Slashdot Mirror


The Billionaire Space Race Is Making Life Difficult for Airlines (bloomberg.com)

On Feb. 6, Elon Musk's SpaceX launched its largest rocket into the blue Florida sky. Onboard was "Starman," a dummy strapped into the billionaire's cherry red Tesla roadster. Minutes later, fans cheered as Musk topped himself by nailing a simultaneous landing of the Falcon Heavy's boosters. It was arguably a turning point for the commercial space age. Airlines were somewhat less thrilled. From a report: On that day, 563 flights were delayed and 62 extra miles added to flights in the southeast region of the U.S., according to Federal Aviation Administration data released Tuesday by the Air Line Pilots Association, or ALPA.

America's airspace is a finite resource, and the growth of commercial launches has U.S. airlines worried. Whenever Musk or one of his rivals sends up a spacecraft, the carriers which operate closer to the ground must avoid large swaths of territory and incur sizable expenses. Most of the commercial activity to date has been focused on Cape Canaveral, the Air Force post on Florida's Atlantic coast, where Musk's Space Exploration Technologies and Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin base their stellar operations. It is one of 22 active U.S. launch sites, and a number of other locales -- including Brownsville, Texas; Watkins, Colorado; and Camden County, Georgia -- are pursuing new spaceport ventures to capitalize on commercial space activity.

5 of 152 comments (clear)

  1. Technology advances and the world changes by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The airlines need to adjust and adapt, just like everyone else.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Technology advances and the world changes by KiloByte · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except... airlines are useful. Private expeditions to Mars are not.

      Your leisure or business flight does nothing to advance humanity. Space research, on the other hand...

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:Technology advances and the world changes by Immerman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      By all means, let's charge SpaceX for the use of airspace.

      But, if we do that we should charge the airlines as well - after all, why should they get subsidized by being given a free ride? It's not their airspace after all.

      Go ahead and make the proposal - I bet you the airlines stop complaining so fast the silence creates a sonic boom.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  2. Dumbest thing I've read all week. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whenever Musk or one of his rivals sends up a spacecraft, the carriers which operate closer to the ground must avoid large swaths of territory and incur sizable expenses.

    They're not launching things willy-nilly for funzies - ding-dongs; they're doing it because they're providing a service for paying customers (commercial and governmental) and preparing for future services. It's not the "billionaire space race" it's commerce and the free market. If it wasn't SpaceX or Blue Origin, etc... it would be the Air Force or NASA directly. Air carriers would have to delay and/or re-direct their traffic regardless. Jesus, get some critical thinking skills.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  3. You know it's bad because "billionaires" by BenJeremy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sigh... seriously, the headline is clearly written by somebody who either hates space travel, or somebody who just hates that billionaires are involved in it.

    Grow up.