Slashdot Mirror
Senate Democrats Force a Vote To Restore Net Neutrality (theverge.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge: Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) and 32 other Democrats have submitted a new discharge petition under the Congressional Review Act, setting the stage for a full congressional vote to restore net neutrality. Because of the unique CRA process, the petition has the power to force a Senate vote on the resolution, which leaders say is expected next week. The Congressional Review Act allows Congress to roll back regulations within 60 legislative days of introduction, a process that today's resolution would apply to the internet rules introduced by FCC chairman Ajit Pai in December. Pai's rules reversed the 2015 Open Internet Order, which had explicitly banned blocking, throttling, and paid prioritization by internet providers. To successfully undo the Pai order and restore the 2015 rules, today's resolution would need a bare majority in both the Senate and the House, as well as the president's signature.
They are ignoring 2 referrals for charging McCabe for lying to FBI during Trump investigation.
2 FBI agents fired from Muller probe for unethical behaviour, possibly illegal behaviour.
A couple prosecutors being bashed by a judge and will be held in contempt of court for not producing what the judge ordered.
Charging Flynn of lying to FBI, then redacting the part where the FBI says he didn't lie for "security reasons"
Failing to comply with MULTIPLE Congressional subpoenas about scope of investigation.
Failure to be ready to try case where they charged Russians with interfering with election and telling them they don't have a right to see evidence they are charged with.
All info based on a FISA warrant illegally obtained by Comey, Lynch, Roseinstein, and Yates lying on the FISA application to the judge.
Thats quite a LOT of illegal activity for a group of 20 people on a SINGLE investigation. Of the charges they have come up with, Flynn appears to have been charged illegally, the 13 Russians appear to have been charged without evidence, Manifort appears to be charged illegally. Not sure why Gates and Popadapoulous pled out, I bet their charges were also illegal.
Its pretty bad when the investigators have committed more in number and seriousness crimes than those they have charged.
Title 2 just means that it's a public communications line and that no special conditions can be created to block or hinder access and that all rates must be reasonable and across the board.
No, Title 2 is a group of regulations for specific classifications and depending on the classification will decide which and how regulations are applied. Are Internet Service Providers a Information Service Provider or are they a Telecommunication Service Provider? Title 2 cannot regulate Information Service Providers because that is the way the law is written. Currently, ISPs are classified as Information Service Providers and thus are less regulated. The Obama-era FCC rules that were repealed effectively said "ISPs are Telecommunication Service Providers and we are going to pick and choose which regulation will apply regardless what the law says.". That is a horrible thing to do because not only does the FCC not have the authority to pick and choose which laws or regulations apply to which classification but it will be a matter of time before the exceptions will be applied because the law says so and as soon as the judiciary gets involved. Some of those exceptions are for example, decency rules. No more offensive content on the internet just like TV or Radio that do fall under Title 2. TV and Radio are Telecommunication Service Providers and if you classify the internet as such you will have a sanitized internet just like TV and Radio because that is the law. It would only be a matter of time and lawsuit.