Slashdot Mirror


Google Broke Up a Vietnamese Con Scheme After an Employee Was Scammed Buying a Bluetooth Headset (cnbc.com)

A Google executive found a high-end Bluetooth headset selling at a steep discount on Google Shopping website earlier this year. He placed the order, but much to his surprise, the headset never arrived at his doorstep. He tried calling the seller, but it turned out that the number listed on the website was disconnected, and the merchant wasn't based in the US, as the website had indicated. Instead of kicking the seller off the website, Google launched an investigation and it soon realized the problem ran too deep. From a report: But instead of simply banning the bad actor from listing new products, Google Shopping's trust and safety team initiated a global probe that ultimately tracked down 5,000 merchant accounts wrapped up in a sophisticated scheme to defraud users. "I think we caught them right at the tip of when they were trying to scale up," Saikat Mitra, Google Shopping's director of trust and safety, told CNBC. The story, which Mitra is sharing publicly for the first time, reflects Google's never-ending battle against scams, a fight that requires engineers and their increasingly sophisticated machine learning tools.

It also illustrates the risks that consumers face as Google aggressively tries to win back product searches from Amazon and stay relevant in the future of e-commerce. Although Google Shopping may look like a marketplace, it really isn't. Amazon and eBay operate shopping platforms that connect sellers with buyers and offer protections like money-back guarantees. Google, by contrast, sends shoppers off its site after they click on an item, and thus has no visibility into what happens after the transaction.

58 comments

  1. Don't rip off bigshots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A Google executive...

    If that to you or I - peasants - we'd be given the run around and basically told to "suck it".

    1. Re:Don't rip off bigshots by tattood · · Score: 2

      Sadly, this is probably true. If it was anyone who didn't work at Google, this would not be a story.

      --
      WTB [sig], PST!!!
    2. Re: Don't rip off bigshots by bobmajdakjr · · Score: 1

      i bet he even used hashtag never again when he first realized the scam.

  2. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After years of scam, google exec had to get scammed to start any investigation. Who cares about 100.000 complains they received earlier...

    1. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I was thinking. Eating your own dogfood for once...

    2. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's like the Ebay people who sell Microsoft licenses for £20, then send out one of the publicly available serial numbers.

    3. Re: wow by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      What? Why? The buyer would just file a refund claim.

    4. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After years of scam, google exec had to get scammed to start any investigation. Who cares about 100.000 complains they received earlier...

      They caught Vietnamese doing the cheating

      Such a major bummer

      They would have been even more elated if they've caught the usual American boogieman, the Chinese, who are supposed to be the worst scumbags ever existed in human history , according to the American MSM

      So much so Mr. Trump is seriously thinking of banning Chinese students from attending colleges inside America

  3. John Doe: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I got scammed!
    Google: Too bad.

    Google Exec:
    I got scammed!
    Google: Let's find the scum and make a press release of how much good we're doing!

  4. If it hadn't happened to a Google exec... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it hadn't happened to a Google exec it would never have been investigated.

  5. eh what? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    Google shopping wants to compete with amazon.com or fleabay? Seems unlikely, as google doesn't actually sell products. It's a search engine that tricks users into thinking there is a store hosted on google.com. Not only that, but many of the results actually end up being listings on fleabay or amazon.com in the first place. If google wants to compete in e-commerece, then they will prob have to.. you know, engage in actual e-commerce.

    1. Re:eh what? by AvitarX · · Score: 2

      Does it really trick anybody?

      I use it specifically because it is a search engine.

      It aggregates many stores, and pretty clearly links to them.

      Similar to its flight search.

      It is specifically because it is a search engine and not a marketplace that I find it so useful.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re: eh what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It makes up for Amazons search engine being absolute dogshit

    3. Re:eh what? by nasch · · Score: 1

      You saw this part right?

      Although Google Shopping may look like a marketplace, it really isn't. Amazon and eBay operate shopping platforms that connect sellers with buyers and offer protections like money-back guarantees. Google, by contrast, sends shoppers off its site after they click on an item, and thus has no visibility into what happens after the transaction.

  6. "much to his surprise, the headset never arrived" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A Google executive found a high-end Bluetooth headset selling at a steep discount on Google Shopping website earlier this year. He placed the order, but much to his surprise, the headset never arrived at his doorstep. ...

    Geez, and this guy is an executive at Google?

  7. Goddamn it!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If that to you or I ...

    I meant: If that HAPPENED to you or I ...

    WTF?

    I can re-read shit multiple times and still not catch stupid shit like that.

    Is there some designer "issue" I can claim to have or am I just some inattentive dipshit?

    Don't worry, I call myself the latter ALL the time. Teachers used to really berate me and later so did my employers.....

    I tried mindfulness training, but all that revealed was how many times I breathed between fuck ups.

    1. Re:Goddamn it!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think he dropped the "happened,"
      it's actually slang and I've heard it spoken that way as well.

      CAP === 'bottle'

    2. Re:Goddamn it!! by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1
      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    3. Re:Goddamn it!! by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      It is a slashdot thing; it deletes key words, or changes positive statements to negatives, to punish people who don't use "preview." It rewrites your comment when you press preview, you're not previewing just to check for your own mistakes, you have to proof read for the added mistakes too.

    4. Re:Goddamn it!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are bad at catching our own mistakes when proofreading because when reading something you wrote yourself you know what you meant, so your brain automatically reads what it thinks is supposed to be there. If you're writing anything important, you should always give it to someone else to proof read.

  8. This is the problem with globalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The main problem with globalization is that we need to rely on corporations, such as Google, to investigate and punish fraud. Although Google did the right thing in this case, they're doing the wrong thing in far too many cases.

    Personally, I think that globalization is just a bad idea. Neverthless, the corporations love it because it gives them immense power and profits.

  9. Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did he ever get his headset?

  10. Exactly. Also by waspleg · · Score: 1

    5000 scam merchants doesn't sound like the tip.

    1. Re:Exactly. Also by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      It depends. Setting up "merchants" can be automated just like sending millions of spams. You just create a script to set them up from a template that is varied by a table in a database. I see "websites" all the time that are obviously just rows in a database created to build 1000s of sites with hours of work just to match a search term now and then and achieve a view on a paid ad.

      One thing that usually gives these away is that they aren't paying for good domain names. I won't shop at anything that is xyz.unrelatedname.com and the xyz is the store name or garbage. It would be nice to just filter those out.

    2. Re:Exactly. Also by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Or at least, if it really is just the tip why would they be admitting it so readily?

      That implies that the problem, which they previously were just ignoring, is really really huge and even when they try to do something, they have little impact.

      But coming from a Director of Trust and Safety, that admission is truly frightening. They're admitting that it's a huge problem and to being barely able to impact it, and that's the spin designed to make you trust them! Z0MG!

    3. Re:Exactly. Also by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I see "websites" all the time that are obviously just rows in a database created to build 1000s of sites with hours of work just to match a search term now and then and achieve a view on a paid ad.

      That there are websites that are just rows in a database designed to build lots of sites to match search terms, that much is obvious and well known.

      Your claim about the purpose is substantially off, however. In fact, it mistakes who is lying, and to who. Consider: Who gets paid to make those sites? What is their job called? Who does it benefit, in what way? And what about the ads, who benefits when the ad gets clicked on? Is it the same person that is benefiting from the fake sites, or is the person who gets paid for the ad actually the person who the site seeks to deceive?! Makes a bit of difference.

  11. Re:"much to his surprise, the headset never arrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seem surprised? Being a executive is all about who you're friends with.

  12. Must be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, to have the power to be able to mobilize a global corporation on your behalf. Truly, we are like insects in the face of these people's glory.

  13. Bargain hunters ... by Freischutz · · Score: 1

    A Google executive found a high-end Bluetooth headset selling at a steep discount on Google Shopping website earlier this year. He placed the order, but much to his surprise, the headset never arrived at his doorstep. He tried calling the seller, but it turned out that the number listed on the website was disconnected, and the merchant wasn't based in the US, as the website had indicated. Instead of kicking the seller off the website, Google launched an investigation and it soon realized the problem ran too deep.

    Now, see ... when that happens to me I start wondering whether this is a scam ... I suppose Google executives are wired differently. I always get a bit of a kick out of greedy bargain hunters. This is not to say that all bargain hunters are greedy, in fact just a small minority of few of them fits that description, but that minority is a pretty reliable source of amusement. Years and years ago there was this case in Germany where people bought a mobile phones from a Swiss company by mail through a magazine ad for a ridiculously low price (this was before internet commerce took off). What they got was a toy phone although that was not necessarily obvious from the ad. Lawsuits ensued which ended with a very Swiss judgement where the judge basically told the plaintiff that: "...Yes this is an awfully expensive toy phone, but if you are dumb enough to expect to get a working mobile phone for that price you are dumber than a bag of hammers". If it looks to good to be true it probably is...

    1. Re:Bargain hunters ... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      I'm trying to figure out why a hyper-rich guy is not only shopping for a bit of electronics himself, but spending time hunting for bargains like a regular broke-ass millennial. Is it some multimillion-dollar headset made from some endangered tree's wood treated with war orphans' tears?

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Bargain hunters ... by jma05 · · Score: 2

      > I'm trying to figure out why a hyper-rich guy is not only shopping for a bit of electronics himself, but spending time hunting for bargains like a regular broke-ass millennial.

      If he is a young exec, chances are that he was a thrifty grad student not too long ago. Most people's spending habits and general behaviors don't automatically get rewired the moment they get a larger pay check.

      I still peek at the same deal sites as I did 15 years ago, often just by habit. My income certainly changed a lot in the meantime.

    3. Re:Bargain hunters ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he was trying to tow the company line by buying something from from a Google Shopping site. Honestly, if a Google executive wasn't willing to buy from Google Shopping, why should the rest of us?

    4. Re:Bargain hunters ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be honest I would have had more respect if the story said the guy expected it to be too good to be true and he tried purchasing the item to confirm it was a scam and something they needed to deal with.

      If he is stupid enough to actually fall for such a scam he is too stupid for his job.

  14. Can we do this with all the robo callers next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If all it takes is pissing of a large corporation to get sh!t done, can we re-route a few of the annoying daily robo calls I get to google?

  15. Product searches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Amazon and eBay operate shopping platforms that connect sellers with buyers and offer protections like money-back guarantees. Google, by contrast, sends shoppers off its site after they click on an item, and thus has no visibility into what happens after the transaction.

    Which is why Google Shopping has no chance of competing with Amazon or eBay.

    1. Re:Product searches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google has no interest in competing with Amazon or eBay in terms of actually selling stuff. All they want is the metadata, that is, the information related to what you're interested in buying.

  16. Fuck google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was a fair trade, at first. Your searches answered for infos about what you were interested in at that moment in time. Anything else google has done since has come at such a great cost that it's close to theft. Ask google what the true cost of a lifetime of advertising and psychological warfare is. They know but they won't tell you.

    1. Re:Fuck google by onepoint · · Score: 1

      well I asked and I got a reply
      https://www.theatlantic.com/ma...

      and

      https://www.theatlantic.com/ma...

      answer's been around forever

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    2. Re:Fuck google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely an article published in 1904 and another one in 1997 can't be the last words in manipulating people? Pretty sure google has studied people and the effects of adverts on people. In-depth studies. Lots, and lots, and lots of them.

  17. What is Google's support phone number? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    He tried calling the seller, but it turned out that the number listed on the website was disconnected.

    Haha, someone at Google saying he was frustrated that he was unable to phone a business to communicate a problem? Gee, that sounds similar to the many complaints people have for Google when trying to reach out for support with their purchased products and services.

  18. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google pats themselves on the back. Google claims to be preventing fraud. Google is not the bad guys, they only direct you to the bad guys. See. We're so good that we put other bad guys away. Well, those that we can't get a kick back from in advertisement dollars.

  19. Google wants to think they caught this early by tyme · · Score: 1

    but there's no way that's actually the case. Amazon and eBay are wormy with this sort of scam, and they put actual effort into combating it. The only reason Google thinks they caught this early is a combination of willful ignorance and wishful thinking.

    --
    just a ghost in the machine.
  20. Correction by aitikin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Amazon and eBay operate shopping platforms that connect sellers with buyers and offer protections like money-back guarantees. Google, by contrast, sends shoppers off its site after they click on an item, and thus has no visibility into what happens after the transaction.

    Actually...Google has started to roll out where you buy things without leaving Google. It's still just rolling out, but I've seen it every once in a while. I've seen it show up a couple times (ironically on stuff I wasn't trying to buy) and have backend knowledge of it happening from a sales side of things. Kind of nifty the way it works, but I doubt that it'll ever catch Amazon. The end user is told that their product is being fulfilled by [insert merchant here] and they never leave the Google page.

    And no, I do not work for Google. I work for a company that has partnered with Google on this particular topic.

    --
    "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    1. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've ordered from Google Express, and I really like the ordering and return experience from the consumer POV, but on one of my orders, whoever it was on the warehouse floor that actually filled my order used a huge box and very little void fill, causing it to show up DOA. So there is at least room for improvement in whatever D2C fulfillment warehouse is being used to fill these orders.

  21. No cure for stupid; pay the extra $2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No cure for stupid. There just isn't.

    This is why buying through a reputable site is necessary, even if it costs $2 more.

    I'd assume it was a 20-something doing this. Part of life that most people learn as a child without "perfect" friends. Trust, but verify.

    1. Re: No cure for stupid; pay the extra $2 by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Or you could read TFS. The price difference was substantial. That's like saying to buy the name brand soup for 2 cents difference when it's actually 40% difference in price. Even if it was only 2 cents, you're not some fucking genius, either.

  22. This is scary by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

    What they did is ultimately good, but how they likely did it???

    A citizen / corporation witnessing a crime and reporting it is one thing. Suspecting one and actively investigating it across international boundaries using powerful spying tools that the police might not have been able to use without subpoenas or warrants is very different. Is this not vigilantism?

    If such capabilities were automated and deployed en masse to detect patterns instead of investigate specific reported instances, we'd start running into the problem of innocents being investigated. That happens in the justice system too with often devastating results to those whose lives are destroyed for nothing, but not as often as can happen when big data mining is employed.

    We shouldn't go there. It fails the risk/reward test.

    1. Re:This is scary by Ken+McE · · Score: 1

      A citizen / corporation witnessing a crime and reporting it is one thing.

      Who would they report it to, the United Nations? These long distance internet scams tend to insulate scammers from the law. Google took responsibility for their own problem and tried to fix a weakness in their own system.

    2. Re:This is scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this not vigilantism?

      Not if they didn't break any laws doing what they did.

  23. Accountability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tech firms like Google (and many others) are accustomed to operating without any accountability. They did a great job of dealing with this situation BUT... it's a situation that should never have occurred in the first place. Vet the sellers, vet the developers - take responsibility for the products and services you create.

    If your biggest effort is manipulating searches for political favors - You. Are. Doing. It. Wrong.

  24. Heh by jtrainor · · Score: 1

    A cynical man would say they're publicizing this now in an attempt to distract people from all the bad publicity they're getting lately.

  25. Damn, I guess I have to turn in my geek badge... by Bearhouse · · Score: 0

    Never heard of "Google Shopping"...use Amazon, eBay and Alibaba all the time; never had a problem.
    Aha, maybe that's the problem TFA refers to, then....

  26. No details by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    Save your time, skip the article. It has no details on how Google fight scams, it just tells us it happens.

  27. Google did good but goofed PR by spinitch · · Score: 1

    Google Execs should be using Google services and learning how to improve. The story was presented poorly that a gullible Exec purchase led to a revelation about a widespread and known scam problems. In Japan, the news regularly posts stories about consumers chasing deals to good to be true then stuff never arrives. Surprise, Surprise, Surprise. Google should have indicated they were monitoring scam reports which happened to include on from its own employees ( not an Exec should not matter level). Anyway, Google will be learning from this experience and benchmark what others do to curtail to improve their services. I have not tried this service from Google much like the other sites even Mercari that have mostly legit stuff since requires a lot of effort for the modest purchases I would consider for such channels. If you have time / energy can save / earn but factor in the effort/ risk. I will someday soon now explore Google for search comparisons

  28. Google What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is this Google Shopping? Does anybody who doesn't work for Google use it? Is this article a publicity campaign?

  29. shows how bad google actually is... by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    So instead of doing this just from the start, they only did this after a google executive was ripped off.. Shows how much google really cares..