Slashdot Mirror


H-1B Visa Alternative 'OPT' Grew 400 Percent In Eight Years, Report Finds

theodp writes: Almost 1.5 million foreign students have been allowed to stay and work in the U.S. after graduation as part of the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program, which is now larger than the controversial H-1B program (Warning: source may be paywalled; alternative source). According to new Pew Research analysis of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement data obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, the number of students authorized to work under OPT has grown 400% since the federal government in 2008 increased the amount of time graduates with science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) degrees could remain in the United States and work. More than half of those working under OPT from 2004 to 2016 were in STEM fields, Pew found, and as a result, were eligible for the so-called STEM extension.

The OPT program added a 17-month STEM extension in 2008, shortly after Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates suggested it in testimony to Congress after complaining that the cap for the H-1B program had caused a serious disruption in the flow of talented STEM graduates to U.S. companies. In 2016, another 12-month extension was added after a Federal judge threatened to torpedo the STEM extension program, saying it "appears to have been adopted directly from the unanimous suggestions by Microsoft and similar industry groups." In its Top Ten Tech Issues for 2018, Microsoft expressed "concern that in 2018 the White House will announce a rollback of the extended period of Optional Practical Training for STEM graduates." Pew also took note of allegations that "visa mills" have sprung up in response to demand driven by the OPT program.

1 of 185 comments (clear)

  1. Xenophobia and bigotry on display right here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Hello, friends. What we have here is a prime example of the xenophobia and bigotry that removes any credibility from discussing H-1B issues on Slashdot. I wholeheartedly oppose the abuse of H-1B visas to replace skilled American labor with cheaper foreign workers. However, that's nowhere close to the claims in the parent comment, saying that Indian and Chinese workers are inherently inferior and prone to stealing intellectual property. I'm willing to accept that the educational systems in India and China instill different attitudes in their students than in American schools, which may translate to the workplace. That is even stronger justification for encouraging foreign students to stay and work in the United States after completing their education. The issues with H-1B workers are probably due to foreign educational systems and are certainly not just because of nationality. There's no reason to expect that an American trained in the United States educational system would inherently be superior to an Indian or Chinese worker with an education from the United States.