Slashdot Mirror


Twitter Suspended 70 Million Accounts In Past Two Months, Says Report (theverge.com)

According to The Washington Post, Twitter has suspended 70 million accounts in the past two months as part of a crackdown on malicious activity on its platform. "The rate of suspensions for May and June is reportedly twice the company's October 2017 suspension rate," reports The Verge. From the report: In a blog post last month, Twitter said it had been working to improve its safety policies, and that its "systems identified and challenged more than 9.9 million potentially spammy or automated accounts per week."

The Post reports that the change in enforcement could cause a decline in users for the company's second quarter, although a Twitter executive told the publication that many of the accounts rarely tweeted, and would therefore not dramatically impact the company's active user count. A Twitter spokesperson said in a statement to The Verge that the company noted in its first-quarter shareholder letter this year that âoeongoing information quality effortsâ had negatively impacted monthly users, and that the efforts could continue to impact user numbers in the future.

20 of 79 comments (clear)

  1. Happened to me as well. by DeBaas · · Score: 2

    Happened to me as well a few times. Their algorithms need some work.
    Biggest issue is that the unlock via a text message doesn't work (for me). You first have to click a captcha, then they want to send you a text to the number you registered. That then fails, with the message that they can't text to your carrier, even though I confirmed that number by a text sent by them... Then it takes support 2-3 days to unlock your account with apologies and the message that they don't reply to emails.

    Not a big thing, it's just twitter, but crappy nonetheless for such a big name in social media

    --
    ---
    1. Re:Happened to me as well. by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      One thing is for sure, when 9.9 million accounts get suspended per month, the innocent will have no avenue of recourse because nobody is going to field millions of support requests on the matter. Someone famous may be an exception that proves the rule.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    2. Re:Happened to me as well. by antdude · · Score: 1

      Why would you give Twitter your phone number? :O

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  2. Re:So what's the use? by MrMr · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing 'failing to read' is considered malicious inactivity by the advertisers.

  3. Jude Law by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    There's plenty more where they came from.

    Why am I reminded of that scene from Enemy At The Gate?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Jude Law by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      There's plenty more where they came from.

      Why am I reminded of that scene from Enemy At The Gate?

      "Honey? the Visigoths are here. They want to know if you can come out to play?"

      dunno why that just popped into my head.

      Anyhow, I know everyone is going off on Politics, but I'l bet a lot of these accounts are leftovers from the services that would get followers for you in a weird Twitter popularity contest for some coin.

      I'll bet after the purge, Kim Cardassian is no longer the most popular person on Twitter. The family will probably sue Twitter now.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  4. Re:Hereâ(TM)s a novel idea... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    And how are we going to know whether the US still has a president without it?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  5. But ISIS is still there.... by sproketboy · · Score: 1

    things that make you go um...

  6. Hypocrites forever by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Troll

    As long as they fail to shut down Trump's account, they are willfully ignoring their own policies in order to remain relevant. Selective enforcement is always used for covert abuse. Twitter is a Trump supporter.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Hypocrites forever by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      As long as they fail to shut down Trump's account, they are willfully ignoring their own policies in order to remain relevant. Selective enforcement is always used for covert abuse. Twitter is a Trump supporter.

      They wanted to shut Emperor Bonespurs down, but Bob Mueller called and told them he wasn't done collecting evidence yet.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:Hypocrites forever by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The people in charge need to stop listening to these lunatics. Trump doesn't listen to them. That's why I'll vote for him again.

      You'll vote for him because you're a racist, and possibly a neo-Nazi. It's impossible to vote for Trump without being deeply, personally racist.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  7. So much for free speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You don't have it on the internet.

    Now you know what these people's true feelings are. They would love the SOVIET UNION.

  8. Re: correct the record? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Just Californians. So many of you packed into those crowded spaces. It makes sense that you would all vote nutty.

  9. Re:correct the record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Instead they elected a leader who will never get above 43%

    Just like he never had more than a 1% of winning.

    Hell, even 43% is damn impressive given the constant propaganda by mainstream media. He's not that for off from Obama at the same time in his presidency and who got fellated non-stop and kept out of as many scandals as possible.

  10. Re:correct the record? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Informative

    That's not just a failure of democracy, that's a failure of basic math, and an indication that something is very rotten in your country.

    The USA is not and never has been a democracy. It is a republic on paper (which is a half-assed kind of "democracy" in which your votes don't really count anyway) and an oligarchy in fact. When it was founded, only racially privileged landowners had any vote at all, just like in ancient Greece. And just like ancient Rome, the dominant forces upon public opinion are bread and circuses.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  11. Re:correct the record? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Troll

    Hell, even 43% is damn impressive given the constant propaganda by mainstream media.

    No, 43% is damned pathetic given the constant propaganda by Faux News, the only channel that his supporters watch and/or believe. They are constantly jerking him off, but his approval is still that low?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  12. Keep going! by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    until they suspend 100% of their accounts. I'm pretty sure violence will drop slightly and people will gain a few IQ points in the process.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  13. Define malicious? by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 1

    Is it just blatent illegal activity or just part of the "war on information"? I'm guessing a bit of both.

  14. Re: correct the record? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    Why the homophobia? Does the idea that a guy might find you attractive scare you?

  15. Re:correct the record? by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    Sarcasm, right?

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.