Slashdot Mirror


Facebook May Have Secret Plans To Build a Satellite-Based Internet (ieee.org)

Public filings suggest the social media giant is quietly developing orbital tech to rival efforts by SpaceX and OneWeb to deliver Internet by satellite. From a report: A filing with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) last week revealed details of a multi-million dollar experimental satellite from a stealthy company called PointView Tech LLC. The satellite, named Athena, will deliver data 10 times faster than SpaceX's Starlink Internet satellites, the first of which launched in February. However, PointView appears to exist only on paper. In fact, the tiny company seems to be a new subsidiary of Facebook, formed last year to keep secret the social media giant's plans to storm space.

Many technology companies believe the future of the Internet is orbital. Around half the people on the planet lack a broadband Internet connection, particularly those who live in rural areas and developing nations. SpaceX aims to put nearly 12,000 Starlinks into low Earth orbit (LEO), to deliver gigabit-speed Internet to most of the Earth's surface. Rival OneWeb, funded by Japan's SoftBank, chipmaker Qualcomm, and Richard Branson's Virgin Group, plans similar global coverage using perhaps 2,500 LEO satellites.
Further reading: Facebook's free walled-garden internet program ended quietly in Myanmar, several other places last year.

75 comments

  1. thatâ(TM)s not a satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thatâ(TM)s one of my gigantic DAMN balls

    1. Re: thatâ(TM)s not a satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ban phone poster

    2. Re: thatâ(TM)s not a satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging by a disease they cause for themselves there will be less over time! Trigger time: A viral hit by "The SoyBoyz" 4u: 'If you're going to TransManCisco? Wear jimmyhats + preparation H there. If you're going, to TransManCisco: You're gonna meet transtesticle soyboy not men there. All across the nation: Surgical sawblade vibration! Surgeons in motion! You're a WHOLE GENERATION w/ Soy + bisphenol A estrogen mimicker EXPLANATIONS! Sawing peckers + balls off tossing them into the SF Bay Ocean - For those who go, to TRANSManCisco - Summer time, will be shitpiles from junkies there... In the streets of TransManCisco!'

      * FYI - 'cover' of Scott McKenzie "SanFranCisco" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7I0vkKy504U/

  2. Shut up soyboys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    None of you unidentifiable do-nothing "ne'er-do-wells" have anything useful to say. This article should have only one comment -- MINE.

    1. Re: Shut up soyboys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too late, bitch, now suck my DAMN balls

    2. Re: Shut up soyboys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ban phne poster

    3. Re:Shut up soyboys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was useful for a huge laugh triggering /. soyboys! A viral hit by "The SoyBoyz" 4u: 'If you're going to TransManCisco? Wear jimmyhats + preparation H there. If you're going, to TransManCisco: You're gonna meet transtesticle soyboy not men there. All across the nation: Surgical sawblade vibration! Surgeons in motion, Sawing peckers + balls off tossing them into the SF Bay Ocean - You're a WHOLE GENERATION w/ Soy + bisphenol A estrogen mimicker EXPLANATIONS! For those who go, to TRANSManCisco - Summer time, will be shitpiles from junkies there... In the streets of TransManCisco!'

      * FYI - 'cover' of Scott McKenzie "SanFranCisco" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7I0vkKy504U/

  3. w00t by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now instead of merely sharing SOME of our personal data with FB, we can share EVERY BYTE of it with FB. I know *I'm* stoked...

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    1. Re:w00t by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I am reminded of the daily conversion between Pinky and the Brain.

  4. This sounds terrible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    terrible for the night sky. Just think: every few seconds a blazing bright satellite over head. Amateur astronomers and nature lovers should at least get them to paint these satellite swarms black and be as non reflective as possible.

    1. Re: This sounds terrible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That could lead to overheating. Plus you can't paint the solar cells. It might be possible to make the panels concave and angle them to point the reflected light away from earth, but it seems like that would be pretty tricky.

  5. LOL! Space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those are yesterday's solutions. We have information-processing technology undreamed of in the 1960s (or barely dreamt of by the likes of JCR Licklidder but probably scoffed at). We have cheap, powerful, commercial RF transistors that can reach 60GHz and more. Worst case, use tubes!

    There is no need for space, unless the plan is to have a single point of failure....

    Or a single listening point.

    1. Re:LOL! Space? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Global deployment of Band 72?

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    2. Re: LOL! Space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would need too much power to punch through cloud cover unless there were enough in a cluster in geosynchronous orbit that at any given time a few get through to one of maybe a handful of key locations globally connected already by multi terabit links?

    3. Re: LOL! Space? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Band 72 would be terrestrial.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  6. End of censorship by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    This could be the end of national firewall based censorship. You can't keep Facebook out of a country if citizens can pull data from the sky.

    1. Re: End of censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Satellite is just radio on specific frequencies. It's trivial for China to jam it. Or just shoot them down.

    2. Re: End of censorship by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Satellite is just radio on specific frequencies. It's trivial for China to jam it.

      Satellite data is line-of-sight, directional, and in the 10 GHz range. Good luck jamming that.

    3. Re: End of censorship by dhaen · · Score: 1

      Oops my "satellite" just bumped into your satellite. Oh what, no signal? What a shame.

    4. Re: End of censorship by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Facebook censors themselves and follow the law so you hope for way too much.

    5. Re: End of censorship by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That's true if you're using a (good) dish. If you're using something like an updated Iridium handset antenna, it's pretty susceptible to jamming.

    6. Re: End of censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Satellite data is line-of-sight, directional, and in the 10 GHz range.

      http://www.idirect.net/Company/Resource-Center/Satellite-Basics/Frequency-Bands.aspx

      Oops, more poohole noise from our resident software clown. Stick to scripts and pasting other people's code, software boy.

    7. Re: End of censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One down, 2499 to go.

      Oh - and fucking with our Sara is an act of war, not commercial competition. GL with that, Mai.

  7. Satellite Internet Pitfalls by flopsquad · · Score: 1

    Global gig speed internet is all well and good, but no self-respecting yak herder is going to accept sky high ping times.

    --
    Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    1. Re:Satellite Internet Pitfalls by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Previous satellite based internet used geostationary satellites (26,199 miles up). These new proposals are using multiple satellites in low earth orbit (100 -1240 miles up) that would off an acceptable ping time vs. landline broadband.

    2. Re:Satellite Internet Pitfalls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree. Most here have been spoiled on current internet, as well as not being old enough to remember dial-up. A Yak herder will gladly take satellite internet without all the whining.

    3. Re: Satellite Internet Pitfalls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

    4. Re: Satellite Internet Pitfalls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TBH I'd love to use dial up to accellerate my satellite.
      It's got huge downstream but it's so slow to get requests out it hardly gets used.

    5. Re:Satellite Internet Pitfalls by torkus · · Score: 1

      Using LEO satellites our friendly yak herder will likely have a ping comparable to consumer broadband.

      That assumes the proposed sats can handle the traffic routing required for it all of course. Power budgets and CPU specs tend to be much smaller in space.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  8. Re:Stormy Daniels payment broke the law by JackieBrown · · Score: 0, Troll

    The $130,000 hush money payment to Stormy Daniels violated campaign finance laws, it has been verified. Trump reimbursed Cohen for the payment he made to the porn star. Nobody honestly believed that Cohen paid her off from the goodness of his black, evil heart. Trump committed adultury with the porn star shortly after his child was born and thought money would make it go away. This is the leader you selected. Sad!

    We already went through this scandal with the Clintons and were told that it didn't impact our leaders ability to lead.

    It's hard to even blink at these charges anymore after everyone that did care about decency was laughed at and called prudes for decades afterwards

  9. Anyone who would use Facebook for internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Deserves to have probes up their ass. Because that's what they're signing up for.

  10. First strike? by LordNicholas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is there any way they can be shot down without exacerbating Kessler Syndrome? Even if not, if the alternative is Facebook becoming the defacto owner of internet access, a few centuries without spaceflight might be worth it...

  11. Thousands of satellites? by TheZeitgeist · · Score: 1

    Yeah right. 2500 satellites, even at ten-per-launch, is 250 launches. Even at "only" $20 million a launch, that's $5 billion...not even counting cost of the satellites.

    Plus 25 launches a year forever after just to replace the ten percent of satellites in the constellation that one can bank will go on fritz annually. And upgrades. Oh boy. Everyone 8G or whatever on the ground? Time for another...2500 satellites.

    How that's cheaper than fiber endpoint -> cellular I don't know.

    1. Re:Thousands of satellites? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      $5 billion dollars is cheap for FB if it gets them access to the Chinese market. $5 billion a year is cheap too.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:Thousands of satellites? by TheZeitgeist · · Score: 1

      $5 billion just launch costs. If satellites $50 million a pop (generously cheap quote there)...one can almost triple that price.

      And Facebook can't get around the Chinese government whether under the sea, across the ground, over the air, or in space.

    3. Re:Thousands of satellites? by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      But the market would be pretty much all people. If they can provide internet services to 100 million people at $5/month, they'd have it paid off in a year.

    4. Re:Thousands of satellites? by u19925 · · Score: 1

      This is not all that costly if you compare with land and undersea cables. The number of satellites you needs depends on the orbit. Too low orbit will need more satellites but will need weaker signal to operate, and too high will need fewer satellites but will need stronger signal for the same data rate. Maintenance is low as you don't need to worry about weather, flooding, theft. The installation is also quicker as you don't need local permits. The revenue will come from all over the world. Also because these satellites will be owned by a fewer companies, it will need lesser administrative costs. You want to be worldwide cellphone provider? Just one dotted line contract will make you one with virtually zero investment! So yes, this will happen. All that is needed is funding for the initial cost. It does not matter which of FB, AMZN, GOOG or a consortium of multiple telecom/IT companies do it.

    5. Re: Thousands of satellites? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Back in 2002 offering broadband to all in Sweden was estimated to cost 50 billion SEK.
      That could easily had been done.
      5 billion usd is less and we're talking 400 times the population if it's only half the earth population ...

      5 billion is "nothing."

    6. Re:Thousands of satellites? by DeBaas · · Score: 1

      For reference, Liberty Global bought a company a few years ago which provides internet and cable TV to roughly four million subscribers for > 10 billion USD. Even if they can't make as much money per subscribers as from cable + internet it still seems cheap for a worldwide infrastructure

      --
      ---
    7. Re:Thousands of satellites? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Sure, but I was also quoting full replacement every year. If the satellites average a 3 year life, then my dual omissions cancel out.

      I don't know why FB couldn't get around the Chinese government from space. I mean, sure the Chinese could DF the people on the grounds transmitters, but I'd imagine that's a sometimes thing.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    8. Re:Thousands of satellites? by torkus · · Score: 1

      You seem to midunderstand the $ scale of global companies these days. If FB could plop down $15B for a global internet today, I don't think they'd hesitate any longer than to pick out some soon-to-be-historic pen to sign with.

      For what you're talking about, that's not a lot of money at all, though I expect it will probably have another zero attached by the time all is said and done...and will still be a good investment.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    9. Re:Thousands of satellites? by TheZeitgeist · · Score: 1

      All the guestimates for cost I quoted are absurdly generous. And for the same $15 billion (again assuming incredibly cheap) one could get a lot more internet with a different approach.

    10. Re:Thousands of satellites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For infrastructure, this is cheap. Go figure out what power grid upgrades in a small or mid size industrial country cost. Or power plants in third world countries. Or giant dams. Or rolling out fiber to a million residential customers. Or, covering a country like Afghanistan or Central African Republic with 4G towers, which isn't really possible.

    11. Re: Thousands of satellites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Traditional telco spends roughly $20B capital per year just to keep things like LTE moving. http://www.telecomlead.com/telecom-services/att-reveals-network-capex-for-2017-73964
      $5B for worldwide Internet would be extremely cheap, until you add up the overhead of managing customer service, account management, etc.

  12. Say they pull it off by ausekilis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Then what? *all* traffic goes through Facebook servers. I don't see anything wrong with a company whose whole reason for being is to sell as much data about the public as it can having the capability to sniff all traffic at a provider level. Do you?

    I can't wait for the law to catch up to this bullshit and finally start breaking apart the media/internet stovepipes.

    1. Re:Say they pull it off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait for the law to catch up to this bullshit and finally start breaking apart the media/internet stovepipes.

      The democrats under Obama had a form of net neutrality. It's gone now, and I'm not certain we are getting it back. Trump correctly tries to stop the at&t cnn thing, but he does it for corrupt reasons. (He hates them.)

      That all being said, I see no path for substantial breakup in the future of these messes. Sure Trump might randomly try to do it, but then he does a lot of random crap. He might randomly launch an attack on North Korea, particularly if he needs a distraction. Unfortunately you can't predict such events.

      Maybe start a petition at change.org? It's a long shot I guess, but I agree that too much power is in the hands of too few companies...

  13. a little bit of by sirber · · Score: 1

    SkyNet anyone?

    --
    Be or ben't
  14. Not much of a secret now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice going guys

  15. WALL-E by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    12,000 Starlinks and perhaps 2,500 LEO satellites. Going to orbit might be nearly impossible after this.

  16. The day Facebook . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Conceives of a project not designed to exploit their users and their data . . . ha, ha, ha! Who are we kidding? That day will never come. The problem with anything Facebook creates is Facebook's own involvement. They can Zuck it, no thanks.

  17. Re:Stormy Daniels payment broke the law by JackieBrown · · Score: 0

    Yes - much higher sums too.

  18. Re: Stormy Daniels payment broke the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh huh. Any citations for that?

  19. waitaminute... by Thud457 · · Score: 2

    I thought Elon scuttled Facebook's evil satellite internet plans when he scuttled their satellite.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  20. Spy agency book by aliquis · · Score: 1

    I don't want to used a walled and fenced spying network.

    Sure it may be what we are forced to use in the future regardless but I don't want it.

  21. Re: Stormy Daniels payment broke the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You can donate money to your own campaign, yes. In fact Trumps entire campaign was financed by his own money and he didn't accept any donations... oops, sorry I forgot that was just one of his lies. There are just so many, it can be hard to keep track of them.
    So, anyway, yeah, you can donate to your own campaign. Having a third party do it undeclared through a special corporation the set up for one payment, then paying them back through structured, deniable, undeclared partial payments is a bit more dubious. Especially when you feel the need to lie about the payment.

  22. The conspiracy looms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait to see when they make a real life version of the Psychic dominator from Red Alert 2.
    What a brave new world we live in

  23. FB: Yeah, Well, I'm gona go build my own internet. by tomxor · · Score: 2

    ... with blackjack, and hookers.

    ... or at least, farmVille blackjack, and targeted ads with the promise of hookers but actually only subliminally delivering politically suggestive ideas based on mined data of unsuspecting users.

    ... actually forget the blackjack, and the hookers.

  24. Serious question about this? by arbiter1 · · Score: 1

    Given what we have learned recently of how FB datamines you and most everything on line via app that captures ur text's and links on pages that let them track you. Is anyone really willing to use internet provided by them so they can now watch EVERYTHING you do regardless if you use their site anymore? They loved the tid bit that data they have on people belongs to them less it wasn't associated to them yet which means FB owns it and you have 0 say if and when its deleted. This question could be asked of google fiber users now given how much both those companies impacted elections far more then Russia could ever hope to dream of.

  25. Re: Stormy Daniels payment broke the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah - I'm going to keep adding more posts for you to down mod.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com...
    http://connection.ebscohost.co...

  26. Re: Stormy Daniels payment broke the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eat pigshit SJW drooler. Your HIV-tainted nibberizing spew should get $0.05 from THEDONALDS self-made-man honey-pot$$$.

  27. Greeeeeat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet another way to get fucked by Zuck. Now bend over and grab the towel rack.

  28. Can't soyboy: You had 'em sawed off (LOL) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A viral hit by "The SoyBoyz" 4u: 'If you're going to TransManCisco? Wear jimmyhats + preparation H there. If you're going, to TransManCisco: You're going to meet a lot of transtesticle soyboy not men there. All across the nation: Surgical sawblade vibration! Surgeons in motion, Sawing peckers + balls off tossing them into the SF Bay Ocean - You're a WHOLE GENERATION w/ Soy + bisphenol A estrogen mimicker EXPLANATIONS! For those who go, to TRANSManCisco - Summer time, will be shitpiles from junkies there... In the streets of TransManCisco!'

    FYI - 'cover' of Scott McKenzie "SanFranCisco" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7I0vkKy504U/

  29. All or None by u19925 · · Score: 1

    The problem with satellite internet is that you can either provide access to the service to everyone on earth or no one. There is no way to do cost saving and make service available to US or China. This means that initial cost will be very high. But then you get global coverage as well. In the past, the cost would have been too high compared to number of users, but now it is not so. With 4 billion plus mobile phones, the market is ready if you can provide affordable service. Even if 10% of these people pay 500 USD/yr, you get 200 billion USD/revenue. So it is definitely possible to make money. Sooner or later someone will get into this. The question is how soon.

  30. Just what the planet needs. by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    The climate heats up and tens of thousands of satellites will be put up that collect solar energy and beam microwaves down on us.

    And that's just a few companies of 1 country, 193 other countries may have the same ideas.

  31. Satellite internet.. is it the late 90' ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of us actually remember satellite internet, which provided nonparallel download speeds compared to ISDN.
    Few of us remember that the upload still went through the phone line (how else you gonna -transmit- to a satellite?),
    And that it was effected by bad weather and cloud overcast.

    Funny.. guess tech is cyclical after all..

  32. Oh Please, next you'll tell me Facebook has a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Secret plan to make me sacrifice my first born son to the Zuckster, I mean this is ridiculous.. OH MY GOD THE BLOOD!!!! WHAT HAVE I DONE!!!!!

  33. How? You sawed your balls off (lmao) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A viral hit by "The SoyBoyz" 4u: 'If you're going to TransManCisco? Wear jimmyhats + preparation H there. If you're going, to TransManCisco: You're gonna meet transtesticle soyboy not men there. - For those come, to TRANSManCisco - Summer time shitpiles from junkies there... In the streets of TransManCisco! All across the nation: Surgical sawblade vibration! Surgeons in motion! A WHOLE GENERATION w/ Soy + bisphenol A estrogen mimicker chemically NEUTERED explanation! Surgeons in motion, sawing peckers + balls off tossing them into the SF Bay Ocean...'

    * FYI - 'cover' of Scott McKenzie "SanFranCisco" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7I0vkKy504U/

  34. Too Late by Doc+Right · · Score: 0

    Anyone with plans to do this can just stop right now. SpaceX won. They have the licenses, they have the launch vehicles, they have the most cost-effective plan to implement it. Even if Facebook paid SpaceX to launch their satellites, they're launching their own right along side of them. Game over.