Slashdot Mirror


E-Waste Innovator Will Go To Jail For Making Windows Restore Disks That Only Worked With Valid Licenses (gizmodo.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Washington Post: California man Eric Lundgren, an electronic waste entrepreneur who produced tens of thousands of Windows restore disks intended to extend the lifespan of aging computers, lost a federal appeals court case in Miami after it ruled "he had infringed Microsoft's products to the tune of $700,000," the Washington Post reported on Tuesday. Per the Post, the appeals court ruled Lundgren's original sentence of 15 months in prison and a $50,000 fine would stay, despite the software being freely available online and only compatible with valid Windows licenses: "The appeals court upheld a federal district judge's ruling that the disks made by Eric Lundgren to restore Microsoft operating systems had a value of $25 apiece, even though they could be downloaded free and could be used only on computers with a valid Microsoft license. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit initially granted Lundgren an emergency stay of his prison sentence, shortly before he was to surrender, but then affirmed his original 15-month sentence and $50,000 fine without hearing oral argument in a ruling issued April 11." All told, the court valued 28,000 restore disks he produced at $700,000, despite testimony from software expert Glenn Weadock that they were worth essentially zero.

8 of 426 comments (clear)

  1. A big win! by gweihir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, repairing computers is obviously stealing from manufacturers of new ones and re-using valid Windows licenses is obviously stealing from MS! This person got what he deserved for his unpatriotic, almost treasonous actions. True Americans throw things away when they get old or break! This person was trying to sabotage capitalism and the rich getting richer. We cannot have that. So I am 100% behind this ruling, except that the sentence is wayyyy to lenient. Maybe we can find some terrorism charge in there as well? Maybe something like "inciting people to not buy new computers" or the like? After all, this _is_ threatening the stabiliy of society, just like terrorism.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:A big win! by supremebob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Somebody should send a Tweet to Bill Gates, and ask him how this ruling "helps" his cause for providing technology for low income people and developing countries. Seems like it would do quite the opposite.

  2. Re:Legal system is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Strange isn't it, that we allow governors and presidents power to usurp law by use of pardon. But when we the people want to do the same through jury nullification we are shunned by authority. It is your right and duty in cases of gross unjust punishment to use jury nullification.

  3. Re:Actual laws matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is everything wrong with this ruling. Imprisonment for a non violent offense? Worst case should be a fine or return the money made.

    Prison is for dangerous or violent felons, or repeat offenders who cannot reform themselves. Not for somebody who ignorantly violates a license agreement.

  4. Re:Legal system is broken by Rhipf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Judges don't have the authority to "usurps the executive powers of the President regarding immigration" but only the legality of how that power is used (hence balance of powers). Without that check the President would become a defacto dictator.

    If you are a judge and you have both sides of the political debate upset with you over different rulings you are probably doing your job properly.

  5. Re:Legal system is broken by king+neckbeard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, it's almost as if they view an important part of the judicial branch as being a check on the power of the other branches of government. Of course, that would also mean realizing that the judge didn't "usurp" power, but instead "checked" it. Usurping the power would be if the judges themselves were deporting immigrants.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  6. Re:Legal system is broken by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > Jury nullification is, by necessity, a complete undermining of the legal and judicial process.

    Uh, that's it purpose, McFly. It is supposed to be used to nullify BAD laws.

    It is basically the equivalent of civil disobedience but in the legal framework.

  7. Re: No good deed goes unpunished! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It wasn;'t illegal. Remember, they claim that they're not selling the disk, else they would have to replace damages and loss, but the license to use, hence you "need" an agreement (EULA). Making the disk itself worthless. And, no, if you have a license, you do not need to use the original disks,you just use the license key. Not even the disk s were illegally copied. So complete fail there, moron.