Slashdot Mirror


Despite FCC's Promise To Take Aggressive Action To Stamp Out Radio Pirates, Illegal Stations Are Flourishing (newyorker.com)

Last year, when Donald Trump appointed Ajit Pai chairman of the F.C.C., Pai promised to "take aggressive action" to stamp out pirates. In early May, the Preventing Illegal Radio Abuse Through Enforcement, or PIRATE, Act was introduced in Congress; it would increase fines from a maximum of a hundred and forty-four thousand dollars to two million dollars. But the stations aren't going away, The New Yorker reports. From the article: Transmission equipment has only become cheaper and more sophisticated. "The problem, as I see it, is that the technology has gone beyond what the law has been able to do," said David Goren, a local resident who works as a producer on licensed radio shows. Between 87.9 and 92.1 FM, Goren counted eleven illegal stations, whose hosts mainly spoke Creole or accented English. Pirates, he said, "offer a kind of programming that their audiences depend on. Spiritual sustenance, news, immigration information, music created at home or in the new home, here."

9 of 198 comments (clear)

  1. Wrong target by arth1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it would increase fines from a maximum of a hundred and forty-four thousand dollars to two million dollars.

    That will do absolutely nothing to deter the pirate radio stations, which seldom are for-profit entities, but special interest and religious kooks.
    They can't afford $144,000 either, so it doesn't matter whether you raise this. As long as people think they won't get caught, it doesn't matter how harsh the penalty is.
    Too high fines even work against the intention, in that you might report your neighbor for running an illegal radio station if he was facing a $1,000 fine, but won't do so if he risks $144,000 or $2,000,000. Ruining a person's life is not something all of us are willing to do, even if they were the ones who broke the law.

    (This is also why excessive prison terms for certain crimes make things worse, not better.)

  2. PIRATE? by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Illegal Radio Abuse..... ....as opposed to the legal kind?

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  3. Mostly Harmless by Zorro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most are low power and doing nothing much except be hobbyist projects.

    Is that really worth a $2,000,000 Fine?

    Just create a special low power license and limit it to noncommercial use.

  4. Re:Spin Vs. Reality.... by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So you just HAVE TO broadcast, eh? You're compelled to sully the airwaves with whatever. Can't live without being on the air?

    Lots of people waited a long time, and went through the drill, and got licensed, and operate legally. Why can't you? What makes you so special?

    They have their house in order, but apparently you can't. That's no rationalization for ruining the airwaves for others.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  5. Re:Better idea by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, we let them talk now. They're brown and that makes them the enemy now, just ask Trump & Co. Before anyone goes there, no, I don't think Hillary would be doing any better.

    It's you guys who are obsessed with always calling people "brown".

    It's strange, and even stranger when you think that your own obsession makes other people magically racist somehow.

  6. Nothing good on commercial radio anyway by LordNicholas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm sure I'd care a lot more about this if I Heart Media didn't own half the spectrum, playing the same garbage across all of it. My wife and I have a game we play in the car, where we try to guess how many stations are playing the latest top 40 hit simultaneously. Highest we've seen is four. Four different stations all playing the same goddamn song at the same time. With internet and satellite radio ubiquitous, we really need to start reevaluating how we prioritize the spectrum.

  7. Re:Spin Vs. Reality.... by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Altruism doesn't give you a pass. Such rationalisms are the crux of narcissistic behavior. Living in a civilized world means looking after everyone, and deeply at your own motives.

    Rationalizing incivility leads to a lot of the evil that the world sees today. You're not a hero, only a cowboy with an exciter.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  8. Re:Spin Vs. Reality.... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The BLM was entirely in the wrong on that one. A little history:
    • A bunch of ranchers were getting pissed off over common resources and some assholes were claiming land that wasn't theirs while others were getting raped on taxes for land which was theirs but was entirely unsustainable.
    • The group got together and tried to find a way to just share the land so they would stop shooting at each other over border disputes and going bankrupt because it couldn't support the cattle required to pay for it.
    • The BLM offered to "manage" the land for them tax-free as long as they just considered is a shared resource and didn't fight over it, they accepted.
    • Several decades later the Clinton administration pushed the BLM to start charging taxes on it, the ranchers refused to pay because it was public land nobody actually got any use out of and their agreement was in large part that they didn't have to pay taxes on it, grandfathered in by several generations.
    • Over a decade and a half later during the Obama administration a corrupt senator in Nevada took a bribe when a Chinese wind energy company said they wanted the land to build a windfarm.
    • The BLM was tasked with claiming the land and slaughtering the free-range cattle owned by the ranchers.
    • Ranchers got pissed, BLM concocted story about back taxes they were never actually allowed to charge, ranchers stood their ground.
    • Several years later, many "missing" militia members who had come to help defend the Bundy ranch and the surrounding ranchers, and the imprisonment of the Bundies was found to be illegal and they were found innocent of any wrongdoing.

    But it's cool, I know you just hate rural people and wish uncle sam could jab his boot a bit further up everyone's ass.

  9. Re:Pro-regulation conservatives by Obfuscant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can't be having people saying just anything over unused radio frequencies.

    There are no unused radio frequencies.

    What you think are "unused frequencies" are actually used by a station far enough away that YOU can't hear them, but would be interfered with if there was a station using them where you are.

    The fight against the free market continues.

    The use of the public airwaves is not a "free market", it is a licensed market. Almost as soon as radio was invented, reasonable people realized it needed to be controlled so it would stay usable. Imagine YOUR delight when your favorite FM station playing your favorite radical hippy music was covered up by a paging system because there were no laws regulating who was licensed to do what. "You can get anything you want, at Alice's BRRRFFZZZZZZQQQQQQQQ..." Now imagine if your favorite FM station that you invested money in installing an external antenna so you could get the news and music you wanted from a distance was suddenly covered up by a pirate station two blocks away that played nothing but Devo songs interspersed with profane rants about the FCC.