Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire Coding Site GitHub (bloomberg.com)

Bloomberg reports:
Microsoft Corp. has agreed to acquire GitHub Inc., the code repository company popular with many software developers, and could announce the deal as soon as Monday, according to people familiar with the matter. GitHub preferred selling the company to going public and chose Microsoft partially because it was impressed by Chief Executive Officer Satya Nadella, said one of the people, who asked not to be identified discussing private information. Terms of the agreement weren't known on Sunday. GitHub was last valued at $2 billion in 2015.

GitHub is an essential tool for coders. Many corporations, including Microsoft and Alphabet Inc.'s Google, use GitHub to store their corporate code and to collaborate. It's also a social network of sorts for developers. While GitHub's losses have been significant -- it lost $66 million over three quarters in 2016 -- it had revenue of $98 million in nine months of that year.

On Friday, it was reported that Microsoft was in talks with GitHub about an acquisition. Now it seems like it's actually happening.

Update: Our sister site, SourceForge, has weighed in. Here is a tool that will import your GitHub project to SourceForge.
Update #2: Already, we are seeing plenty of backlash over this news. One user has started a petition to stop Microsoft from buying GitHub.
Update #3: It's official. Microsoft has acquired GitHub for a whopping sum of $7.5B.

3 of 323 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Why are unprofitable companies worth so much? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It remains to be seen how much Microsoft has paid for GitHub, but why pay anything if they're unprofitable

    The classic Economics answer, is that you believe that it is unprofitable because it is poorly managed, and that you can do a better job of managing it to profitability. This usually means that you can integrate it with your existing businesses, streamline, and cut a lot of costs. This also usually includes massive layoffs at the purchased company, accompanied by folks jumping ship to look elsewhere for a job, before they are eventually fired.

    IBM's ThinkPad business was unprofitable when Lenovo bought it. Lenovo turned it around into profitability.

    Of course, there are often other ulterior motives. Microsoft bought Nokia because they thought Nokia built hardware would help Windows Phone be a success.

    Microsoft was wrong. So they did what any other rational investor would do . . . cut your losses and let it die.

    We'll see in about a year what Github's fate is . . . profitability . . . or death . . .

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  2. Re:Bwahahaahahah by whipslash · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Completely different owners did that. We got rid of all that nonsense.

  3. Re:Well tat certainly explains this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What's the business model, inquiring minds want to know?

    How long until you need a microsoft account to use github?

    How long until commercial customers also need to subscribe to Office 365?

    Given other activity by Microsoft, I wonder if Software Freedom Conservancy needs to step in and protect the Git mark.

    (https://www.git-scm.com/about/trademark section 2.3)