Slashdot Mirror


AIM Has Been Resurrected. Kind Of. (vice.com)

AOL discontinued AIM, its 20-year-old iconic instant messaging service, last December, months after cutting third-party access to it. Now Motherboard reports a a small team of developers has resurrected it with a private server. From the report: The new chat service is called AIM Phoenix, and it works by running the messages through a private Dynamic DNS run by Wildman Productions, a non-profit group of hobbyist programers. This isn't a new AIM client, it literally uses the old software running on a new server, so it looks and feels exactly like AIM. It's simple to set up. First, you download an old version of AIM from the AIM Phoenix website, register for a new username, tweak the settings to reroute through Wildman Productions' server, and then open yourself up the nostalgic glory of Web 2.0. The old versions of AIM are touchy on new machines and I had to play with a few different versions before I got 5.0 working on my Windows 10 machine.

24 of 54 comments (clear)

  1. Why use the AIM client? by sleekware · · Score: 3, Insightful

    https://pidgin.im/ still updated and supported

    1. Re:Why use the AIM client? by Topwiz · · Score: 1

      Are the messages encrypted?

    2. Re:Why use the AIM client? by ichthus · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      sig: sauer
  2. Web 2.0? Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    AIM was not Web 2.0. AIM, ICQ and the likes existed as part of the web long before Web 2.0 was a term.

    Captcha: change

  3. Was part of the Internet, yes by evanh · · Score: 1

    Independent of the Web altogether.

  4. Unanswered question by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    Why would anyone want to do this?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Unanswered question by hviniciusg · · Score: 1

      I think there is a lot of people that would have a lot of found memories using AOL. maybe them would like to revive their experience in this platform.

      but i agree, it does not make a lot of sense.

    2. Re:Unanswered question by jythie · · Score: 2

      For the fun of doing it? Outside that, yeah, there is not much reason. I could kinda see it if it maintained the user's contact list so was just a drop in replacement to keep chatting with the same people, but if it can not do that I am not sure what purpose it serves.

    3. Re:Unanswered question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      asl?

    4. Re:Unanswered question by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 4, Funny

      The good old days on the internet:
      Where the men were men, the women were men and the children were FBI agents.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  5. Re:I blame Microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Had they not totally Bjorked up Skype (and yes I use her name as a pejorative) there would be no need for any competitors, new or old.

    That is ridiculous. There is always a need for competitors. A product/company/thingy without competition becomes stagnant, regardless of how dope it is. That aside - there is no practical reason to resurrect AIM. Somebody did it because they could - not because MS did something stupid with Skype.

  6. Jabber and IRC are 1000X more advanced by mysidia · · Score: 1

    And at least Jabber offers the possibility of TLS and a decent password hashing system that allows strong passwords without them getting truncated for validation and encoded using a weak crackable hash. So what's the draw of the AIM client today?

    1. Re:Jabber and IRC are 1000X more advanced by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      And at least Jabber offers the possibility of TLS and a decent password hashing system that allows strong passwords without them getting truncated for validation and encoded using a weak crackable hash. So what's the draw of the AIM client today?

      Nostalgia.

      Same reason anyone would want to play (original Atari) Pitfall ...

  7. Retro Clients by Only+Time+Will+Tell · · Score: 1

    My biggest question is when will we resurrect the ICQ beta clients and MSN Messenger? Nothing takes me back to my college days more than the thought of hearing the ICQ sound from behind doors as I walked down the hall. Everyone was too lazy to get up and ask each other face-to-face if they were doing dinner.

    1. Re:Retro Clients by dejitaru · · Score: 1

      Isn't ICQ still around?

    2. Re:Retro Clients by lannocc · · Score: 1

      25239342 here... hit me up!

  8. Re:I blame Microsoft. by tepples · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't the use case for AIM, Skype, and Discord be equally served with an extension to the IRC protocol that lets a user choose to store chat history on the server?

  9. AIM-54 Phoenix by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

    When I saw the title, I thought it was referring to the AIM-54 Phoenix missile, used by the F-14 Fighter. With another Top Gun movie coming out, it was a possibility.

  10. Re:I blame Microsoft. by shaitand · · Score: 1

    It would be interesting to find out why. There was never a point in history when there weren't superior solutions for anything aol made, including aim. AOL was never anything more or less than a platform that exploited ignorance of what the internet was to create the impression that its solution was the internet. We shouldn't forget the lessons learned when we overcome predators who attempt to cultivate ignorance and exploit it for control and profit but we've seriously broken something if we look back on them with nostalgia.

  11. Reinventing the Wheel by DatbeDank · · Score: 2

    What I find hilarious is how Slack came about. It's the best example of recreating the wheel I can imagine. There is no reason AOL couldn't have made AIM into what Slack is today.

    And yet corporations pony up tons of cash for the privilege of using it when there are a ton of chat programs around that use the same thing.

    I need to start thinking like a fashion designer. What's old is new and what is new is old.

    Maybe I should resurrect PDAs again, oh wait they already did that with Tablets.

    1. Re:Reinventing the Wheel by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      They weren't more useful, but they did have a superior user interface. Graffiti was amazing, easy to learn, and as fast as handwriting. It ran on devices with tiny amounts of processing power, and it even had gestures. A modern version would be something like Swype, but - speaking as someone who used it from the beta days until about six months ago - that was a brilliant product that just wouldn't sell to individuals, because most couldn't really grasp the advantages of it. As of about two years ago, every update made it less effective. Even today, if I show someone SwiftKey or GBoard, neither of which is as good as Swype in its prime (but far better than the standard iOS keyboard, e.g.), the most likely response is "oh, that just looks too hard, I don't really know where the keys are". If you do know where the keys are, you can be a wizard with it.

  12. "register for a new username" by pepsikid · · Score: 1

    Wha? Why can't I reclaim my old username by requesting a confirmation link be sent to my AOL email account?

  13. You're thinking of AOL, not AIM by evanh · · Score: 1

    AIM was just another ICQ rip-off. Not to dissimilar to todays Telegram, WeChat, Whatsapp and the likes.

  14. I miss when everyone used IM clients by Daralantan · · Score: 1
    Eventually most people just switched to "Oh I don't use Aim/whatever anymore, talk to me on facebook!"

    Please no.