Verizon's New Phone Plan Proves It Has No Idea What 'Unlimited' Actually Means (gizmodo.com)
Verizon has unveiled its third "unlimited" smartphone plan that goes to show just how meaningless the term has become in the U.S. wireless industry. "In addition to its Go Unlimited and Beyond Unlimited plans, Verizon is now adding a premium Above Unlimited plan to the mix, which offers 75GB of 'unlimited' data per month (as opposed to the 22GB of 'unlimited' data you get on less expensive plans), along with 20GB of 'unlimited' data when using your phone as a hotspot, 500GB of Verizon cloud storage, and five monthly international Travel Passes, which are daily vouchers that let you use your phone's wireless service abroad the same as if you were in the U.S.," reports Gizmodo. Are you confused yet? From the report: And as if that wasn't bad enough, Verizon has also updated its convoluted sliding pricing scheme that adjusts based on how many phones are on a single bill. For families with four lines of service, the Above Unlimited cost $60 per person, but if you're a single user the same service costs $95, which really seems like bullshit because if everything is supposed to be unlimited, it shouldn't really make a difference how many people are on the same bill. As a small concession to flexibility, Verizon says families with multiple lines can now mix and match plans instead of having to choose a single plan for every line, which should allow families to choose the right service for an individual person's needs and help keep costs down. The new Above Unlimited plan and the company's mix-and-match feature arrives next week on June 18th.
and they are wording it to exclude the few people who want to use their smartphone as their home internet or have some continuous download on it 24x7 cause they want to feel special at using a lot of data
Comment removed based on user account deletion
In business, "commodity" is a dirty word. Nobody wants to be in a commodity business, because it's really, really hard to compete in a commodity business because there's only one number that matters to the consumer: price. If your customers see the commodity you're selling for a penny less, they're not your customers anymore.
Telecommunication bandwith is a commodity. Access to a MB/s is the same (except for perhaps minor differences in latency), so it should be the easiest thing in the world for consumers to buy. Consequently telecom vendors want to make pricing as confusing as possible. This is coming to ISP service too, with the end of net neutrality. Comcast and Verizon will make it impossible to tell whether Xfinity or Fios is a better deal.
Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
I have verizon unlimited and constantly go over 22 GB and don't think I've ever been throttled.
Maybe they have a peering agreement with PornHub?
T-Mo has for quite a while now been a lot more upfront about how the term "unlimited" includes a certain amount being your "prioritization point" after which you get throttled.
And this is exactly why I'm grateful I decided to switch to Google's Project Fi. None of this fake bullshit "unlimited"
Right from the Fi pricing site:
After 6 GB, data is free! Enjoy the same high-speed connectivity for up to 15 GB of data use.
You can opt out of slower speeds by paying for $10/GB any individual data used above 15 GB in a billing cycle. Learn more here.
So EXACTLY the same bullshit, except a lower threshold at which they start throttling you, OR they actually start charging you by the GB. Explain how this is better?
> As a folk who knows a lot more about math than you,
*facepalm*
Any number divided by zero is UNDEFINED or in IEEE754 notation NaN (Not-a-Number)
Why?
Because if you graph:
* 0/negative x towards zero it goes toward -Infinity
* 0/positive x towards zero it goes toward +Infinity
The problem is that 0/0 is BOTH positive AND negative infinity. Which one is correct?
In Mathematics this is called a Singularity. Division is supposed to be closed, meaning a single number divided by another singlenumber produces a SINGLE number -- not TWO of them! Since it is impossible to tell which Infinity is correct: a) both, b) neither, c) positive, d) negative along with the fact that we haven't invented multi-valued variables, Mathematicians leave the division by zero as undefined by definition.
Where the fuck you are are getting this C/0 = Inf + (C-1) horseshit from???