Slashdot Mirror


Bitcoin Tumbles Most in Two Weeks Amid South Korea Hack (bloomberg.com)

Bitcoin extended losses for a third day, tumbling as much as 6 percent Sunday as South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Coinrail said there was a "cyber intrusion" in its system. From a report: The largest cryptocurrency declined 4.6 percent to $7,277 as of 10 a.m. time, the biggest drop since May 23, according to data compiled by Bloomberg from Bitstamp pricing. That widens Bitcoin's losses for the year to 49 percent. Peer cryptocurrencies Ethereum and Ripple fell 5 percent and 6.6 percent, respectively.

87 comments

  1. People are still buying bitcoins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That shark was jumped in 2017

  2. No, few people are, thus dropping half its value by raymorris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nope, few people are buying Bitcoin anymore. That's why the value has dropped in half in the last six months.

  3. Bit-corns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The world is simply a better place because of PedoPesos!!!!

  4. In before by ArchieBunker · · Score: 0

    neck beards compare bitcoins to tulips.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:In before by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Forget claiming they are like tulips, cryptocurrencies are worse than tulips. You can plant a tulip and it can reproduce with no additional effort. Cryptocurrencies and their network have to be maintained with other resources. Not only that but 51% attacks actually happen so your cryptocurrency may just vanish one day.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    2. Re:In before by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 0
      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re: In before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess we know where Archie "invested" his savings.

    4. Re:In before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, just for the benefit of mods, my previous post is based on his considerable posting history and not the one line message above, although that message does sum-up his air of superior idiocy quite well.

    5. Re:In before by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      You better calm down before that mighty fedora topples from your head. You totally failed at reading comprehension. My whole point is they aren't alike but neck beards like yourself always bring up the tulip market when bitcoins are mentioned. You seem to be projecting a lot of inadequacies from your own life onto mine. Funny you mention normal intelligence when you can't even understand my comment.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    6. Re: In before by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      You don't make money by in crypto by dumping in money and waiting. You might as well pay the lottery. You make money by setting up buy and sell points. No different than day trading stocks.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    7. Re: In before by denis.goddard · · Score: 1

      Only PoW crypto is susceptible to 51% attacks. Ripple, for example, is not.

    8. Re:In before by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "My whole point is they aren't alike but neck beards like yourself always bring up the tulip market when bitcoins are mentioned."

      Meanwhile, those of us with actual stock market experience AND those that possess knowledge of history know that they are very, very much alike.

      People like you who don't see the similarities are the reason for its proliferation.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    9. Re: In before by LordKronos · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope, Ripple is only susceptible to something MUCH stupider.

      The whole bitcoin craze was quite pointless IMHO, but at least they thought they were solving some problem...namely eliminating the need to trust in a government fiat currency and banking system and it's inherent downsides (inflation, stability, vulnerability to government confiscation, bank failure which is only partially mitigated by FDIC for people with large balances, etc).

      But now with Ripple, the whole design is founded on having trust in a "bank" who holds your value. If that bank is deemed not trustworthy, then your dollar equivalent worth of Ripples isn't even equivalent to a dollar anymore. Thus we have the downsides of a banking system, without the benefit of FDIC to insure your value, government regulation to keep the Ripple banks accountable, or the decades of actual use to help expose the flaws in the system.

      So no, you aren't vulnerable to 51% attacks, just single-entity attacks. Yeah, so much better.

    10. Re:In before by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Can tulips be exchanged for goods and services?

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    11. Re:In before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for proving my point about you, fucktard.

      Now get back to your incel meeting.

    12. Re:In before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My god you're stupid.

      Tulips are a good, so of course they can be. Just last fall I exchanged some money for tulips too. Now that they're blooming, they are definitely something of tangible value.

      Just go fuck off and die.

    13. Re:In before by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Give a woman a really pretty tulip, you might get laid. Perhaps if you left your desk and went outside, you'd know this.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    14. Re: In before by mikeabbott420 · · Score: 1

      the bigger idiot theory vs. the buy and hold theory

      --
      This program was made possible by a grant from the Ultra-Humanite, and viewers like you.
    15. Re:In before by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting on stores that take tulips as payments. Why are you so angry anyhow? I'm going to comment more now that I know it pisses you off so much.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    16. Re:In before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idk man, maybe you have some insight to share. Anything's possible. It's hard to tell from "neckbeardz!!!!" posts, though.

    17. Re: In before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iâ(TM)m waiting for most legit stores to take bit

    18. Re:In before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you ignorant fool, you don't; seem to know the difference between the 17th and 21st centuries. Doesn't really surprise me given how stupid you are.

      Tulips were more liquid in the time you're talking about than bitcoin is today. Very few stores or people will accept bitcoin, many that used to have stopped because of the volatility. A tulip exchange was much cheaper and easier to use in its day than a bitcoin exchange is today.

  5. Not news. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 3, Informative

    All widely traded cryptocurrencies have been trending downward since the crazy peak last December. There have been multiple larger events where values dropped precipitously without definable causes. Bitcoin and it's associated cryptocurrencies are a racket wherein people want to get rich by merely transferring money from others to themselves. There is no investment behind purchasing, it's all just taking.

    Tell me when it really crashes and who's left holding the bag. Until then, shut up with this crap.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Not news. by MikeDataLink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All widely traded cryptocurrencies have been trending downward since the crazy peak last December. There have been multiple larger events where values dropped precipitously without definable causes. Bitcoin and it's associated cryptocurrencies are a racket wherein people want to get rich by merely transferring money from others to themselves. There is no investment behind purchasing, it's all just taking.

      Tell me when it really crashes and who's left holding the bag. Until then, shut up with this crap.

      Replace Bitcoin with "Precious Metals (Bullion)". Investments are risky. Don't invest if you don't know how to. Don't invest what you can't afford to lose. People don't get rich without taking educated risks.

      --
      Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
    2. Re:Not news. by symes · · Score: 3, Informative

      Are you comparing rare elements dug out of the Earth with bitcoin? One has limited supply, the other is unlimited. When it gets too difficult to mine one coin, just go and invent a new one. When you've dug all the gold out of the Earth then that is that.

    3. Re:Not news. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

      Replace Bitcoin with "Precious Metals (Bullion)".

      Wrong. Most precious metals are actually useful, so they have real value. Gold and silver are great conductors which copper can be used for a magnitude of things. Even platinum is useful because it's biocompatible. Matter is a real thing but numbers are conceptual.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    4. Re:Not news. by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      None of what you describe are investments. You are talking about speculation.

    5. Re:Not news. by rgmoore · · Score: 4, Informative

      The difference between precious metals and cryptocurrencies is that precious metals have some practical uses. Apart from their use in jewelry- which in many cases is ultimately a form of bullion- they have industrial uses. Admittedly, those uses alone would result in a lower price than the current one, but they do provide some kind of absolute price floor. In contrast, cryptocurrencies have no use except as a medium of exchange, and their price will fall to zero if people decide to stop using them that way.

      And yes, you can say something similar about any fiat currency, too; there's no inherent value to dollars, euros, or yen. The practical difference there is that governments demand you use their currencies to pay taxes, which provides a real world use for them that isn't going away any time soon.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    6. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While everything you said is true, bitcoin does have a sort of price floor to it. In order to drop to zero, everyone would have to abandon it simultaneously. Otherwise, after the first group abandons it, the price would drop to a point where mining is unprofitable. Then with no one mining, losses (forgot wallet key, etc.) slowly push the price back up. It should not normally be possible for the bitcoin price to fall below the cost of electricity used to mine it, except very briefly.

      There's also the difficulty calculation. The difficulty is targeted for, IIRC, ten minutes. If enough miners leave, the difficulty will actually adjust downward rather than upward, to encourage them to rejoin. So despite being backed by nothing, the system has a lot of engineered stability to it that has kept it from ever going to zero all these years.

      (I do not own bitcoin and have never owned any bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies.)

    7. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies do have a use for them that other means can't match - crime. Especially ransomware.

      The original bitcoin explosion occurred when organised crime figured out that it's a great way to pass value undetected from victims to ransomers. There was just enough innocent traffic to mask the transfers***, and every victim allows a new ransomer to redeem his coupons. After that, other users like launderers and North Korea came in... So bitcoin does have a floor. Mind you, the floor is a good reason to ban bitcoin.

      *** But every transfer is logged! Not a problem with mixers and exchanges.

    8. Re:Not news. by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      So what do you keep your assets in that you won't lose them in? Banknotes are guaranteed to go to zero over time. Bank accounts and stocks have been wiped out many times over the US history. Even real estate has been demonstrated as a risk investment recently.

      Gold and silver on the other hand have as much buying power today as they did 100, 1000, and 5000 years ago. The thing you don't seem to get is that precious metals are not an "investment" to make a profit. They are a store of value designed to protect wealth, not generate it. So the people who compare bitcoin to precious metal and then call either an investment really have no idea what they are talking about.

    9. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It crashed today, and I'm now HODL'ing the bag.

    10. Re:Not news. by rgmoore · · Score: 2

      There was just enough innocent traffic to mask the transfers***

      This is the key, though. The criminal uses of cryptocurrency depend on there being enough legitimate uses to provide effective cover. If those legitimate uses dry up, the cover is blown. If only criminals use cryptocurrency, then using cryptocurrency is enough to get the police to investigate you.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    11. Re:Not news. by MikeDataLink · · Score: 2

      None of what you describe are investments. You are talking about speculation.

      You are correct. The point I was trying to make is that we speculate on many things. Gold, natural gas, oil, etc. No one gets up in arms over speculation on those things (well some do, but you get the point).

      --
      Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
    12. Re:Not news. by Khyber · · Score: 2

      "There have been multiple larger events where values dropped precipitously without definable causes."

      Anyone that actually watched the buy/sell/hold orders during those times knew exactly what was going on - pumping and dumping from China and South Korea.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    13. Re:Not news. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Investing is speculating, or more appropriately hypothesizing since you're working with available evidence instead of just making a guess out of thin air.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    14. Re:Not news. by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      This is like saying that once all the gold and silver dries up, we can just switch to bottlecaps. It doesn't work this way. Something is only valuable if people give it value. Sure you can start a new coin, but if people don't give it value then it's worthless.

    15. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, I'd argue the criminal uses rely on governments being too stupid or not caring enough to crack down on criminal uses of BitCoin/etc. e.g. when you have a "mixer" for fiat currency, it's called money laundering. For some reason, the US government doesn't care when you launder BTC. With a transaction log, it's trivial to determine if BTC is stolen or not. With other goods, possession of stolen goods is sufficient for charges to be brought. But no one gets charged with possession of stolen BTC.

    16. Re:Not news. by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      Tell me when it really crashes and who's left holding the bag.

      "You are . . . Number 6 . . ."

      This will be just like the sub-prime mortgages bust:

      The folks who bought houses way beyond their means couldn't bail it out. They were flat broke.

      The rich banks and bankers couldn't bail it out. They were "Too Big To Fail". That would have expanded the financial crisis.

      So . . . I guess that left the taxpayers . . . who had nothing to do with the sub-prime loan shenanigans . . . to bail it out.

      So . . . who will bail out the mess left by a Bitcoin Bubble Burst . . . ?

      The Bitcoin speculators will have no money. They won't be able to bail it out.

      The banks and bank speculators who have been messing with Bitcoin quietly are still "Too Big To Fail" . . .

      . . . so I guess that leaves the taxpayers . . . who have not speculated with Bitcoin . . .

      The old-time government birthday party game:

      "Pin the bill, on the taxpayers!"

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    17. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All investments contain risk factors. CD's are relatively risk free compared to trading volatile stocks in the market.

      "Banknotes are guaranteed to go to zero over time"
      And everybody is going to die sometime. Does that mean we should do nothing because everything you do will fade in the future. And the Federal government created the FDIC to add some measure of protection for a persons qualifying bank account. I believe the FDIC provides up to $250,000 if your accounts are lost due to bank mismanagement.

      "Even real estate has been demonstrated as a risk investment recently."
      Real estate investments have always carried a fair amount of risk. Even if real estate prices decline a smart investor will wait until the prices hit bottom and buy every piece of real estate they can. When the real estate market rebounds your investment portfolio can start providing a ROI. A homeowner who sees the price of his house declining is not a reason to panic. Most homes are mortgaged for 15 to 30 years. There is time to ride out the price fluctuations. If the house value declines they will see an immediate reduction in the amount of real estate taxes collected by their state, county, or parish.

      "Gold and silver on the other hand have as much buying power today as they did 100, 1000, and 5000 years ago"

      No. The value of gold and other precious metals fluctuates just like all the other investments. The US currency use to be pegged to the price of Gold until President Nixon. If advantageous the US could revert back to pegging the US Dollar based on the price of Gold and sometime Silver.

    18. Re:Not news. by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      Problem with the floor value, is that Bitcoin (and derivatives) are susceptible to 51% mining attacks. If you have bitcoin, and can double the processing (or take over some of it) current to bitcoin, you can double or tripple spend their coins. So if mining drops significantly, Bitcoin cannot then be trusted for any high value transaction that has any anonymity to it, unless some regulatory and authority comes into bitcoin.

      If bitcoin ever drops from being the top coin, it's value quickly goes to 0. If you can build and sustain a profitable network mining the other coins, then anytime you want to steel some bitcoin switch all of the machines over for a few hours and clean out an exchanges, repeat later.

      Only if Bitcoin is regulated could it survive then.

    19. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but precious metals have actual intrinsic value, we can bludgeon your head with some, for example, or thousands of other uses. With bitcoin, all we can do is waste electricity.

    20. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because noone anticipated laundering money by converting it to monopoly money lol, it's almost impossible to do anything about it this way if a large group of people agree that some token has value, you can try to regulate it, but now you're going against the will of the people, better be careful if youre in politics

    21. Re:Not news. by sjames · · Score: 1

      In fact, if nobody is mining it, it becomes impossible to transact in it at all. The process of mining is what commits transactions to the blockchain.

      The number of miners has to be sufficient that no individual or group has the ability to decide what transactions become part of the blockchain and which ones don't (a 51% attack).

    22. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lack of 'innocent' transactions used to be an issue when bitcoin was starting up. I don't think that would be a problem anymore.

      By now, BitCoin etc. is sufficiently well-known so that organized crime can set up the 'innocent' transfers themselves and look legitimate. It's also a nice way to transfer value for rich, well-connected people who would pay more to taxes than the transfer charges. Note also that ransomware victims buying and selling bitcoins is technically legitimate (there's no reporting duty here, one can always pretend they were hacked). So they'll always be sufficient cover here.

    23. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are two investment options that never go bad. As the esteemed Dr. Zoidberg chose, the sandwich heavy portfolio is great in the near term. In the long term, as Bender Bending Rodriguez might say:
      I've got one word for you.
      Pyramids.

      Pyramids, unlike sandwiches, last thousands of years after you. The clear winner for a long term strategy.

    24. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Demand leads. Supply follows. That is, in those timelines where bitcoin died, transaction rate went to zero first, mining followed to zero behind it. Never the other way around.

      A 51% attack required buying and selling coins. You couldn't do it when there was no one at the other end of your transactions. Furthermore, after your double-spent you were left with coins in a dead currency, and didn't have any way to cash out. What was your motive?

    25. Re: Not news. by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      Cryptocurrency has some value in the fact that it has an immutable, undeleteable record of a transaction.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    26. Re:Not news. by sjames · · Score: 1

      I was addressing:

      Then with no one mining, losses (forgot wallet key, etc.) slowly push the price back up. It should not normally be possible for the bitcoin price to fall below the cost of electricity used to mine it, except very briefly.

      In fact, no. With no one mining, bitcoin is dead. Nobody can buy, sell, or trade it because transactions can't happen.

    27. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I wrote that, I meant "practically no one mining" not "exactly zero miners".

      It doesn't matter that with no one mining bitcoin is dead.
      If it's there's no one mining at all then it doesn't matter that nobody can buy sell or trade BECAUSE THEY ALREADY STOPPED BEFORE THE MINING DID.

      Effects occur AFTER their causes.

    28. Re: Not news. by Khyber · · Score: 2

      "Cryptocurrency has some value in the fact that it has an immutable"

      That was proven bullshit very recently, too, when Vitalik reversed some transaction for some company that mistakenly dumped a bunch of ether. Immutability is BULLSHIT.

      Meanwhile, you don't see that happening for anyone that was trying to figure out the convoluted system and lost ether by mistake. Nope. Fuck the small person.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    29. Re:Not news. by sjames · · Score: 1

      If mining cost nothing, then there would be mining as long as a few were still interested. Since it does cost, it will stop when the value people place on bitcoin isn't enough to justify mining. There will be some people trying to transact when the last miner hits the off button.

    30. Re:Not news. by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

      Notice Bitcoin hasn't had any crazy jumps ever since Bitcoin futures started trading? Wall Street doing it's thing...

    31. Re:Not news. by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

      don't talk to me about bailing out the Banks.

      The US Government is either maliciously corrupt or COMPLETE FUCKING IDIOTS.

      https://www.nytimes.com/2008/0...

      Sweden bailed out their banks but ALSO gave them a set of ADAMANTIUM HANDCUFFS along with the bailout.

      Finland DID NOT bail out their banks, and sure it SUCKED BADLY for a few years, but their financial system is BETTER AND STRONGER as a result.

      Only USA threw billions of dollars into a blackhole and told the taxpayers "there is no other way".

      In what universe does it make sense to tell THE NATIONAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS that NO MATTER how badly they DELIBERATELY FUCK EVERYTHING UP, there are LITERALLY zero negative repercussions.

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    32. Re:Not news. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      When it gets too difficult to mine one coin, just go and invent a new one

      No... there is a limited supply of Bitcoins which are secured by the high hashing power of the Bitcoin miners, and you can't just go out and "invent a new one" and have it be comparable to Bitcoin, because your new coin will have a very low hashrate, and thus it will be easy to target with a 51% attack, should your "new invented coin" ever become valuable enough to even be worth it to try attacking.

    33. Re: Not news. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Vitalik reversed some transaction for some company that mistakenly dumped a bunch of ether. Immutability is BULLSHIT.

      Your argument doesn't apply to Bitcoin itself.... effective Immutability is not Bullshit for Bitcoin itself.
      ONLY for pretender cryptocurrencies like Ether which are ACTUALLY centralized, despite their claims to be decentralized --- Ether is still centrally controlled by Vitalik who hold a huge fraction of coins which were pre-mined and their loyal supporters, as you observed.

    34. Re: Not news. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Yes but precious metals have actual intrinsic value

      NOTHING is intrinsically or inherently worth a certain amount of USD or other fiat currency.
      The US government has and could again fix an arbitrary fiat price of their choosing for any precious metal,
      because they in effect decide how much fiat will be worth ---- they can also make the fiat worth 0 by invalidating it
      at any time and issuing new currency which they distribute in various proportions to people they like, their supporters, then the rest of the population in amounts as they see fit.

    35. Re:Not news. by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Those CDs pay less than inflation and unless it's in a registered account you get to pay tax on the "income" just to add insult to injury. Income tax on an asset that's losing buying power. Money is a scam and wealthy people have very little actual money; their assets are in things that have actual value.

      Gold and Silver have maintained their real world buying power. It's money that has fluctuated since Nixon shock. And before that money allowed the US to criminalize ownership of gold so they could force you take banknotes and the cut their value in half the next year. If paper money had any real value, why would they have to criminalize gold ownership to convince people to take their magic beans?

      That FDIC insurance was $100,000 until fairly recently. They have to keep increasing it as the value of $100,000 plummets.

  6. Not a problem by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

    I just switched my Bitcoin investment into Tesla stock.

    1. Re:Not a problem by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I just switched my Apple and Tesla stock into Dogecoin.

      To the moon!!!1

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Not a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The treasury thanks you for your capital gains taxes. (Well, not really, but it's the thought that counts. Well, not really.)

    3. Re:Not a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My country taxes 30% of a 4% assumed gain, so 1.2% per year, whatever the actual gain or even loss was that year.

    4. Re:Not a problem by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Damn where is that? That's freaking awesome!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    5. Re: Not a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's The Netherlands, except that the percentages have been tweaked somewhat recently.

  7. Re: Two things happening at the same time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, you can have fake Russia meddling news and cover-up Stefan Halper's spying which was much worse than Watergate, both at the same time!

    Heil Hillary as mandated by law. The Nazis were leftists too, just like you.

  8. Despite this its still up significantly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the exchange rate has dropped a bit its still way up and for the usefulness it remains. The people who "invest" are the ones I'm skeptical of. The value in crypto currencies is not in its price. Its in its ability to drastically lower transaction costs that most consumers aren't aware of. Credit cards drive up prices by 6% or so and more in places where cash has been outlawed or shunned via various means. That can be as high as 12%. Then if you are smart you can take advantage of the liquidity in the market to get as much as 30 or so percent on top of this saved as a consumer.

    I'm both a businesses owner and a crypto currency user. The main places where crypto currencies are seeing adoption are Venezuela and New Hampshire. It took 40 years for credit cards to see widespread acceptance and I imagine it will take similar amounts of time to see that with crypto currencies.

    1. Re:Despite this its still up significantly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Transaction costs for what?

  9. Price is low by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now is a great time to buy buy buy!!!!! /sarcasm

  10. AC-Coin by raymorris · · Score: 1

    To mine an AC-Coin, you currently have to find the last four bits that correspond to the hash.

    As you might imagine, finding four bits is easy (just guess 16 times). What do you think the current value of AC-Coin is? What will YOU pay for a 10,000 AC coin? I have some to sell you.

    Making mining easy doesn't mean people do it.

    1. Re:AC-Coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like I said, if everyone abandons the coin simultaneously, it fails. The restoring force is only for slower price declines. Since there are currently zero holders of AC-Coin, I think it's fair to say everyone has abandoned AC-Coin simultaneously right now this instant. So, no, I'll not buy your coin.

  11. no regulation, no transparency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crypto markets have no reporting rules and are full of corruption. It is sad that Bloomberg feels the need to report on this sector, but I guess there are enough legitimate players involved that the data is worth tracking. But right now the pool is so shallow, so many "whales" have already dropped out of the market, that all it takes in one party trying to cash out $250k worth of coins to cause a 1-2% drop across the entire sector. Most people are still holding, in the hopes that new investors are going to start discovering bitcoin again in the near future, but crypto already became a global sensation in 2017 and there won't be another significant pool of investors for 5-10 years. It is time to move back to real securities.

  12. Re:No, few people are, thus dropping half its valu by corezz · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the exact date will be (and it will come) when MOST people realize Bitcoin isn't just a get-rich buy-then-sell cash scheme, and instead, has an actual beneficial purpose to this world. Seeing it in widespread by the average person everyday life would be a sight. It is that day when bitcoin's price will dramatically fall to more commonsense levels. But i figure that day will only come when these people get bored of the cash grab and lose interest causing it to take a massive nose dive (ie, a crash) and then someone finally finds its true killer app (not including b2b behind-the-scenes stuff).

  13. Re:No, few people are, thus dropping half its valu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me see again, what are bitcoin's beneficial purposes to this world? What problem of the current financial system has it solved?

    Last time I checked, transactions were slower and more expensive than with e.g. VISA with the perspective of becoming even more expensive as mining becomes harder. It wasn't decentralized as theory describes, because wallets are centralized at exchanges, which work like banks, with the difference that they are unregulated, have no liability and no one knows who owns them. Transactions aren't anonymous, because you can easily track down every transaction in the ledger. Not to mention the amount of energy wasted on mining (at least in some countries it can be used for heating) and the risk of 51% attacks which turn out to be more realistic than thought.

  14. Re:No, few people are, thus dropping half its valu by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

    It has more to do with the MtGox coin liquidation. The current price is what the coins are selling at. Someone is buying them. Someone is always buying them

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  15. people are SO stupid by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    South Korea owns maybe 1%, probably 0.1% of bitcoins. China and the US own almost all of them. This is utterly ridiculous to have this much of an overreaction. This is like short selling Pepsi because one delivery truck burst into flames.

    1. Re:people are SO stupid by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

      wait whut?

      You're ACTUALLY implying that THE MARKET (ie stock exechanges) is based on REAL value?

      When THE SAME BULLSHIT REPORT that gets dragged out EVERY YEAR saying words to the effect of "Apple has JUMPED THE SHARK and we're all gonna die !!!!!!" immediately talks Apple stock by "about twenty percent".

      AT LEAST ONCE EVERY YEAR.

      (and Apple is only one of HUNDREDS of examples)

      Seriously, have you NOT been paying attention? The Stock Market is all about PERCEIVED VALUE.

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
  16. All cryptocurrencies are scams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are (any) fiat-currency and (any) cryptocurrency really equivalent, as cryptocurrency fans claim?
    For example, US Dollar and Bitcoin are really equals?
    Value/validity/authorization of US dollar is provided/guaranteed by US Government (and in-turn whole US Public)!
    Also, not to mention, US Dollars in any US Bank is insured by US Government!
    What authorization/guarantee/insurance is behind Bitcoin? Nothing!
    Sorry but that is the end of discussion then!

    Why do you think Satoshi Nakamoto is really hiding his identity, if Bitcoin is really such a great innovation?
    He is just someone does not like media/fan attention?
    Or, could it be really because Bitcoin (and all cryptocurrencies followed it) are actually Ponzi Schemes?
    (So he knew very well that law enforcement would come after him sooner or later?!)

    If so-called cryptocurrencies are really good innovation, why they attract so many criminals/criminal activity?
    Could it really be because, all cryptocurrencies themselves are scams, and that is why they attract all kinds of criminals/criminal activity?

    If so-called cryptocurrencies are really currency, why no company/store can use Bitcoin as currency anymore?
    Because the price of Bitcoin proved to be extremely unstable to use as a currency?
    Would the result be different, if Bitcoin replaced by any other "cryptocurrency"?
    Aren't all work the same way?

    If so-called cryptocurrencies are really money; isn't people issuing their own money, illegal already, in all countries?
    If so then, why they are still not banned in all countries?

    Or, they are not actually virtual currency but virtual investment?
    But, if they are actually investment, why we need/want them?
    What would happen to world economy, if people invested in virtual investments, instead of real investments?

    Or, all so-called cryptocurrencies are actually just a modified (made decentralized and paying variable interest) Ponzi Schemes?
    (Price of cryptocurrencies would keep increasing in the long term (by their design), so it is equivalent of paying variable interest to all long term investors.)

    Also, since all so-called cryptocurrencies are actually financial scams (Ponzi Schemes), that means, they cannot be the solution for any of existing financial problems of our world!

    As more and more people invest in cryptocurrencies, it will become harder and harder to ban their trading everywhere (because people invested in cryptocurrencies, would try to stop anyone trying to ban cryptocurrencies)!
    All cryptocurrencies need to be banned globally before it is too late!

  17. Re:No, few people are, thus dropping half its valu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Bitcoin doesn't work as a currency because it's not an effective substitute for the US Dollar and it never will be. Frankly, Bitcoin sucks for any legal transaction because the fees are too high and the processing times are too slow and just try to dump your whole stash of Bitcoins and see where the price goes. When Warren Buffet of Berkshire Hathaway, arguably the greatest living investor, and Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase say that Bitcoin is scam, the average person should listen. Even George Soros, the man who "broke the pound", and has made billions of dollars trading currencies warned at Davos that Bitcoin was a bubble and that people should "watch out". But hey, those guys are chumps right and we should be listening to "corezz" who hopes that his Bitcoin will be awesome someday. Right.

  18. Re:No, few people are, thus dropping half its valu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dig deeper, there is so much development ongoing. crypto can and will scale. decentralized exchanges are being rolled out. PoS instead of PoW will stop the amount of energy wasted. privacy on the blockchain is already possible, we have a great FOSS project build on good community principles.

  19. Re:No, few people are, thus dropping half its valu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dig deeper, there is so much development ongoing. crypto can and will scale. decentralized exchanges are being rolled out. PoS instead of PoW will stop the amount of energy wasted. privacy on the blockchain is already possible, we have a great FOSS project build on good community principles.

    Yeah, if and only if they (cryptocurrencies) are not spotted by those who can exploit them using 51% attack...

  20. Re:No, few people are, thus dropping half its valu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://gobitcoin.io/tools/cost-51-attack/:

    Cost of a 51% attack
    US$5,915,971,908
    Hardware cost only, at cheapest rate
    The attack would consume 81,344,613 kWh per day (4,067,230$ per day)

    I am not worried about Bitcoin. Ethereum switching to PoS would change the dynamics completely because instead of mining you would need to accumulate enough coins to double spend - it will be impossible to buy 51% coins.

  21. Re: No, few people are, thus dropping half its val by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are and do read more /. FYI renting power is a thing

  22. Re:No, few people are, thus dropping half its valu by mysidia · · Score: 1

    It is that day when bitcoin's price will dramatically fall to more commonsense levels.

    Actually... that will probably be the day when Bitcoin's price would have dramatically increased to more commonsense levels, such as $0.0001 US per Satoshi.

  23. Re:No, few people are, thus dropping half its valu by mysidia · · Score: 1

    rankly, Bitcoin sucks for any legal transaction because the fees are too high and the processing times are too slow

    The fees are lower than bank fees, and the transaction clearing time averages less than an hour, so it is faster than a Check or Overnight wire --- It's not like current banks support clearing transactions instantly. Even your credit card transactions are just pre-"Authorized", and the settlement process takes days before the merchant actually gets paid.

  24. Fraud by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Looking at news over the last several years I think it is less likely that you'd lose your coins in some hacking event, and more likely though some sort of more fraud scheme. Either in some coin that is more less fake, or even in established coins where the brokerage/trading houses just embezzle it and vanish.

    A lot is made out of blockchain ledgers supplanting the need about placing your trust in corporate banks or nations, but they don't exactly have a monopoly on fraudulent activity.

    I think the time has come and gone that these crypto "currencies" can be legitimately called currencies anymore. They are simply speculative investment schemes, but one where their are literally zero assets attached to them. They are particularly risky fundamentally in that at least a currency can be spent someplace (unless inflation makes it worthless), and more traditional investments, even should they fail are able to recoup some value by selling off assets. If/when they fail, you'll be left with nothing except perhaps the few at the top (due to sheer volume and value), or those with enough savvy to GTFO at just the right time, the rest will be left with squat. The *only* thing keeping them going at this point is the collective will of those that own it, and the get rich quick greed of new investors. Once the later drops off because the price is too high, or public perception changes, then the end is neigh...