Slashdot Mirror


Elon Musk's Alleged Email To Employees on Tesla's Big Picture (jalopnik.com)

An email allegedly sent by Elon Musk to Tesla staff has announced that the Model 3, which has faced a number of production issues, will go into "24/7" production by June, resulting in 6,000 Model 3 units made per week. But apart from this update, in the email, Elon Musk sheds light on how much he values precision in his cars. An excerpt: Most of the design tolerances of the Model 3 are already better than any other car in the world. Soon, they will all be better. This is not enough. We will keep going until the Model 3 build precision is a factor of ten better than any other car in the world. I am not kidding.

Our car needs to be designed and built with such accuracy and precision that, if an owner measures dimensions, panel gaps and flushness, and their measurements don't match the Model 3 specs, it just means that their measuring tape is wrong.

Some parts suppliers will be unwilling or unable to achieve this level of precision. I understand that this will be considered an unreasonable request by some. That's ok, there are lots of other car companies with much lower standards. They just can't work with Tesla.

8 of 186 comments (clear)

  1. This one... by sacrilicious · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We will keep going until the Model 3 build precision is a factor of ten better than any other car in the world.

    That's so ordinary. When you're 10x better than everyone else, you're fully cranked up, you want to go further, where can you go? Nowhere...

    ... unless they go to 11.

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  2. Unnecessary precision? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Our car needs to be designed and built with such accuracy and precision that, if an owner measures dimensions, panel gaps and flushness, and their measurements don't match the Model 3 specs, it just means that their measuring tape is wrong.

    If this is genuine, it seems a bit dumb. Tighter tolerances cost money to achieve, so in general, you do not use higher tolerances than you actually need. Now I haven't read the article, so maybe he goes on to give perfectly valid reasons as to why he wants such precise tolerances, but otherwise it just sounds like a way to pointlessly push up production costs. Since I don't believe Elon is that dumb, I'm questioning whether this email actually is genuine.

  3. This email is not targeted to the employees... by DrTJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... but rather to customers, investors and suppliers, I think.

  4. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What Musk needs to do

    He had delegated this work. He's back in the middle now because they failed. I don't know why, and you don't either; Tesla doesn't share enough information to know and the stuff appearing in the media about all this isn't credible for a whole bunch of reasons.

  5. Re:Musk must be kicking himself by hipp5 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why would he kick himself? This email is clearly intended to be leaked. "We're doing great and we're going to do better!" Why wouldn't he want the press to repeat that message?

  6. Re: Meh by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mass production (making all parts within exacting tolerances so they can be swapped, as opposed to being custom fit together in the end product) and the assembly line are the twin juggernauts of modern manufacturing, working hand in hand.

    However, his statement for needless 10x improvement on the formet smacks more of justification FUD for delays than any real need.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  7. Re: Meh by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Both ebay and amazon predate paypal, his first venture into e commerce

    Viaweb predated at least e-Bay, doesn't it?

    I see you're unfamiliar with NASAs space shuttle, a far more practical design than anything he's created

    Oh come on, that's just dumb, isn't it? What's "far more practical" about throwing 60% of your hardware mass away each time?

    For starters, it doesn't lose several tons of lift capacity by having to reserve fuel for landing.

    Reserve fuel that is cheaper than throwaway hardware. When will you people finally learn to use a calculator? And how about the Shuttle losing forty tonnes of payload by having wings and a heat shield, that doesn't bother you? How's that for your hypocrisy? :-p

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  8. Re: Meh by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 4, Insightful

    However, his statement for needless 10x improvement on the formet smacks more of justification FUD for delays than any real need.

    It's not entirely justification FUD on his part. It's counter-FUD to one of the most frequently repeated slurs against Tesla: that their fit and finish is poor. We see it here on Slashdot constantly, so constantly and consistently that it's obviously a concerted smear campaign. Personally I think it's an overreaction on Elon's part. An order of magnitude improvement in tolerances in wholly unnecessary to achieving their goals, and mostly tangential to ending the smear campaign.

    All Tesla has to do to make the FUD stop is to make Model 3s, fast and well. When enough of the short sellers go bankrupt, the FUD campaigns will run out of funding too and stop.