Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's New Mobile Strategy: Create Windows-like App 'Experiences' For Smartphones (pcworld.com)

Microsoft is investing in Windows experiences on mobile devices, with a new app called Your Phone; a migration of Windows 10's Timeline productivity feature to phones; and an update to its launcher app for enterprises. The app, available on Android and iOS, is designed to provide a mirror of a phone straight to a desktop PC, and it will let Windows 10 users access texts, photos, and notifications from their machines. Features will vary depending on iOS and Android. From a report: While Microsoft is also expected to discuss some of the features of its next Windows 10 update (code-named "Redstone 5") at Build, the company indicated that it will be emphasizing cross-platform apps instead. Microsoft will discuss some of these in a Tuesday presentation by Joe Belfiore, who leads Windows "experiences" as the corporate vice president in the Operating Systems Group at Microsoft.

The idea, Belfiore said in a briefing in advance of the show, was that Microsoft needs to know what users are working on, across any device. "Whether you look at a Word doc on Android, iOS, or Windows, is irrelevant," Belfiore said. Belfiore was talking about Timeline, the feature that tracks your work in the Office apps or Edge, recording your activity in what Microsoft calls the Microsoft Graph. But Belfiore could have been talking about any hardware platform. Microsoft sounds like it wants to elevate Microsoft mobile applications to the level of importance of a PC -- making the actual hardware, and operating system, irrelevant.

74 comments

  1. The fourth E by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Embrace, Extend, "Experience" and Extinguish.

  2. BSOD by oldgraybeard · · Score: 1

    Screens, I am just filled with anticipation ;)

    Just my 2 cents ;)

    1. Re:BSOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screens, I am just filled with anticipation

      +1

    2. Re:BSOD by meglon · · Score: 1

      Exactly my first thought too. Wonder how much they'll be charging for that one.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  3. Good luck with that ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    making the actual hardware, and operating system, irrelevant

    Short of Office or Outlook (which my company requires I use), I don't use any MIcrosoft applications.

    I'm sure as hell not inviting them onto my phone.

    They might find themselves irrelevant if they keep focusing on telling us they'll do anything they want to our computers and think they're going to start competing on mobile phones.

    Microsoft is fast on its way to becoming another IBM, one that used to be important but is now relegated to the "meh" bucket.

    1. Re:Good luck with that ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dude you need to get out of your little bubble more often and take a real good look at reality. You, and everyone else is free to do whatever you want when it comes to your technology choices. MS started life by doing exactly what they did in the past. They are creating products and services that are hardware and OS independent. At the beginning MS's only real competitor, Apple, went the other way and tied all their products and services to their proprietary hardware and software. Had it not been for the success of the iPod Apple was on the path to bankruptcy. MS (BG) actually provided Apple with a bridge loan so they could continue operations. When MS was fighting the anti-trust trials MS needed to have at least one competitor to fight off the anti-trust charges. Every other competitor at the time either went out of business do to bad decisions or accepted buckets of money from MS for their technology. MS didn't steal technologies they bought them from willing sellers. And MS is not another IBM. IBM turned into an unmanageable behemoth who scorned change all the while writing off the impact of the personal computing would have on their business model. They were arrogantly confident that their big iron and their smaller mid-tier offerings would could withstand the coming of the client-server paradigm. On the other hand MS, like a bunch of other companies, have never been able to stop adapting to radical new technologies and future possibilities. And MS is on thee verge of pissing off every critic by integrating both open source and platform independent products and services. There evolution has taking some time but MS has a more than adequate and stable revenue pipeline and can now move to the next new thing. MS is actually doing what it's harshest critics and Linux worshippers were using as their club to bash MS every chance they had. Now I have a Windows box that also provides a Linux VM without actually needing a dedicated VM running. I have many of the command line tools in both OS's. Eventually this will help developers create more platform independent applications which will benefit everyone. Linux never reality took of in the desktop user space because of the lack of user friendly applications. All they got was poor clones of the MS Office suite and poor clones of any other applications that were migrated into the Linux platform. People were told the applications were "good enough" when recommending people change office suites or even the basic UI that users were expected to understand how to use.

    2. Re: Good luck with that ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Paragraphs are your friend.

      Ain't nobody got time for walls of text.

    3. Re: Good luck with that ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude you need to get out of your little bubble more often and take a real good look at reality.

      You, and everyone else is free to do whatever you want when it comes to your technology choices. MS started life by doing exactly what they did in the past. They are creating products and services that are hardware and OS independent. At the beginning MS's only real competitor, Apple, went the other way and tied all their products and services to their proprietary hardware and software. Had it not been for the success of the iPod Apple was on the path to bankruptcy. MS (BG) actually provided Apple with a bridge loan so they could continue operations.

      When MS was fighting the anti-trust trials MS needed to have at least one competitor to fight off the anti-trust charges. Every other competitor at the time either went out of business do to bad decisions or accepted buckets of money from MS for their technology. MS didn't steal technologies they bought them from willing sellers.

        And MS is not another IBM. IBM turned into an unmanageable behemoth who scorned change all the while writing off the impact of the personal computing would have on their business model. They were arrogantly confident that their big iron and their smaller mid-tier offerings would could withstand the coming of the client-server paradigm. On the other hand MS, like a bunch of other companies, have never been able to stop adapting to radical new technologies and future possibilities.

      And MS is on thee verge of pissing off every critic by integrating both open source and platform independent products and services. There evolution has taking some time but MS has a more than adequate and stable revenue pipeline and can now move to the next new thing. MS is actually doing what it's harshest critics and Linux worshippers were using as their club to bash MS every chance they had. Now I have a Windows box that also provides a Linux VM without actually needing a dedicated VM running. I have many of the command line tools in both OS's. Eventually this will help developers create more platform independent applications which will benefit everyone. Linux never reality took of in the desktop user space because of the lack of user friendly applications. All they got was poor clones of the MS Office suite and poor clones of any other applications that were migrated into the Linux platform. People were told the applications were "good enough" when recommending people change office suites or even the basic UI that users were expected to understand how to use.

      Still unreadable.

  4. "Needs to know..." by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft doesn't "need" to know what you, I, or anyone else are working on. It's not a big deal to re-open a document on a different device without giving your life's story to Microsoft (or any other Big Cloud company).

    This is just an excuse to loot your personal/corporate data under the excuse of a tiny bit more convenience.

    Also, the functions of phones and "desktop" devices (not really desktops, could be laptops with a keyboard) are orthogonal. The first are for brief communications, (yes) talking, recording of data (e.g. fitness tracking), and media consumption. But they stink at content production, which "desktop" devices excel at. Try writing several pages on a phone or many tablets -- it amounts to torture.

    1. Re:"Needs to know..." by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Microsoft doesn't "need" to know what you, I, or anyone else are working on. It's not a big deal to re-open a document on a different device without giving your life's story to Microsoft (or any other Big Cloud company).

      This is just an excuse to loot your personal/corporate data under the excuse of a tiny bit more convenience.

      Also, the functions of phones and "desktop" devices (not really desktops, could be laptops with a keyboard) are orthogonal. The first are for brief communications, (yes) talking, recording of data (e.g. fitness tracking), and media consumption. But they stink at content production, which "desktop" devices excel at. Try writing several pages on a phone or many tablets -- it amounts to torture.

      Yep, I would never write that much on a keyboardless device. However being able to review a document I'm working with while on the run is great for me.

    2. Re:"Needs to know..." by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Sure, but Microsoft doesn't need to know what I'm working on for this to work. I can open a copy of the document read-only from the cloud-storage (or private server) of my choice.

    3. Re:"Needs to know..." by williamyf · · Score: 1

      Also, the functions of phones and "desktop" devices (not really desktops, could be laptops with a keyboard) are orthogonal. The first are for brief communications, (yes) talking, recording of data (e.g. fitness tracking), and media consumption. But they stink at content production, which "desktop" devices excel at. Try writing several pages on a phone or many tablets -- it amounts to torture.

      While I generally agrre with that statement, I often find that I write several pages of a document (think 12 in the last one I wrote) in my desktop-bound laptop (with true keyboard, true mouse, and external monitor in portrait mode). Then I let the documet simmer, and re-read it a few times, making a few edits here and there each time. And for re-reading and small editing, a Smartphone or tablet is a very convenient device, because it allows me to re-read and edit when there is time, or when inspiration strikes...

      And I think I am not the only one. H.P. Lovecraft used a similar method* (writing, simmering, multiple editing). Just imagine how morre productive he would have been with a Desktop+Smartphone combo... And I am sure HPL and I are not alone in using this method.

      * Not that I imply that I am at the same level of HPL. Not Even close, he is way beyond me, of course. Is just that we use the same method, and we are not alone at that.

      --
      *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
    4. Re:"Needs to know..." by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Sure, but Microsoft doesn't need to know what I'm working on for this to work. I can open a copy of the document read-only from the cloud-storage (or private server) of my choice.

      Fully agreed on this point, I prefer cloud storage servers with encryption keys I hold on to.

    5. Re:"Needs to know..." by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      I can't believe I'm actually going to play devil's advocate on a post I actually agree with...

      Microsoft doesn't "need" to know what you, I, or anyone else are working on.

      This is true. However, browser-based productivity suites are very popular for lots of people. In addition, as much as you and I would be happier with some sort of a self-hosted compromise, like a partnership between OnlyOffice and Synology to make a browser based productivity appliance that's accessible from anywhere and stores data locally, the reality is that far too many people see Google Docs as $0 and no technical thingies required, so there's basically no market for it. For Microsoft to eschew providing an alternative to GDocs is counterproductive for everybody, especially since (sadly) there's a clear market for it.

      It's not a big deal to re-open a document on a different device without giving your life's story to Microsoft (or any other Big Cloud company).

      It's certainly possible to do this, but it's not nearly as simple. Nextcloud is great, but nobody is making an appliance for it that's seamless. iOS still does data shuffling through iTunes, and using a separate FTP client or similar is a pain, especially for the incredibly high number of people who don't really understand the concept of a file system. I agree, it's certainly possible for those who share our principles, but it's not "enter your e-mail address and a password and then leave everything else to us" simple. Remember: you have to think in terms of folks who think Snapchat is a useful piece of software.

      This is just an excuse to loot your personal/corporate data under the excuse of a tiny bit more convenience.

      Of course. It's not like MS is going to not-mine that data. However, the target demographic here isn't the Slashdot crowd.

      Also, the functions of phones and "desktop" devices (not really desktops, could be laptops with a keyboard) are orthogonal.

      Keep in mind that the original topic here is about making the phone's data more useful on a desktop. Manipulating phone contacts, writing longer text messages, and syncing photos are tasks that are still expedited by leveraging the desktop...which is sounds like is the task MS is looking to implement here. Now it sounds like MS is releasing an app that shares data with the OS directly rather than something like the now-defunct Jeyo Mobile Companion for Windows Mobile. To be fair though, Apple has been doing that for years between iOS and OSX, and Google has been largely-there if you consider Chrome and "The Google Ecosystem" an OS in context, so MS is just releasing an app to allow Windows 10 to do the same.

      The first are for brief communications, (yes) talking, recording of data (e.g. fitness tracking), and media consumption. But they stink at content production, which "desktop" devices excel at. Try writing several pages on a phone or many tablets -- it amounts to torture.

      100% agreed. However, there are two things missing from this assessment. First, it underestimates how much time children have to write their documents on a tablet when the assignment is "use your tablet to write your document", especially when they *only* have a tablet at their disposal. Second, consider the creation:consumption proportion for lots of people. You and I might be 50:50 or even higher, but for the crowd who's got a 20:80 split, investing in phones and tablets has been their more common technology purchase, with an aging XP/Vista/Early-Win7 desktop/$300-Celeron-Closeout machine being the PC that's "just kinda there" for the handful of times they need PC-specific stuff.

      I love me my Origin laptop and agree that self-hosted browser-based applications are far more preferable to trusting Aunt Google or Uncle Tim or Cousin Nadella to handle my computing needs to my satisfaction. I also realize that we live in a society where "use a Raspberry Pi or t

    6. Re:"Needs to know..." by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Does anyone assign children to write documents on a tablet? Chromebooks seem to be gaining popularity in lower education, while what I see in higher education is about a 30:30:30:10 mix. Macbooks:Chromebooks:Windows:Linux. Any of those things is closer in form factor to a laptop, not to a tablet or phone.

      It would take much LONGER to write a paper on a tablet -- if I had a kid with that assignment, I'd show them how to type it on a real laptop, then copy the thing to whatever tablet their school was trying to force down people's gullets.

    7. Re:"Needs to know..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, I would never write that much on a keyboardless device. However being able to review a document I'm working with while on the run is great for me.

      So you review documents while on the run? You review documents when you are technically multitasking?

      Geez!!

      I hope you are not not another one of those useless professionals (doctors, lawyers, erected officials, etc.) that charge sky-high rates for little to no obvious value.

    8. Re:"Needs to know..." by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Yep, I would never write that much on a keyboardless device. However being able to review a document I'm working with while on the run is great for me.

      So you review documents while on the run? You review documents when you are technically multitasking?

      Geez!!

      I hope you are not not another one of those useless professionals (doctors, lawyers, erected officials, etc.) that charge sky-high rates for little to no obvious value.

      Software engineer, making a little less than average for my experience according to glass door. Most of my document reviews are the papers I'm working on for graduate school, which I mostly pay for since I'm working full time too. Two jobs at once, and only getting paid for one, keeps one busy.

    9. Re:"Needs to know..." by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      Does anyone assign children to write documents on a tablet? Chromebooks seem to be gaining popularity in lower education, while what I see in higher education is about a 30:30:30:10 mix. Macbooks:Chromebooks:Windows:Linux. Any of those things is closer in form factor to a laptop, not to a tablet or phone.

      It would take much LONGER to write a paper on a tablet -- if I had a kid with that assignment, I'd show them how to type it on a real laptop, then copy the thing to whatever tablet their school was trying to force down people's gullets.

      I completely concur. However, "technology in education" is like Communism - one of those great ideas whose real-world implementation never, ever looks anything like the brochure. If a school was sold on a one-iPad-per-pupil solution, you'd better believe that the point of the assignment is to justify the purchase of the iPad, rather than for an educative activity to have been performed. It obviously varies from school to school, and I begrudgingly share your preference for Chromebooks to tablets in this context for the very reasons you specify...but for every one parent like you, there's a classroom of students whose parents are anywhere from incapable to apathetic about the situation.

    10. Re:"Needs to know..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, they've just realized that Windows cannot be everywhere, and are desperately trying to cancerize every system for profit.

  5. leave that to Windows Phone by swschrad · · Score: 2

    aka "failure." you broke the user experience in Win 8 and plowed it under and used it as an artillery range in Win 10. get rid of the idea that big-screen PCs and little-screen phones are the same thing, they aren't, and stop trying to graft Presentation Manager or Quantum on top of Windows.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:leave that to Windows Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows phone sucked and failed. It's good that it's gone.

    2. Re:leave that to Windows Phone by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      The worst thing about Windows Phone is not that it was crap, but that far superior Nokia MeeGo was cancelled to make way for it.

    3. Re:leave that to Windows Phone by Agripa · · Score: 1

      aka "failure." you broke the user experience in Win 8 and plowed it under and used it as an artillery range in Win 10. get rid of the idea that big-screen PCs and little-screen phones are the same thing, they aren't, and stop trying to graft Presentation Manager or Quantum on top of Windows.

      But if they do not do this, then how will they leverage their desktop monopoly onto smart phones?

  6. Oh, Hell no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The idea, Belfiore said in a briefing in advance of the show, was that Microsoft needs to know what users are working on, across any device."

    Just what is wrong with these people?
    Wherever they come from, they should stop getting any more from there.

    Maybe it's some sort of environmental damage.

    1. Re:Oh, Hell no! by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, it's environmental damage. The world would be a better place if people like Belfiore got an incurable physical illness as well as a mental one.

    2. Re:Oh, Hell no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, the vitriol on /. really has reached a new low. Belfiore is generally always near the top of the short list of MS presenters that people actually react positively to. What did he ever do to you?

    3. Re:Oh, Hell no! by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      His quote about "needing" to know what users are doing strikes me as the height of condescension and paternalism. Microsoft should write the damn software. The data which people who choose to use it generate is none of their business. Incidentally, there is a private way to do all of this. Update a database of recent documents/work in progress across devices, but protect everything with keys known only to the devices themselves, not to Microsoft. Microsoft just chooses to snoop, rather than doing it that way.

  7. Winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am an Apple user and many people have been talking about how amazing Microsoft products are so I will probably make the switch.

    1. Re:Winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a shill, or I'm not getting the sarcasm. No sane person would ever compliment Microsoft's products.

    2. Re: Winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I used to be a fan of Linux but have you seen how terrible it is lately? I've switched to widnows full time now and have converted dozens of other Linux users as well. Microsoft is hitting home run after home run these days.

  8. This could be really good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you're looking at Microsoft's offerings for business products, they're making a big push to provide a unified experience across platforms. With 365 you can have your office docs and email on smartphone apps, tablet apps, browser, and what I'm going to to call "Office Classic" - That is the old office suite that is both ancient yet ubiquitous and still commands a lot of revenue.

    One account controls all of the above (Apps are free to download, and you log in to use them) and provides cloud storage so your stuff is available everywhere. You can be part of an organization with shared storage, and outfits can create hybrid installations that merge on-site installations with the office365 versions.

    The disconnect between mobile and desktop is still a bit of a problem. Getting your "Stuff" to and from your desktop in an automatic and intelligent way could be a real winner. Imagine just getting your "Microsoft deskop" app for your phone and running to get access to all the things you were doing on your desktop (And the other way around)

    What's really good is Microsoft has given up on the idea that they're going to be a player in the mobile space and are embracing both Android and iOS

    1. Re:This could be really good. by greenwow · · Score: 1

      Outlook Web Access and Teams on the web are pretty damn good except they're just too slow. We have a bunch of Surfaces without enough SSD space to install Office 2016, so we made those users use the web interface. The problem is the users are starting to rebel against it. We're considering going back to an older version of Exchange and back to Skype.

    2. Re:This could be really good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surface devices and O365 Web Apps like OWA are great. OWA is even great as an android App.

      The problem is the pricing of surface devices and that MS doesn't support them very well, at least on the consumer end. MS still has a large software provider mindset where consumers will take whatever they dish out and the harder to get direct support, the better. Might be fine for consumer operating systems, not so good for enterprise hardware.

    3. Re:This could be really good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can feel the temptation to push users to the web interface. It's a million times more easy to administer.

      If you're looking for speed I'm not sure that trying to wedge the-thing-that-will-not-die that is outlook2016 on to a tablet is going to give you much love.

      To their credit Microsoft is pouring a lot of effort in to making their office365 offerings more usable.

    4. Re:This could be really good. by greenwow · · Score: 1

      If you're looking for speed I'm not sure that trying to wedge the-thing-that-will-not-die that is outlook2016 on to a tablet is going to give you much love.

      It takes forever to load even with a very fast computer with a spinning rust drive. Yes, we buy $3k desktops that don't have SSDs since my boss won't less us buy laptops or desktops with one since we had a bunch of them fail suddenly without warning about six years ago. It takes about twenty seconds for the window to open after clicking on "New Email," but that's not a blocker.

    5. Re:This could be really good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > twenty seconds for the window to open after clicking on "New Email,"

      Yep. Went from about five seconds with Outlook 2010 to well over twenty with 2016. Our machines are all three+ years old, but all have maxed memory (64GB in desktops and 16GB in laptops) and i7s so it just shouldn't be that slow. That doesn't annoy me as much as the fact that I type fast and Outlook can't keep-up. Having to pause and wait on it to catchup so you can see what you typed and let it spellcheck is painful.

    6. Re:This could be really good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny.

      I get my stuff from my phone or other devices to my desktop using usb cables or flash drives. It's really easy and intuitive.

      I don't need Microsoft squashing everything as a bottleneck in the middle with online transfers.

  9. I always said that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...MS should compile a special build of Windows for the top 5 selling phones, and sell it the way they sold it for computers. Let people install Windows on their S9, Pixel, iPhone, etc.

  10. One account controls all of the above by swm · · Score: 1

    One Ring to rule them all,
    One Ring to find them,
    One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.

  11. Does this scream too little to late? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    This type of stuff reminds me of Terminal Emulator Apps who added GUI Buttons, and form like input boxes, to Make your old Console Terminal Based application look more like a PC App. The features are just to make sure people don't migrate off the old legacy system, and stop buying licenses for the Terminal Emulator. This is just screaming, Mobile makers don't make Windows irrelevant, we will give you this fancy tool so you don't go off Windows.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  12. Where is the LUDDITE APPS guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is the LUDDITE APPS guy?

  13. "experience" by greenwow · · Score: 1

    That word shows they're a bit out of touch with what users want. They want programs and web sites to be reliable, fast, and have interfaces that make sense with features that are needed and without ones that don't make sense like "social" features.

    Ever dealt with a user "experience" consultant? They talk a lot about how users feel or why they do things. It's never about getting actual work done. The five we've churned through wouldn't even look at web analytics. The last one refused since they claimed it didn't explain the "why." We use Piwik which is awesome for seeing exactly what people do. You can even track specific user sessions to see exactly what they do and how long each step takes and even more important where they bounce. I've found and fixed at least a hundred problems I found using Piwik, but the UX people wouldn't even login to it.

    1. Re:"experience" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bigger problem you didn't mention is that without analytics before/after a change, you don't know if it was a good thing. You also can't do good A/B testing.

      At my last job, I worked on a web app that had nearly 3 million users. We had great analytics. Most of the things we changed made things worse even though they seemed like common sense. Other changes that would seem to be a bad idea, worked great like adding two extra steps to the check-out process by having more but simpler pages. The biggest single improvement we made was moving our CSS files to a CDN which shaved about 150 ms off of the average load time. You can't even tell the difference, but it had a measurable improvement on the bounce rate that took us from losing a little money each day to making money.

    2. Re:"experience" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "social" features.

      Especially when adding them along with ads, weather, games, etc. to the start menu. Even after disabling all of the extra crap, the start menu is still annoyingly slow. With them, it's just painful and affects productivity. You use the start menu hundreds of times a day so it is a bad "experience."

    3. Re:"experience" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bigger problem you didn't mention is that without analytics before/after a change, you don't know if it was a good thing.

      No of course you can't. No way.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      You also can't do good A/B testing.

      Monkey see monkey do.

      At my last job, I worked on a web app that had nearly 3 million users. We had great analytics. Most of the things we changed made things worse even though they seemed like common sense.

      Seems core issue here is being out of touch.

      The biggest single improvement we made was moving our CSS files to a CDN which shaved about 150 ms off of the average load time. You can't even tell the difference, but it had a measurable improvement on the bounce rate that took us from losing a little money each day to making money.

      And clueless. Average load time...? Really? What matters is what the outliers experience not no stinking retarded average.

      If you want to improve sales try using the golden rule. Simulate a shit connection from a shit computer and keep pulling shit until the experience doesn't suck ass.

  14. All your base^H^H^H^Hdata are belong to us by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Title summarizes parent post.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  15. Why is this so hard? by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    you already have models in Adroid and IOS, if it's the fact that you want a Windows kernel underneath for app developers then don't hold your breath Microsoft. Nobody wants to deliver for a platform that you constantly change or drop focus on from a business perspective. Of course Microsoft can port their own bloatware onto a phone with their own O/S but unless they pay third party developers to port popular applications, the app store will be a bit barren. Oh wait, that's like it is in Windows 10 now with about half the apps unusable.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  16. still trying to get into the mobile space by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    OK, Microsoft finally realizes that they kinda suck at creating a mobile-specific OS, (WinCE, Windows Mobile, etc) and that full blast Windows isn't a good fit on a mobile device. This is good. But Microsoft still needs to be a player in this space, hence a mirror application rather than an OS. I can see where this would make sense to Microsoft strategists.

    Thing is, with apps like Good (as much as I personally dislike it) that already give encapsulated access to Outlook, and are more well known and a lot more mature, I'm not sure how successful Microsoft is going to be in this space. But I guess one can't fault them for trying. I'm thinking this'll drag on for a few years and then get quietly canceled, but hey, my crystal ball has been wrong before.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:still trying to get into the mobile space by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      It also occurred to me just now that Microsoft seems to be abandoning the "one OS to rule them all" approach and starting to concentrate on apps, which I think is a much better fit for the company moving forward.

      If nothing else, this helps to "future proof" Microsoft technologies, as apps are easier to make work in radically different spaces than an OS is. (And with PC sales stagnant, having a presence in other spaces is doubly important.) Let Google and Apple continue to create the framework, and Microsoft can concentrate on selling apps.

      And who knows? With pressure off the company to come up with radical "improvements" in the OS every couple years, maybe Windows will settle down and get more robust as time goes on, instead of more different.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:still trying to get into the mobile space by sinij · · Score: 2

      Actually, Microsoft's Windows 10 on mobile was an excellent OS. What MS sucked at is convincing people to pay for it. It wasn't perceived as upmarket the way people view Apple products, and it wasn't being given away for free to everyone the way Google does with Android. So MS didn't manage to become cool and couldn't beat free.

    3. Re:still trying to get into the mobile space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Microsoft's Windows 10 on mobile was an excellent OS. What MS sucked at is convincing people to pay for it. It wasn't perceived as upmarket the way people view Apple products, and it wasn't being given away for free to everyone the way Google does with Android. So MS didn't manage to become cool and couldn't beat free.

      Microsoft has the same problem as Comcast, Oracle, AT&T and Verizon. Most of their customers hate their fucking guts. It's hard to break into an existing market when your existing customers wouldn't be your customers if they had the chance.

    4. Re:still trying to get into the mobile space by swb · · Score: 1

      The problem is they're prone to crippling apps that could be useful in the mobile space by chaining them to their own cloud services.

      I find OneNote to be useful on the PC and it even manages to work with the documents synced with Dropbox, but it's chained to OneDrive, which I don't use. It would even be kind of useful if I had to manually import the data files.

  17. You mean that experience nobody wants? by gweihir · · Score: 0

    It is really fascinating. MS consistently delivers bad quality, ignores their customers, messes around, and _still_ they rake in cash like crazy...

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:You mean that experience nobody wants? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      You've never wanted your text messages on your desktop or laptop without having to type on a phone screen?

    2. Re:You mean that experience nobody wants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not really. But I can ssh into my phone to do that. And while I can do so already (but find it boring), why would I use some slow cloud service that doesn't respect privacy to achieve the same - still boring?

  18. if you can't beat 'em... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    siphon off all their data; because that's what you really wanted, anyway.

  19. "a Word doc" - proprietary double-speak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's supposed to be no such thing as "a Word doc" right? Wasn't Microsoft supposedly embracing document format standards by supporting MOOXML, and ODF, and 20 other formats in Word?

    So what the heck is a "Word doc"? My gosh, one might think Microsoft all along was fudging, and never did mean anything they said about openness and interoperable formats.

    Ya think?

  20. So BlackBerry Blend? by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    If I'm understanding the summary, and I very well may not, this is exactly what BlackBerry Blend did on BBOS 10. It was quite slick being able to throw my device up on my big screen and use the PC keyboard to finish that email I started while on the bus.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    1. Re:So BlackBerry Blend? by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      I guess I did understand it

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    2. Re:So BlackBerry Blend? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it won't be as reliable or secure as Blend.

    3. Re:So BlackBerry Blend? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blend was many years ahead of its time. Same with BB10. Pity Big PR destroyed BlackBerry and gave us two "choices," both which are just data harvesters. BlackBerry made the best mobile computing devices and software by far.

  21. Windows-like experiences are why I left Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1989-2004 were the suckiest years in personal computers, ever. Why? Microsoft. And once I ditched them, everything got so much nicer, easier, faster, more reliable, etc. Microsoft should sell their phones under a different name. "Windows" is not a word people want to hear unless they're masochists wanting to be dominated, tied up, humiliated.

  22. So.... by Heebie · · Score: 1

    No sane person wants a Windows phone, presumably because it gives them a "windows-like" "experience" on their smartphone (since it runs feckin' windows.) and M$ wants to make OTHER things on phones act as shit as windows? Are they high?

    1. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing wrong with Windows Phones as phones, really, except that in about a year they will reach the support level of Android Jellybean or maybe KitKat. AKA none

      As for the document looking the same all over the place, if the device looks to the software like a desktop Libreoffice has done that for years. So tablets, desktops, laptopss, 2-in-1's, even, probably, Chromebooks if they run something arguably related to Linux. Main issue with the LO route is minor differences with MS Office files (usually not of consequence, but there are several corner cases), and the fact that there's no official LO for phones & similar ARM devices.

  23. already using this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using this phone to pc integration for years.... it's called AirDroid.

  24. I still don't know why we can't dock our phones... by gravyface · · Score: 1

    I'd love to be able to come home, dock my phone into a charging KVM station, and use it like a desktop.

    --
    body massage!
  25. Re:I still don't know why we can't dock our phones by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    (provided the phone is capable of running an OS that doesn't stink on the desktop)

  26. Zeitgeist, Gnome Activity Journal and Unity... by Julz · · Score: 1

    Isn't this just like Zeitgeist, Gnome Activity Journal or Unity Dash? I've been using Ubuntu on the desktop for a number of years now and using Zeitgeist, Zeitgeist Explorer, Gnome Activity Journal and more recently Unity Dash to look at my document and application history and context. These aren't my only "go to" methods for finding historical activity on my Linux system but they are nicely integrated and useful at times. I'm pretty sure that Zeitgeist has been around since before 2008 and Gnome Activity Journal came in around 2009 with Gnome 3.0 and then Unity around 2011?

    Is this another Microsoft copying a previously existing platform to promote as their own?

    --
    When shit hits the fan get some of these https://youtu.be/pY-GncsZ-UE
  27. Non-native speaker question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the deal with Microsoft replacing the words "software" or "solution" with "experience"? To me it just sounds odd, pretentious, and plain ugly.

  28. Windows-like crap 'Experiences' For Smartphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    smh tbh

  29. Seventeen mentions of MICROS~1 on the frontpage by najajomo · · Score: 2

    For a new record for how many mentions of Microsoft you can get on the front page.

    1. Re:Seventeen mentions of MICROS~1 on the frontpage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is to Microsoft as Republicans are to Hillary Clinton.

  30. Re:I still don't know why we can't dock our phones by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

    >> I'd love to dock my phone and use it like a desktop.

    Have you tried this on your existing kit? A Bluetooth Keyboard and Mouse works on my Android phone, as does a USB-C to HDMI adapter.

    The trick is finding a bluetooth keyboard that doesn't suck.

  31. Re:I still don't know why we can't dock our phones by jezwel · · Score: 1
    You can do what you want with newer Samsung phones and their Dex dock - I think the latest iteration might finally support >1080p monitors too.

    I would imagine this is why MS is looking to provide their apps everywhere and deprecate the device/OS. Your data is in OneDrive, and whatever you are working on is available immediately in their experience app.