Slashdot Mirror


First Government Office in the US To Accept Bitcoin As Payment (orlandosentinel.com)

Long-time Slashdot reader SonicSpike quotes the Orlando Sentinel: If cash, check or credit card seems too old-fashioned, Seminole County, Florida Tax Collector Joel Greenberg said this week his office will begin accepting bitcoin as payment for new IDs, license plates and property taxes starting next month. Greenberg said accepting bitcoin and bitcoin cash as a payment method will promote transparency and accuracy in payment.

"There's no risk to the taxpayer," said Greenberg, who has often raised eyebrows since his 2016 election by moves including encouraging certain employees with concealed-weapons permits to carry a firearm openly as a security measure. "Blockchain technology is the future of the whole financial industry."

A spokesperson for a neighboring county's tax collector said they had no plans to follow the move. "Frankly, I think the currency is so volatile that I donâ(TM)t think it makes sense."

And an official at a nearby county said bitcoin payments were "not on our to-do list", adding that no one in the county had requested the ability to pay their taxes in bitcoin.

17 of 42 comments (clear)

  1. There's no risk to the taxpayer by john+of+sparta · · Score: 1

    right

  2. Not really... by mhkohne · · Score: 4, Informative

    BitPay is guaranteeing the exchange rate for long enough for the transaction to go through. So the tax office never actually takes Bitcoin - BitPay takes BitCoin, and sends cash to the government office. And presumably, BitPay gets a cut somewhere in there.

    It's more or less like adding a new credit card processor, as far as the receiver of the payment is concerned.

    --
    A thousand pounds of wood moving at 300 feet per minute. Don't get in the way.
  3. hm by supernova87a · · Score: 1

    I mean, I'm all in favor of government being more proactive, responsive, etc, but this is ridiculous.

    And, by the way, didn't the other story today just say that quantum computing is about to break encryption in 5 years?

  4. FALSE headline by gravewax · · Score: 2

    The government department is not accepting bitcoin at all, it accepts the cash equivalent as transacted through bitpay. They are not nor do they have any intention of accepting bitcoin.

    1. Re:FALSE headline by gravewax · · Score: 1

      I got no problems with it being convertible into another currency. I have issue with morons like you that think this is them accepting bitcoin, it is not. They are explicitly NOT accepting bitcoin, they are simply enabling another payment provider, that payment provider only pays them in USD.

  5. Re:Carbon Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This perspective ignores the cost (and thus environmental harms) of traditional currencies (digital or federal reserve notes).

    The cost of traditional fiat currency regardless of whether we are talking about ones and zeros in a computer or a printed / minted one are more significant than typically understood. It's not just the printing that has a cost. It's the movement of that money that comes at a price. If you talking printed or minted money there is the physical transport costs and production costs. This is in part due to high manual security costs (armored trucks, personal, banks, vaults, etc). Then if we start talking about wire transfers, credit cards, etc you have to take into account the high costs here as well. Where do banks make a buck? Fees. And those fees are particulalry true for wire transfers. By the time all is said and done an international wire transfer will likely cost $55-120 USD+. I know I just got one. it was something like $63 to send and 15 to receive. From Sweden to a US bank account. The item cost $106.97. The wire cost almost as much. The credit card would have cost a lot less- but not anywhere near the 1 cent that a payment via Dash would have cost or even a "high" fee of Bitcoin at maybe 40 cents. The immediate fee for the credit card would have been over $3.76 USD (3% plus 25 cents a transaction). $116.97 was the total bill with shipping. Then there is another 3% due to the cost of charge backs and fraud. Security is simply non-existent with fiat currencies like it is with crypto currencies. Then there is potentially another 6% you'll likely have to tack on soon because governments are getting rid of cash. In many cases small businesses are forced to turn to purchasing goods using a credit card thus the total added cost to the goods you sell ends up being around 12% (maybe even higher). My company has been saving around 40% on transaction and related costs via the use of crypto currencies.

    The reality is the federal reserve notes you have in your pocket are subsided by taxpayers. Crypto currencies stand and fall on there own merits. I've only ever really gained in the long term from my use of crypto currencies. Crypto currencies have gained in value far more than they've lost and crypto currencies are more valuable than the "investment" value hype.

  6. Who takes the risk, and the benefits? by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    Government relies on Bitpay cover the risk associated with volatility. Bitpay will make nice benefits or huge losses depending if bitcoin is rising or crashing vs USD. Is it just government promoting speculation?

    Perhaps... except that Bitpay only guarantee the rate for 15 mn, and bitcoin transaction can make much more time to be processed. Hence government also takes a share in the volatility risk.

    1. Re:Who takes the risk, and the benefits? by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure, that the government will never take the risk with volatility, they will just send the payer a bill for the difference.

    2. Re:Who takes the risk, and the benefits? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Perhaps... except that Bitpay only guarantee the rate for 15 mn, and bitcoin transaction can make much more time to be processed. Hence government also takes a share in the volatility risk.

      Some simple searches would show this is false. Bitpay guarantees the exchange rate for 15 minutes, if your bitcoins arrive later they'll be converted at the current rate and if it's enough they'll pay the invoice, otherwise they'll just send you back a notification that you underpaid so try again. In which case it looks like you need to get a refund (2nd transaction fee) and pay again (3rd transaction fee). Not surprising since they don't know when you initiated the transfer, if you spent 14 minutes waiting for BTC to crash thinking the actual transaction would finish in seconds or set some super-low fee causing it to take a day. In fact since long processing times are highly correlated with extreme volatility it's probably near impossible to get any significant exchange rate advantage out of those 15 minutes. Most likely it'll just be delayed, underpaid and you lose a bunch in fees. Not the merchant, you.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:Who takes the risk, and the benefits? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Perhaps... except that Bitpay only guarantee the rate for 15 mn, and bitcoin transaction can make much more time to be processed. Hence government also takes a share in the volatility risk.

      No, it just converts it at the current rate. Which means you can underpay and have to pay again.

      And even when BitCoin payments were taking days to transact, you can still get them done in 10 minutes - it just means you have to pay $50 in transaction fees since you set how much extra you need to pay. There's a default fee you can pay which will be handled as and when the miners get around to it.

      You have to remember that these companies are there to eliminate risk, and for risky systems like bitcoin, they do it by passing it onto you. The 15 minute guarantee is generally necessary (since it takes 10 minutes per block so they give you the opportunity if you're unlucky and then some), and even during periods of extreme volatility, 15 minute rates can be stable. Plus, they build in the risk into the exchange rate so the chance of losing money is extremely low. All this ensures they can make money on the transaction as well.

  7. Correct, county/merchants don't hold so no risk by perpenso · · Score: 4, Informative

    There likely is no risk, the country is probably using the same sort of bitcoin payment processors that various merchants do. When using these services the recipient never sees or touches a bitcoin, they only receive fiat. When someone indicates that they want to pay with bitcoin the payment processor is given a dollar amount, they do a real time conversion to bitcoin and provide a payment address and a coin amount, when that coin amount shows up at the address the recipient is notified and the recipient's account is credited for the exact dollar amount they original specified. The taxpayer was never exposed to any bitcoin volatility risk. The taxpayer merely paid a payment processor's fee, just like when they accept a credit card and pay a fee.

  8. Re: money laundering by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Joke's on them, I'm going to pay everything in Dogecoins. Let's see them haul five million dogecoins for tax payment.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  9. Re:Carbon Cost by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Your bank is screwing you. I do a wire transfer from HSBC in Hong Kong to either Germany (3 weeks ago) or the US (1 week ago) for $14.65; now, the receiving bank charged ~$23 (Germany) and $25 (US). When I receive wire transfers from the EU or the US to HK, I pay $14.65. So you're getting screwed - find a better bank. Wire transfers - flat fee - for less than $15 on my side...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  10. Re: money laundering by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    CCTV of every face connected to using computer currency.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  11. Re:Carbon Cost by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Your bank is screwing you.

    Must be in the USA. Virtually all US banks screw you over on wire transfer fees which are multiples of what it costs in most other countries... because they can.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  12. When The Law Is Not The Law by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    Florida requires a concealed carry permit. You can not get a permit for openly displaying a firearm. Only cops have that privilege. So here we have a tax collector that feels tax collectors can openly display a weapon. What happened to the law being equal for all people all of the time?

  13. Flawed logic by dkman · · Score: 1

    Greenberg said accepting bitcoin and bitcoin cash as a payment method will promote transparency and accuracy in payment.

    I don't think BitCoin is what he thinks it is.

    --
    I refuse to sign