Slashdot Mirror


Engineers Develop Electric Car Battery That Can Heat Itself During Winter (popularmechanics.com)

Engineers at Penn State have created a battery that can self-heat, allowing for rapid charging regardless of the outside cold. The battery can reportedly provide a 15-minute rapid charge at all temperatures, even when the cold is as low as minus 45 degrees Fahrenheit. Popular Mechanics reports: Batteries have both positive and negative terminals. The scientists placed thin nickel foil with one end attached to the negative terminal and the other end creating a third terminal. When a temperature sensor attached to a battery detects that the battery is below room temperature, it then sends electrons flowing through the nickel foil. This heats the battery up until it's above room temperature again. When the sensor detects that the battery is above room temperature, that's the sign that charging that can begin again. Electric current flows into the battery, rapidly charging in a more efficient state. After 4,500 cycles of testing, the new battery only showed a 20 percent capacity loss, which could provide approximately 280,000 miles of driving and a lifetime of 12.5 years. This is compared to a conventional battery that "showed a 20 percent capacity loss after only 50 charges," reports Popular Mechanics. Penn State released a press statement with more details.

118 comments

  1. This is News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Short circuit a battery, and it heats?

    1. Re: This is News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      SHUT UP, not everyone is a "pro" like you. This is news to nerds like us who do not have an engineering Degree.

      ==BeauHD==

    2. Re:This is News? by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, sounds more like an integral heating coil that gets the charging current until proper temp is reached, at which point the current is switched to the battery itself. Simple and elegant as it can be all built into the battery, if you are into that sort of thing.

    3. Re:This is News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Interesting, but would it run Linux?

    4. Re:This is News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real news is this 'sensor' that somehow knows what temperature it is and turns on the heater. That kind of thing could be useful in other ways. So many possibilities!

    5. Re:This is News? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      The real news is this 'sensor' that somehow knows what temperature it is and turns on the heater. That kind of thing could be useful in other ways. So many possibilities!

      They should call it a 'thermo-switch'.

    6. Re:This is News? by tsa · · Score: 1

      And can you make a Beowulf cluster of these things?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    7. Re: This is News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ass

    8. Re: This is News? by schure · · Score: 1

      No, no, you misunderstood. Look, there's a sophisticated, futuristic system here that is doing unbelievable tricks at the elementary-particle scale. That's what you should read from "sends electrons flowing through the nickel foil". The fact that there's nickel foil involved should just signal to you an exceeding amount of intriguing beauty amd elegance in the design. You can't just say "the heating element lights up", oh no! /s

    9. Re: This is News? by DethLok · · Score: 1

      Umm, the coldest day of June was yesterday. As I backed out of my (unheated) garage my car told me it was 12.5 C. Outside it was about 4C.

      And in summer the garage, at 6am, is easily 20+C. Outside it is likely to be warmer (the garage is insulated).

      How is this useful? It's NOT cold!

      Ooooh, it might be useful to those people who, for some strange reason, choose to live in places where water actually freezes OUTSIDE of a refrigerator freezer???

      That is, in bugger all parts of the world?

      Yeah... great advance I'm sure.

      [Yes, I'm being deliberately obtuse, as I know that for some reason/s large numbers of humans insist on living outside the comfortably habitable range of climate suited for humans, but I still do not know why they choose this].

    10. Re: This is News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh indeed the exotic nickle. But would it work with a wooden nickle.

    11. Re: This is News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Samsung phones can keep you warm during winter... itâ(TM)s by design man!

    12. Re:This is News? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      They should call it a 'thermo-switch'.

      And fit it with an Arduino and give it an IP address

      In no time, it will be able to spam us all!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    13. Re: This is News? by j-beda · · Score: 1

      Yeah... great advance I'm sure.

      [Yes, I'm being deliberately obtuse, as I know that for some reason/s large numbers of humans insist on living outside the comfortably habitable range of climate suited for humans, but I still do not know why they choose this].

      Did you actually choose to live where you are, or was that choice made by someone else when you were a wee tot or before you were born? If so, did they make the choice based primarily on climate?

      You may be correct that the climate you are living in is the objective optimal one, the fact that it is not currently completely buried in new immigrants seems to indicate that people generally do not decide where to live based on this type of thing.

      There are economic reasons why people live in places with non-ideal climates - the "natural resources" are spread around, and historically it was hard to live far from where those things were. Once you have built the population centers it is hard to move them to "better" places even if the climate would be nicer.

    14. Re: This is News? by DethLok · · Score: 1

      That is all true, hence my use of the word 'choose'. Many don't choose to live in location X, it's just where they were born/grew up, etc.

      I still find it somewhat puzzling that many of those able to move - don't.

      Humans, eh?

    15. Re: This is News? by j-beda · · Score: 1

      I am curious - did you move some from other less hospitable part of the planet or did someone else make the "smart choice" for you?

      I am not as surprised as you that more people don't move to "better places", since climate is but one factor that is important to human decisions, and there are a WHOLE BUNCH of factors that are essentially randomly decided that get "baked into" the desirability of a location. "Hey what a pretty spot for a hunting campsite, I like the way that tree gives good shade next to the fork in the stream"...."Yes this city sucks and the other place over there would be better in every way, except that all the infrastructure is here, all the capital is here, all the jobs are here, all the customers are here, all the sexy people are here, and over there are only a few people saying how great it is."

      I happen to live in what is objectively described as fairly inhospitable, but we decided to move here based on work and economic grounds. We have convinced ourselves that skiing is "fun" and freezing part of the year while melting part of the year is a good trade off.

      I suppose the argument could be made that if we only lived in those parts of the world where clothing is optional the year around, and the food is easy to come by, then as a species we might still be in the "hunter-gather" stage, with the "couch-potato" stage not even on the horizon. If we want to be able to post on Slashdot, maybe some of us NEEDED to live in shitty climates. Maybe our great-grandchildren in the post-scarcity world beyond the singularity will all live in pastoral bliss, but if seven to ten billion of us all move to the Bahamas it might get a bit crowded.

    16. Re: This is News? by DethLok · · Score: 1

      A bit of karma served upon me, and deservedly so. Nicely done, sir or madam :)

      I was born about 10km from I've lived in a city for the last 16 years, but I grew up in "the country", several hundred km away from the city, and moved around to other country towns until high school, which I attended at a boarding school in the 'big smoke' (city).

      Since then I've lived in the city, country life is a bit bland and lacking of opportunities (jobs) unless you are in one of a few specific careers.

      And yes, my entire country is pleasantly climated, Gods Own, or Godzone, as you will, as we sometimes say here.

      While I've seen snow and been out in it, decades ago (and in my own country, which has more snowfields than Switzerland) I prefer the heat and the summer to winter, at least it's more pleasant riding my bicycle to work in summer (even in 40) than in the cold (single digit temperatures! OMG!) wet (it might possibly rain!) and dark (it's certainly that until about halfway to work) when it's one of our mild winters.

      As a jaded almost baby boomer (parents were born before that war) I'm increasingly of the opinion that the locals (before the invasion) had the right civilisation, wander around for a few hours a day collecting enough food, then socialise. I'm not sure that the couch-potato life of early 21st century is ideal. Sure, medicine and life spans are great, but...

      Yeah, I'm too jaded and drunk to think it's the best solution to existence.

      Full disclosure, I live in Western Australia, in the capital. It's quite pleasant here. All year round. If it hits freezing in winter it's front page news nation wide, as it is so rare.

    17. Re: This is News? by j-beda · · Score: 1

      Thanks for sharing. I don't know that there is much "karma served" - but these sorts of discussions can provide some interesting perspective.

      As the product of a fairly similar "Commonwealth Colonial" legacy in Canada and the Northern US, I usually manage to convince myself that most of my life choices are the product of rational thoughts and decisions, rather than emotion and clever self justification of whatever my lizard-brain instincts have decided it wants or whatever the random history of my self, family, or culture have lead me to. Sometimes that might even be true!

      Right now, I live only a few hours from Ottawa, which I believe has the largest annual temperature difference of any capital city in the world (I think they might have hit 40 last week, and -40 is not totally unheard of - we tell ourselves that it is a "dry cold" that ain't so bad. Maybe, but the high humidity hot is pretty unpleasant.) Currently I am visiting my "hometown" on the coast in Vancouver which had "pre-contact" cultures on the coast with such "easy living" at least in terms of food resources, that people gave extreme gifts or even destroyed wealth to demonstrate social status - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... It is thought of as a bit rainy for many people though, so not the Pacific Paradise that the Polynesians prefer.

       

    18. Re: This is News? by DethLok · · Score: 1

      I have a Canadian friend, when she & family emigrated Downunder, they left 40 below to arrive, 3 days later, at 40 above.
      Celsius.
      She was not impressed.

    19. Re: This is News? by j-beda · · Score: 1

      My wife had a student (actually their spouse) who did the opposite, getting on the plane in Africa at about +40 and arriving in Toronto at -40. He ended up deluding himself that winter was a fabulous wonder and took up skating and had his newborn signed up for hockey teams as soon as he could walk.

    20. Re: This is News? by DethLok · · Score: 1

      Ice and snow are pretty awesome things to people who don't get to experience it 'at home', it's quite possible to enjoy freezing weather, even outside, if you can muck around in snow and stuff.

      Though, admittedly, the ability to go "nup, had enough, going inside now" is kind of an essential, indeed integral, part of that enjoyment :)

  2. Re:Not useful in Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Then don't fucking use them if you live in Florida. Buy a normal, cheaper one.

  3. Which Is It? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    approximately 280,000 miles of driving and a lifetime of 12.5 years.

    So which comes first, the 280,000 miles or the 12.5 years? Rather few people are going to get anywhere near that mileage, my car is 12 years old and only has 160,000 miles on it and I thought that I did a lot of driving.

    1. Re:Which Is It? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      15K miles per year is pretty close to average when taking age grouping into account.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:Which Is It? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      approximately 280,000 miles of driving and a lifetime of 12.5 years.

      So which comes first, the 280,000 miles or the 12.5 years? Rather few people are going to get anywhere near that mileage, my car is 12 years old and only has 160,000 miles on it and I thought that I did a lot of driving.

      You're delusional. When your car reached 160,000 miles did you scrap it yourself?
      No, someone else will continue to drive it (or most cars anyway) for a few more years.
      You should check out the average age of the fleet in the US. It's astounding.

      Anyway, I drive a lot more than you. About, 25,000 miles a year.

    3. Re:Which Is It? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      approximately 280,000 miles of driving and a lifetime of 12.5 years.

      So which comes first, the 280,000 miles or the 12.5 years?

      Different on different instances of the car. But it doesn't matter.

      The batteries have more than one mode of ageing. One is driven mainly by time-since-manufacture, others by cycling. So after you drive it for 280,000 miles in, say, eight years OR park it for 12.5 years on a trickle charger, don't expect the car to work well any more (or the manufacturer's warranty to still be in force).

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    4. Re:Which Is It? by geoskd · · Score: 2

      OR park it for 12.5 years on a trickle charger

      You don't trickle charge a lithium chemistry battery. This is the #1 cause of lithium battery fires and explosions. To store them for long periods of disuse, you have to charge them to a storage charge (typically 50%) at which point they are good for about 2-3 years of storage. After that, they need to be restored to their storage charge again. Storing Lithium batteries at full charge accelerates internal corrosion (anode gets oxidized iirc), and will reduce the total lifespan of the battery by half or more.

      Properly cared for, a lithium chemistry battery will still have 75% of its total capacity after 15 years and 1000 complete charge discharge cycles (or 5000 20% charge cycles) This means keeping them within their proper operating temperature and not charging / discharging them when they are too cold or too hot.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    5. Re:Which Is It? by tsa · · Score: 2

      My MacBook Pro is now 7 years old, is used daily and still has 84% of its original capacity so you must be right. That is good news for me because I hope it will male the 15 years, considering the abysmal rubbish Apple has on the market now.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    6. Re:Which Is It? by tsa · · Score: 1

      Make, not male.
      Why does THE site for nerds have such an archaic posting feature?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    7. Re: Which Is It? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say 15k sounds low. I used to average 7k/y when I lived in walking distance to work and only drove on weekends for pleasure. Now that I drive to work I do 18k/y and my commute is one of the shortest amongst my colleagues

    8. Re:Which Is It? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why does THE site for nerds have such an archaic posting feature?

      Well, because nerds are very conservative when it comes to technology.
      Nerds typically won't switch to new software unless it has been proven to be better than the old at almost everything.

      Also, I wouldn't be so sure about Slashdot being "THE site for nerds".
      It's more like the site for old farts who used to be nerds in the 90's.
      You know, back in the days when Slashdot loaded quickly and had a better design.

    9. Re:Which Is It? by tsa · · Score: 1

      Spot on, LOL.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    10. Re:Which Is It? by AndroSyn · · Score: 1

      I've got a 2008 VW Jetta with 255000 miles on it...

  4. so.. they 'invented' this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    essentially a resistance heater in an electricity storage device.. for when the natural heat generated from charging isn't 'enough' to keep a suitable temperature?

    wow. it took 'til 2018 to come up with that?

    next you're gonna tell me they got a cooler for batteries for use in hot climates.....

    1. Re:so.. they 'invented' this? by geoskd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      essentially a resistance heater in an electricity storage device.. for when the natural heat generated from charging isn't 'enough' to keep a suitable temperature? wow. it took 'til 2018 to come up with that?

      Car makers (Tesla not withstanding) are remarkably inept at designing and manufacturing electric systems. They primarily consist of mechanical engineers who think all batteries work like lead acid batteries.

      The first hybrid cars that came to market continuously trickle charged the lithium packs, and had absolutely no environmental controls on the packs. This caused the batteries to wear out within 5 years, and caused numerous car fires.

      The first all electric car that Nissan produced also had zero battery temperature conditioning, and as such the pack would wear out and have to be replaced after just 60k miles. Nissan has since corrected the problem, but only just barely.

      The traditional car manufacturers are bloated and incompetent dinosaurs, and the great recession should have killed half of them were it not for corrupt politicians handing out money like candy to babies.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    2. Re:so.. they 'invented' this? by thestuckmud · · Score: 1

      The first hybrid cars that came to market continuously trickle charged the lithium packs...

      The first hybrid electric car was the Lohner-Porsche, which used lead acid batteries, but I assume you are referring to the Toyota Prius and Honda Insight, which employed NiMH. Lithium ion batteries offer far better specific energy density and other advantages, but should never, ever be trickle charged.

    3. Re:so.. they 'invented' this? by geoskd · · Score: 2

      The first hybrid electric car was the Lohner-Porsche, which used lead acid batteries, but I assume you are referring to the Toyota Prius and Honda Insight, which employed NiMH

      Sorry, I should have been clearer: the first Lithium hybrid cars had serious issues. The manufacturers thought that the lithium batteries were simple drop in replacements for the NiMH and had them setup to trickle charge with the obvious results.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    4. Re:so.. they 'invented' this? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The original Leaf 24 is fine without heating/cooling of the battery. There were some early issues but lack of cooling was not the problem.

      The new Leaf 40 is major issues due to lack of thermal management. Most EVs do have at least cooling for the battery.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:so.. they 'invented' this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lithium ion batteries offer far better specific energy density

      That's not the be all and end all in electric vehicle design. Energy per unit volume can be more important than energy per unit of mass. When the Prius came out 15 or so years ago I don't think lithium batteries were there in terms of safe chemistries able to reliably provide the same or better energy per unit volume, AND as many recharge cycles as NiMH.

    6. Re:so.. they 'invented' this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "so.. they 'invented' this?"

      No, they "developed" it.

    7. Re:so.. they 'invented' this? by unimacs · · Score: 1

      Didn't a Tesla spontaneously combust a couple of weeks ago?

      I'm a big fan of Tesla and think they have the potential to disrupt the auto industry in very positive ways (if they already haven't), but I also believe it would be a mistake to characterize traditional car manufacturers as comparatively clueless when it comes to battery technology.

      As I said, I'm a big fan of Tesla but their cars cost much more than I'm willing to spend on a vehicle. In fact I bike to work and a lot of places which is a dirt cheap way to get around. Still we do own and drive a couple of cars for those trips where biking or other forms of transportation aren't vey practical. When one of them got to be about 16 years old it started to become less reliable and we decided to replace it. I wanted to try an EV and for us a plug-hybrid made a lot of sense. As someone who considers $15,000 to be a lot of money for a car, a new one was out of the question. But the beauty of used marked for EVs is that resale values are crappy because people don't want to get stuck with having to replace a battery pack.

      What we ended up with was a used Chevy Volt. I've never owned a Chevy in my life but the battery packs on those cars have a pretty good reputation. Contrary to what you might think, they put a lot of thought and engineering into designing those packs. They DO have their own independent cooling and heating systems and have since the first ones came out in 2010/2011. They have not suffered the degradation that early Nissan Leaf owners did who lived in hot climates.

      So, our 2012 Volt (manufactured in late 2011) is nearly 7 years old, has 73,000 miles and so far has not lost any perceptible amount of electric range. Tesla has not cornered the market on EV battery technology.

    8. Re:so.. they 'invented' this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The original Leaf 24 is fine without heating/cooling of the battery. There were some early issues but lack of cooling was not the problem.

      The original Leaf was notorious for battery degradation in high temperatures. Nissan updated the battery chemistry (the so-called "lizard" pack) and that seemed to mitigate the worst problems. But cooling WAS the problem, and still is. Passive cooling does NOT work with LiON battery packs at this point in the game. The chemistries aren't there yet. Toyota and Ford use forced air from the cabin to keep their LiON cells cool, while GM and Tesla use liquid cooling loops. But Nissan does nothing and then acts surprised that cells are crapping out prematurely. Their engineers are either idiots, or they're too limp-wristed to stand up to the beancounters and demand a proper thermal management system for the batteries.

    9. Re:so.. they 'invented' this? by Macman408 · · Score: 2

      Chevy seems to be doing pretty well in this area, actually. Like Tesla, the Chevy Bolt EV has active heating and cooling (as does the Chevy Volt, a PHEV). The Bolt has a dedicated heater for the battery coolant loop, and uses the same cooling as the air conditioning. When fast charging, it does start off slowly in cold weather, but it can get faster as the battery heats up. Chevy is more conservative than Tesla in many ways, though; for example, even fast charging on the Bolt is limited to 1C (not that there are many CCS chargers that can do better than that yet anyway), while Tesla Supercharging is much faster. But Chevy seems to be capable of making good, reliable EVs so far.

    10. Re:so.. they 'invented' this? by rsborg · · Score: 1

      s/limpwristed/corrupt/

      No active cooling, heck that's just additional sales down the road, amirite?!

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    11. Re:so.. they 'invented' this? by dougmc · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I should have been clearer: the first Lithium hybrid cars had serious issues. The manufacturers thought that the lithium batteries were simple drop in replacements for the NiMH and had them setup to trickle charge with the obvious results.

      Such a mistake would be grade A incompetence on the part of the designers of the cars, and while your link does talk about lots of issues -- not a single one of those issues is attributed to trickle charging Li-ion cars.

      I do not believe your claim that any electric or hybrid car manufacturer (let alone multiple manufacturers) actually thought that Lithium-Ion/LiPo/etc. batteries were a drop-in replacement for NiMH batteries and so they could still trickle charge them even when full. They would absolutely have to update their chargers to support the new chemistry -- this would not be optional. NiMH chargers would probably look for the slight dip in voltage when the battery was fully charged and Lithium-ion/LiPo batteries would have no such dip -- so it would keep charging at full power, at least until it triggered whatever other protective circuit was there. (Too high of voltage, battery temperature, etc.)

      If they did do this, the "obvious results" you refer to would be that almost every car with this flaw would ruin the battery within the first few days of use -- and some would probably catch fire, probably while driving down the road (I'll assume they're not plug-in hybrids, but just ordinary hybrids. If they were plug-in hybrids, it would happen with them parked and charging too.)

  5. Tesla batteries last longer than that. by godel_56 · · Score: 4, Informative

    A group of Tesla owners on the Dutch-Belgium Tesla Forum are gathering data from over 350 Tesla vehicles across the world and frequently updating it in a public Google file. We have previously reported on the data, but they have since added many more vehicles and those vehicles have been driving a lot more – completing more battery cycles. The data clearly shows that for the first 50,000 miles (100,000 km), most Tesla battery packs will lose about 5% of their capacity, but after the 50,000-mile mark, the capacity levels off and it looks like it could be difficult to make a pack degrade by another 5%.

    https://electrek.co/2018/04/14/tesla-battery-degradation-data/

    The trend line currently suggests that the average battery pack could cycle through over 300,000 km (186,000) before coming close to 90% capacity.

    1. Re:Tesla batteries last longer than that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or people that spent 50-100k on a car and love it so much to frequent the forums provided data that justified their purchase and love while electrek.co was made, owned, and operated by the same group.

      Meanwhile the website MAGA has data provided by forum members showing that Donald Trump's shit does indeed smell like roses.

    2. Re:Tesla batteries last longer than that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile the website MAGA has data provided by forum members showing that Donald Trump's shit does indeed smell like roses.

      That wouldn't be consistent with how things usually are.

      Rather it would state that just like Kim Jong Il, Donald Trump doesn't shit.
      Then Doland would jump out on twitter and proudly proclaim that the very trustworthy MAGA site, really the best site out there, have conclusive proof that his shit does smell like roses!
      Then Huckabee Sanders would make a statement that the MAGA site didn't compare Donald to Kim Joing Il and that the president never made any statement about the smell of his shit, but that it does indeed smell like roses.

    3. Re:Tesla batteries last longer than that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooo salty. That's ok though, can use that to make more batteries.

    4. Re:Tesla batteries last longer than that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm at almost 130,000 miles on a Prius plugin with no appreciable difference in battery capacity from day one. Toyota is very conservative with their batteries and only allows charging to 80% capacity and discharge to 20% or so.

  6. Cycles vs. Miles by crow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If they say it can go 4500 cycles with a 20% degradation, then assuming a linear drop, a total distance of 280,000 miles implies...

    280000/4500/0.9 -> 70 miles of range.

    That's a compliance car. Even the Leaf is over 100 miles now, and most are over 200.

    1. Re:Cycles vs. Miles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't 20% degradation make that last part 0.8, and thus ~77.8mi range?

      Taken the reverse way, a battery pack with 300mi range implies 1,080,000 miles (1,215,000 if I'm wrong about that denominator) of driving to experience similar degradation after 4,500 cycles. Not too shabby.

    2. Re:Cycles vs. Miles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on how big the battery is. Big enough, and you can run a Bolt from it. Which, by the way, is one of only 2 non-Tesla normal highway vehicles presently available i(i.e. not counting one-offs and tiny-production specials like Rimac as wonderful as they are) that offers more than 200 miles range (the other is a Jaguar). So "most" are not over 200 - only those 2 plus Teslas. The others are all 150 miles (latest Leaf model) or less in standardized testing, and "most" are around 100 miles or less.

    3. Re:Cycles vs. Miles by crow · · Score: 1

      I assumed (probably incorrectly) linear degradation. As such, 20% degradation at the end means an average of 10% degradation. The real formula would be an integral of the degradation curve, but what I used should be sufficient.

    4. Re:Cycles vs. Miles by crow · · Score: 1

      It's not like there are a lot of pure EVs out there (excluding limited distribution compliance cars), so any generalization is flawed. The market clearly is moving towards a 200-mile minimum advertised range. But even 150 is about double the range cited in the article.

    5. Re:Cycles vs. Miles by crow · · Score: 1

      And the important point is that quick charging is nearly irrelevant except on trips, and you don't take a short-range EV on a trip. Regular charging is mostly at home or work. People aren't generally buying EVs on the assumption that they'll fill them up at a quick charge station like they do with gas.

    6. Re:Cycles vs. Miles by Ranbot · · Score: 1

      And the important point is that quick charging is nearly irrelevant except on trips, and you don't take a short-range EV on a trip. Regular charging is mostly at home or work. People aren't generally buying EVs on the assumption that they'll fill them up at a quick charge station like they do with gas.

      Absolutely true. People are far too hung up on charging stations and fast-charging concerns. They are stuck in the gas station mindset [understandably, to a degree] and worry a lot about non-issues. I've owned a Nissan Leaf for nearly 3 years and I've never taken it to a charging station. All of my charging has been in my garage by 120V "trickle" charge. I drive it almost every day. Obviously, it's local/commuter vehicle only, which won't work everyone, but if you have a 2-car household it's very easy to get by with one EV and one ICE, for short and long trips, respectively.

  7. Lies! by fluffernutter · · Score: 0

    Ok so everyone insisting that cold climates didn't affect EVs so I should definitely get an EV.... was lying to me?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:Lies! by crow · · Score: 4, Informative

      EVs work fine in the cold, but it does reduce their range. A friend of mine used the same cells that Tesla uses to power a light for his dog sled in the Iditarod, and it worked flawlessly at 40 below.

      Some cars do worse in the winter than others. My Tesla may lose a third of its range in extreme cold while my Leaf loses more than half. Whether this makes a particular EV impractical for you depends on the car and your needs.

    2. Re:Lies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have missed the main point. Lithium Ion batteries cannot be charged rapidly at low temperatures. If you do charge one rapidly at low temperature, it will experience permanent, severe capacity loss. Discharge at low temperatures does not damage the battery.

    3. Re:Lies! by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      Ok so everyone insisting that cold climates didn't affect EVs so I should definitely get an EV.... was lying to me?

      Anyone saying that cold climates do not affect EV's either weren't specific enough in what they meant or were smoking something.

      As stated by another poster, cold weather and more specifically, a cold battery, affects the range of the vehicle. I've read that it can be up to a 40% loss in distance.

      Personally, I live in the New England area and would not feel comfortable owning an EV as my primary vehicle. Between cold snaps, winter storms, traffic, and some of the distances that I drive, there is, in my opinion, a much wider range of safety latitude running an ICE vehicle vs an EV.

      But that's just my opinion. Everyone has different driving needs and an EV might be a better fit for you.

    4. Re:Lies! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Ok so everyone insisting that cold climates didn't affect EVs so I should definitely get an EV.... was lying to me?

      No. What you should do is get out of that anti EV echo chamber you and all your other nutters seem to hang about in.

    5. Re:Lies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla already has thermal management for its batteries, it will heat them when they are too cold and cool them when they are too hot.

      So this invention, means pretty much nothing to Tesla. I presume other electric cars are the same, but haven't checked.

  8. Heating for Driving? by crow · · Score: 2

    This sounds like it may be a nice solution for heating the battery during charging, but you also need to both heat and cool batteries during driving to keep them in the optimal temperature range. Can this also be used while also drawing power to drive the vehicle? It sounds like it only works with external power.

    So if you assume that the battery will have external heating and cooling anyway, the elegance of the solution is lost, and now it's back to the question of whether this method of heating the battery is more efficient than using a traditional heating system.

    1. Re:Heating for Driving? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Its a Block heater https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... like up in Canada eh.
      With the plug and the heating and the charging. More power to look after the battery.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Heating for Driving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My concern would be the opposite!

      Resistance heating is a huge power draw and getting/maintaining a target temperature might be a problem at very low ambient temperatures. This is no big deal frankly when plugged in, but once you are on the road it becomes significant. You could wind up gaining on battery cycle efficiency on the temps and losing it all due to the current draw required to maintain those temps.

      Or maybe not. I'm not an EE so these concerns are based upon the general knowledge that resistance heating is one of the most energy intensive cycles we use in everyday life.

  9. Re:Not useful in Florida by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    Yep. For almost any battery pack with active cooling, you could achieve the same thing by adjusting the cooling.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  10. US PATENT#123456789: Battery With A Shelf Life. by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

    essentially a resistance heater in an electricity storage device.. for when the natural heat generated from charging isn't 'enough' to keep a suitable temperature?

    wow. it took 'til 2018 to come up with that?

    next you're gonna tell me they got a cooler for batteries for use in hot climates.....

    Basically, a PetSmart aquarium heater in the electrolyte. Generations of Canadians have known that hair dryers are Really Good Things at 4:AM and it's -30C and you car *MUST* *START* *NOW*. (Or, usually, within 15 minutes.)

    The concept of heating a battery is nothing new. And I applaud any effort which brings practical renewable energy to any environment.

    The gasoline engine is an absolutely beautiful thing, but it is an inefficient machine, and it wastes the vast majority of its input energy as the heat that burns your hands on the exhaust manifold.

    If you're espousing electric cars as the way of the future, are you sure you want to be wasting precious electricity as heat? I'd be far more impressed if those heaters were off-spec GPUs working World Community Grid problems, mining currency, or, maybe somehow part of the autonomous driving system.

    We're bragging that we've invented the Battery With A Shelf Life. We're celebrating a car which intentionally leaks its own fuel.

    I'll celebrate if they improved the battery technology enough that hair dryers weren't waking up neighbours at 4:AM.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re:US PATENT#123456789: Battery With A Shelf Life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Generations of Canadians have known that hair dryers are Really Good Things" Like 3 at most, stop boasting about random things that are barely true eh?

  11. Sure it's useful in Florida by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I take issue with your "Not useful in Florida" title.

    Sure, in Florida (at normal temperatures) the battery/controller would go straight to charging (and the normal cooling fans or whatever would kick in once it got hot enough). So it would work just fine, though it wouldn't use the "heat me up first" feature.

    Until some winter when you drive up to Michigan, Quebeck, Alaska, or the nearest ski mountain or place where your kids can make snowballs, park it overnight at a motel or resort (because all the charging stations are full), then charge it in the morning while you eat breakfast. Oops! THEN you'll want the feature to be installed.

    (It's really low weight, so hauling around a extra power transistor and some nickel foil heating elements doesn't cut into your mileage.)

    So even if you don't actually use it in Florida it's still useful there - to the dealer selling you the car. B-)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Sure it's useful in Florida by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      Active thermal management presumably includes heating, too. Remember, Tesla is selling a lot of cars in Norway.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Sure it's useful in Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, Tesla is selling a lot of cars in Norway.

      Yep, but Norwegians aren't entitled bitches so they will make do without something that handles all situations if necessary.
      They decided to stop emissions first and sort out convenience later.
      This battery tech is needed to target other markets that aren't willing to make sacrifices.

    3. Re:Sure it's useful in Florida by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I have a picture of a Model S charging at the supercharger in Pyhäjärvi in Finland. It was -35C at the time so they must have done something.

      Sidenote: While double checking the name of the supercharger on Google maps I found that the maps entry had a picture of a Model S charging in winter so someone else was intrigued as much as I was ... even more so if he felt the need to post it on Google Maps.

    4. Re:Sure it's useful in Florida by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      (BTW, I didn't write the title.)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    5. Re: Sure it's useful in Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is that -35 in the winter or summer? And did you include âwind chill factorâ(TM) in there..?

    6. Re:Sure it's useful in Florida by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Who the hell's driving from Florida to Alaska?

  12. Re:Not useful in Florida by crow · · Score: 2

    Yeah, it never gets that cold in Florida. That's why they never had problems with shuttle launches, and orange growers never panic about freezing.

    I'll agree that it's rare to drop below freezing, but it does happen.

    Also, it's not clear to me that the optimal charging temperature is anything above freezing. That's not a magic temperature when dealing with battery chemistry. I know my Tesla starts to have reduced regenerative braking below 45 or so until the pack warms up. For high speed charging, they'll probably want to heat to 45 or 50 for best results.

  13. Re:Not useful in Florida by bjwest · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    I'm going to jump under the bridge and defend this "troll". I'm sick and tired of people saying "[this thing] isn't needed [some place]", "[this thing] is useless [because reason]", and "I don't need/want [this thing]".

    Seriously, if you don't want/need something don't fucking buy/steal or otherwise acquire the god damn thing. The market place, like the universe, doens't revolve around your sorry ass.

    --

    --- Keep the choice with the user..
  14. ....eh....ok by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
    They re-invented a thermostat and a heating pad to combat cold climates. For their next trick they are going to re-invent a device known as a "fan" to help keep them cool.

    How far we have fallen if this is news.

    1. Re:....eh....ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "innovative" thing is to have the heater in the batteries instead of heating them from the outside.
      That means that you get a more even temperature instead of overheating one part and wasting energy just to get the other side warm.

      Also, you probably wouldn't settle for just a fan in an EV.
      Since they don't have a lot of waste heat from the engine you will find that they use heat pumps instead to be able to both heat up and cool down depending on what you need.

      The only thing that is comparable between an ICE vehicle and an EV is the tires.
      If you do anything else the same you have design flaws.

  15. Re:Not useful in Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey dumbass, Florida is more than Miami. It even snowed a few days in much of the panhandle this past winter.

  16. Here's a free analog alternative by technosaurus · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Use thermal expansion coefficient to allow terminals to touch when cold (when it heats up sufficiently the terminals will disconnect) . In case this isn't obvious I am placing it in the public domain.

    1. Re:Here's a free analog alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case this isn't obvious I am placing it in the public domain.

      Doesn't matter. Prior art and obviousness haven't prevented companies from patenting and protecting their IP so far.

  17. Another biased report. :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While this looks good I can't tolerate inaccurate reporting. It makes me wonder the validating of what is being reported. In this case, " This is compared to a conventional battery that "showed a 20 percent capacity loss after only 50 charges," Statements like this hold 1% truth and 99% bull. Yes, if you totally drain a lead-acid battery and allow the gases to escape this might be true. But a sealed lead-acid battery that is discharged by the normal starting of a vehicle will be no where near this bad.

    Simply think for a minute. This would mean if you started you car twice a day, for 1 month, just one month your battery would have lost 20% of it's ability to hold a charge. So after 5 months your battery would be worthless and not hold a charge or close to it???????

    So, we'll see this along with those 1990 video games that we're still waiting to play that never appeared, N'est pas?

  18. Prior Art by Edis+Krad · · Score: 2

    I thought Samsung invented those....

    1. Re:Prior Art by DeBaas · · Score: 1

      no they invented the round corners version

      --
      ---
  19. Short term solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the longer term, we are warming the globe quickly enough that these cold specific solutions will no longer be necessary.

  20. Re:Not useful in Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, it never gets that cold in Florida. That's why they never had problems with shuttle launches, and orange growers never panic about freezing.

    Well, KSC is pretty far north. South Florida it doesn't even hit freezing.

  21. Tesla is already shipping it by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Tesla battery pack has the most advanced thermal management system. It is linked to the vehicle's a/c, it has circulating cooling fluid, and heating elements. It protects itself using the energy in the cells even when not plugged in.

    Adding a heating coil to the charging circuit while plugged in is quite trivial.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Tesla is already shipping it by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      The Model 3 doesn't even have a dedicated heater element: it uses waste heat from the motor to heat the battery and has some way to use the motor for heating even when not moving.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:Tesla is already shipping it by thestuckmud · · Score: 1

      Does Tesla really have the "most advanced thermal, management"? AFAIK, they do not use a heat pump, which BMW claims can save up to 3 kW of electrical energy in favorable conditions (BMW Technical Training manual for the i3, originally called i01).

    3. Re:Tesla is already shipping it by SpiceWare · · Score: 1

      Key phrase, favorable conditions

      Will a Heat Pump Work in Cold Weather?

      Because they use outside air, air source heat pumps work especially well in moderate temperatures. But when temperatures drop below 32 F, they lose efficiency, meaning they have to rely on a secondary source of heat to properly heat your home.

      Secondary forms of heat come in two forms:
      1. Electric resistance coil heaters (the default)
      2. Gas furnaces (when combined with a heat pump this is called “hybrid heat” or “dual fuel system”)

      So an EV would have to haul around both the heat pump and resistance coils. Excess weight is bad in cars, hence the trend away from spare tires, so it's better to just use the coils by themselves even if they're inefficient over a narrow temperature range.

    4. Re:Tesla is already shipping it by thestuckmud · · Score: 1

      Correct. Heat pumps only make sense in environments where a cool [warm] source is available to drain [source] heat to [from]. According to BMW, "The operation of a heat pump in all its operating modes makes sense in a temperature range between -10C and +40C / +14F and +104F." Pretty much all populous areas of the planet are within this range as I write this, though I admit McMurdo Station in Antarctica is colder (-2F) and I may have missed an unusually cold mountain village or two in the southern hemisphere.

      Of course, a heat pump is not a replacement for resistive heating and refrigeration elements, it is a system that incorporates those and other component to optimize heating and cooling operations.

  22. Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a beowulf cluster of these!

  23. Tesla did it better! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of building a dedicated battery heater, Model 3 simply uses the motor's coils as a resistive heater. This can easily provide more than enough heat to bring up batteries to a comfortable temperature within minutes.

  24. spotify web player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The information above is very good to me, thanks for sharing! - spotify web player

  25. Rigged Research? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is compared to a conventional battery that "showed a 20 percent capacity loss after only 50 charges

    Were they comparing their batteries to Nickel Cadmium? Seriously, my Nissan Leaf is at 33,000 with only one bar 1/12 missing. I even have a set of snow tires for the Michigan winter.

  26. This tech is a stop gap by Karmashock · · Score: 2

    ... fuel cells. The batteries are a stop gap. We need air breathing fuel cells to compete with hydrocarbon internal combustion engines.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:This tech is a stop gap by swillden · · Score: 1

      ... fuel cells. The batteries are a stop gap. We need air breathing fuel cells to compete with hydrocarbon internal combustion engines.

      I don't think fuel cells will take off. There are some pretty fundamental difficulties with them, and relatively little research investment is going into them -- certainly nothing to compare with the research going into improved batteries. We see another probably-significant battery research result every couple of weeks.

      Further, BEVs already compete quite well with ICEVs. Not for all use cases, but many. Batteries are going to continue getting better, and cheaper, and moving BEVs into ever-broader roles, continuing to narrow the applications for which fuel cells would be better... if practical, cost-effective, mass market fuel cells existed, which they don't.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:This tech is a stop gap by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      the use categories they're not competitive in are the ones where they're not commonly used... the internal combustion engine is to be challenged in those "use categories" then you need a technology that is competitive in them.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    3. Re:This tech is a stop gap by swillden · · Score: 1

      But narrow use cases aren't going to drive a broad technology shift. More passenger vehicles are built than all other types combined, and BEVs have that use case pretty well covered now, and will have it fully covered within a few years. I expect Tesla's semi trucks to move the freight industry towards BEVs as well; the economics are pretty compelling.

      No, I don't see fuel cells going anywhere. Batteries are going to continue moving into larger and larger swaths of the vehicle market and the remaining use cases are going to stick with ICEs until batteries can take over.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:This tech is a stop gap by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      time will tell

      I don't see batteries having legs.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    5. Re:This tech is a stop gap by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      The problem with using fuel cells in cars isn't the fuel cells. It's the fuel storage.

      Home fuel cells are easy. You can pipe natural gas at low pressure to your house and crack it as needed with no real problem.

      When you start putting hydrogen (or natural gas) in tanks at high pressure, you get problems due to the pressure cycling (think "Tank rupture") along with embritlement and in the case of hydrogen it's hard to keep _in_ the tank over a prolonged period.

      Hydrogen is a "gee whiz" technology, but trhe reality is that no maker has ever sold a hydrogen powered car due to the liability issues arising if owners don't rigidly maintain them in the case of pressurised tanks. LH2 is impractical (it's hard enough to handle in stationary applications) and whilst metal hydrides are safe, they're so expensive that you'd end up with the fuel tank costing more than the rest of the car, so noone would buy them.

    6. Re:This tech is a stop gap by swillden · · Score: 1

      Indeed, time will tell. And it won't take too long, I think. It should be clear in three or four years.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  27. Re: Not useful in Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your temperature units are so shitty that you have to cut them in half for a thermostat. Your mass unit is so terrible that you had to multiply it by a thousand to be useful.

  28. Ambient temps, constant heat? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    So it seems there is no real logic to the sensor...if ambient temp is low, it heats.
    I live in MN. What happens if this battery is sitting in a car outside when it -reasonably frequently - is -35c for a week? How much of the charge is them eaten by constant heating?

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Ambient temps, constant heat? by PPH · · Score: 1

      I suspect that this heating system is only used prior to rapid charging a cold battery pack. Park your car for a week when it's not plugged in and I suspect the battery temp will drop to ambient. There may be some preheating logic that connects some loads and warms the battery up due to internal losses when it's time to drive off.

      Back in the 'old days', we used to warm up a car's cranking battery in sub freezing weather by turning the headlights on for a few minutes.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Ambient temps, constant heat? by unimacs · · Score: 1

      I've spent most of my 50+ years in Minnesota including my time at college. Like many campuses, parking was scarce and there was effectively only one lot at the far end of campus where a car could be kept over night. Even then all cars had to be off the lot between 1:00 and 5:00 pm on Saturday's. I had a good job back home about 2 hours away that I worked every other weekend, so I kept on car on campus.

      I have vivid memories of tromping down to the lot to see the local tow trucks circling like vultures. If it had been a cold week, the chances of your car starting were slim unless you'd been vigilant about running it now and again. If you got there early enough, they'd charge you to start your car. If not, you'd get a nice ticket left on your windshield or possibly even towed.

      There's a reason I tell that story. In the days of carburetors and mechanical ignition, it wasn't uncommon for people to have block heaters installed in their cars and plug them in overnight. Some motels would even advertise free plugins. With EVs for extreme cold or heat the same thing applies. You plug it in not only to charge it, but to maintain the battery temp. I own a Chevy Volt and it's not a problem to leave it a day or two unused outdoors in sub zero (Fahrenheit) weather. Longer than that and it should be plugged in.

      Now a slight point of contention. As I said, I've seen many winters in MN. There are definitely places where it falls below -35 C multiple times during the winter, but I don't think there's any place in the state where it'll stay that cold for a week. Maybe -18 C. (0 F).

    3. Re:Ambient temps, constant heat? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      You're kidding, right?
      I'm 50, lived in MN in the Twin Cities and southern MN all my life.
      For example, IIRC the winter of 1987 - I was a skating rink manager in my early college years, and we were required to close (for safety) when the temps were persistently below -20 - that winter, we were closed in Dec before Christmas more days than we were open.
      Usually when it's hitting -35-40C, sure it's usually no more than a handful of days in row but 0F? It's an unusual winter when there AREN'T a week or more.
      https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/cl...

      Tip: the airport where official temps are recorded, being in the depth of a metro area, is typically 5 degrees F warmer than even the western edge of the metro, much less outstate.

      --
      -Styopa
    4. Re:Ambient temps, constant heat? by unimacs · · Score: 1

      Nope. Not kidding. The article you linked would seem to agree with me.

      The question I was responding to was was: "I live in MN. What happens if this battery is sitting in a car outside when it -reasonably frequently - is -35c for a week?"

      Just to convert for people more used to Fahrenheit, -35 C is -31 F, - not that much different. The Fahrenheit and Celsius scales converge at about -40.

      If I was going to be nitpicky, the phase "-35c for a week" would mean that the temp never varied from -35c for 7 straight days which is of course not what you meant. What I took it to mean was what if it was about that cold or colder for a week? In other words, what if the temp *never* rose about -35c for a week?

      It's just not that cold here. You might have lots of days where it *falls* below 0 F, and there are a number of days where it never rises above 0 F, but in the twin cities area, it almost never stays below 0 F for 168 consecutive hours (a week). According to your article, the last time it stayed below 0 for 4 days or more was 1994.

      As for -35 C (or -31 F), it almost never gets that cold in the Twin Cities metro area period, at the airport or anywhere. The coldest recorded temp in the metro area is -34 F back in 1936. Not sure if that temp was measured at the airport. There was an airport, but there wasn't much to it, certainly not much of a heat island effect.

      Anyway the distinction between "falls below" and "remains below" is important when it comes to EV battery packs. Batteries have a fairly hight specific heat and in well built EVs they're pretty well insulated. So just because it falls below 0 outside, does not mean the cells themselves will get that cold. It would have to remain below 0 for a significant amount of time.

    5. Re:Ambient temps, constant heat? by unimacs · · Score: 1

      Oh, and just to be clear, when I said "it's just not that cold here", I mean that it's not so cold that staying below 0 F for 7 straight days is a common occurrence. That almost never happens. But it is still obviously a very cold place, as anyone who was here during the Super Bowl last winter can tell you.

  29. 'Scientists'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is kinda lame; It's just resistive heating! There's nothing clever about that! And it's been done!

    Heck, even diesel engines have similar heaters to heat the fuel lines in colder countries!

    And this isn't even particularly good - a strip of nickle?! Why not use coils between the cell packs for more surface area? Or something surrounding the coolant loop if it has one?

    The worst thing about this is it wastes loads of battery power - Using electricity to generate heat is relatively efficient but uses a LOT of battery power; Power that would be far more useful in propelling the car!
    When we invent a better way of storing electricity then it won't be so bad to waste it like this, but at the moment given most electric cars can't even do 100 miles on a single charge I don't think this is a good idea at all.

    A little gas heater could do the job without wasting the limited electrical reserves.

    Also, Toyota HSDs have already shown that, with careful battery management, you can extend the life of a battery greatly; There are people with Mk2 Priuses (Over 10 years old!) who are still on the original battery and still with useful capacity, and those are NiMH! People were predicting those would be killed within 2 years by the memory effect!

  30. Re: Not useful in Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod down. I didn't need to read that post, so it is over rated.

  31. Re: Not useful in Florida by j-beda · · Score: 1

    Your temperature units are so shitty that you have to cut them in half for a thermostat. Your mass unit is so terrible that you had to multiply it by a thousand to be useful.

    Ouch! What a burn! I am sure the rest of the world looks upon the non-metric system with envy.

    They don't use it because they hate our freedom.