Google News To Be Revamped, Incorporate YouTube Videos and Magazines (arstechnica.com)
Google News is reportedly being updated with a "new design" that will "incorporate elements of the [Google Play] Newsstand app and YouTube." It will be powered by Google's AMP technology and is expected to launch at Google I/O 2018. AdAge was first to report the changes. From a report: A Google News redesign is surprising considering that the current design is less than a year old. It's unclear if the current design is just being tweaked to incorporate YouTube and Play Newsstand or if the whole thing is being scrapped and rebuilt. The report also mentions that Google News will get a new app. Google Play Newsstand is currently an odd hybrid of magazine store and RSS reader. The report says that Google Play Newsstand is going to close as part of the Google News redesign. This is the second time we've heard of a "Google Play" brand getting the axe: Google Play Music is also expected to close when it merges with YouTube. We should learn more about the changes at Google I/O, which starts next week on Tuesday, May 8.
Can't we just read it? More efficient, more pleasant, less annoying. I guess they must get more ad revenue when they can force us to sit through video ads.
No doubt the key problems will remain: the failure to flag pay-walled content and the total inability to blacklist particular news sources.
I stopped using Google News with last year's horrific revamp. I'm shocked it still exists. The last thing I want is more video centric content. When I'm reading news, it's often when I'm places where having a video with sound would be a disruption to those around me. I also prefer skimming through to get the important parts of a story. Video sucks.
The last redesign (sometimes?*) made it impossible to simply search a topic and view the results chronologically, so that I can easily see all new articles and ignore the old. Just let me do that, and don't censor based on politics.
I'm not interested in videos on the news feed.
* Sometimes it appears that part of the old Google news format is present, but usually when I search it goes to mobile hell.
How do I want thee less? Let me count the ways:
(1) Mostly stop showing news sources that I've already assessed as sources of worthless sludge and fake news.
(2) Fewer intrusions on my attention for no real reason.
(3) Fewer updates. Should be a user default, and in my case I think I'd prefer to set it for twice a day.
Several other thoughts, but the snark on Slashdot has reached such a tiresome level... I wonder if that's related to the evidently low interest in the story?
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
"A Google News redesign is surprising..."
No it's not at all surprising since Google has faced harsh criticism of that redesign, which put everything into a single column. The previous version was much more useful than the current.
Just another day in Paradise
Also change the name, to make it more confusing. Even better, have two products that do more or less the same thing, with wildly different names. That will make things even more confusing. That seems to be Google's goal, right?
If their revamp is anything like what they did to Google Finance, then Yahoo's about to get a bunch more page impressions...
A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
I used to use google news regularly, they seemed a perfect aggregation of news with the option of adding your own sources, however I stopped because: ...", it might be a curiosity, someone might like it, but science?
- there was no option to turn off google pre-selection, so instead of having access to the latest news I kept seeing week old (or even more) posts constantly, I asked google service for such option - no response
- I kept being forced upon with news completely out of mind, I don't even know where they find them, again, no option to select sources, or some basic fact check from google side, to be fair there is an option to disable a source, however they keep popping up, and somehow google algorithm finds them more important then some fact based news
- final decision to abandon the platform was (constant) pseudoscience in science section, like "somebody calculated the end of the world on April
I switched to BBC and have never regretted since. I consider going to google news aggregation a waste of my time. In theory would be a great tool to have instant access to fresh news from many sources, but in reality is just annoyance.
stage of development.
Don't really innovate anything; just piss about at the edges and generally degrade the user experience.
You've yet to say anything relevant. Are you some sort of troll?
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.