Digital and Analog Audio's Curious Coexistence (cnet.com)

Steve Guttenberg, writing for CNET: It's a funny thing, the ongoing turntable sales surge shows no signs of slowing down, but nearly all new music is recorded digitally. It seems like a contradiction, turntables and LPs are purely analog in nature, but nearly all new (not remastered LPs) made over the last 30+ years were recorded, mixed, and mastered from digital sources. Older, pre 1980 LPs were made in an all-analog world. Today's LPs are hybrids of a sort, the grooves are still analog, but the music was probably made in the digital domain.

Be that as it may, LPs, regardless of vintage, can sound great. While pre-1980s records may be richer in tone and warmth, there are lots of more recent albums that sound just as good or better. In other words vinyl's sound quality or lack thereof has mostly to do with the quality of the original recording, and the choices made by the recording, mixing, and mastering engineers.

Despite the overwhelming number of digital recordings, there is still a tiny percentage of all-analog recordings being made. To cite one mostly analog studio, the legendary Electrical Audio, which owner Steve Albini told me records and mixes around 70 percent of all of its sessions on tape.

Comments

wrong conclusion

[religionofpeas]

In other words vinyl's sound quality or lack thereof has mostly to do with the quality of the original recording

No, if everything comes from the same digital master, then vinyl's difference in sound quality comes from imperfections in the medium itself.

Re:96KHz

[Joce640k]

The placebo effect is real, too. You can actually cure illness with sugar pills!

Bottom line: If analog sound is better in their heads then it really is better (for them).