Slashdot Mirror


Apple's New iPhones Will Come In a Plethora of New Colors, Says Report (9to5mac.com)

According to analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, Apple's new 2018 iPhones will come in a plethora of colors. The 6.5-inch iPhone will be offered in black, white, and a (new) gold, while the entry-level 6.1-inch LCD iPhone will debut in "grey, white, blue, red and orange." 9to5Mac reports: That's a potential five new colors for the LCD model. It is very possible that when Kuo says "grey" and "white" he is referring to the Space Grey and Silver finishes as seen on the current iPhone X. We've mocked up the new finishes by tinting an iPhone X, but note the 6.1-inch LCD iPhone is not expected to have a dual-camera system. However, that still means Apple is looking to introduce four new options. It seems like the higher end models will add gold to the lineup...

The ~$700 6.1-inch LCD 2018 iPhone (which will mostly resemble an iPhone X's design from the front) will have a larger lineup including blue, red and orange. This harkens back to the iPhone 5c era when Apple rolled out a cheaper iPhone sibling in colorful chassis. We have heard some mumblings prior to today's report about Apple expanding the color options for the cheaper phone, but this is the first time someone reputable has reported specifics. It's not clear if the "red" color means PRODUCT(RED)...
Kuo also says that the 6.5-inch OLED iPhone Model should be priced around $1,000 like the current iPhone X, and will feature dual SIM capabilities. Meanwhile, the 6.1-inch LCD iPhone X style device should retail for around $700. The other iPhone expected to be released later this year will be a spec-bump upgrade to the 5.8-inch iPhone X currently available.

In other Apple-related news, Intel will reportedly not provide the 5G modems for Apple's 2020 mobile devices.

24 of 192 comments (clear)

  1. Redefining 'plethora' by chrism238 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seems that the Reality Distortion Field will soon be redefining 'plethora'.

    1. Re:Redefining 'plethora' by Zaelath · · Score: 4, Funny

      Jefe, would you say I have a plethora of piñatas?

    2. Re:Redefining 'plethora' by Green+Mountain+Bot · · Score: 2

      Well it sounds more ominous then the term "Good marketing".

      "Good marketing" should be considered a very ominous term, indeed.

  2. When your product's stale ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... paint it.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:When your product's stale ... by alvinrod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd honestly be happy if new colors were about the extent of things and that they'd spent an entire year polishing features that already exist. As much as everyone harps on about innovation, new features for the sake of new features aren't useful, especially when half-baked in order to meet a yearly release schedule. Give me a solid implementation of a good idea over a weak attempt at a new one any day. New colors should be plenty to satisfy the idiots.

    2. Re:When your product's stale ... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

      After emojis and animojis, yet another spec few people really care about: color - actually I could care, but since the thing needs a protection case [ otherwise it breaks like thin ice ] the "color" is not visible.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    3. Re:When your product's stale ... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      a solid implementation of a good idea over a weak attempt at a new one

      That's basically what made the first iPhones such a success. And I like that.

      Meamwhile however, a few high-end Chinese smart phones come with an all-screen front, yes, all-screen meaning no godawful "notch": the front facing camera slides up from the top of the phone when needed. That's solid implementation of a good idea (provided the mechanism holds up with prolonged use, and that you cared about all-screen fronts in the first place).

      Now put a good fingerprint scanner (i.e. the one the iPhone uses) under that screen, and you got yourself a phone worthy of some excitement.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  3. "Stuff that Matters" my ass by KiloByte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think this is a new low for Slashdot. How bad into minutiae of rumours for a crap phone can you get? The only site this oh-so-vital piece of news could fit on would be fashion for hipsters.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  4. Guess they haven't learned the lesson yet by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 4, Insightful

    that phones nearing that $1k price tag don't seem to sell so well.
    ( No matter what lovely colors it comes in )

    The $700 variant will probably fare much better.

    However, is it just me or does no one really give a damn about the " new " iPhones / Androids that come out every year with not a whole lot of anything to get excited about ?

    Roll one out with a headphone jack, removable battery, the basic OS without all the GD bloatware, a physical switch that disables GPS, the MIC and Cameras and you might pique my interest. Selling me the same old sh*t with a colorful new paintjob just doesn't really do it for me I'm afraid.

    1. Re:Guess they haven't learned the lesson yet by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China will soon flood the US market with phones at cost to build their designed in China brand names.
      $350 will be the new $1100. Memory, cpu, gpu, camera lens count, headphone jack, battery hours will all be great from China at a new low price.
      Apps and software will go they way of 1980's IBM on the price of its hardware.
      Apple will have to design its way past China and set its own new price on design.
      Make a Performa phone?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Guess they haven't learned the lesson yet by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I make a good income and yet, I can't imagine spending $1k on a phone. a fucking PHONE, which is locked down, not a general purpose computer that I control, but something that I have temporary use of, and the vendor will EOL when it suits them.

      I guess the lesson is: the power of peer pressure makes even poor people think they -have- to have this thingie to be part of the in-crowd.

      but wow, a grand for a phone. and people are buying them. I am not unaware of this, but I'm continually amazed by how people can be conned out of their money so easily and for such a silly thing, too. yes, phones are needed, but not $1k phones! there's absolutely nothing ESSENTIAL on this phone that you simply must have. its all about style and being part of the in-crowd. and people do this. yes, I'm really amazed.

      (my phone is at least 4 gens back, some generica android thing, and I bought it as a refurb. and I'll stop using it when it STOPS running. so far, after 3 yrs of ownership, it still runs as fine as it did on day1, so I can't see the reason to throw it out)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:Guess they haven't learned the lesson yet by swb · · Score: 2

      No offense, but you're one of the Slashdot types who:

      1) Values "control" over their device more than ease of use, performance or other utility markers other people like. You devalue a smartphone because of vendor practices designed to limit how you use the device.

      2) Price matters to you in spite of "making a good income" which presumably means sufficient disposable income that a high-cost smartphone isn't sacrificing your other economic choices.

      3) You see buying recent model smartphones as a moral flaw, that someone who buys them is indulging in status signaling and other similar kinds of flaunting behavior.

      Individually, if these are your personal values I don't think there's anything wrong with them. #3 I might be somewhat critical of, since it requires you to negate other people's utility values in their smartphone choices -- they may actually think that some feature or other makes it worthwhile and thus flaunting/status may not actually be a conscious decision on their part.

      Although it may actually be in some places a current smartphone is a beneficial status marker. I can see at least business situations where you may want to signal some kind of current-model smartphone status to people who may see it as a signal of sophistication in marketing or social media.

      For me, I owned all the Apple smartphones from 3G to 6 Plus because they actually were better (speed, features) from model to model. I also passed my year-old ones to my wife and her 2 year old ones went to my kid and/or for me to use in testing email connectivity, so they got 3 years of use out of them. I stopped this at 6 Plus because it stayed reasonably fast, my wife got a new phone out of cycle due problems with hers. I would still be using the 6 Plus if the battery hadn't quit and I don't see that any new feature my 8 Plus (FaceID, etc) was worth the premium for the X.

      Control hasn't ever been an issue for me. I think there are some dumb decisions made that restrict certain use cases, but they're not show stoppers because the phone does what I want it to well enough that it doesn't matter. That I can't run a Perl interpreter, sideload software or other stuff makes no difference to me.

      Price is an annoyance, but I'm willing to accept what I paid for it with a 3-ish year use out of it, plus I bought it direct from Apple so it is unlocked and I can use alternate SIMs without an issue overseas.

    4. Re:Guess they haven't learned the lesson yet by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      This especially and one like the original iPhone that was powerful enough to drive good headphones before Apple crippled it due to parents complaining

      Not just parents, government and everyone else.

      And they have a right to - kids these days are starting to have hearing loss that you'd find in career musicians or seniors. And they're still kids. The next generation is growing up deaf.

      That's why volume limiters are imposed on all portable devices nowadays - kids are turning up the volume way too loud and they're going deaf exceeding the exposure limits of their ears.

      Given hearing loss takes years to manifest themselves, by the time you realize you have it, it's too late - you can't take back those years of listening to music just a bit too loud at that point.

  5. Re:Oh my, color me beige by iggymanz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Culture would includes fads and fashion.

    But this is supposed to be a tech news site. Instead we're finding out if a appliance can color coordinate with our shoes.

  6. Color IS NOT NEWS /.! by gordguide · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What else to add? Is /. now "News for Fashionistas? Does a chipset setting determine the colour? Because if it doesn't, this is garbage news.

  7. Colors? Big deal.... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...first thing most people do is slap a case on them so you can barely see what color they are. It's not like these are iMacs, y'know.

  8. That worked so well by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    for a camera company. Addicted consumers always buy extra colors.
    Every shop has to buy a set of color iPhone in packs? Work hard to sell the colors nobody wants to buy?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  9. Blueberry, Grape, Tangerine, Lime and Strawberry by jfdavis668 · · Score: 4, Funny

    We need to bring back the iMac G3 colors. Also, have the phone be round like the puck mouse.

  10. Re:What does it matter... by sremick · · Score: 2

    It encourages people to NOT use cases, which increases the breakage (and replacement) rate. 3) PROFIT!

  11. Re:Oh my, color me beige by rtb61 · · Score: 2

    We still have to keep track of the others, so we can mock and laugh at them. Soon they will be wanting colour coding for their custom genitals, you know they will, you just absolutely know they will.

    Apple we have absolutely nothing to announce, 'FUCK', 'er' colour coded phones, yeah. C'mon Apple where is the resin phone, where the bulk of parts of cast in resin, leaving the front add on panel for a screen and the back panel as battery, user removable and replaceable, the electronics safely locked away behind a solid resin, extremely damage resistant and definitely water proof.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  12. Re:Blueberry, Grape, Tangerine, Lime and Strawberr by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    Zune brown.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  13. Innovative by polyp2000 · · Score: 2

    Wow, consumer electronics available in a variety of different colors . Only to be concealed with ugly rubber protective cases that also come in a variety of garish colors. Apples ability to push the boundaries never ceases to amaze me.

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  14. Re:Oh my, color me beige by KiloByte · · Score: 2

    Oh, so now it's an "appliance"?

    It's an iPhone, so yes. Apple is pretty insistent on not giving the user access to anything Turing-complete, thus it merely has a computer inside, no different from that set of computers doing your car's injection or setting rotation speed of your washing machine.

    Tell me when I can install Perl and PostgreSQL and interact with them. Resources-wise, anything bigger than an Arduino can do so (there's a large gap between microcontrollers and stuff meant for general-purpose operating systems, the latter starting at 256-512MB ram). So all that power means nothing if you can't actually use it.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  15. Re:Swift & ObjectiveC aren't Turing complete? by KiloByte · · Score: 2

    I'm talking about end user, not about a developer with a purchased license running some IDE on another machine, not even able to copy that program to a friend.

    For me, a computer is something that can run arbitrary computing tasks. It's usually done in some sort of container with parts you don't have access to: on Windows, you can't mess with the system, on an Intel PC running Linux there's some supervising code at ring -17 spying on you, but inside that contained jail you are free to do what you want. User interface might be a touch screen, a ssh login over ethernet, a query dispatcher for a cluster, or perhaps even a deer hide tarpaulin for sending smoke signals, but there is one. One of biggest rules for Apple's App Store is not providing this ability.

    For me, a computer is something that lets you do computing. An appliance might have a computer inside but doesn't expose it.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.