Ask Slashdot: Which Is the Safest Router?
MindPrison writes: As ashamed as I am to admit it -- a longtime computer user since the Commodore heydays, I've been hacked twice recently and that has seriously made me rethink my options for my safety and well-being. So, I ask you dear Slashdot users, from one fellow longtime Slashdotter to another: which is the best router for optimal safety today?
...as long as you put OpenWrt on it.
Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
pfSense running on WANBOX...
pfSense because its open source and free and "just works". WANBOX, because its reliable and supports AES-NI crypto onboard.
Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
Unless you are talking about your netgear or dlink box getting back doored, I think you are looking in the wrong places.
Any NAT device is sufficient.
Patch all your stuff
Don't download crap
Don't execute the crap you download
Don't play web games
Don't use internet explorer
uninstall flash
uninstall java
If you are really looking for a good firewall, go grab a little pfsense box from netgate. But I think you have many other places to look at first.
A self made/installed Linux box probably the least secure solution for most people. Unless you really know how to secure and lock down your Linux box AND keep it up to date on weekly basis, your "router" is far from secure. There are few people who really know what they're doing in this domain. Just because you can't hack it, doesn't mean it's safe. Misconfiguration is the most common cause for security holes (do you really know each and every piece of software you have running on it, every kernel module, driver, server, etc?), but even if you do manage to lock it down, security vulnerabilities in Linux and other open source software that Linux uses are discovered all the time and need to be patched fast as scripts exploiting them come just as fast. It's a full time job to keep a Linux box secured on the open internet.