""but they do have the right to know." = Not really. Tenants have an expectation of privacy within reasonable limits. Keeping the identities of all visitors indefinitely creates a privacy hazard that does not actually improve safety."
How doesn't it improve safety when people know that if they enter that building their identity is register with a video, so if something happens they have facial data of everyone in the building at the time. That would mean anyone looking to cause harm will likely GO somewhere else that doesn't have facial recognition at entry. What you are saying is a Bank would be less likely to be robbed if they had NO camera's in it. As for Privacy, the tenants only really have that reasonable limit within THE apartment they have rented, entry to said building and hall wall up to the front door of said apartment is lack of a better term Public Area which you have no reasonable expectation of privacy from the person that owns the building.
That is next step argument after gun ban is to ban cars off the road since they are used in more crimes and death then a gun is. Just like a gun people that aren't supposed to be behind the wheel can get one and drive.
yea maybe cause they don't want landlord to know how many people are living in said apartment or who is coming and going to said apartment. With a keycard/keyfob you they don't know who has it or used it just that it was used. They could instead of using facial software just put a camera at the entrance that imposes who the card/fob is linked to apartment wise. Which would be the same thing as facial software.
Is as much as Democrat's claim NN stops ISPs from controlling activities it gave exemption's to companies like google and Facebook which did exactly what they are claiming their rules are preventing. The vast majority of censorship we seen on the internet happened while NN was in place from said companies. On top of all that they let Obama pretty much turn control most essential part of the internet over to the UN who lets be real that countries that have most strict control over internet information is in control of.
Other problem is sometimes that system is abused and most people that have videos removed don't get this kinda PR that ends up helping them. A lot of videos that get removed lose a lot of views and never recover from it.
Just the fact Cuomo waited UNTIL after the election to announce the deal told me enough about it. It was a bad deal if you wait til after danger of being voted out passed before revealing a deal like this.
Here is why, Spain tried same type of law not to many years back. News sites in spain saw a massive drop in traffic when google removed their sites from their news feeds.
No company that provides power is gonna want to take over the area one run by PG&E given the liability it has and even any another area they won't want to stay in. This law is gonna create a very big issues for customers in terms of increased costs that state did 0 to manage the forest lands to prevent a fire from spreading like it did.
Gotta remember this is a state that consistently votes in democrat's even though state has highest cost of living in the US and every year they find new ways to make costs higher.
I think you mean 3g HSPA+. That is what AT&T did back in day instead of true 4g, was they took 3g and claimed it was 4g cause of speed boosting tech they used.
If a person that is a so called "pro" uses a hack to get an advantage how can still call them a pro then since they had to use a cheat to get the advantage? Too me if you use such program in online play you aren't a pro you are one lowest forms of life on earth, you are lower then likes of rats and cock roaches.
Its much easier server load wise to just tell clients who is within xxx range of player. Let the clients computer hand rest. Sadly it allows for this to happen as they can see everyone within that range. Its one thing to have server do work load in games with say 12-16 players its another thing when tracking 90+ at start of matches.
Its not the first time AT&T has done this, look back when 4g was new, they claimed their network was 4g when it was really 3g+ speed boosting techniques. They had no problem in ever commercial claiming their network was 4g though.
Russia attacked both sides, they had meme's that attack Both Clinton and Trump. They want people to think it was only Clinton they attacked and it was reason they lost. Last i checked Clinton didn't show up here in Michigan til Mon nov 7th's, 1 day before voting happened. It wasn't Russia that turned Michigan Red. It was Clinton's lack of doing anything to get out there to get people to vote for her on top of all the very questionable legal issues surrounding her and all the money they some how many since leaving the white house.
Yet we didn't see so much censorship on the internet til AFTER NN was pushed though by the left. Notice how sites like youtube started doing most their censoring of people's views while NN has been in place?
If they didn't change the mandate, but last i heard a house needed a net 0 energy cost over a year. I doubt an 8kW system is gonna come close to getting that due to 8kW is on a good sunny day, with sun at prefect angel to the panels. So 8kW probably gonna need a bit more then that for most homes.
How many people are buying that leaf? I personally don't want to die in a car that is not much bigger then a beer can. I think They should be elminated for cars that are higher end, like most Tesla model's that cost near 6 figures. Those tax breaks were made specificcly for rich people early on since they were only ones that could afford EV's. So I think Should be an income threshold on who can get those Subsidies.
Yea Got 1 model claims we are gonna die in 12 years cause climate change but then another shows where first model fudged the numbers to make it look worse then fact its just normal changes in the planet. Serious question is the "scientists" that were involved, how many them have a vested financial interest in clean energy companies? That would be interesting study to look in to on all these people that are pushing "climate change" studies.
This lawsuit sounds like a bad joke. No channel has right to force a provide to carry their channel. Don't even see how this even got past hearing stage. Why would a tv provider carry a channel if it isn't a channel people want? Its like forcing you to buy a car with features you don't want but they make you pay for them anyway.
Slashdot Mirror
If they want to sell service legally then yes they will have follow the law's of said country.
""but they do have the right to know." = Not really. Tenants have an expectation of privacy within reasonable limits. Keeping the identities of all visitors indefinitely creates a privacy hazard that does not actually improve safety." How doesn't it improve safety when people know that if they enter that building their identity is register with a video, so if something happens they have facial data of everyone in the building at the time. That would mean anyone looking to cause harm will likely GO somewhere else that doesn't have facial recognition at entry. What you are saying is a Bank would be less likely to be robbed if they had NO camera's in it. As for Privacy, the tenants only really have that reasonable limit within THE apartment they have rented, entry to said building and hall wall up to the front door of said apartment is lack of a better term Public Area which you have no reasonable expectation of privacy from the person that owns the building.
That is next step argument after gun ban is to ban cars off the road since they are used in more crimes and death then a gun is. Just like a gun people that aren't supposed to be behind the wheel can get one and drive.
yea maybe cause they don't want landlord to know how many people are living in said apartment or who is coming and going to said apartment. With a keycard/keyfob you they don't know who has it or used it just that it was used. They could instead of using facial software just put a camera at the entrance that imposes who the card/fob is linked to apartment wise. Which would be the same thing as facial software.
Is as much as Democrat's claim NN stops ISPs from controlling activities it gave exemption's to companies like google and Facebook which did exactly what they are claiming their rules are preventing. The vast majority of censorship we seen on the internet happened while NN was in place from said companies. On top of all that they let Obama pretty much turn control most essential part of the internet over to the UN who lets be real that countries that have most strict control over internet information is in control of.
The bill should called Net Censorship since the vast majority of censorship started under so called net neutrality.
Other problem is sometimes that system is abused and most people that have videos removed don't get this kinda PR that ends up helping them. A lot of videos that get removed lose a lot of views and never recover from it.
Just the fact Cuomo waited UNTIL after the election to announce the deal told me enough about it. It was a bad deal if you wait til after danger of being voted out passed before revealing a deal like this.
Here is why, Spain tried same type of law not to many years back. News sites in spain saw a massive drop in traffic when google removed their sites from their news feeds.
No company that provides power is gonna want to take over the area one run by PG&E given the liability it has and even any another area they won't want to stay in. This law is gonna create a very big issues for customers in terms of increased costs that state did 0 to manage the forest lands to prevent a fire from spreading like it did.
Gotta remember this is a state that consistently votes in democrat's even though state has highest cost of living in the US and every year they find new ways to make costs higher.
Yea welfare red states, that is funny considering 25% of the nation's homeless call California home.
Having phone saying its "5g" when phones hardware can't do that is false advertising as phone has hardware it doesn't have.
No AT&T did it as well.
I think you mean 3g HSPA+. That is what AT&T did back in day instead of true 4g, was they took 3g and claimed it was 4g cause of speed boosting tech they used.
If a person that is a so called "pro" uses a hack to get an advantage how can still call them a pro then since they had to use a cheat to get the advantage? Too me if you use such program in online play you aren't a pro you are one lowest forms of life on earth, you are lower then likes of rats and cock roaches.
Its much easier server load wise to just tell clients who is within xxx range of player. Let the clients computer hand rest. Sadly it allows for this to happen as they can see everyone within that range. Its one thing to have server do work load in games with say 12-16 players its another thing when tracking 90+ at start of matches.
Its not the first time AT&T has done this, look back when 4g was new, they claimed their network was 4g when it was really 3g+ speed boosting techniques. They had no problem in ever commercial claiming their network was 4g though.
As people say that Clinton and the pioneers of the tactic Barrack Obama got off Scott free while doing same thing and no one got mad.
Russia attacked both sides, they had meme's that attack Both Clinton and Trump. They want people to think it was only Clinton they attacked and it was reason they lost. Last i checked Clinton didn't show up here in Michigan til Mon nov 7th's, 1 day before voting happened. It wasn't Russia that turned Michigan Red. It was Clinton's lack of doing anything to get out there to get people to vote for her on top of all the very questionable legal issues surrounding her and all the money they some how many since leaving the white house.
NN regulations protect a free internet..
Yet we didn't see so much censorship on the internet til AFTER NN was pushed though by the left. Notice how sites like youtube started doing most their censoring of people's views while NN has been in place?
If they didn't change the mandate, but last i heard a house needed a net 0 energy cost over a year. I doubt an 8kW system is gonna come close to getting that due to 8kW is on a good sunny day, with sun at prefect angel to the panels. So 8kW probably gonna need a bit more then that for most homes.
How many people are buying that leaf? I personally don't want to die in a car that is not much bigger then a beer can. I think They should be elminated for cars that are higher end, like most Tesla model's that cost near 6 figures. Those tax breaks were made specificcly for rich people early on since they were only ones that could afford EV's. So I think Should be an income threshold on who can get those Subsidies.
Yea Got 1 model claims we are gonna die in 12 years cause climate change but then another shows where first model fudged the numbers to make it look worse then fact its just normal changes in the planet. Serious question is the "scientists" that were involved, how many them have a vested financial interest in clean energy companies? That would be interesting study to look in to on all these people that are pushing "climate change" studies.
This lawsuit sounds like a bad joke. No channel has right to force a provide to carry their channel. Don't even see how this even got past hearing stage. Why would a tv provider carry a channel if it isn't a channel people want? Its like forcing you to buy a car with features you don't want but they make you pay for them anyway.