Slashdot Mirror


Face Recognition Is Now Being Used In Schools (theintercept.com)

Presto Vivace shares a report from The Intercept: Officials at the Lockport, New York, school district have purchased face recognition technology as part of a purported effort to prevent school shootings. Starting in September, all 10 of Lockport District's school buildings, just north of Buffalo, will be outfitted with a surveillance system that can identify faces and objects. The software, known as Aegis, was developed by SN Technologies Corp., a Canadian biometrics firm that specifically advertises to schools. It can be used to alert officials to whenever sex offenders, suspended students, fired employees, suspected gang members, or anyone else placed on a school's "blacklist" enters the premises. Aegis also sends alerts any time one of the "top 10" most popular guns used in school shootings appears in view of a camera. The district is spending most of its recent $4 million state "Smart School" grant on these and other enhancements to its security systems, including bullet-proof greeter windows and a mass notification system, according to the Niagra Gazette. Slashdot reader Presto Vivace adds: "This is why municipal elections are so important. Just because this stuff is on the market, does not mean your local school system has to buy it."

The report notes that "all the major school shootings in the last five years in the U.S. have been carried out by current students or alumnae of the school in question." These students wouldn't have their face entered into the face recognition system's blacklist. Furthermore, "Most shooters don't brandish their guns before opening fire; and by the time they do, an object-detection algorithm that could specify the exact type of weapon they're firing would not be of much use," reports The Intercept. "... the technology would give a school, at best, only a few extra seconds in response time to a shooting."

11 of 206 comments (clear)

  1. Race to the bottom by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So we have to compete with China in creepiness?

    1. Re:Race to the bottom by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd rather accept some safety risks than have kids learn that total surveillance is acceptable.

    2. Re:Race to the bottom by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... or we could just make guns harder to buy. And stop encouraging copycats by not making mass shooters and their deeds part of the 24 hour news cycle. Also offer psych treatment for free and have employment policies that don't destroy families.

      You know, the way most civilised countries handle it. But, nooooo, we need our guns and our crappy private insurance system... because freedom.

    3. Re:Race to the bottom by Brett+Buck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More than that, the bastard at Parkland had raised *every possible red flag* and had been reported to the responsible authorities multiple times by multimple people - and they still did nothing. Now, you see an alumnus on a camera, and you are going to rush in with the SWAT team in a few tens of seconds? When you have no idea why he is there or what he plans?

    4. Re:Race to the bottom by fafalone · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well if you don't like it, amend or abolish the 2nd Amendment. Seriously, that's a good idea, do it.

      But in the mean time, people need to stop pretending that ignoring and gutting the intent of it doesn't lay the groundwork for even more gutting and ignoring of the other, more popular rights.

  2. Incredible Pranking Opportunity by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 5, Insightful

    any time one of the "top 10" most popular guns

    That is going to be a lot of fun for the kids. Better than eating tide pods. "Trigger the cams!"

    The coolest kids will be the ones who figure out the most clever ways of triggering the system.

    1. Re:Incredible Pranking Opportunity by fafalone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Since a school suspended a 2nd grader just for chewing his poptart into the shape of a gun, an absurd decision upheld in court, I can't imagine anything that would confuse the recognition would end up well for the student. It's the world of Zero Tolerance [for common sense].

  3. Band-Aid solution... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If someone is inside the school with a gun, it's too damn late. Want to fix school shootings? Put a waiting period on all gun purchases to allow the mentally ill to "cool off." Stop publicizing the names and activities of school shooters. Publicity encourages copycats -- this is a well-known phenomenon with suicides as well. And God forbid people have access to free mental health care, and we enact policies like limits on working hours and vacation time that actually keep family support networks together vs driving them apart. But nooooo ... we have our FREEDOM in America.

  4. Re:this is another example of why we don't have by markdavis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >"If we ban assault weapons and high capacity magazines, as they have done in Australia, we could protect school children and the rest of us."

    You are 100% wrong. The last school murdering, in Texas was done with a revolver, a shotgun, and [not deployed] bombs.

    1) Was it an "assault revolver"? No. Revolvers typically hold ONLY 6 rounds and have been around for hundreds of years. They have ZERO magazines.

    2) Was it an "assault shotgun"? No. Again, been around forever, typically hold only 2 to 5 rounds, and have ZERO magazines.

    3) Bombs are not guns. By the way, "assault cars" and vans are not guns. Knives are not guns. Gasoline, axes, bowes, pressure cookers, etc are all not guns.

    The problem is not simple. It isn't guns in the hands of good people, which is often the only thing that keeps things in check AND it is the only real thing that additional gun control affects the most. The problems are:

    1) Untreated mental health problems

    2) Way too much media coverage and sensationalism that causes copy-cating.

    3) Unarmed trained guards and unarmed trained staff that can't do anything about murder sprees until it is too late. There is often to the point of almost always zero armed resistance. And there is zero deterrence, due to the same reason.

    4) Insecure facilities with too many uncontrolled entrances and lack of defenses.

    5) Underenforced EXISTING laws. It is already illegal to sell guns of any type or capacity to the mentally ill or felons. It is already illegal to buy or possess guns of any type or capacity by the mentally ill or felons.

    6) This one is controversial and not proven yet, but possibly putting way too many children/teens on psychotropic drugs and without enough careful monitoring of their use.

    7) Lack of child supervision, teaching morality (in whatever form that takes), involvement in their lives, and true caring by their parent(s). Lack of holding children responsible for what they do (with real consequences) and preparing them to be adults.

    There are probably some others, but I think those are the main factors. Despite the sensationalism, school murders are still very, very rare when you look at all the data. Kids are far, far, far more likely to die of dozens of other things than a "mass shooting". And there is no way to have a free society without some amount of risk.

  5. Re: this is another example of why we don't have by bestweasel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You forgot
    8) A society awash with guns and too many people who value them above others' lives.

    Funny how it's only the US which specializes in gun massacres. Must be more of that American exceptionalism.

  6. Re:*facepalms* by 6Yankee · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We could do something about school shootings, or we could sell guns AND surveillance systems AND clear backpacks.

    We could do something about obesity, or we could sell Twinkies AND mobility scooters AND healthcare.

    For every problem, a profit. Solving the problems means removing the profit, and that's Communist. You're not a Communist, are you, son?