Slashdot Mirror


Exec Accused of Stealing Waymo's Trade Secrets Starts New Self-Driving Company (techcrunch.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch: Anthony Levandowski, the former Google engineer and serial entrepreneur who was at the center of a trade secrets lawsuit between Uber and Waymo, is back. And he is connected to an autonomous trucking company that is still in stealth mode, TechCrunch has learned. The company, called Kache.ai (pronounced like cache), has kept a low profile since paperwork registering it as a corporation was first filed with the California Secretary of State nearly seven months ago. And at first glance, there's no indication that Levandowski is even tied to the company.

Little is known about Kache.ai. The word "Kache" in Chinese means truck, which could signal a connection to China. Although TechCrunch was not able to independently verify if Kache.ai has any outside partners or backers yet. [T]he Kache.ai website said the company was working on "the next generation of autonomous vehicle technology for the commercial trucking industry." It appears the company is hiring at every level, from mapping and database experts to people with robotics and simulation skills. The website also noted that the company is looking for software engineers with experience in convolutional neural networks as well as computer vision and machine learning algorithms.

29 comments

  1. Or maybe it's a bicycle sharing startup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, da.kache.ai.

  2. That's kinda like... by cre1mer · · Score: 1

    Me starting an Amazon affiliate company after spamming Slashdot to death for a year. Oh, wait.

    1. Re:That's kinda like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wait, isn't that after Slashdot management decided to toss your feeble ass off the site and you desperately tried to make us believe that's what you wanted all along?

      It's sure not from putting Amazon links on your zero view blogs and "author website" that you're going to make any money!

      You had no choice but to spam your "Internet home" since your annoying ass sure didn't get any attention elsewhere!

    2. Re:That's kinda like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In order to save Slashdot, we must spam Slashdot first.

  3. Common Technology in Autonomous Vehicles? by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    I'm wondering how much common technology there is in the current state of the art of autonomous vehicles for stealing from your previous employer would make a difference.

    As I understand it, every company is approaching the problem from a different perspective and (I would think a bigger issue) is that each company has a different sensor set and philosophy which means that there is different information provided for the system to plan it's way forwards (excuse the pun).

    I guess there are common high level operations/actions/responses (like "there's a bike in my path, do I turn, slow down, change lane, etc.?) but I would think that these are changing, being dependent on laws and regulations, hardware and vehicle parameters.

    1. Re:Common Technology in Autonomous Vehicles? by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      I could say the same about CRM or ERP. Each vendor has a different philosophy, technology, database, etc. Still, top-level execs and engineers at such firms are pretty much interchangeable.

    2. Re:Common Technology in Autonomous Vehicles? by stephanruby · · Score: 3, Informative

      As I understand it, every company is approaching the problem from a different perspective and (I would think a bigger issue) is that each company has a different sensor set and philosophy which means that there is different information provided for the system to plan it's way forwards (excuse the pun).

      In the case of Uber vs. Waymo, the blueprints of one sensor were completely identical. And a vendor "inadvertently" emailed Waymo an email that was meant for Uber. That's what tipped off Waymo according to them that they were using an identical part that Waymo had designed itself.

      You also have to keep in mind that it only took three months for the original exec to leave Waymo, create his own company called Otto, and sell it to Uber for 680 US million dollars. 680 million dollars for three months work, that's unusually good, don't you think?

      You also have to keep in mind that the trial wasn't going well for Uber and that the only reason Waymo settled the case so easily was because Google/Alphabet had already invested billions of dollars into Uber, so destroying Uber wasn't in Google's self-interest. Google really wanted for Travis to step down as CEO and that's the key thing that happened that made Google bury the hatchet.

      Without Google owning a significant portion of Uber, Google/Waymo would have pursued the matter to the end and Levandowski would be in prison by now.

    3. Re:Common Technology in Autonomous Vehicles? by mykepredko · · Score: 1

      Thanx - that's helpful to explain the situation.

    4. Re: Common Technology in Autonomous Vehicles? by houghi · · Score: 1

      I shpuld start looking at all patents about radar, lidar, cameras and add "in a vehicle" to it. Or save time and replace "on the inyernet" wit "in a vehicle".

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  4. Sounds like a known scumbag already though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Levandowski, where have I heard that scummy name before...

    1. Re:Sounds like a known scumbag already though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Womp! Womp!

  5. Pronounced... by Vylen · · Score: 1

    Kache.. pronounced like cache... but how do you pronounce cache :P

    1. Re:Pronounced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Cah-SHAY"

      For example your CPU has multi-level cachet. When a processor has "4-way cachet" it means it holds those cachet lines in very high regard. 4 times as much. It's closely related to CPU affinity, which is a similar measure of likeability and preference

    2. Re: Pronounced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's not jews, that's Republicans. It does include some jews, which is why when Trump gives speeches to groups of them and says dumb shit and people cringe, it's kind of an portent of what's to come really.

      *(Because he's a nazi, make no bonepiles about it)

    3. Re:Pronounced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought they meant Cache`, pronounced cash-ay

    4. Re: Pronounced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe because they work hard? Do you know how hard it is to, eg, play concert piano? Maybe a culture of valuing art has benefits after all.

    5. Re: Pronounced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys are completely ignorant on what Nazis were. You can't make a guy who is just a narcissist billionaire out to be Hitler because he just isn't anything close. Making all kinds of extreme statements isn't impressing anyone.

    6. Re: Pronounced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its like kashe

  6. Maaayyyybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The word "Kache" in Chinese means truck, which could signal a connection to China.

    Or maybe he's going to use the Chinese character for truck as part of his logo - kind of like how the kids have Chinese characters tattooed on their asses - they think it's cool.

    In my day, we named shit after French things - made them sound French. Ya know putting "Le" in front of every fucking thing. Like "Le Fucking Thing." - sounds classy, right?

    1. Re:Maaayyyybe by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Like "Le Fucking Thing." - sounds classy, right?

      Non!

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  7. Re: Can anyone explain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should the SJW police care that I don't like the Jews or the blacks? Isn't that my right? Shouldn't the people who preach tolerance be more tolerant of my beliefs?

  8. Re:Can anyone explain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your assumption about somebody's racial background based on name, appearance, behavior, etc... is what is racist.
    Please try and keep up, you are society's boat anchor. We are tired of dragging bottom and are about to cut the rope

  9. Re: Can anyone explain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How are you being not tolerated? Have you been imprisoned, or deported, or scheduled for execution? Or is it not intolerance, but rather a questioning of your judgement? Someone asking you to reconsider your position (of persecuting a group of people based on presumed characteristics) is not being intolerant. Maybe you should consider how your life would be richer and more pleasant if you were to reconsider your beliefs, instead of digging in in fear of losing your identity.

  10. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  11. One letter change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of building a car using the technologies from Waymo, he should have to use technologies from Whamo. Frisbees, hula hoops, slip n slide, ring toss, hacky sacks, hula hoops.

  12. Re: Self-Driving Company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lol I work at a self driving car âstartupâ(TM) and the puppet CEO is definitely not in charge of anything, the VP of Engineering is not in charge of Engineering, the VP of Product is not doing Product, the COO is chief of nothing.
    If you see a self driving car thatâ(TM)s not Waymo (the only ones that are anal about making the technology actually work safely since they have unlimited funding) just stay far far away.

    Self driving cars is not going to be commercially viable for many many years since until it is actually on par with humans it will require âremote operatorsâ(TM) in the same city, making the whole thing less cost effective than Uber or Lyft anyways. There will be consumer availability of âself drivingâ(TM) rides but heavily subsidized by VC money, VCs that have not learned from Theranos.

  13. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion