Slashdot Mirror
Mystery Donor Pledges $1 Million To The GNOME Foundation (betanews.com)
Brian Fagioli, writing for BetaNews: This week, The GNOME Foundation made a shocking revelation: a mystery donor has pledged $1 million dollars. We don't know who is promising the money -- it could be a rich man or woman, but more likely -- and this is pure speculation -- it is probably a company that benefits from GNOME, such as Red Hat or Canonical.
"An anonymous donor has pledged to donate up to $1,000,000 over the next two years, some of which will be matching funds. The GNOME Foundation is grateful for this donation and plans on using these funds to increase staff to streamline operations and to grow its support of the GNOME Project and the surrounding ecosystem. While the GNOME Foundation has maintained its position as a proponent of the GNOME Project, growth has been limited. With these funds, the GNOME Foundation will be able to expand and lead in the free software space," says The GNOME Foundation.
"An anonymous donor has pledged to donate up to $1,000,000 over the next two years, some of which will be matching funds. The GNOME Foundation is grateful for this donation and plans on using these funds to increase staff to streamline operations and to grow its support of the GNOME Project and the surrounding ecosystem. While the GNOME Foundation has maintained its position as a proponent of the GNOME Project, growth has been limited. With these funds, the GNOME Foundation will be able to expand and lead in the free software space," says The GNOME Foundation.
Trump will die in prison a traitor next to his bitch beta traitor sons and worthless attorneys.
Hmm.
$1M, at 500k/year, and 'increasing staff' seems like it will get burned through rather quick. A couple of devs, full time per year, will eat that cash up easily.
Of course, two devs can get a lot done.. so, who knows.
GNOME devs have their heads deeper up their own asses than pretty much any project in the history of software development.
so much for open source. or is a systemd related ransom/protection payment?
I heard that the gnome UI has devolved into a single large button labelled "NO" but I can't say if that's true. You know, so as not to confuse the users. The last time I looked at gnome it was headed in that direction.
Thank me you stupid fucks!
Before the HIG, spatial file manager, shell, disabling of double click to launch executables and other Gnome groans. Despite given head starts by Microsoft with Me, Vista, 8 and 10 Gnome is still a major reason we haven’t had a year of the Linux desktop in the 20 years Gnome has existed.
Get the ovens ready, we're going to have a lot of suicidal Trumpfags to burn once he dies in prison a traitor.
Couldn't ever get used to the weird French ways of KDE
If you look at the strings attached to the donation, it should be obvious what's going on here.
Gnome 4 needs to be the Gnome 3 of Gnome 3s! We want a user experience so new, bold and exciting that nobody will believe it! Not just out of the box but in a different galaxy as the box! Also, all applications must be fully usable on smartwatches!
But hey, I for one welcome our open source sniff-and-spit smartwatches! ;)
Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
Probably Putin, trying to destabilize the Free Software movement and keeping the desktop fragmentation Gnome created (or, at least, greatly escalated) going.)
You are mentally ill and need clinical help.
<dr evil>One Million Dollars</dr evil>
Don't spend it all in one place
Trump's going to die a traitor in Florence, Kansas. You should be there to fuck his corpse if you're so interested.
More general solution: Use a CSB (Charity Share Brokerage). People who want to use GNOME would be able to buy charity shares in related projects. Some projects might develop new features, others might pay for ongoing costs for the next budget period, other projects would provide support, and so on. If lots of people want to donate to GNOME, then it will flourish, but if not, then it will survive to the degree that some people are willing to cover the costs.
This might remind you of Kickstarter, but it's actually an older idea that has evolved over the years. There are two major differences: One is a focus on accountability for the projects, with every proposal including the success criteria, and another is elimination of the jackpot effect. When a project gets enough funding, that's it. If there is extra enthusiasm for the project it should be transferred to the next step or a related project (rather than cause replanning of the current project).
Latest wrinkle involves the question "Who shall assess those selfsame projects?" The problem is that the CSB has a vested interest in successful projects. The CSB's reputation is linked to successful projects, even though the CSB needs to be honest about the ones that don't do so well (so the CSB can learn to make future projects better). The donors also have a vested interest in declaring their own projects successful. Therefore I think the assessment should include two additional panels of judges:
(1) Some people who read the original project proposal, but who decided not to donate to it. The CSB can recruit them with a closing option such as "I do not want to donate to this project, but I'm interested in the outcome."
(2) Some random people who have never heard of the project. Rather than details on the three most obvious pools, let me just close with my usual ADSAuPR, atAJG.
Whoops, almost forgot the main link to the original story: Large donors would be allowed to match charity shares on projects they want to support. In this case, the anonymous donor's big donation would be divided into small shares to match individual donations. I think the normal price of a charity share should be around $10 (but it should still be the individual donor's choice about whose matching donation is acceptable or not).
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
Why would Red Hat or Canonical donate anonymously? They both already public give financial support to GNOME ( https://www.gnome.org/foundation/ ) and pay developers to work on GNOME.
how about making a distribution that plays ALL multimedia files? we'd even pay for that, although it should be free like us hobbyists were? peace on stasians..
I'd be terrified that they'd spend it all on sweets and comic books. I would at least demand some old bugs to be fixed.
Another Trump fag with getting fucked up the ass on his mind again. #Prison is coming traitors
Look at what Gnome3 has done to fracture the user base.
Microsoft benefits from more changes in Gnome.
The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
... single-click becomes possible?
Come on folks, it's dumb to keep saying it can't be done right -- KDE has been doing it since eons!
I suspect the donation is by Microsoft or Apple, given the way Gnome3 has developed from Gnome2. There's also the increasing monolithic spread of systemd, and various other trends that I find "equally encouraging". Such as adaptations to facilitate running Linux as a subsystem under MSWindows.
I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
Talk tough baby girl, it still won't make the moans of your wife while the bull is in her bedroom go away.
that it's getting older and older, because it staunchly refuses to take cues from other systems and current UI design to stay modern. Instead it tries it hardest to preserve itself and be a Linux desktop for Linux users, rather than a modern system for all users.
I don't get it, what is it about the bloated white fatass carcass of America's biggest-ever traitor that appeals to you Trumpy faggots sexually? Is it the see-thru tennis shorts, the complete lack of athleticism? The treason?
Just remember to put the shotgun in your bitch mouth rather than under the chin. *(You GOP traitor faggots tend to have huge blubbery jowels.)
Oh, fuck. So, let's see, who would financially back the worst dev team in the linux world, one that does not care about users/usability etc as long as their ego is satisfied and is constantly putting obstacles in the linux world? My guess is someone not after the good of Linux.
Microsoft pledged the 1000000 dollars.
I assume this is not a tax deduction.
If you estimate the value of FOSS that has been given away, AND is in regular use in schools,business and gov't, then you quickly see that BILLIONS of unclaimed tax deductions have been foregone by a relatively small number of developers.
*** Charitable giving is only a useful tool for the rich. ***
Garfield the Cat
Trump fag about to get prison fucked, and there's nothing traitors like you can do about it. #Sad!
It will suck badly as usual
I hope 1M is enough to fix that mess. Successfully switching between user sessions is a matter of luck; Useful panel functionality is only provided through sometimes abandoned third party extensions; For anything other than the five-or-so options in the system settings you need to resort to something like a "tweak-tool"; Then there is the wildly unnecessary "swipe up screen" that get's in your way. All in all a very bad experience. I'm switching back to 16.04 for now.
ok, it was me.
I didn't realize how foul mouthed little girls sitting in moms basement could be, oh my! Get out your unicorn and give it a big hug......
Everything above is my opinion....YMMV
They should spend the money to hire "women in coding" advocates, preferably trannies of color with preference given to those without legal immigration status!
GNOME > Trump
Poop > Trump
These "anonymous" funds are just a money laundering operation by Gnome. They stole this from banks, and just need a way to make it legit. Pretty clever, I must say.
I'm not convinced even $1000000 could save that bag of bolts.... what a waste of money, better investing it in systemd alternatives....
I tried to disable the stupid swipe up to log in for a bit, then realized you could just start typing your password and it would log you in.
It's stupid as fuck, and everyone who came up with the idea, approved it, and implemented it should be shot.
Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
Being shot would be too gentle. It's time to break out the boats.
Here's some other deserving open-source projects where $2M would have a wider benefit to the Linux community than GNOME:
(in no particular order)
1. Linux Mint/Cinnamon
2. MATE
3. GIMP
4. Inkscape
5. Firefox
6. Scribus
7. XFCE
You're welcome.
Linux desktop is just never going to be anything but a waste of your precious time.
Like they say, a fool and his money are soon parted.
You are an idiot. We have been using far better WMs than Windows' shitty "explore" she'll for literally decades. Only an incompetent idiot would try to claim that Windows has a better desktop / WM than Gnome or KDE. In other words does Gnome suck compared to KDE? Absolutely. Does it suck compared to Windows? Give me a break. Windows is a toy OS with a WM that barely qualifies as an "also ran" in the race.
Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
That is ridiculous. Stay with the current release and switch to KDE.
Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
a company that sells Linux support as a business model? Redhat pushed systemd knowing it was untested and bad ideas so they could sell more support.
Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
You are an idiot, go back and read again. Nobody ever said Windows' window manager is superior nor does that have any impact on the desktop OS battle as evidenced by the fact that Windows 8's godawful shell still got more users than all the linux desktop distributions combined.
Said claim was made in the first two sentences. You truly are a precious fucking idiot.
Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
Wrong again. Are you dense or just completely retarded? The term "window manager" was not used in the post at all. The term "operating system" was used, an "operating system" is not a "window manager", the fact that you clearly do not even understand that makes you completely incapable of conversing on this topic you braindead fuckwit.
Only an incompetent idiot would try to claim that Windows has a better desktop / WM than Gnome or KDE.
While that is indeed subjective, GP does not appear to have made that claim. Whether WM 'sucks' is a matter of opinion but really across the board they are unlikely to be that bad that they cause a user to switch OSes entirely.
I'm sorry you are too stupid to understand what you read. I assume it is because you have no idea what a WM is, and don't realize that claiming the "desktop experience" is superior is, by definition, claiming the WM is superior.
Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
Holy shit, you are one phenomenally stupid fuckwit. It boggles the mind really.
Look, troll.
There are reasons to not like Gnome.
I don't, for one (I was with Gnome up to the beginnings of 2, back then). But it is free software, and there are alternatives.
So (a) deal with it or (b) change it -- or (c) use an alternative. But in all three cases, say THANKS, because it is a present, and it isn't forced upon you.
Good to see the comments are at the basic level of pre-pubescent teenagers. Go on say a swear word just to sound big!
They want Ubuntu to be nice and pretty before they completely take it over, I mean before Canonical IPO's Ubuntu for a short while and M$ just happens to want to buy one of the most popular Linux distributions out there. Maybe put their Azure bullshit on it. Canonical is M$'s bitch people.
I am a gnome 3 user since 2013. I have installed it on the computer of my (old) mother who lives far away. For remote administration, I use wakeonlan and x11vnc through a ssh tunnel. I often also connect remotely to my personal computer. This is already more complicated since 16.04 LTS. I wonder how gnome will again make my life more complicated with 18.04. Remote connection is a family of basic scenarios that should be clearly explained.
If I want to add support to a new file extension (like http://torvalds-family.blogspo...), where shall I start? Again a very weak documentation (or I have not found it).
The file indexer is a nightmare (I have a big disk with many small files (like git repositories). Nothing about how to mitigate this issue in the documentation.
I want to share the Document (and Image) directory of the main computer or the house with the 2 other ubuntu computers. What are the best solutions (I have setup nfs but everything is not smooth).
For basic usages (usages that were common and easier 20 years ago) of an advanced user, gnome introduces a level of abstraction that needs to be documented, otherwise, we have to find half working workarounds.
Phew!! Looks like I just saved myself 1M by entering a single apt-get install command into the terminal. Happy days!
With Google about to launch ChromeOS with significant improvements to Android app support and more importantly, new Linux application support (yes this includes Wine/Crossover) , the value of GTK/Gnome fitting easily (with some slight tweaks/code commits ) into the carefully managed material theme used throughout ChromeOS is worth the donation.
If a similar donation was made to Wayland, then I will be more confident in my assumption.
The way Gnome have managed one of the most loved and used DE out there from simple to use to be a fsking nightmare of usability and feature-cropping simply left you wonder why inject all that big money there?
Slashdot ya no es que lo era!
I did it as a drunken wager. What in holey hell did I do!?
See subject: It's highly configurable, pretty stable, & works + looks very pretty via Plasma OpenGL (2 or 3.1) display!
* I've liked it since the Linux kernel 2.2 days!
APK
P.S.=> It's good stuff & very easy to get used to... apk
man or woman
Just say "person" or some other gender neutral word, if you're going to do something as cumbersome as "man or woman". It's unnatural and very annoying. And not all people associate with being male or female. It's not a binary system.
I wouldn't think so-- you can look forward to more ego and "we know best" design decisions.
You can also look forward to the "mystery" leaking just when they've gotten addicted to the sugar.
"a shocking revelation"
No.
Try:
"announced"
This is not a shocking revelation.
Clickbait crap, written by/for children and kiddies.
Where, in this post do you see (or even infer) the terms "window manager" or "desktop experience"? I didn't write those words, I didn't imply those terms and I would be happy to clarify any misunderstanding you have about what I wrote because I do not disagree with your initial rebuttal. I do not believe that Windows' window manager is superior to Gnome or KDE at all, I agree with you on that which is why I did not write or imply what you seem to believe I did. Please point out where you think that was written or implied:
The Linux community has always been so poor at producing a decent desktop operating system that Microsoft has never really had to worry about them, Ballmer had a minor pooping of the pants moment and called Linux a cancer 15-odd years ago but really there was never any threat to Windows' desktop dominance from Linux. The most successful consumer-facing Linux operating systems have been those where a corporation stepped in, took charge and did it their way, GNU/Linux has been eclipsed on mobile and desktop by Android and ChromeOS which did in a very brief time what the hundreds of 'shit flung at the wall' distros produced by the community couldn't do in decades and have still failed to do now... if anything they are worse now thanks to things like systemd, gnome3, pulseaudio, mir, unity, etc... produced by the rampant NIH syndrome in the "community".
You can argue that some elements of the community have managed to finally cobble together a usable desktop OS in say, Mint, for example but it's an also-ran that isn't innovative and its success has been in copying the incumbents rather than adding real value through innovation which is why, relatively speaking, nobody uses it. As for mobile, a now very mature industry, there is nothing even close to usable. The usable FOSS community also-ran mobile OS is likely still at least a decade off.
Dude he buried you and you are just exposing what a complete ignoramus you are at this point
After using Gnome 3, I am addicted to it, as well as other Gnome tools. No KDE please!