Slashdot Mirror
Cambridge Analytica Shuts Down Amid Scandal Over Use of Facebook Data (gizmodo.com)
Gizmodo reports that Cambridge Analytica and its parent company, the SCL Group, are shutting down. "The news was announced during a conference call led by Julian Wheatland, the current chairman of the SCL Group who was reportedly tapped to take over as Cambridge Analytica's next CEO," reports Gizmodo. "Both Cambridge Analytica and SCL Elections will now close their doors." From the report: During the call, Wheatland said that the board determined that rebranding the company's current offerings in the current environment is "futile." Cambridge Analytica and SCL have offices in London, New York City, Arlington, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. The conference call was originally scheduled for Tuesday morning, but was repeatedly pushed back until early Wednesday afternoon, ultimately getting rescheduled more than half a dozen times. In explaining the decision to close the offices, Wheatland cited the ongoing investigations into Cambridge Analytica's massive data harvesting scandal, damage to the company's reputation, and loss of clients. In March, Britain's information commissioner announced that she was seeking a warrant to investigate any misconduct by the data analytics firm, looking to search both its offices and its servers. UK authorities raided the London office later that month, but have yet to release their findings. Meanwhile, embattled former CEO Alexander Nix refused to testify before the British Parliamentary media committee regarding the firm's misuse of Facebook user data.
These people will just start a new business and rehire the core team. Watch.
And here it is: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/05/02/cambridge_analytica_shutdown/
No it was users who let it happen. Facebook made it pretty clear it would rape you from very early on. The fact people still use / used it is more to do with a failure of education.
It's Cambridge Analytica, not Cardiff.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
Anyone could have done what Cambridge Analytica did....
You just need a Facebook account, agree (and ignore) a few Facebook TOS and you're good to go, you can start creating Facebook apps today.
What you can't do now which Cambridge Analytica did, is use the Facebook Graph API that was available before 2014 which gave developers far more liberties than Facebook ever should have allowed.
The major issue has been lack of oversight, Facebook makes no review of the systems it grants access to. The liberties that developers still have, present a tangible risk to people's privacy. Facebook is still relying on their users having some discretion and not just run around granting everything access to their Facebook.
So yes I imagine there are tens of thousands of entities out there using similar tricks with Facebook that Cambridge Analytica used. I doubt many of these companies have links to current and former members of the intelligence community and are using the data to distort the democratic process like Cambridge Analytica did. At least they're no where near as successful as Cambridge Analytica was.
Of course as linked here Cambridge Analytica is now Emerdata so there's at least one company that still exists that's exactly like Cambridge Analytica.
Fortunately UK data protection law allows individuals to be held to account, so shutting down the company doesn't absolve the people who ran it of responsibility. They can still be held individually accountable for illegality relating to personal data at a company they worked at. The fact the company has gone doesn't matter, and the ICO have made this clear themselves in a statement - they're not going to stop just because the company has shut down.
All new companies processing such data have to register with the Information Commissioners Office too, it's a criminal offence not to do so. As such the ICO will know if they're having another go and can audit them regularly based on past behavior and ensure compliance, or fine for non-compliance.
So whilst I agree, there's no doubt they'll try again, it's possible that the ICO will still file criminal proceedings against them, and if they're found guilty they may be banned from running or being director at a company for some time.
As such, I wouldn't assume they've got away with it, the ICO will take time to build their case and pursue them, but it'll happen if there's illegality.
It's also noting that GDPR becomes law this month too, so they'll be held to even higher standards which will basically make it impossible to do even much of the legal stuff they did before, much less the illegal - not simply because there are tougher laws that affect them directly, but because companies around them will be held to GDPR which will make it much harder for CA to acquire data in the first place even if they're operating outside the law themselves.
FTFA