Slashdot Mirror


Talent War in Silicon Valley Demands High Salary (axios.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Employees at Google's parent company Alphabet earned "a median pay package of more than $197,000" in 2017, around 18% lower than Facebook's median salary of $240,000, the Wall Street Journal reports. Per the Journal, this illustrates the competitive "talent war in Silicon Valley, where talented engineers are in limited supply." These two salaries were more than $100,000 above Amazon's median pay, which sat at $28,446. The median price for a home in Silicon Valley is upwards of $1 million, in Seattle the median home price is just under $800,000.

32 of 189 comments (clear)

  1. Median Salary by Talderas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's nothing valuable or sane about comparing Amazon's median salary to that of Facebook or Alphabet. When either of the latter two start employing thousands of low wage workers you'll see their median salary plummet to Amazon levels.

    But hey, I guess we can't expect the Wall Street Journal to apply basic critical thinking skills.

    --
    "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    1. Re:Median Salary by kenh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd be curious to see Amazon's median salary minus the warehouse workers. They compared two marketing/advertising giants with a retail enterprise, and we're supposed to feel bad that Amazon's tens of thousands of warehouse workers don't earn a quarter-million dollars/year like top-talent programmers and technology specialists?

      Puh-leeze.

      --
      Ken
    2. Re:Median Salary by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2

      Yes, but it is proof that it is MAXIMUM WAGE, not MINIMUM WAGE, which drives inflation.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:Median Salary by omnichad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is a huge leap in logic. Inflation is primarily driven by prices on commodities that poor people spend most of their income on. More income at the bottom means more demand for those commodities, driving up prices.

    4. Re: Median Salary by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That is a rather ignorant way of looking at things. Inflation is caused by printing too much money. The federal reserve is largely in control of inflation, and can usually get as much or as little as they want. Inflation is not controlled by either the maximum or minimum wage. For more information on this topic, look up the monetary equation mv=pq. Raising the minimum wage doesn't affect inflation, but it increases unemployment as some businesses won't be able to afford the new higher wages, and will hire fewer people. The labor pool has its own supply demand curve. Again, if you don't understand why it is called a curve, please don't waste your time arguing. To really understand this topic well it would be helpful to get a good economics book.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re: Median Salary by Drethon · · Score: 2

      That is a rather ignorant way of looking at things. Inflation is caused by printing too much money. The federal reserve is largely in control of inflation, and can usually get as much or as little as they want. Inflation is not controlled by either the maximum or minimum wage. For more information on this topic, look up the monetary equation mv=pq. Raising the minimum wage doesn't affect inflation, but it increases unemployment as some businesses won't be able to afford the new higher wages, and will hire fewer people. The labor pool has its own supply demand curve. Again, if you don't understand why it is called a curve, please don't waste your time arguing. To really understand this topic well it would be helpful to get a good economics book.

      You are oversimplifying a bit: https://www.moneycrashers.com/...

      Inflation is also impacted by increased demand. If people have more money but the supply of the goods they want to buy does not increase, we have inflation due to more demand than supply (item 3 in the link). If products become more expensive to produce (having to pay workers more), we have inflation as companies pass on this cost (or hire less people as you mentioned), item 4 in the link.

    6. Re:Median Salary by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2

      "market-based"
      "rugged individualism"
      Those are mutually exclusive. There's nothing ruggedly individualistic about swindling money from VCs, and corporations are incredibly dependent on some degree of collectivism.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    7. Re:Median Salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But, that's not at all true. WWII is what made America the most successful country in the history of the planet. Nearly all of the competitors were destroyed during the war as all their production capacity was targeted during fighting. The result was that we had a period of a couple decades where we had virtually no competition to ward off.

      But, that's also a period where the nation was far less capitalist than it is now. Employees were actually being paid for the work they were doing. They were able to save money to start their own ventures if they wanted to and there wasn't anywhere near as much predatory banking practice going on at the time.

      On top of that, since employees were actually being paid, there was money for people to go out and buy goods and services.

      Funny how people choose to just ignore those facts when astroturfing.

    8. Re:Median Salary by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      When either of the latter two start employing thousands of low wage workers you'll see their median salary plummet to Amazon levels.

      This. There's no sane way to take the entire group of people and compare them using a normal statistical mean, or median. That alone should be evident by the fact that Facebook has some 25000 people, Google has 70000 people. Amazon has 566000, checking the number of zeros.... yes I wrote it correctly.

      Comparing employees between these companies is asinine.

    9. Re: Median Salary by kenh · · Score: 2

      What if two-thirds of your workforce are warehouse pickers? What does that do to your median salary?

      --
      Ken
    10. Re:Median Salary by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 2

      I'd be curious to see Amazon's median salary minus the warehouse workers.

      From what I've heard, the salaries are comparable albeit a bit lower.

      But even then, base salaries are useless by comparison. A useful comparison requires the inclusion of benefit packages, PTO/vacation, hiring (or annual) bonuses (and in the case of STEM companies, college reimbursement.)

      Base salaries do not make apple to apple comparisons, and it is a near-fatal yet common mistake that techies make (specially when they consider going into consulting.)

    11. Re: Median Salary by ranton · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are oversimplifying a bit:

      I didn't, I gave the full equation, mv=pq. If you don't understand it, you should go look it up right now.

      His point is that mv=pq is a very simplified equation which makes numerous false assumptions. It is good for a ECON 101 class to explain the basics, but it doesn't cover the entirety of what affects the CPI. Some basic problems with the equation include:

      M = Money Supply -> This is a very complex topic as there are many forms of money supply with very different characteristics, such as liquidity. This is one way wages enter into inflation figures, because more liquid forms of money supply in the hands of people who spend most of their money on goods and services (such as minimum wage workers) have a higher effect on inflation.

      V = Velocity -> In this equation V is not well defined. I'm not going to write a paper about it on Slashdot, but you can read this for a little more info.

      P = Price of Goods and Services -> This equation also doesn't take into account how inflation can hit different types of goods and services very differently. The type of Money Supply has a strong effect on this.

      I was going to type more but have a meeting to get to. I'm not saying that MV=PQ is a meaningless equation, it just doesn't encompass all economic theory on inflationary pressures. Think of it as F=MA before Einstein and quantum mechanics.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    12. Re:Median Salary by barc0001 · · Score: 2

      > and we're supposed to feel bad that Amazon's tens of thousands of warehouse workers don't earn a quarter-million dollars/year like top-talent programmers and technology specialists?

      No, but maybe you should feel bad that whatever their salary is it dragged the median down to $28,000 so they're making much less than that, all the while not being able to take a break long enough to use the can so they're pissing in bottles and working in cold in winter, boiling hot in the summer. All so you can save an extra 10 cents on that bauble you ordered through prime same day shipping for free.

      North America needs to have a serious conversation about what a living wage means.

  2. Might be time to leave... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...the sillycon valley. It's always going to be the center of tech, but there's a large hunk of america that costs a tiny fraction where anyone can live like a king on $100k/yr.

    It's a nice place, I spent the past week there, but I am glad to have left too. Paying 33% more in gas, 50% more in food, 30% more in groceries and the crowding and density didn't really endear it to me. To get an equivalent size house there to what I own would have cost almost 20x the price, and I know damn well I'm not going to get 20x the salary.

    I'm just not convinced that in the digital era that the silicon valley created that we all need to pile in there anymore. Video conferencing works well, email works well, networks work well. Let's spread out some.

    1. Re:Might be time to leave... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      People have realized that if they go and earn big bucks for a few years and then bail to somewhere cheaper, that mega salary will help them get above the going rate anywhere. Recruiters don't look at a $200k salary and think "oh but that was Silicon Valley, this person will take $50k out here and maintain the same lifestyle", they think "well I had better offer at least 100k to get someone like that!"

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Might be time to leave... by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      San Francisco is basically one big-ass-giant "college campus" for the young to start their careers. It's not a place to raise a family in your 40s. That city entire MO is to constantly churn the young along. You go in, get experience, and then GTFO! It's pure insanity to think SF is to be a city for life living experience; you'll end up in the poorhouse after being kicked to the curb for your old age.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re: Might be time to leave... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not really. Years ago I worked in the Midwest and weâ(TM)d laugh at the people coming from California demanding similar inflated salaries.

    4. Re:Might be time to leave... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      You can have both though. The wage battle is the same, and we know companies can afford to pay $200k/yr, so they can and do continue to do so regardless of location. The difference is the company that can afford to pay me that and live in an area with a fraction of the cost is going to be better than the one who pays just a bit more in silicon valley, unless you are very young and really sold on urban lifestyle at any cost (I was never that young...)

      All I know is living here I can have a fast car, a big house, have college funds for my kids, my wife can work or not at her discretion, we still have a well stocked retirement fund and I can also enjoy my job and not have to get promoted into low oxygen jobs. The si valley dream is still alive and well, these companies are making a fortune, but employees aren't benefitting because of high costs. It's bad for everyone: employers are having to fight a wage war that is starting to hurt, employees aren't really able to benefit from the money, while more and more wealth is concentrating in a small area unevenly, driving inflation up locally.

      If you spread that across our entire country, things might be very different politically and economically. If everyone is bought in, people tend to think more alike.

  3. Re:So, accounting or IT? by AuMatar · · Score: 2

    First off- whoever posted that put no evidence in at all. Secondly- the vast majority of people at those companies are not IT. They're programmers. Totally different payscale. The actual IT people are probably paid well, but not anything like the numbers above.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  4. Re:Outsource it all by Drethon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Outsource it all to Africa as even India’s too expensive now.

    Outsource it to pretty much any state east of California, it is still going to be cheaper than hiring someone local.

  5. Left unsaid in the summary by DeplorableCodeMonkey · · Score: 2

    Is that that average salary includes data scientists, AI researchers, etc. which command higher salaries than typical software engineers. I would be very surprised to find that the median salary of a SWE at Facebook is $240k unless they bring a very impressive resume with them. The SWEs who just build out new user-facing features with Hack and React are likely not anywhere near that.

  6. Re:welfare state inflationary spuidity by kenh · · Score: 2

    No, the blue-collar workers live in their cars, tents, and RVs, live several workers to a small apartment, or they live 2 hours away and drive in in carpools. Most are paid to well to collect many means-tested programs (section 8 housing, welfare, SNAP, Aid for Women with dependent children, etc.).

    --
    Ken
  7. Re:welfare state inflationary spuidity by Nidi62 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If we did not do the welfare madness one of two things would happen. The servant class would be forced to flea the city for green pastures, property values would collapse because obtaining a cup of coffee or getting your lawn mowed; the property otherwise maintained, you kids tutored would be impossible; or wages would rise, until those workers could afford to live.

    Where exactly are the "servant class" going to flee to, and how are they going to finance said move and secure housing and employment in said destination? They aren't going anywhere. The people that stayed aren't there because they love working menial jobs and subsisting on welfare living in government housing. The ones that can leave have already left. Cut off the welfare for those left behind and you'll just have more homeless, more hungry people. And that leads to more crime. What those making six-figure salaries would save in taxes, they will more than make up for in higher insurance costs, or paying for security as those "servants" start breaking into their $100k cars and $1 million homes.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  8. The "Golden Handcuffs". . . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And that's the flip side of it: The so-called "Golden Handcuffs". We have it, to a lesser extent, in Metro DC as well. The pay is significantly higher, and you adjust your lifestyle to it. And then. . . .companies outside "the bubble" cannot offer that level, even if the cost of living is low enough that it's a defacto lifestyle IMPROVEMENT. . .

    1. Re:The "Golden Handcuffs". . . . by supremebob · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure how much a lifestyle improvement a $200,000 a year salary would be when you're losing half of that to taxes and paying $4,000 a month for a friggin one bedroom apartment.

  9. Your slip is showing by swm · · Score: 2

    that has made the USA the most successful company in the history of the planet.

  10. Re:So, accounting or IT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Depends on your definition of "IT". For a lot of companies, if your customer is internal you are IT whether you are changing printer toner or writing applications or keeping servers up.

    In my experience, companies that have other product engineering are the only ones who limit the definition of IT to admins and helpdesk people.

    Indeed, I am both IT and programmer. I'm an experienced programmer, but because I work internally facing, and we are support to the main operations of the company (not the product itself)- I am considered IT to the rest of the staff.

    No, I don't monitor network traffic, or remove people's malware, or tell them not to pour coffee on their keyboards when their keyboards stop working. I write software- but I'm still considered IT here.

  11. Re:Outsource it all by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Outsource it all to Africa as even India’s too expensive now.

    Outsource it to pretty much any state east of California, it is still going to be cheaper than hiring someone local.

    But, but, those people east of California might occasionally think unapproved thoughts!

  12. Your hatred of America is showing by mi · · Score: 2

    the most successful company in the history of the planet

    I'm pretty sure, that's Japan, actually...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  13. Re:The definition of *Talent* has changed by mikael · · Score: 2

    At the top of the food chain were the big iron companies that made UNIX workstations and servers (Sun, SGI, HP, Dec, Digital, Apple, Fujitsu), chip makers (MIPS, Intel), high-speed networks (Cisco) and databases (Oracle). At the far end of the peninsula were Pixar and ILM. Microsoft crushed big iron UNIX with Windows NT. They got companies to abandon their own OS variants and use Windows NT instead.

    If you look around the internet for "Silicon Valley wall posters", you'll find cartoon style maps of all the companies that used to be there:

    https://www.siliconmaps.com/20...
    http://archive.computerhistory...

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  14. Re:The definition of *Talent* has changed by mnemotronic · · Score: 2

    Nice maps. Where is Hooli on there? ;-)

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  15. Actually Linux destroyed traditional *nix by perpenso · · Score: 2

    Microsoft crushed big iron UNIX with Windows NT. They got companies to abandon their own OS variants and use Windows NT instead.

    Actually that was Linux. People running *nix tended to stay with *nix. Microsoft's OS was brand named "workstation" but it was not displacing traditional *nix workstations. *nix never really made it to the desktop of average workers, *nix users tended to be high end and specialized and remained so. DOS, OS/2 and Windows 3.x were what Windows NT displaced on the desktop.

    Servers were a similar story. traditional *nix servers were largely displaced by Linux or FreeBSD. Windows server users tended to be those new to servers. Microsoft captured a large chunk of new users, of the growth, but not much displacing of existing *nix. And *nix captured a large chunk of the new users / growth too.