Slashdot Mirror


Two Koreas Agree To End War This Year, Pursue Denuclearization (bloomberg.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg: North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and South Korean President Moon Jae-in agreed Friday to finally end a seven-decade war this year, and pursue the "complete denuclearization" of the Korean Peninsula. Kim and Moon embraced after signing the deal during a historic meeting on their militarized border, the first time a North Korean leader set foot on the southern side. They announced plans to replace the 1953 armistice that ended hostilities with a peace treaty by year's end. Their statement on a "common goal of realizing, through complete denuclearization, a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula," stopped short of the "complete, verifiable and irreversible denuclearization" long sought by the U.S. and its allies. The statement didn't elaborate on what the term meant and Kim didn't personally utter the word during remarks Friday. "We have agreed to share a firm determination to open a new era in which all Korean people enjoy prosperity and happiness on a peaceful land without war," Kim told reporters, without taking questions. President Trump hailed the move, declaring "KOREAN WAR TO END!" on Twitter. He has agreed to meet with Kim at a time and place yet to be determined.

25 of 368 comments (clear)

  1. Camp Humphries by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It'll be interesting to see how they negotiate the removal of US forces from South Korea. The US has its biggest bases and airfields in all of Asia over there, and I can't imagine removing them is going to sit well with the Pentagon.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  2. Trust, but verify by TomR+teh+Pirate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Kim has made a lot of commitments, none of them worth the paper they were printed on. I'll believe it when the inspectors believe it.

  3. Kim won by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    we've acknowledged him as the legitimate ruler of North Korea. That's what this was about. As soon as Trump said he'd meet with Kim, Kim won. He doesn't need the nukes any more. He's still got enough firepower to flatten South Korea, so he's still got his hostage situation. The nukes were just a trick to get us to the table and to get us to legitimize his reign. Worked too.

    On the one hand I should be upset we're giving approval to yet another dictatorship. On the other hand NK is hardly the first and Trump just got outmaneuvered and lost his shot at an Iraq style war. On the other other hand there's still Iran, and they don't have a hostage to protect them.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  4. Re:Nobel Peace Prize Winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Goaded them on until they neared collapse, and then made them come to the table.

    Sometimes the baby wins.

  5. Re:Nobel Peace Prize Winner by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think you'd have to show there was some intent. If two people are arguing, then a third person runs through the room flinging their poop at the walls and gibbering like a madman, it doesn't automatically mean the poop flinger is a master negotiator just because the argument gets cut short.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  6. Re:Nobel Peace Prize Winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump are alpha male Presidents. They defeat their enemies George Bush (all of them), Jimbo Carter, Barack Obama, etc are panty waste girly men.

  7. Wow by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People are really over-reacting to this - on both sides. It's certainly better news than if the two presidents had walked away from the table shouting "LOCK AND LOAD!" - but, right now, it's just words, and there have been plenty of words before.

    Moon isn't an idiot - he's well aware he's got 25 million of his people living in and around a city that's only 35 miles from North Korea. He hasn't committed to much of anything... nor has Kim. "Ending" a war which has effectively been over for 70 years is a symbolic gesture, but little more than that.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  8. We've been doing that for ages by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    what triggered this is folks think Trump and his Cabinet are crazy enough to actually go to war and let NK make good on their threat to flatten Seoul.

    I still don't like this outcome. We've not acknowledged Kim Jun Un's regime as legitimate. At least legally (and practically, since there's plenty of folks who don't follow politics enough to know NK's a monarchy and not a Democracy).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:We've been doing that for ages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "folks think Trump and his Cabinet are crazy enough to actually go to war "
      Trump is unpredictable and nobody knows exactly what he will do and this is a good thing. He is a poor President but he is necessary. The status quo needs to be challenged on both the domestic and international relations sides. Prior to Trump the US had been 100% predictable when it came to addressing international relations. Being predictable gives your adversaries the upper hand in almost every conflict. If you know what your adversary is going to do you can adjust your actions accordingly. Russia knew it could invade Crimea and start a civil war in Ukraine because the US reaction was totally predictable. Russia figured a few meaningless economic sanctions was a small price to pay for taking control of it's former eastern bloc vassal states. Russia thought they would have a friendly US President who would withdraw the Obama era sanctions instead they have received quite a few hard kicks in the nuts by an unpredictable US President. Trumps unpredictability finally got China to enforce the economic sanctions targeting NK. Trumps tariff war threats against China has also finally got China talking about addressing the US complaints against China for it's unfair trade practices, currency manipulation, and intellectual property theft. China is dealing with an unpredictable US President who thinks the US could actually win a trade war with China. Trumps boisterous Twitter attacks on the NK missile man was unprecedented and certainly not Presidential. Trump's unhinged ramblings about destroying an entire country using the big button on his desk really broke the mold. It's one thing for some little country with a few nuclear bombs to threaten the US but it is an entirely different matter when a country with enough nuclear missiles to blow up the world 3 times over openly threatens to use them. I actually thought Trump sounded rather excited about the prospect of pushing his big button.
      When Trump questioned the usefulness of NATO and complained about countries not fulfilling their funding commitments those behind in their payments suddenly ponied up the money owed.

      Trump scares people. He is not a politician and never even tries to be one. He is not a Republican or Democrat. He is not a liberal or conservative. He has shown no interest in playing politics with the DC power elite and he seems to enjoy attacking the media. He certainly doesn't play the identity politics practiced today. He is not a statesman or skilled orator. He is everything a President shouldn't be but when his Presidency is over he may be remembered as the President who finally ended the NK-SK war. The President who reminded US allies that relations between countries go both ways. If you are going to constantly criticize and berate the US don't expect US military support and lopsided trade deals to continue. He may be the President who finally forced the Palestinians to face reality, disarm, and sue for peace with Israel. Moving the US Embassy to Jerusalem is just a kick in the head for the Palestinians who need to realize they have lost 3 wars against Israel and if there is a 4th the US will not prevent Israel from ending the conflict any way they see fit.

  9. Re:Nobel Peace Prize Winner by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

    More like two people arguing whether Kiss or AC/DC is better with Trump coming in as the crazy friend high on LSD asking if he should bash the other guy's skull in. And then it's like "Uh no we're good, they're both good bands... we're friends, see" because I don't think this happened on its own. I think they realized that Trump might actually set off a new Korean war, regardless if that'd fuck both North and South Korea hard. So when push comes to shove they'd rather come to terms, at least while the crazy guy is in the room...

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  10. Re: Nobel Peace Prize Winner by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Trump surrounded NK with carriers and flew bombers off the coast. Moreover there are hard hitting sanctions that are harming Kim's ability to keep bribing his generals. This could have been done decades ago, but globalists find North Korea useful as a source of tension. The fact that millions suffer means nothing to them. Trump brought Kim to the table, but naturally nobody wants to give him credit because he's Hitler.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  11. Re:Thank you Dennis Rodman! by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, you're supposed to believe that Obama set this all up in perfect stealth mode over a year ago, or that Hillary should get the credit because this would have spontaneously happened on her watch while she was continuing Obama's failed policies.

  12. Re:Nobel Peace Prize Winner by guruevi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It’s called negotiation and persuasion. Regardless of whether you agree with him, he has a way of getting under his opponents skins. CNN is still talking about the elections while Trump is changing policies right under our noses.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  13. Re:Nobel Peace Prize Winner by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People like you said the same BS about Reagan and the dissolution of the USSR: it was all accidental, would've happened anyway, Reagan was an incompetent warmonger, blah blah blah. You simply refuse to grasp that a hardline, belligerent stance backed up with credible threats of military action actually work when facing down tyrannical dictatorships.

    Here's what really happened, and none of it was by accident:

    1. NK developed their nukes with the intention of saber rattling and getting their way since it's worked so well for the last 70 years.
    2. Trump let NK know we can and will turn them into a glowing parking lot if they don't stop doing that.
    3. Trump let China know he's quite serious about pushing the Big Red Button on NK and put pressure on China via tariffs, probably with the deal being China pushes NK to start behaving and Trump will remove the tariffs.
    4. China values their economic ties with the US far more than anything they're getting from NK, and further NK embarrassed the Chinese leadership with his nuclear testing.
    5. China, seeing it in their best interests to reign in NK, told them they wouldn't step in if Trump pushed the Big Red Button and Kim finally figured out he's playing with something that will get him burned. China also probably threatened severe economic pressure on NK if they continued to misbehave.
    6. NK, unable to survive economically without China and unable to withstand a US military without Chinese backing, wisely decided it's time to come to the the peace table before things get out of control.

    Even you ought to be able to put the pieces together. Trump visits China. Then Kim visits China. Shortly thereafter Kim changes its stance. Only a fool would consider this accidental. Trump leaned on China and China leaned on Kim. This is something Obama could've easily done -- and maybe earned a Nobel instead of being given one for "participation" -- but was too naive to do. But no doubt had this happened on his watch you'd have given him full credit and claimed him a master politician. But since it happened on Trump's watch it has to be accidental, right? Can't give Trump credit. That might validate his ideology and invalidate yours and that simply can't be allowed.

    --
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  14. Re:Nobel Peace Prize Winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do you always judge people not by the content of their actions and words, but by what you think they think?

    Admit it to yourself that if Obama, or Hillary, or literally anyone else did the exact same things Trump did in the exact same ways Trump did you would be posting praise instead of condemnation.

  15. Re:Nobel Peace Prize Winner by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 2, Insightful

    She's more useful not being in jail. Imprison her and she becomes a martyr. Right now she's a washed-up has-been that's so toxic even Democrats don't want anything to do with her anymore.

    Trust me, the sting of losing to Trump and having to live in political exile having never eclipsed her philandering husband's name is far more punishing than any cell could ever be.

    --
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  16. He probably doesn't care by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 3, Insightful

    what triggered this is folks think Trump and his Cabinet are crazy enough to actually go to war and let NK make good on their threat to flatten Seoul.

    No! What really triggered this is folks think Trump is literally Hitler!

    (Gotta love the gymnastics people are attempting, just to put Trump in a bad light here.)

    The reality is that he probably doesn't even care about the Nobel prize - he probably viewed North Korea as another problem to fix, and went and fixed it. Next up: Iran.

    My take, after watching his actions over the past couple of years, is that he doesn't actually care what people think or say about him.

    So please tell us how he's flinging poo everywhere, has no plan and doesn't think and doesn't read and is stupid and immature and is literally Hitler...

    ..and has somehow just racked up yet another massive win.

    For the world.

    1. Re:He probably doesn't care by Rockoon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My take, after watching his actions over the past couple of years, is that he doesn't actually care what people think or say about him.

      Trump is in the unique position of being more popular than the press. Flinging dung at him will only work if people like you. The cast of characters that are constantly on the air waves flinging dung, are neither liked nor trusted. Not one bit.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  17. Re:Nobel Peace Prize Winner by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nothing you've posted suggests that Trump was doing anything other than being a belligerent asshole rather than acting like one as part of a cunning plan.

    And nothing you've observed has made a dent in that hardened cranium of yours to make you understand that Kim wouldn't have buckled to anyone except a belligerent asshole.

    Obama wouldn't and couldn't have done it for many reasons, not least that NK would never have bought it coming from him.

    Which, whether you realize it or not, proves my point. NK took Trump's threats seriously because they knew he was serious. Obama they laughed at and manipulated him like a child.

    Trump being a gibbering lunatic might just be one of several factors that contribute to a lasting peace between NK and SK. That doesn't make him any less of a gibbering lunatic.

    It's easier for you to chalk this up to total chance by a gibbering lunatic than to even consider the possibility this was all planned. This despite all the evidence in front of you that Trump's visit to China, Kim's subsequent visit to China, and Kim's sudden about face are very much intertwined.

    It's very childish to go stating your baseless conclusions as to what I'm thinking as fact, when you could instead argue your own point constructively.

    I have argued it constructively, even to the point of giving a numbered list backed up with observable evidence. You're just too stuck in your own mindset to listen to it. Hence I'm mocking you, as your response is exactly what I expected.

    --
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  18. Re:Nobel Peace Prize Winner by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The notion of giving a US President a Peace Prize is pretty much insane.

    Al Gore got his as a consolation prize for not being president.

  19. Re:We don't think Trump is Hitler by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, *you* think he's a proto-hitler. The same guy that isn't rounding up people, but is more then happy to come out swinging against him. The same guy who isn't telling the police to shoot people, but is more then happy to attack them publicly win or lose. The same guy who places blame on both groups, but also says both groups have good people in them. And you're screeching "but he didn't DENOUNCE THEM!" just like the media told you. He's put people into place who are ardent believers that the constitution isn't a "living breathing document" but foundational to the point that it's sacrosanct and all law should be build around, and not that the constitution should fit the law. He's doesn't care to play nice with the media, this isn't a fault. It's a bonus. Trust in media is declining worldwide and he isn't the cause of it, the media itself is.

    For a fascist, proto-fascist, next hitler he's doing a pretty shit job. You have no pattern recognition in this, if you did you would have been screeching at Obama when he was using EO's to create policy by fiat, and leaving the US in the current cluster fuck with DACA among other massive abuses of executive power bypassing the house and the senate. Hell you would have been screeching when Obama was preforming extra-judicial killings of american citizens without trial. At least Bush Jr. attempted to give some semblance of legal rights how badly it was regardless.

    God damn give your fucking head a shake. At this point, it seems like the anti-trumpers would have been happier with another war or three. And considering all the neocons who flipped from Bush Jr's side after the tea party groups drove them out, and to the democrats and progressive left? I'm not fucking surprised.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  20. Re: Nobel Peace Prize Winner by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not 'our' fucking business to prevent peace from breaking out in Korea. It's for the Korean people to decide.

    I can't believe it's even necessary to have to say this.

  21. Re:Nobel Peace Prize Winner by jander · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would add:

    7. NK Nuclear test mountain collapsed in on itself and would require significant resources to rebuild. Resources that they no longer have the economic means to acquire.

    Agreeing to denuclearize means they get a win without having to substantiate it....

    --
    An ounce of perception is worth a pound of obscure
  22. Re:Who is the more dangerous fool? by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You should probably pay more attention to S.Korean politics. They just finished having an election there after the previous president was impeached and was a batshit crazy feminist that believed she was the reincarnation of a god and actively operated drugging dens for teen girls and the head of one of their largest multinational companies was directly bribing the president for policy. And, illegally destroyed documents(server wipes) tying all of this together. But was too stupid to destroy handwritten notes. Her daughter is singing like a bird and so loudly that it's damn right hilarious to save herself from life imprisonment. The two other options between Moon were, soft-China and soft-Japan neither won. Moon on the other hand has had a reunification desire after a friend of his was assassinated by Park's father in the 1960's for pushing for reunification.

    In the end it doesn't matter what China wants, or even Japan, or the US. It's S.Korea and N.Korea's choice, and it looks like finally it might just happen with help from all parties involved.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  23. Re:Nobel Peace Prize Winner by Uberbah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    She's more useful not being in jail. Imprison her and she becomes a martyr.

    She wont go to jail for the same reason her husband dropped the Iran Contra investigation, the same reason Obama didn't prosecute Bush for war crimes, the same reason Trump wont prosecute Obama for starting wars without Congressional authorization. They're all a part of the same club and aren't about to send anyone to prison least they end up there themselves.

    Right now she's a washed-up has-been that's so toxic even Democrats don't want anything to do with her anymore.

    With the voters, yes, but the party has been working very, very, very hard to make it clear they DGAF about the voters. From the DNC arguing in court they have the right to rig primaries to Steney Hoyer just getting taped on doing just that. The Clintons are still influence peddlers and most Democratic officials owe them favors - favors the Clintons are happy to call in.