Slashdot Mirror
Algeria Shuts Off Entire Country's Internet To Stop Students From Cheating (gizmodo.com)
Algeria has begun instituting nationwide internet blackouts to prevent students from leaking high school diploma exams online. Gizmodo reports: The country will turn off mobile and landline internet service across the country for an hour at a time during the exam period, which started on Wednesday and runs through June 25. The 11 blackouts are scheduled for an hour after each exam begins. In 2016, exam questions were reportedly leaked online and authorities were dissatisfied with a less stringent attempt to limit social media during the 2017 exams. The sweeping shutdown will also block Facebook for the entirety of the exam period, Education Minister Nouria Benghabrit told Algerian newspaper Annahar, according to the BBC. Benghabrit reportedly said they are "not comfortable" with their choice to shut down all internet service, but that they "should not passively stand in front of such a possible leak." Metal detectors are reportedly being used to make sure that no one brings any internet-enabled devices into the exam halls. Surveillance cameras and phone jammers are also being used at the locations where the exams are being printed.
Because students don't cheat, the internet cheats!
The problem is broken culture, not internet access.
Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
Always wondered what would happen if the student population gets organized/determined enough to cheat that they set up an underground wireless network (if that term even makes sense)?
What you're looking for is this:
A mobile ad hoc network (MANET), also known as wireless ad hoc network or ad hoc wireless network, is a continuously self-configuring, infrastructure-less network of mobile devices connected wirelessly.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Have fun and enjoy!
Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
Why shut down the entire country's internet, when you can just wrap the testing location in wire?
Of course, anyone with an electronic device could still just have his cheat-sheet cached on it locally...
I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
I have a degree in cybersecurity. I try very hard to be honest, but while preparing for a proctored test where I'm being tested on my knowledge of ways to bypass security, some thoughts certainly occurred to me. :)
Cheaters suck.
They ruin things for everyone who is and can actually do the task legitimately.
Doesn't matter if it's body building (where they now look more like ball shaped aliens than body builders), sports (where they die years too early and break reacords set by people who were not cheating), or screw up the reputation of their education system when they go to a new job and do terribly.
Glad Algeria is taking education seriously. It's foundational and critical.
She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
You forget capitalism is competition. You might as well say, I want everything that will advantage me and disadvantage everyone else, so I always win. All things being equal you compete with someone for the same job and you are both sufficiently good enough, you suffer a handicap which does give them employment advantage, they do not, well bye bye you.
All contests are artificial and governed by rules, you just want the rules changed to favour you but so does everyone else and the biggest cunts in the world today are exactly those people who changed the rules to favour their psychopathy. Don't pretend fairness in the rules of competition in capitalism, capitalism by nature is psychopathic, the rules are artificial and your capital worth is worth more than other people's lives a unlimited number of other people's lives.
I can push further with my mind, I feel no need to make a pig of my self, have more than everyone else, a rich mind is it's own reward, shame about your handicap.
Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
Well part of the problem can be fixed by just writing multiple tests
That does NOT fix the problem.
This is the problem:
1. Exams are passed out.
2. Cheater snaps a photo of the exam and transmits it.
3. Parents or other collaborators receive the photo, quickly work the problems and transmit back the answers.
This is done in near realtime. They will not get every question right, but will get enough to give the cheater an edge.
So in many countries, do parents actually help their kids cheat? Yes. Yes they do.
It is not just a cultural difference. It is also the importance of the test. In America, if you do well on the SAT you may to an Ivy League school. If you slightly less well, you will still go to a good state university. The next tier will start at a community college, and maybe transfer later to a four year college. Others may go to vocational colleges, etc.
But in many other countries, a single exam is an educational death sentence. If you don't make the cutoff you are put on a different track, with little hope of recovering later. In countries with either high rates of female infanticide and/or customary polygamy, this means little chance for males to marry and have children.
If every answer can be had in a matter of seconds on a phone.
[($)]
Why does Algeria have so much more trouble dealing with cheating than America? Can Algeria learn anything from the American model?
You're implying US students don't cheat, or cheat much less than Algerian students. Which is likely wrong.
Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
That's probably because these educational systems are based on the British model, where you have literally a Mother of All Exams to take, and how you do on those exams dictates your path in life. Basically every student will write the exam at the same time on the same day (heaven forbid you get ill or sick, though I'm sure you can take an alternate if you really are sick). But these exams are it - do well, you can look forward to an overseas scholarship to some prestigious college or university anywhere - the UK, US, etc. Do really well and it'll be a full meal deal. Do less well and it'll be a local college or university, then trade school, then well, whatever else.
Honestly, it's a rather disgusting system, and in Asia, from China to India and Singapore and others, it leads to some seriously messed up kids - suicides become the #1 reason for death. Doesn't help that parents generally insist on the foreign scholarship or kicked out of the house. Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if the death rate among teens due to suicides will start to approach that of the US from guns.
Thus, it's no big surprise that the alternative to killing yourself is to cheat. And cheating devices have grown in sophistication and complexity (and generally are under $200), from smartwatches that hold gigabytes of text and images, micro radio transmitters and receivers, ultra tiny cellphones, etc.
The American system generally has a lot more compassion and in general, you don't have one big exam to determine your future, you may have the SATs and ACTs and other standardized tests, but in general, the kids figure out their path in life - if they want to study overseas, they work for it, else they have to go local. Or some just go trade school and be done with it.
There's still an incentive to cheat, but honestly, the push and motivation to cheat is a lot less - cheating on your SATs and ACTs may get you in the door at your dream university, but in general, you probably wouldn't hack it. You're not trying to compete for your parent's (and relatives!) love, a roof over your head, etc. Not surprisingly, the teenage suicide rate is far lower.
For all its faults, the American system at least lets the kids choose their path and gives them opportunity to succeed, rather than boil down their entire learning into a single number that decides their fate.
In the US, you cheat to get better grades. Elsewhere, you cheat just to survive, live, or avoid getting kicked out of the house.
The American model would not work in these countries because of corruption. Also, they would cheat on those "SATs ACTs" too.
They aren't so much worried about cheating in exam rooms; that's easy to fix, just take away mobile phones. They are worried about students taking an exam and then posting the questions and answers on social media afterwards. Not all students sit the exams at the exact same time so the ones taking them later could benefit from prior knowledge of the test content.
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
Well part of the problem can be fixed by just writing multiple tests
That does NOT fix the problem.
This is the problem: 1. Exams are passed out. 2. Cheater snaps a photo of the exam and transmits it. 3. Parents or other collaborators receive the photo, quickly work the problems and transmit back the answers.
This is done in near realtime. They will not get every question right, but will get enough to give the cheater an edge.
So in many countries, do parents actually help their kids cheat? Yes. Yes they do.
It is not just a cultural difference. It is also the importance of the test. In America, if you do well on the SAT you may to an Ivy League school. If you slightly less well, you will still go to a good state university. The next tier will start at a community college, and maybe transfer later to a four year college. Others may go to vocational colleges, etc.
But in many other countries, a single exam is an educational death sentence. If you don't make the cutoff you are put on a different track, with little hope of recovering later. In countries with either high rates of female infanticide and/or customary polygamy, this means little chance for males to marry and have children.
This used to be the case in the UK where you took the "Eleven Plus" exam and it decided whether you went to a good (Grammar) or rubbish (Secondary Modern) school. If you had a bad day or were a late developer, you were hugely handicapped at the age of 11 by being dumped in a school designed to basically keep you busy until you left at 15 and got an unskilled manual job.
Unless you were truly exceptional, if you went to a Secondary Modern, you basically weren't ever going to University.
To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
For math, we could have a graphing calculator,
Visit some tech boards. One of the popular posting topics is 'How can I take the guts of a prohibited calculator model and stuff them inside a featureless calculator housing?'
I swear, some people put enough effort into this sort of thing that they could have earned an engineering degree.
Have gnu, will travel.
Maybe they should make the test harder and just expect kids to use any resource available to them because that's how life does work.
Would you want to live in an apartment building designed by a construction engineer who passed his engineering license exams by having his roommate give him the answers to the test, or one who understands the concepts of load bearing this and stress limit that? You know, one who can tell that the answer he gets from Wikipedia about how to design where you sleep at night isn't right?
like, did you even TRY yo search online?
Would you like him to be the programmer on your team who implements an O(N^2) sort in your app because that's the first one he found online, instead of understanding the problem and using an O(N) algorithm, or understanding even more and deciding it is appropriate to use an O(1) "sort" by keeping a sorted, linked-list of the data instead of sorting each time? Do YOU want to have to tell the client that the app you wrote for him is miserably slow in real life applications because he's got too much data and your programmer was a cut-and-paste-from-the-net expert who didn't understand how to make it fast enough from the beginning?