Slashdot Mirror


Robot-Launched Weather Balloons in Alaska Hasten Demise of Remote Stations (sciencemag.org)

The National Weather Service is choosing automated launchers over human employees to deploy weather balloons in Alaska. From a report: Last Thursday, just before 3 p.m., things began stirring inside the truck-size box that sat among melting piles of snow at the airport in Fairbanks, Alaska. Inside, software ran checks on instruments to measure atmospheric temperature, humidity, and pressure; a tray slid into place; and a nozzle began filling a large balloon with gas. Finally, the roof of the box yawned open and a weather balloon took off into the sunny afternoon, instruments dangling. The entire launch was triggered with the touch of a button, 5 kilometers away at an office of the National Weather Service (NWS).

The flight was smooth, just one of hundreds of twice-daily balloon launches around the world that radio back crucial data for weather forecasts. But most of those balloons are launched by people; the robotic launchers, which are rolling out across Alaska, are proving to be controversial. NWS says the autolaunchers will save money and free up staff to work on more pressing matters. But representatives of the employee union question their reliability, and say they will hasten the end of Alaska's remote weather offices, where forecasting duties and hours have already been slashed. "The autolauncher is just another nail in their coffin," says Kimberly Vaughan, a union steward in Juneau.

Once deployed across the state, the $1.2 million machines, built by Finnish company Vaisala, will save about 8 hours of forecaster time a day -- and about $1 million a year at NWS, Susan Buchanan, an NWS spokesperson says.

8 of 52 comments (clear)

  1. What was that saving? by tomhath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    will save about 8 hours of forecaster time a day -- and about $1 million a year at NWS

    Okay, I see that this is in Alaska. But a million dollars a year for one FTE? No wonder the union is squawking.

    1. Re:What was that saving? by b0bby · · Score: 3, Informative

      It seems like they are shooting for 3 FTEs per location, but because there aren't enough people they have to keep moving them around to cover. So while it still seems high, $333k per employee when you include transportation to remote areas and maintaining accommodations for them in said remote areas starts to seem more plausible. If you're flying in all supplies with a bush pilot things get expensive.

    2. Re:What was that saving? by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      It seems like they are shooting for 3 FTEs per location,

      Eight hours a day is one FTE, not three. I guess if they said they're trying to replace one full time job and two needless supervisors with one machine, someone would have wondered why they needed the extra two people. At $333k/year you're talking about a pretty good paying job, even assuming that the pay is only half the cost of the employee. $150k/year is a good sum. You can see why the union is objecting.

      But then, is it REALLY an 8 hour task to prep and launch one of these balloons? Really? Because the robot is getting rid of that job, but it doesn't do the other parts of the process like look at and understand how the data fits into the whole picture, or deal with questions from the local weather users.

  2. Re:Unions: What are they for, again? by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

    Unions: "We demand that these people get to keep their boring-ass, poorly paying jobs

    If NWS is saving a million a year by getting rid of an employee, then it isn't a poorly paying job.

  3. Buggy Whips by zarmanto · · Score: 2

    Oh well... just add it to the list, I guess:

    • * Gong farmers -- Who literally collected dog crap from people's yards, to re-purpose as fertilizer.
    • * Ice cutters -- As in, that guy in Frozen, whose job was apparently pretty dangerous, as it turns out.
    • * Knocker ups -- A distinctly boring job which consisted of knocking on doors and windows to wake people up... which was replaced by the lowly alarm clock.
    • * Lamplighters -- Who probably weren't all that happy about the invention of electric light-bulbs -- so we should all do our part to save their jobs, and shutdown everything we own that uses electricity to produce light, right? Right? Bueller?
    • * Leech collectors -- Who worked for (ahem!) "doctors". Now, let's just be honest; surely we're all glad that doctors don't use leeches anymore, right?
    • * Buggy Whip maker -- I would hope that we all recognize this reference by now.
    • * Weather Balloon Launchers -- and there we are.

    So, ummm... why is anybody upset about this, again?

    1. Re:Buggy Whips by Holi · · Score: 2

      Doctors do use leeches still. Though they are bred and not collected. So leech collectors were replaced by leech breeders.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  4. Re:Unions: What are they for, again? by Holi · · Score: 2

    If automation makes this part of forecasting more efficient and less expensive then why are we bitching.

    Launching balloons is probably the least technical part of the job. So while I feel for these low skill employees at NWS, I feel it's better to save there where it will not effect our forecast accuracy.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  5. 8 hours a day ? by dargaud · · Score: 2

    I've had to do that job among many others while in Antarctica. And the launches were much worse than in Alaska (where I've also been): insane winds (250+ km/h) or insane temperatures (-80C) . And it doesn't take '8 hours a day of forecaster's time' to launch a balloon, but about 15 minutes, then 2 hours to remotely collect data (while you work on something else) and a few minutes to send the result if you need to setup a manual internet connection. Anyway, just to say that automated launchers have existed for the last 30 years but they've never been reliable, maybe they've finally improved...

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?