Slashdot Mirror


Is C++ a 'Really Terrible Language'? (gamesindustry.biz)

Long-time Slashdot reader slack_justyb writes, "Jonathan Blow, an independent video game developer, indicated to gamesindustry.biz that while working on a recent project he stopped and considered how miserable programming can be. After some reflection Blow came to the realization as to why. [C++ is a] 'really terrible, terrible language.'"

The main flaw with C++, in Blow's opinion, is that it's a fiendishly complex and layered ecosystem that has becoming increasingly convoluted in its effort to solve different problems; the more layers, the higher the stack, the more wobbly it becomes, and the harder it is to understand.
"Blow is the developer of two games so far -- Braid and The Witness -- and developed a new programming language known as Jai in hopes to help C++ game developers become more productive."

With Jai, Blow hopes to achieve three things: improve the quality of life for the programmer because "we shouldn't be miserable like many of us are"; simplify the systems; and increase expressive power by allowing programmers to build a large amount of functionality with a small amount of code.

Long-time Slashdot reader xx_chris calls C++ "the triumph of syntax over clarity," while in the interview Blow calls C++ 'a weird mess.' But the original submission ends with these questions. "Is Blow correct? Has C++ become a horrific mess that we should ultimately relegate to the bins of COBOL and Pascal? Are there redeeming qualities of C++ that justify the tangle it has become?

"And is Jai a solution or just yet another programming language?"

5 of 603 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Yes by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nope.

    People who don't understand C++ are doomed to recreate it, badly.

    --
    No sig today...
  2. Know what things to avoid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Part of the challenge of using a language is not just knowing all of the things you *can* do. It is also knowing which things are best to avoid, and what the pitfalls are.

  3. Re:Yes by Narcocide · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Doesn't happen much, but this time I'm going to have to agree with Anonymous Coward. All that will be accomplished by making programming languages easier is fostering the proliferation of even less qualified jackasses flooding the market with dangerously insecure and buggy code.

  4. Re:Yes by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is nothing saying you have to use every bit of it.

    Other than the guy you inherited the codebase from.

  5. Re:Yes by careysub · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hope you get modded way up! This is the fallacy of the "but only use a subset and you are good".

    Real world programmers must maintain and modify code bases that have been written by people that no one currently at the company even knows.

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj