Scientists Find Physically Demanding Jobs Are Linked To Greater Risk of Early Death (metro.co.uk)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Metro: Researchers in the Netherlands claim that a "physical activity paradox" exists, where exercise may only be good for you if it's done outside of your job. Manual laborers may be physically active all day but that doesn't actually help them. In fact, the research claims that it might actually increase their risk of dying early. "While we know leisure-time physical activity is good for you, we found that occupational physical activity has an 18% increased risk of early mortality for men," says Pieter Coenen, public health researcher at UV University medical centre in Amsterdam. "These men are dying earlier than those who are not physically active in their occupation."

He says that it's all down to the type of exercise you do in your spare time, versus occupational physical activity. When you choose to exercise, you can take rest periods when you want -- something that often may not be available to you if you're working on a building site (for example). The research combined results from 17 studies, dated between 1960 and 2010 -- looking at data on almost 200,000 people. The study has been published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine.

Comments

Correlation isn't causation

[b0s0z0ku]

Correlation isn't causation. Many physically demanding jobs (fireman, mechanic, building trades) involve more exposure to toxic chemicals than other jobs.

But bias is evident..

[thesupraman]

Exactly.

Not to mention the fact that many outside/active jobs are held by lower socio-economic groups, who also tend to die earlier for a wide range of reasons.
I should check, but do they even adjust for people who die BECAUSE of the job? such jobs hold a much higher rate of job based death, which would
skew the figures significantly.
Plus, such people tend to be involved in more risky passtimes as well.

There would seem to be SO many other factors immediately available, that caliming some mystical difference in the value of the associated exercise
would be a little... odd perhaps?

But, ah, here we go.

Journal of Sports Medicine, basically claiming that sports exercise is good, and other exercise is bad.
WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT.

Re:But bias is evident..

[Jon Peterson]

Have you read the paper? No you haven't. Because the paper raises all the issues you have. Only better, in more detail, with some facts and numbers. Because you know, *science*

Where's #metoo on workplace injuries?

[Subm]

Here's another place men dominate in the workplace: on the job injuries and deaths. Where's the #metoo movement on equality there?

I don't know why men don't start a #metoo movement around injury and death prone jobs. And jobs that are migrant, outdoor, physically demanding, and other things that make them more grueling.

#injuredtoo

Clueless about combat

[sjbe]

Combat isn't a dangerous job these days with drones, body armor, and armored vehicles.

So says the anonymous coward who has never been anywhere near a real battlefield in his pathetic life. Probably played a lot of HALO though so he's bad ass and qualified to comment on how not dangerous combat is.

Pro-tip: Body armor won't save your ass from an artillery shell or a bomb. Most combat isn't done by drones. Armored vehicles aren't all that hard to kill along with their occupants.

Farmers, truck drivers, taxi drivers, and industrial workers are more likely to die on the job than an average military member.

You do realize that statement becomes wildly, ludicrously, (almost) humorously false during combat right? You know, the activity that the military is actually built and trained to do? Being in the military is mostly boring tedium but occasionally it becomes the most dangerous occupation imaginable.