Slashdot Mirror


An Average Earth Day Used To Be Less Than 19 Hours Long (theguardian.com)

Scientists have determined that some 1.4 billion years ago, an Earth day -- that is, a full rotation around its axis -- took 18 hours and 41 minutes, rather than the familiar 24 hours. The Guardian reports: According to fresh calculations, a day on Earth was a full five hours and fifteen minutes shorter a billion or so years ago, well before complex life spread around the planet. Scientists used a combination of astronomical theory and geochemical signatures buried in ancient rocks to show that 1.4bn years ago the Earth turned a full revolution on its axis every 18 hours and 41 minutes. The number means that, on average, the length of the day on Earth has grown by approximately one 74 thousandth of a second per year since Precambrian times, a trend that is expected to continue for millions, if not billions, of years more.

7 of 113 comments (clear)

  1. I'll get more time to do things eventually by ranton · · Score: 3, Funny

    So I just have to wait a few hundred million years for those extra hours each day I have been wanting? Sweet.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    1. Re:I'll get more time to do things eventually by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 5, Funny

      What causes the earth to slow down in its rotation?

      Project update meetings.

  2. Re:Moon by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As long as the sun remains approximately the same mass, it should have no significant effect on the gravity felt by Earth at this distance.

    Of course the sun IS losing mass, both by converting mass to energy in nuclear reactions and through boiling off particles into the solar wind.

    And the Earth also experiences an influence on spin from the sun. If the sun survived long enough, Earth would become tidally locked to the sun - with a single rotation lasting an Earth year and the same side of the planet always facing the sun... the same way the same side of the moon always faces Earth. Earth is far enough away from the sun that the sun will die before this occurs. Mercury is close to the sun and is tidally locked. Venus is closer but has a bizarre backwards slow spin, the cause of I don't think is well understood.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  3. civilization in stasis by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Funny

    So in order to preserve the traditional 24 hour day that is the foundation of our society and culture, we must destroy the Moon.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  4. Slashdot doesn't even know how long a day is... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Informative

    Scientists have determined that some 1.4 billion years ago, an Earth day -- that is, a full rotation around its axis -- took 18 hours and 41 minutes, rather than the familiar 24 hours.

    If you're going to go so far as to specify "a full rotation around its axis" - a sidereal day - then you should know that that does not currently take 24 hours. It takes 23 hours and 56 minutes (and 4 seconds).

    The article gets it right when it says:

    According to fresh calculations, a day on Earth was a full five hours and fifteen minutes shorter

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  5. Summary Ignores the Subject of the Article by careysub · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article (which you can download with Sci-Hub) is not about the length of Earth's day, although it does produce a new and more accurate estimate of it at early epochs on Earth. The paper is really about the Milankovitch Cycle that controls climate on a ~22,000 year time scale which be evident if TFS bothered to include the paper's title Proterozoic Milankovitch cycles and the history of the solar system.

    The main purpose of the study was to use geological data to construct the Milankovitch cycle going back more than a billion years.

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  6. nothing new here by u19925 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Using the ancient paintings of eclipses and comparing with the predictions using Newton's laws of motions shows some discrepancy. If this is assumed due to shift of moon than conservation of angular momentum implies drifting of moon of 3 cm/yr. This was known for over a century ago. Using this knowledge and doing back of the envelope calculations game me almost same results. So there is nothing new here.