Slashdot Mirror
Snapchat Takes a Second Try at Spectacles (cnbc.com)
Snapchat is launching an updated version of Spectacles, its glasses with an embedded camera, and says its first version of the smart glasses sold over 220,000 units. From a report: That first version also caused the company to take a nearly $40 million write-down in the third quarter due to excess inventory. But instead of scrapping its hardware unit, the company is pressing ahead. Snap "listened to our customers and our community and incorporated every part of their feedback," said Mark Randall, Snapchat's vice president of hardware. The new version costs $150 -- $20 more than the prior version. They come in three new colors (onyx, ruby, and sapphire), are water resistant and can take photos and videos in high definition. Plus the content transfers much faster.
If you cross reference this with MyPillow and ShamWow lists, you would have a very valuable list of people who will basically throw away money on anything.
I don't quite get who the target audience of those are. All the social media seems to be focused on people posting photos of themselves, not of stuff they are looking at. So a selfie-stick makes sense for that audience. The camera on these glasses however is pointing in the wrong direction. These glasses might have more success if they'd changed the design into something more serious and make it a cheaper consumer focused alternative to a Taser Axon.
Go around a large cities public transit system taking videos and pictures of fellow passengers, especially in high crime sudivisions. After you get the shit beat out of you, you will then no longer wonder why wearing glasses such as these will get you punched in the face in many places.
They are cheaper, better specs (pun intended), less conspicuous and won't freak out the rubes.
Just look at their marketing FFS they want hipsters so bad you can taste the Portland with a hint of Brooklyn
The irony is rather than a consumer product this would be a great industrial one. Imagine doing on-site inspection with this crap built into safety glasses. There's a lot of untapped potential there.
Indeed. I just embed a regular camera on my regular glasses. Pinhole. No one notices it is there.
Make a spectacle of yourself and get the shit beat out of you, or DIY your own incognito system where they just look like normal glasses.
Hush! Darwin has the right to be right from time to time.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
The glasses are pointless. I can just walk around with my phone, snapping pictures and taking videos of everybody. Nobody questions people fiddling with phones in practically any setting.
Have gnu, will travel.
That's what I'm going to say to anyone who wears those around me.
"Are you a narc? You look like a narc."
...and pretty soon, anyone wearing normal glasses will get the snot beaten out of them too...
...and pretty soon, anyone wearing normal glasses will get the snot beaten out of them too...
NERD!
An augmented reality display like Google's Glass was trying for, but also voice and virtual keyboard (google or epson or somebody had a little touchpad thing you could manuver that would allow a virtual keyboard for typing) so that you could annotate and post your photographs on the go.
As to why someone would want this over a cell phone? Simplicity. One click photography is not something MOST cell phones have. Combined with a quick voice annotation and post, or virtual text entry and post a lot of people might be interested in such a device for taking shots of their day to day life without the fumbling required to dig out your cell phone for that split second shot.
Having said that, I don't think the market for that is big enough to finance SnapChat, or anyone else's products. And furthermore China has already produced these devices for going on 10 years now, up to 1080p@15(maybe 30 now) resolution. If this device supports touchless upload to your phone, it might be handy, but if it just stores files on an SD card, it has literally already been done by china with a few dozen different implementations based on glasses frame design.
So are you saying the police could use these to increase survelience in crime ridden areas? Perfect, i'll buy a million.
the police in large cities don't care if obnoxious people get beat up. guess again.
It's quite telling that the behaviour most resembling an "arsehole" is that of the people who use the term "glasshole" to describe someone who owns something rather than describing their actions.
Maybe go on youtube one day and see just how many people have photos or videos of strangers online. You'll be amazed to know that the majority of the world does not simply beat the shit out of other people.
in plenty of countries you have to blur the faces of strangers in your pictures. You must be unaware of how life is in at least half the world, not like your little safe space between your ears. Those acting outside accepted norm will get beaten or worse.
It's a dual-use tech and, when someone gets the formula right, means that the "consumers" will fund the development and propagation of a body spycam on every citizen.
Punching someone for taking your picture sounds like a great way to get into trouble with the law. Also good luck if the person is bigger than you.
They gonna lose another 50$ million lol
Who cares about the ShamWow, I only bought it to get the SlapChop.
Too bad, though, that they look like something you got at the kiosk in the mall, the checkout counter of 7-11, or a TV infomercial.
Maybe they can throw in a free Mr. Microphone?
"Hey, good lookin'! We'll be back to pick you up later!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
big doesn't matter, there will be more of "them" than of the picture taker. Again, you try it in New York or Chicago CTA train (I recommend south side red line late at night) and get back to us with how your high moral views are respected by the natives. You'll be lisping a lot with no teeth....
Not sure if I should be more disappointed by that fact or that you seem to delight in that scenario...
in plenty of countries you have to blur the faces of strangers in your pictures. You must be unaware of how life is in at least half the world
Nope, you're just the arsehole who assumes everyone who owns these glasses does so in order to take photos of strangers. Congratulations, you're exactly the type of person I'm talking about.
And no in nearly all countries you don't need to blur photos of strangers taken in public if not used for commercial reasons.
No It's a warning about reality and how some subcultures will act on violation of their privacy which should not be done in any case even where there will be no immediate consequences
There is no expectation of privacy in public, though.