Slashdot Mirror


MIT's AI Uses Radio Signals To See People Through Walls (inverse.com)

Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have developed a new piece of software that uses wifi signals to monitor the movements, breathing, and heartbeats of humans on the other side of walls. While the researchers say this new tech could be used in areas like remote healthcare, it could in theory be used in more dystopian applications. Inverse reports: "We actually are tracking 14 different joints on the body [...] the head, the neck, the shoulders, the elbows, the wrists, the hips, the knees, and the feet," Dina Katabi, an electrical engineering and computer science teacher at MIT, said. "So you can get the full stick-figure that is dynamically moving with the individuals that are obstructed from you -- and that's something new that was not possible before." The technology works a little bit like radar, but to teach their neural network how to interpret these granular bits of human activity, the team at MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) had to create two separate A.I.s: a student and a teacher.

[T]he team developed one A.I. program that monitored human movements with a camera, on one side of a wall, and fed that information to their wifi X-ray A.I., called RF-Pose, as it struggled to make sense of the radio waves passing through that wall on the other side. The research builds off of a longstanding project at CSAIL lead by Katabi, which hopes to use this wifi tracking to help passively monitor the elderly and automate any emergency alerts to EMTs and medical professionals if they were to fall or suffer some other injury.
For more information, a press release and video about the software are available.

76 comments

  1. Cool cover story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Cool cover story, will be interesting to see what it's really used for.

    1. Re: Cool cover story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can't show us cooch and teat so who cares?

    2. Re: Cool cover story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More importantly, this isn't Al.
       
      BeauHD does not have enough of a scientific background (African American Studies major) to discern what counts as an ordinary computer program and what is more than a computer program. Repeat after me. Al does not exist.

    3. Re: Cool cover story bro by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

      He doesn't have an African American studies major from what I've been able to find. LinkedIn only shows 3 years at Portland Community College. His summary mentions studying business and film. I'm guessing you found a troll's profile instead of a real one.

    4. Re: Cool cover story bro by BeauXD · · Score: 0

      Is this the one you found?

      Hey, might be old enough to drink now! (Mom's titty milk, that is.) LOL!

      :P

      XD

    5. Re: Cool cover story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leave that poor child alone, you all.

    6. Re:Cool cover story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such technology was discussed in a Tom Clancy novel a long time ago for anti-terrorism and hostage rescue operations, if I remember correctly.

    7. Re: Cool cover story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My morning tea dripped out my nose when I read this. Bravo!

    8. Re:Cool cover story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the group that includes Robert T. Morris. Morris wrote the "Morris Worm", a poorly executed worm that took down thousands if not hundreds of UNIX systems in 1988, and avoided jail time because his father was the head of the NSA. It's *amazing* when your daddy can fund your department and keep you out of the way, and you *still* get to involved computer projects like this one that have far more criminal and security abuse use than actual use to humanity. We could also discuss the "monitor people with a network of audio transcievers scattered around the home or office" project, the "let's invent chips for routers that no one gets to see the customized compiler for and no one thus gets to see the custom backdoors" project. It used to be a lot easier to track all of this nonsense that lab left all their NFS open the Internet, at large, with write privileges controlled only by the uid of the user. I wonder if they still do that?

      These bozos are not competent enough or thoughtful enough to be *trusted* with security tools. They don't think about the consequences of what they do.

  2. How could this possibly be a bad thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course this will only ever be used for good and will never be used (read: abused) by the military, security forces, police, etc.

    1. Re:How could this possibly be a bad thing? by javaman235 · · Score: 2

      Good really does need this more... Intelligence forces just plant hidden camera in your room, but senior support services need to be able to monitor senior motion without privacy violations like that to monitor for falls.

      --
      -The art of programming is the pursuit of absolute simplicity.
    2. Re:How could this possibly be a bad thing? by mark_reh · · Score: 1

      You can't monitor for falls seismically? Here's the pattern... clunk clunk, "ugh!", then silence or someone yelling for help. It wouldn't take much of an AI...

    3. Re:How could this possibly be a bad thing? by LifesABeach · · Score: 2

      the close combat applications of this are pretty straight forward. device plots movement, a shot can be fired at a limb, or center mass area. when the heart stops, move on. usually 3 taps causes the victim to bleed out. all and all, a cheap solution for pain in the rear problem. of course if the victim is a senior, then all the senior has to do is start talking about any subject. this irreversibly causes the assassin to shot themselves. unfortunately for team members of the assassin, when they enter the same room, they to will face the outcome.

    4. Re:How could this possibly be a bad thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      One could argue that monitoring people’s movement with WIFI signals and without their consent is still a privacy violation. It is no different than using hidden cameras, just different wavelengths.

    5. Re:How could this possibly be a bad thing? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nothing to worry about here.

      MIT would never weaponize the technology they develop. They totally don't run a major DoD weapons research laboratory. No one there is involved in the development of killer robots. I'm certain they haven't had any thoughts at all of selling this privacy invasion tech to repressive regimes for use in their automated tyranny systems.

      Thank goodness for MITtens!

    6. Re:How could this possibly be a bad thing? by jenningsthecat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One could argue that monitoring people’s movement with WIFI signals and without their consent is still a privacy violation. It is no different than using hidden cameras, just different wavelengths.

      Average citizens no longer care about privacy invasion. Hell, they're no longer in a position to even define privacy. 'Reality' TV shows, pervasive video surveillance, selling out themselves and all their acquaintances on Facebook, and turning a blind, (or not so blind), eye to the advertisers that stalk them around the Web - I'd say "privacy" is pretty much a meaningless word now among the majority of folks.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    7. Re:How could this possibly be a bad thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pastor peen the pedo, explaining the jokes!! What would the really stupid people do without you?
      Did you develop your explaining skills in order to groom the kiddos?

    8. Re:How could this possibly be a bad thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I could offer a counterargument, but I got nothin

    9. Re:How could this possibly be a bad thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Privacy is the right to be imperfect.

      And people care a lot about it, even though they can't always articulate it. When they say things like "I have nothing to hide", when you ask them a few intimate questions they soon see that they are saying things without thinking it through.

      More to the point: doesn't Origin Wireless already sell this technology? http://www.originwireless.net/

  3. Old news again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was in the news and on TV science shows years ago.

  4. Dead end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The source signal isn't designed to be used for imaging. Yes, you can train an AI for one particular room and its reflections. This isn't going to transfer to learning in a different set of reflections.

    If you want to look in people's house, just use IR.

    1. Re:Dead end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the setup could eventually become as easy as doing a quick on-site calibration of the background noise without any targets in the field

    2. Re:Dead end by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      the setup could eventually become as easy as doing a quick on-site calibration of the background noise without any targets in the field

      Sure, all you have to do is send people and some cameras into the room you want to surveil for that "quick on-site calibration". Should not pose a problem.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    3. Re:Dead end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to look in people's house, just use IR.

      Go back to reddit, you don't belong here.

    4. Re:Dead end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The source signal isn't designed to be used for imaging. Yes, you can train an AI for one particular room and its reflections. This isn't going to transfer to learning in a different set of reflections.

      If you want to look in people's house, just use IR.

      And you can always use a tinfoil lining for clothes.

  5. Another reason not to use WiFi at home. by BitterOak · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm glad I installed Cat 5e ethernet cable in my home 10 years ago!

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    1. Re:Another reason not to use WiFi at home. by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      And one could not possibly supply their own wifi signals?

    2. Re: Another reason not to use WiFi at home. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fantasize daily about buying an off grid house in a radio dark zone and using only wired technology. Can you imagine how badass it would be to ditch the celly and just have a POTS phone. My only computer tethered to one spot. I was an adolescent when I first thought wifi was a great idea. I'm a much more mature person now, and I see it was not such a great idea.

    3. Re:Another reason not to use WiFi at home. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be much better. You would have a better model for the source. But we would call it RADAR at that point.

    4. Re: Another reason not to use WiFi at home. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's ok, the wifi on your phone will do.

    5. Re:Another reason not to use WiFi at home. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I installed Cat 5e ethernet cable in my home 10 years ago!

      Unless you wallpapered with Cat5, that won't help - they use their own WiFi device to scan.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  6. Shoot through walls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... received funding from the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.

    Forget body armour or drones, now attackers can shoot through walls.

    ... heartbeats of humans ...

    I assume internal movement will be detected via wave scatter over multiple receiving antennas.

    1. Re:Shoot through walls by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Tom Clancy wrote about this in jungle warfare.

    2. Re:Shoot through walls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tom Clancy wrote about this in jungle warfare.

      He also wrote about technology to monitor heartbeats through walls in Rainbow Six for military applications.

      This screams of something which will see military applications.

  7. It's not the seeing, it's the tracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wifi for seeing through walls isn't new:

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/808289/x-ray-vision-wifi-Technical-University-of-Munich (2017)

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352864816300426 (2016)

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/sciencetech/video-1224807/Researchers-WALLS-using-WiFi.html (2015)

    It's the tracking limbs etc that is pretty nifty, but ultimately, just an extension.

  8. MK Ultra! by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    Man! Those dudes were right! Next they'll be beaming thoughts into peoples' heads.

  9. I wish this was news, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you have reported the same thing being done using wifi signals about 10 years ago. Since WiFi signals are also only radio signals, there is no news here other than MIT being very very late to the party.

    1. Re:I wish this was news, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      University of Utah did this in 2009: https://archive.unews.utah.edu/news_releases/radio-waves-039see039-through-walls/

    2. Re:I wish this was news, but... by slew · · Score: 3, Informative

      Even this report is a dupe of a report from the exact same MIT research group back in 2013...

      https://tech.slashdot.org/stor...

    3. Re:I wish this was news, but... by sabbede · · Score: 1

      That was back in 2013? First thing I thought when I saw the headline was, "Oh, they've added AI to that think I read about... when was it, a couple of months ago? Last year?" I didn't think it was five years ago, that's for sure.

  10. I wish this was news, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it also wasn't new when you reported it in 2013:

    https://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/06/29/138230/mit-researchers-can-see-through-walls-using-wi-fi

  11. Dupe? No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We havenâ(TM)t had a Tesla, Trump or AGW story in hours!

    1. Re:Dupe? No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      â(TM)t

  12. News from 2011. by tlambert · · Score: 3, Informative

    News from 2011.

    See-Through Walls: Motion Tracking Using Variance-Based Radio Tomography Networks

    https://www.semanticscholar.or... [semanticscholar.org]

    1. Re:News from 2011. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      yes but that was in the same room, and required a lot of specific room dimensions and knowledge of the frequency and power. This new research and product attempt builds on that previous pioneering work, which was relatively pointless except as an intellectual exercise and physics proof.

      This one is actually useful, able to 'see' through walls and with machine learning so in theory could be adapted to any situation assuming the radio signal was able to be measured in the way this is measuing the subtle variance in their demo situation i.e. not just wifi but maybe even EMF in the range of our electrical produces.

      assuming they expose the same machine learning to multiple situations, its possible to commercialize this i guess. assuming also that the measured variance is not 100% related to room shape, otherwise the variations you'd have to train this on would be incredibly high.

      These ML "AI" are only intelligent under the right circumstances and infintely better than the research paper you mentioned, which this whole concept is based on.

    2. Re:News from 2011. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so you throw in a calibration puck, takes pictures and EM snapshots of the room

    3. Re:News from 2011. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This new research and product attempt builds on that previous pioneering work, which was relatively pointless except as an intellectual exercise and physics proof.

      This one is actually useful

      Except that the intellectual exercise and physics proof is the science.

      This one is useful, because as you say, the previous one was pioneering. You build something new for the first time ever, and then go on to make a better version of it.

      This is what people don't understand about basic research ... you have no real way of knowing what it turns into. But you find things, and then figure out what you can do with them.

      From "relatively pointless" to "useful" is a generation of advancement on a previous technology. But you don't get to the useful on the first step, you get to the point where you know what comes next.

    4. Re:News from 2011. by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      Oh no you don't get to explain shit! You get exactly one slashdot article per topic ever, lest we cry dupe immediately from a keyword match! There's no such thing as building on research, especially not when it only says that in TFA. You think I'm going to read the article? Nah, I'm going to read ANOTHER article, do a few searches, just to post how this is late and irrelevant. Improved breakthroughs huh? Let me tell you sir, unless its a minor Linux kernel upgrade, a story about menu changes in the Tesla cafeteria, or a bitcoin price update, I only want to hear about a story twice: the first time someone thinks about it ever, and when its been discounted at Fry's. Now off with your "research" and "paths of innovation", I see me a story about Elon's new menu item in the Tesla Model X in yonder firehose!!!

  13. Maybe that's why the summary says that by raymorris · · Score: 2

    I wonder if maybe that's why the summary said "The research builds off of a longstanding project at CSAIL lead by Katabi".

    In 2013 they could detect that a person (or person-sized object) was present. Now they have a stick figure showing what the person is doing, the positions of their head, arms and legs, along with a clear path on how to see finger movements and such.

  14. ehternet and phones... by kiviQr · · Score: 2

    ...tried it but I kept tripping on the Cat5e cable that was connected to my phone.

  15. Coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Facebook will be using this technology so that the Zuck can watch you fuck.

  16. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the book and game from like 20 years ago a device called the "Heartbeat Monitor" was a key tool in knowing where terrorists and hostages were when planning a breach. It used radio waves to detect where people were behind a wall.

    Used to have lots of fun staying up all night at LAN parties playing Rainbow 6 and its sequel Rogue Spear. We loved how once you were dead that was it - no respawning - and how you only needed one or two bullets to be taken out. Made for very tense games.

  17. admin plz ban mit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuckin mit using wallhax goddamn cheaters wtf get off my game

  18. People with tin foil hats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every day they seem less crazy than before.

    CAPTCHA: mental

    1. Re:People with tin foil hats by bobbied · · Score: 2

      Because they ARE.... Less crazy that is..

      Actually, most of them get wrapped around what's possible and forget to consider what's practical. If wrapping tinfoil around their heads helps them keep it all in, so be it.

      However, this might actually help them get those hats off because tinfoil makes a great RF reflector and makes it easier to track their movements behind that wall. Be sure to mention that to the next one you meet.. ;)

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  19. 4th Amendment or Aluminum siding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess which I have more confidence in now? Time to bring back Aluminum siding!

    1. Re: 4th Amendment or Aluminum siding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No that will be outlawed as it interferes with criminal investigation.

      Wouldn't actually surprise me

    2. Re:4th Amendment or Aluminum siding by bobbied · · Score: 2

      Just use a radiant barrier as the moisture barrier and save energy too. As a bonus, you can take off the tinfoil underwear inside your home.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  20. LazerTag Wall Hack! by zifn4b · · Score: 1

    Not just for CSGO anymore...

    --
    We'll make great pets
  21. Police can see into house without a warrant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If it is passively getting signals out at the street, it is like looking into an open window.
    The police can then see how many people are in the house and what they are doing.
    It will also be useful at border crossings.
    It will be sold as "Think of the Children and the Elderly". They always get a pass.

    1. Re:Police can see into house without a warrant by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Cute... You don't believe they are not doing this now... LOL

      I'm pretty sure they use IR and millimeter wave X-Ray technology now....

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  22. Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I love how it's always some far fetched "healthcare" or whatever.

    Yeah that's what they made this for, health and safety.

  23. Emergency response = red flag by mileshigh · · Score: 1

    hopes to use this wifi tracking to help passively monitor the elderly and automate any emergency alerts to EMTs and medical professionals

    Emergency response: this is what researchers put on their grant proposals when the actual end-game is an unpalatable one.

    Actual emergency responders would be technology-enabled supermen if the had even 1% of the tech that's supposedly developed for them.

  24. sigh .. how about solving some real problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like poverty, environmental detoxification, corruption, etc ... you know, real problems that affect real people. A lot of so-called science is just rich kids playing with public dollars. It's a crime really.

  25. Example of a technology that should not be pursued by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That tech would no doubt be used for dystopian purposes. It should not be pursued and all existing work should be shredded and erased from hard drives.

  26. perfect tech for killer dogbots by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

    Watch the black mirror episode Metalhead and imagine the robot dogs to have this technology. No point in hiding in a house then. May as well just surrender to the inevitable and present ones neck. Something like this can make most forms of cover irrelevant. This will also be helpful to American chickenhawk cops who want to kill without any risk to themselves.

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    1. Re:perfect tech for killer dogbots by mesterha · · Score: 1

      Something like this can make most forms of cover irrelevant.

      Turn off your wifi and you'll be fine. It's might be enough to just move your routers. Machine learning can be very fragile.

      --

      Chris Mesterharm
  27. Is nothing sacred anymore by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

    Jazus Crisco, now we gotta lead-line the WALLS for basic privacy anymore??

    --
    .
    == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    1. Re:Is nothing sacred anymore by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Jazus Crisco, now we gotta lead-line the WALLS for basic privacy anymore??

      Privacy is dying. If we don't build a better society in which that doesn't matter, we're all well and truly fucked.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Is nothing sacred anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a better society, it would matter.

    3. Re:Is nothing sacred anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck to us all, then. I'll remember that the next time I'm getting a Freedom Grope at the airport, because I refuse to be digitally strip searched. Assuming there is even a choice in that, anymore.

      It seems that if we can't virtue signal about it, noone cares.

  28. Not in the US by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    You better tell the Supreme Court. Even using IR cameras requires a warrant. (At least to peer in people's houses)

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  29. Cyrez Corporation did it better by kimgkimg · · Score: 1

    "GET DOWN! GET DOWN, NOW!!!" https://youtu.be/HCeCVZqcpnE?t...

  30. But nobody's listening by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Thanks to the Supreme Court, especially Scalia, passive scanners cannot be used without a warrant to see through walls. This was an infrared case.

    And sniffing dogs on a porch.

    Of course other countries without a 4th Amendment migjt struggle a bit, and dictatorships roar ahead with a complete panopticon, while our side is limited to merely monitoring everything you do on the Internet or buy or call, i.e. all your papers, 4th Amendment-wise.

    Sigh.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  31. Passively? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The research builds off of a longstanding project at CSAIL lead by Katabi, which hopes to use this wifi tracking to help passively monitor the elderly and automate any emergency alerts to EMTs and medical professionals if they were to fall or suffer some other injury.

    I don't think "passively" means what you think it means. If it were a passive system it wouldn't be emitting radio signals at all.

  32. OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just use the proper machine learning terminology. They used a GAN.