Slashdot Mirror


American Tech Giants Are Making Life Tough For Startups (economist.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Economist: Venture capitalists, such as Albert Wenger of Union Square Ventures, who was an early investor in Twitter, now talk of a "kill-zone" around the giants. Once a young firm enters, it can be extremely difficult to survive. Tech giants try to squash startups by copying them, or they pay to scoop them up early to eliminate a threat. The idea of a kill-zone may bring to mind Microsoft's long reign in the 1990s, as it embraced a strategy of "embrace, extend and extinguish" and tried to intimidate startups from entering its domain. But entrepreneurs' and venture capitalists' concerns are striking because for a long while afterwards, startups had free rein. [...] Venture capitalists are wary of backing startups in online search, social media, mobile and e-commerce. It has become harder for startups to secure a first financing round. According to Pitchbook, a research company, in 2017 the number of these rounds were down by around 22% from 2012 (see chart).

The wariness comes from seeing what happens to startups when they enter the kill-zone, either deliberately or accidentally. Snap is the most prominent example; after Snap rebuffed Facebook's attempts to buy the firm in 2013, for $3 billion, Facebook cloned many of its successful features and has put a damper on its growth. A less known example is Life on Air, which launched Meerkat, a live video-streaming app, in 2015. It was obliterated when Twitter acquired and promoted a competing app, Periscope. Life on Air shut Meerkat down and launched a different app, called Houseparty, which offered group video chats. This briefly gained prominence, but was then copied by Facebook, seizing users and attention away from the startup.
The Economist goes on to state three reasons why the kill-zone is likely to stay: "First, the giants have tons of data to identify emerging rivals faster than ever before. Recruiting is a second tool the giants will use to enforce their kill zones. A third reason that startups may struggle to break through is that there is no sign of a new platform emerging which could disrupt the incumbents, even more than a decade after the rise of mobile."

2 of 142 comments (clear)

  1. Re: The next disruption will be distributed. by Wycliffe · · Score: 3, Informative

    A distributed Facebook is basically a fancy RSS feed - each user hosts their own profile on their own host. There is no need for advertising, and people who are pushing advertising into their feed for others to see can be unfollowed for the social menace they are.

    Back in the real world, the average non-geek is never going to "host their own profile on their own host" and without advertising or some other form of revenue, there is no way for a startup to compete with the cash cow that is facebook.

  2. Perhaps China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The disruptors are happening, but they are not in the US. China, India, and other countries have their own companies, backed by the government that are breaking ground. For example, Taobao and Single's Day made more revenue than the Christmas holidays. Alibaba, Tencent, and Yandex are booming, while Google is still begging to be let into the party.