ads even for ACs!

  16. Signal or Telegram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Signal's code has been through more scrutiny. The big downside is the service is sometimes unreliable (mostly with calling). However, with Brian Acton's recent $50M I expect that to get a lot better. It's usually pretty reliable and has top-notch security.

    Telegram has wider use and is more reliable, but the DEFAULT settings encrypt your communications with Telegram's keys. For the best security, make sure you always activate private conversations to generate an ephemeral key.

  17. Ayarollah knows! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1
    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  18. We can hope for one thing by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

    That their attempts to block are at least as futile as they are in Russia.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:We can hope for one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 Troll

      Oooo, pissy little moderator taking things personally! I'm impressed! But still disappointed...

  19. Ha ! The real suspects ... by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    If your stated goal is to reduce terrorism and you prohibit state workers, are you suggesting government workers are more likely to be terrorists?

  20. Preparing for war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, Iran and her allies are under credible war threats from multiple countries. Their ally Syria is assaulted by four nuclear powers. The US has just asked Saudi Arabia to invade Syria (wtf?). Whatever else. Iranians killed by Israel in Syria. John Bolton is their sworn enemy, and might be days from saying something in the vein of "This is 1938 and we're in Munich (...)".

    To me it seems just about cutting a means of communication (and also making the population and country less Internet-observable)
    Telegram is kind of an IM, but where you subscribe to "channels" too. Kind of a mix of using MSN Messenger and RSS feeds. Perfect to give tips about stock exchange, or to rat someone out. Or to give details to the wrong "internet friend".

    I have to say, if there's such a risk to Iran's national security (no fake, imagined fears of US people surrounded with Canada and 10,000 kilometers of water on both sides) I think I support Iran doing this.

    Furthermore before posting this I managed to re-read the blurb and even the short headline that both says it's "state bodies" that won't be allowed to use it i.e. government, military, IRGC, police, fire department or what else. So, reading the *headline* would have helped us and myself before answering.
    If this bans concerns the government and not even the population, this is more akin to a "Clinton's mail server need be secured" situation than "the king bans SMS and closes the post office". Or today's story about a Western European country doing its own IM for goverment. There may be more mundane concerns even. Why have your mom, friends and the defense minister in your same contact list? And something positive in sovereign and independent entities using sovereign networks. Like it's easier to have a file server on the LAN than playing James Bond on the Internet with your data.

  21. they could publicly refuse an FBI security letter by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Russia and Iran are pikers next to the NSA/CIA/FBI elephants in the room.

    I can't think of a better recommendation.

    There was also Apple being willing to spend millions going to court when the FBI wanted to force them into cracking a dead suspect's iPhone.

  22. Government software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as it's not followed by a more general ban, I don't see any problem with this. If you're a government worker, you can expect your software choices to be dictated by security (real or imagined threats) or even purely political reasons.

  23. Re:they could publicly refuse an FBI security lett by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 1

    There was also Apple being willing to spend millions going to court when the FBI wanted to force them into cracking a dead suspect's iPhone.

    Agreed. I am posting from my iPad Pro right now.

  24. Not "secret messages", but keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a minor mistage in the article. Russia's goverment only demanded decryption keys for Telegram's cloud storage. "Secret chat" feature of Telegram uses end-to-end encryption without centralised keys.