Slashdot Mirror


Why No One Answers Their Phone Anymore (theatlantic.com)

An anonymous reader shares an excerpt from a report via The Atlantic, written by Alexis C. Madrigal: No one picks up the phone anymore. Even many businesses do everything they can to avoid picking up the phone. Of the 50 or so calls I received in the last month, I might have picked up four or five times. The reflex of answering -- built so deeply into people who grew up in 20th-century telephonic culture -- is gone. There are many reasons for the slow erosion of this commons. The most important aspect is structural: There are simply more communication options. Text messaging and its associated multimedia variations are rich and wonderful: words mixed with emoji, Bitmoji, reaction gifs, regular old photos, video, links. Texting is fun, lightly asynchronous, and possible to do with many people simultaneously. It's almost as immediate as a phone call, but not quite. You've got your Twitter, your Facebook, your work Slack, your email, FaceTimes incoming from family members. So many little dings have begun to make the rings obsolete.

But in the last couple years, there is a more specific reason for eyeing my phone's ring warily. Perhaps 80 or even 90 percent of the calls coming into my phone are spam of one kind or another. [...] There are unsolicited telemarketing calls. There are straight-up robocalls that merely deliver recorded messages. There are the cyborg telemarketers, who sit in call centers playing prerecorded bits of audio to simulate a conversation. There are the spam phone calls, whose sole purpose seems to be verifying that your phone number is real and working.

12 of 429 comments (clear)

  1. I don't understand why you tolerate it by VMaN · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just don't understand how you can have spam calls like that and be ok with it. Is it an american thing?
    Do people think that proper laws to outlaw that behaviour is some sort of free speech issue?

    1. Re:I don't understand why you tolerate it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I just don't understand how you can have spam calls like that and be ok with it.

      We DO have laws against these sorts of spam calls in the US. We also have laws against people sending email spam too. Actually managing to enforce these laws is a different matter entirely.

      Is it an american thing? Do people think that proper laws to outlaw that behaviour is some sort of free speech issue?

      Umm, what? Criminals are going to break the law...that's what criminals do. The problem is enforcement of the laws that already exist.

    2. Re:I don't understand why you tolerate it by VMaN · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > We DO have laws against these sorts of spam calls in the US. We also have laws against people sending email spam too. Actually managing to enforce these laws is a different matter entirely.

      No, it's really easy when it comes to phone calls - Got an illegal spam call? Report and person gets a hefty fine. Can't identify caller? Move punishment to the company that provides the call. Done.
      There is no reason for someone dialling YOU to be anonymous to your telcom provider.
      And no, there is no reason to make exceptions for any category of calls, be it political or non-profit.

    3. Re:I don't understand why you tolerate it by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > We DO have laws against these sorts of spam calls in the US. We also have laws against people sending email spam too. Actually managing to enforce these laws is a different matter entirely.

      No, it's really easy when it comes to phone calls - Got an illegal spam call? Report and person gets a hefty fine. Can't identify caller? Move punishment to the company that provides the call. Done. There is no reason for someone dialling YOU to be anonymous to your telcom provider. And no, there is no reason to make exceptions for any category of calls, be it political or non-profit.

      That would work real well when it is sone off shore call center using VOIP and spoofing phone numbers. Spammers / scammers seem to like to use the same area code and first 3 digits to make calls appear local. My solution is to simply let al calls go to voicemail unless I recognize the caller. I get very few spam voicemails.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    4. Re:I don't understand why you tolerate it by hawguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > We DO have laws against these sorts of spam calls in the US. We also have laws against people sending email spam too. Actually managing to enforce these laws is a different matter entirely.

      No, it's really easy when it comes to phone calls - Got an illegal spam call? Report and person gets a hefty fine. Can't identify caller? Move punishment to the company that provides the call. Done.
      There is no reason for someone dialling YOU to be anonymous to your telcom provider.
      And no, there is no reason to make exceptions for any category of calls, be it political or non-profit.

      Aside from the political and charity calls, the vast majority of the remainder are from call center operations outside of US jurisdiction. The operate from Canada, India, etc .. any where with good internet connectivity ( VoIP service ) and simple pick currently unassigned phone numbers to spoof (some of the really evil ones
      will use the number they are calling for the caller id).

      So what you have is a situation with many, many technical workarounds and very little legal recourse. There isn't an international treaty that bans unsolicited phone calls , just like their isn't on that bans unsolicited email. Its all local or national which is simply avoided by working from outside the jurisdiction.

      If the telcos were on the hook for unidentified spam callers, they'd wouldn't allow it to be so easy to spoof caller iD.

    5. Re: I don't understand why you tolerate it by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As others have pointed out how would you punish a company overseas? They are beyond jurisdiction of your country's laws.

      Solution: Don't allow non-conforming companies to connect to the American telecom network.

      Why should MY phone company (T-Mobile) be allowed to let a foreign company connect to their network and spoof a LOCAL number?

      If T-Mobile pays a fine every time that happens, they will find a technical solution really quickly.

    6. Re:I don't understand why you tolerate it by Notabadguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The skies the limit, here; this is a sport with few rules.

      It is a sport that most of us don't want to play.

    7. Re:I don't understand why you tolerate it by dcw3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yup, the only real issue is the reluctance to hold the telecoms accountable.

      Ya, but I'm sure Ajit Pai will get right on that. :-)

      As much as I'd like to string up that jackass, the FTC, not the FCC is who runs the national do not call list.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  2. The phone companies could fix this! by MikeDataLink · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I never answer calls anymore. 95% of the calls I get are scammers and spammers. And the caller ID is always spoofed to something that looks similar to my own number.

    I've even had people call me claiming my number is spamming them!

    The phone companies should be held liable for not fixing caller ID spoofing. There are numerous ways to do this. Caller ID spoofing is needed for corporate main numbers and the like. Those could be registered just like SSL certs. There is no reason a random device should be allowed to spoof.

    --
    Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
  3. It's because we have a choice by ErichTheRed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm older (43) and still tend to answer the phone. But, one thing I do see is that people who don't like talking to people feel they don't have to anymore. There's other non-voice options.

    This is especially true in workplaces, where the younger crowd is finally starting to reach the supervisory levels. In tech shops it's all Slack, Teams, IM of one form or another, texting, etc. I actually find myself preferring this, even though I know it's not normal.

    I'm not an antisocial nerd, but I'm also not a type-A salesy extrovert either. Talking to people on the phone means uncomfortable small talk, having to manage the conversation, etc. Sending a to-the-point message is much more useful to me. I know extroverts probably love the small talk aspect, but it's something I can live without if I can get my information without it.

  4. Texting? by jenningsthecat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Texting is fun, lightly asynchronous, and possible to do with many people simultaneously.

    I find texting to be a distracting pain in the ass, and if a text thread goes beyond a few messaged in the space of an hour, I'm either placing a call or dropping the thread. Texting is a thoroughly inefficient way of communicating when compared with two-way speech, even if you don't consider that it's WAY harder to text and do something else than it is to talk and do something else.

    ... words mixed with emoji, Bitmoji, reaction gifs ...

    I hate those damned things - they're un-subtle, annoying, tacky, and cheesy. Fortunately, I only get stuck with Emoji - I had to look up the other two for this comment. And if THEY start showing up, I'm going back to a flip phone.

    Texting definitely has its uses, and I appreciate what it brought to the party; but it is in NO WAY a substitute for talking, and any graphic elements beyond specific and personal pictures and videos are the ugly garden trolls and velvet paintings of the smartphone world. Now get off of my lawn, dammit!

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  5. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion