Slashdot Mirror


Linux Foundation Celebrates Microsoft's GitHub Acquisition (theverge.com)

The Linux Foundation has endorsed Microsoft's acquisition of GitHub. In a blog post, Jim Zemlin, the executive director at the Linux Foundation, said: "This is pretty good news for the world of Open Source and we should celebrate Microsoft's smart move." The Verge reports: 10 years ago, Zemlin was calling for Microsoft to stop secretly attacking Linux by selling patents that targeted the operating system, and he also poked fun at Microsoft multiple times over the years. "I will own responsibility for some of that as I spent a good part of my career at the Linux Foundation poking fun at Microsoft (which, at times, prior management made way too easy)," explains Zemlin. "But times have changed and it's time to recognize that we have all grown up -- the industry, the open source community, even me." Nat Friedman, the future CEO of GitHub (once the deal closes), took to Reddit to answer questions on the company's plans. "We are not buying GitHub to turn it into Microsoft; we are buying GitHub because we believe in the importance of developers, and in GitHub's unique role in the developer community," explains Friedman. "Our goal is to help GitHub be better at being GitHub, and if anything, to help Microsoft be a little more like GitHub."

5 of 162 comments (clear)

  1. I'll just leave this here... by svanheulen · · Score: 5, Informative
  2. Re:oh yeah, i always celebreate when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Microsoft still demands pay from linux and android for "stolen" microsoft code and they are getting paid per sold unit

  3. Re:Big business has eaten FOSS by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  4. Re:oh yeah, i always celebreate when... by andydread · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can appreciate your concern, since the recent history with Skype and some other acquisitions left a bit of a bad taste, but this article from ArsTechnica suggests that Microsoft might have been the best option:

    https://arstechnica.com/gadget...

    The Microsoft of today is not the same Microsoft as in the days of Ballmer and Gates. While Microsoft certainly has as big focus on the corporate world, its open source portfolio is bigger by the day. In many ways pigs are flying.

    Are you not aware that Microsoft is still currently "licensing" software patents on devices distributed with the Linux kernel?

    Yes... It goes like this... You build a new device and start distributing it with the Linux kernel installed.
    Microsoft approaches you and says your device violates 200+ Microsoft software patents because it runs Linux.
    You now have to pay Microsoft money for a software patent license for every device you distribute because you are building and distributing devices that include the Linux kernel which they say violates their software patents.

    It's a very sleazy extortion scheme designed to stifle Linux and open source in the marketplace.