Slashdot Mirror


Russian Influence Campaign Sought To Exploit Americans' Trust In Local News (npr.org)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from NPR: The information operatives who worked out of the Internet Research Agency in St. Petersburg did not stop at posing as American social media users or spreading false information from purported news sources, according to new details. They also created a number of Twitter accounts that posed as sources for Americans' hometown headlines. NPR has reviewed information connected with the investigation and found 48 such accounts. They have names such as @ElPasoTopNews, @MilwaukeeVoice, @CamdenCityNews and @Seattle_Post. "A not-insignificant amount of those had some sort of variation on what appeared to be a homegrown local news site," said Bret Schafer, a social media analyst for the Alliance for Securing Democracy, which tracks Russian influence operations and first noticed this trend. Another example: The Internet Research Agency created an account that looks like it is the Chicago Daily News. That newspaper shuttered in 1978. The Internet Research Agency-linked account was created in May 2014, and for years, it just posted local headlines, accumulating some 19,000 followers by July 2016.

Another twist: These accounts apparently never spread misinformation. In fact, they posted real local news, serving as sleeper accounts building trust and readership for some future, unforeseen effort. "They set them up for a reason. And if at any given moment, they wanted to operationalize this network of what seemed to be local American news handles, they can significantly influence the narrative on a breaking news story," Schafer told NPR. "But now instead of just showing up online and flooding it with news sites, they have these accounts with two years of credible history."

287 comments

  1. Sinclair Broadcast Group by Smidge204 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good thing there isn't a major, national media group that controls a whole bunch of local news channels and can force them to run pre-written stories to push a political narrative. That would be awful!

    =Smidge=

    1. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by BeauHD+(5) · · Score: 0

      SHUT UP. Vlad

      -=BeauHD=-

    2. Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Yes, the attempt to convince people that Trump was elected unfairly is not working. That after they did all they could to get their dirtiest politician in there.

    3. Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If not for Russian influence JEB would be president today!

    4. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Informative

      Were it only so. There would be no business model for them if what you said was true, and they're still thriving. Look to Sinclair Media's profitability and lockstep newscasts if you had any questions. Underestimating compromised media is a big mistake.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    5. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Also, look at their tendencies to run stories that are pumped up to push buttons and generate outrage (when a Dem is office) or quiet acceptance (when GOP is in office)

      The fact that Russia is trying to do the same thing serves to shine a light on what Murdock and Sinclair are already doing to poison the minds of Americans

    6. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good thing there isn't a major, national media group that controls a whole bunch of local news channels and can force them to run pre-written stories to push a political narrative. That would be awful!

      =Smidge=

      So, the Russia! Russia! Russia! Russians are now trying to undermine trust in "conservative" news outlets and help Democrats?

      I thought all those Russia! Russia! Russia! Russians were out to help Trump?

      Dafuq? The Russia! Russia! Russia! tinfoil-hat conspiracy theories are devolving into utter incoherence. And they started out utterly fucking brain-dead.

    7. Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ShUt Up. HiLlARY! ,-=Dood=-,

    8. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by ole_timer · · Score: 1

      the revenue comes from ads not watchers...if I bought my car based on an ad i'd be (fill in the blank)

      --
      nothing to see here - move along
    9. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by eaglesrule · · Score: 5, Informative

      Obligatory.

      This is extremely dangerous to our democracy!

    10. Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group by greenwow · · Score: 2

      Then thank God for the Russians!

    11. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good thing NBC, CBS, Fox, CNN are not doing the exact same thing!

    12. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by benjfowler · · Score: 0

      Eat a dick, you Russian pig.

    13. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by benjfowler · · Score: 1

      Russia! Russia! Russia! ... is going to get clubbed like seal pups after America is back under adult supervision. And all the Quislings, spies and traitors too.

      The knives are being sharpened as we speak.

    14. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by yuriklastalov · · Score: 2

      Hell yeah! Bring on the thermonuclear Armageddon! That'll show those fucking Russian who's boss!

    15. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Informative

      the revenue comes from ads not watchers...if I bought my car based on an ad i'd be (fill in the blank)

      One word: ratings.

      The more watchers they have, the more they can charge advertisers.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    16. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Nobody would pay to have their ads air on a broadcast with no viewers. Ergo, if advertisers are buying ad space, people are watching.

      You can get a sense of who's watching in your area at any given time of day by what kinds of ads are airing, too. The selection of products and services will be aimed at the largest viewing demographic for that time slot in that region.
      =Smidge=

    17. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by benjfowler · · Score: 0

      Well, you shouldn't start shit if it risks getting nuked, should you?

      Typical Russian peasant scumbag mentality. Being a stupid-arsed peasant degenerate, you can't create anything of beauty of value, so you have to define and destroy everyone else. History will judge your kind poorly.

    18. Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mirror image of NBC and CNN.

    19. Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    20. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

      good thing most people don't listen, watch, or care...

      Local news are watched -- and believed -- by those who care, and vote, the most.. the geriatric ward. Be very concerned. They still think it's the era of Cronkite.

      They also watch -- and believe -- Fox "News"

      To me, it is now apparent that someone, or something, is trying to rend this country apart... Some Say it's the Russians, Some Say it's dem Liberals, and some rather kooky religious nuts I know say it's Satan and his minions (rich people in control.) I don't know where the truth lies. All I know is I think they're all lying, every single one of them.

      But it is rather noticeable, no? All the yelling on both sides? "Listen to me!" "No, listen to MEEEE! HE speaks lies!" And so forth.

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    21. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by postbigbang · · Score: 2

      You mistake yourself for the average Joe or Jane.

      They're the one watching TV tonight. Not you. They're not you.

      They're not me, either, but at least I understand they exist, and swing electoral college votes. Don't under estimate TV watchers. TV is still free. Slashdot is still free. People do both because: Free.

      Much of rural America still watches TV over dishes. Think about election demographics, urban vs not. Re-evaluate the importance. This is why nutjobs like 538.com blew the election predictions: underestimated the power of TV as a media source. Yes, there were other perhaps evil influences. TV has a captive audience. Not you. Not me. But it's a big audience.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    22. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by benjfowler · · Score: 0

      Hahaha! I see what you did there Ivan!! Get Trump to demand 4% of GDP, and then slyly turn around and claim America is "extorting" Europe. How very sneaky and _Russian_ of you...

      Surprise!

      It didn't work.

      WOWW!!! This shill-troll post has it all: brandishing nuclear weapons (because Putin is totally economically incompetent, they can't even afford upkeep on their nukes), projection (and this troll is projecting like a fucking IMAX), accusation of corruption (even through Russia is rated as one of the most corrupt countries on Earth alongside places like Somalia and Afghanistan, "US military industrial complex" (to rile up lefties), tax bullshit (to rile up the Righties), and calling NATO an "occupation force" and conflating it with nationhood (whereas in fact it's a mutual defence treaty and nothing else). Bravo *slow clap*

      Nobody has been deceived. Nobody is fooled. Nice try, but NO CIGAR FOR YOU, Ivan!

      For those of you browsing casually, the above post is a neat summary of popular talking points that paid Russia shills like to post across the internet. The specifics on their dictated daily talking point bulletin ('temka') change on a day-to-day basis, but the above, in broad strokes, hews to the Russian "narrative".

      Russia has made up this huge, mostly fictional bullshit story, where every time the violently corrupt authoritarian regime in Moscow does something corrupt, violent, or illegal, Russia is the victim, being "attacked" and "humiliated" by its victims.

      Everyone LOVES indulging their bullshit sense of victimhood. Especially Russians.

    23. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have heard people from extremes on the right and left screech about how they are right and the other side is wrong. Both are usually woefully ignorant of the facts they are so certain of. The sad thing is that so many are so certain of their own selves, they refuse to see anything that upsets that world view. It scares me when two people can see the same set of facts and come to diametrically opposing conclusions.

    24. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think you missed a dose of Prozac there Benny. Either that or someone forgot to log off of the computer at the nurses station over there at the Smith's Grove Sanitarium.

    25. Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except in this case when it makes perfect sense and you make a false argument against his point.

      The left has very large and loud control of a large segment of media. The right has fox and am radio.

      You are a knucklehead not clever like you think.

    26. Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see your point of view but mirror images are not necessarily the same as the originals: they can be distorted in many ways, for example swapping left for right. I doubt the original commenter had that in mind though.

    27. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      All the yelling on both sides? "Listen to me!" "No, listen to MEEEE! HE speaks lies!"

      Except that there are objective truths in the world. And it's possible to examine the yelling and disregard that which doesn't seem to match what is true. It does mean you need to brand 90% of one party liars and 65% of the other liars, but you can find one side that leans more towards truth.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    28. Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except Trump didn't demand that 4%. That policy was drafted over his predecessor. Trump said Ameroca should leave the NATO instead. Where is your false flag now?

    29. Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, your English isn't so good when you have to wing it instead of copypasta. Time for them to get in a replacement for you, Ivan.

    30. Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, it is hilarious to observe the current superpower has it panties twisted in a bunch because of actions of few dozens of operatives.

      POTUS is under investigation. Some people claim the election was "stolen". Every opponent is a Russian bot by default, meaningful discussion stops at this point. Social media spends millions on new censorship which may and likely will be used domestically. Collecting and selling user information suddenly become a tabu.

      This is a result of operation financed by, basically, pocket change. "Telling the lies" - well, this always was part of propaganda and US never had any problem doing it. What goes around comes around. More importantly, it works very well.

      Also, it is my understanding that not everything was a lie. They used pre-existed contradictions in society. This is the main reason it works.

    31. Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woooh, we can also be thankful there arenâ(TM)t a number of funded independent âoejournalistsâ pushing their narrative as well!

      Maybe this nonsense will wake people up to the idea they are being lied to, manipulated and worse to push someone elseâ(TM)s ideals.

      A healthy dose of paranoia might make the common folk question what people tell them.

      Then again itâ(TM)s probably safe to believe what you find online.

    32. Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would only make sense if the audience of Sinclair Broadcast Group and CNN/other-left-leaning-media-outlets would be about the same size. Maybe it is. I don't know. But if that isn't given it's similar to saying that there's a 50/50 change to win the lottery, because either you win or you lose. Even very stupid people will understand that this just isn't true.

      You can get a rough summary of Sinclair affiliates here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_stations_owned_or_operated_by_Sinclair_Broadcast_Group

      The assumption that there's at least some cooperation among them isn't that far off, opposed to the assumption that all those random left leaning media are conspiring under something equally monolithic.

    33. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by denzacar · · Score: 1

      But it is rather noticeable, no? All the yelling on both sides? "Listen to me!" "No, listen to MEEEE! HE speaks lies!" And so forth.

      Ahh...The good old celebration of ignorance as wisdom.
      Boy... if you can still convince yourself of that bullshit in this day and age you should turn in your card.
      The "I am a living person with a working brain, please don't unplug me" one.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    34. Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the lefts media talking heads say nearly the exact same thing. Google the montage of any subject. The points and verbage are all the same.

    35. Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear that Ivan has Russian trolls coming across the border as illegal immigrants. Can we let my Russian ops in? Lets work on your paranoia Ben. Theyre everywhere ben. We are coming ben.

    36. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To me, it is now apparent that someone, or something, is trying to rend this country apart... Some Say it's the Russians, Some Say it's dem Liberals, and some rather kooky religious nuts I know say it's Satan and his minions (rich people in control.) I don't know where the truth lies.

      His name is Phillip. I rent a flat out to him. He's a congenial enough block but you don't want to get on his bad side.

    37. Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CNN isn't left-leaning in any objective sense.

    38. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by rtb61 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Your a nut and I am Australian, from Adelaide without the least bit of Russian ancestry, in fact Croatian ancestry, hey but that's Slavic too your cry and I just, well, I just know you want to troll people, do better you wont last on slashdot with that low level trolling. The whole Russia bot thing has been destroyed and yeah calling all advertising coming out of Russia influence programs really lame. The US government has become a joke, a dangerous fool with a gun, from outside it looks like you are run by drunks, the behaviour just so aligns with that kind of heavily alchohol influenced decision making.

      Hey, you can call this comment an Australian influence program, make you feel better ;).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    39. Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Well it certainly wouldn't look left leaning if you leaned to the left.

      Unless you are trying to talk about left being what Europe defines left. But that wouldn't be relevant in a story about american politics and american news' networks.

    40. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by ole_timer · · Score: 1

      ratings are all a scam...it's a self licking ice cream cone...

      --
      nothing to see here - move along
    41. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by ole_timer · · Score: 1

      ratings are all a scam

      --
      nothing to see here - move along
    42. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a Russian bot. The level of this misinformation is insane. The Russian bot thing has been proven, not destroyed, you lying sack of dicks.

    43. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by ole_timer · · Score: 1

      could be...lots of dishes here in Alaska...

      --
      nothing to see here - move along
    44. Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (1) and (2) don't change the fact that it was pocket change. By all indications this is all that was necessary. And the main reasons it could work at all are insane FPTP system, ancient electoral college, two nearly identical right wing parties which represent interests of big business and population which is largely clueless about politics and economy and therefore easily manipulated. None of this has anything to do with Russia, it is internal US problems.

      Denying or not - what difference at this point does it make? There is no way to say if result was changed or not. Even if there was, ther is no way to do over. It just fuels ridiculous shouting match between Little-Endians and Big-Endians.

      Anyway, both original poster and you seem to imply that participants supposed to be ashamed. I wonder why. "Goal justifies means" is used by US government agencies all the time, are they so exceptional no one else can do it?

    45. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by benjfowler · · Score: 1

      Nobody's forgotten that Russia introduced the world to "punitive psychiatry".

      So excuse me if I tell you to go and fuck yourself.

    46. Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      The right has a TRUELY vast and well funded RW fake news distribution network
      Examples
      Accuracy in Media
      Avinu News Avinu News.com
      Citizens United
      The Conservative Voice conservativevoice.com
      Conservatives Forum conservativesforum.com
      Constitution Society constitution.org
      Cybercast News Service
      Drudge Report
      Ether Zone etherzone.com
      The Federal Observer federalobserver.com
      The Third Report ThirdReport.com
      Federal Review federalreview.com
      Fox News: Bill O'Reilly (O'Reilly Factor); Shepard Smith; Greta Van Susteren; Brit Hume; Rita Crosby
      Free Republic
      FrontPageMag.com
      GOPUSA
      Hannity & Colmes (Fox News)
      Human Events Online humaneventsonline.com
      LewRockwell.com lewrockwell.com
      Media Research Center: "Tracking Liberal Media Bias Since 1996."
      MensNewsDaily.com
      Move America Forward
      Mullings mullings.com
      National Review Online
      NewsMax NewsMax.com
      The Northern Right northernright.com
      The Patriotist patriotist.com
      The Third Report ThirdReport.com
      Restoring America restoringamerica.org
      RightMarch.com / rightmarch.com
      Right Wing News rightwingnews.com
      Rush Limbaugh
      Sierra Times sierratimes.com
      Talon News (see article)
      Town Hall
      Wall Street Journal Opinion opinionjournal.com
      Washington Times
      Weekly Standard
      WorldNetDaily
      and NONE of the MSM is truely left wing, or why would Republican Joe Scarbrough have a show on MSNBC?

    47. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are excused. Now shuffle off to bed and don't forget to put up the rails. You don't want to fall out before Nurse Ratchet catches up and gives you your Thorazine. I promise you won't be seeing Russians behind every tree after you get your pills.

    48. Re:Sinclair Broadcast Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  2. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why? To erode U.S. politics and disrupt NATO.

    Russia's biggest restriction on expanding their influence has always been NATO. NATO's balls have been cut off without reliable American participation.

    Someone ought to swing for this. As a cynic I know that powerful people often don't bear the consequences of their actions. But make no mistake, this is as much of an attack on America as 9/11 was.

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Shut up trumptard. You'll believe anything the orange clown says. So you'll surely believe this:

      "I could stand in the middle of fifth avenue and shoot someone, and I still wouldn't lose any voters".

      Those "voters" he was talking about, yeah, that's you.

      It takes a special kind of moron to keep defending a man who calls them moron to their faces.

    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the Holy Comings and Goings of the Red Dawn. Russian paratroopers are already preparing to destroy the economic engines of the world, the small American towns, so that they may succumb even deeper into traditional Russian misery and consume even more vodka. For the betterment of Putin. As a foremost expert of Putinologia, I should know, you know.

    3. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you denying that Germany is dependent on Russian energy? Are you denying that Germany and other NATO members are not fulfilling their obligations to the Alliance?

      Yet, you blame the guy that points out the bullshit Europeans and Canadians are trying to pull. Right. How about you bitch at the people that are not fulfilling their promises instead of the messenger that notifies you of that fact.

    4. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany is doing more to disrupt NATO than anything Trump or Russia could dream of. Freeloaders.

      Are you fucking insane?!

    5. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but millions of death worshiping cultists now living in Germany are.

    6. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump would have no grounds for criticisms if the majority of NATO members paid their fair share. Especially, if that country didn't hitch their energy dependence on an adversary/competitor. Just sayin.

    7. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You fucking moron. That was already debunked the day Trump said that.

    8. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how much is the GOP paying you to repeat Trumps lies?

    9. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or is it just the Putin regime paying you?

    10. Re:Why? by Daetrin · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Are you denying that Germany is dependent on Russian energy?"

      In general, yes.

      Fact Check - Germany Imports Gas From Russia. But Is It a 'Captive'?

      TL;DR: Trump was very incorrect (or lied, take your pick) about the amount of energy Germany gets from Russia. Germany does get _some_ of their energy from Russia, but it's not the majority of their energy, and despite that Germany has been far more willing to stand up to Russia and impose sanctions against than Trump is.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    11. Re:Why? by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's all about pressuring Germany to buy fracked LNG. If you expected Truth from Trump, you were mistaken; he's a sales guy with lip flatulence, a bad hairdo, and no conscience. Sales guy.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    12. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must consider that trump will say any outrageous lie that suits his purposes, just... like... you...

    13. Re: Why? by tsa · · Score: 1

      Even if he knows what the word means, he still doesnâ(TM)t what truth is.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    14. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NATO is no longer required, disband it.

    15. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bunch of russian ACs arguing with other russian ACs.

    16. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are seriously brainwashed by the media. and its scary.. that's the thing Im worried about here.

    17. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Shut up trumptard"

      Fuck off Ivan

      "Are you denying"

      Fuck off Boris.

      Hell, you're probably the same dude.

    18. Re:Why? by benjfowler · · Score: 1

      Shut up Ivan.

      NATO was founded to contain Russian imperialism and fascism. You do NOT get a say on what we can and can't do to protect ourselves against the fascists.

    19. Re:Why? by benjfowler · · Score: 1

      Russia are pissants. Vile, sneaky, backwards nasty pissants -- but they are pissants. Who will be stomped in short order once the West gets out from under Trump and Brexit.

    20. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany imports gas and oil. "half" come from Russia. NYT says: "German energy is diversified".

      That doesn't address the point that if Russia is a threat why is Germany sending billions for energy sources.

    21. Re:Why? by will_die · · Score: 2, Informative

      And that article is a perfect example why people should not trust the NY Times.
      Lets look at its major claims:
      That Trump lied about the amount of natural gas using the numbers 60 to 70 percent : The journalist did not even try to do basic research, and kind of admits that. The numbers from eurostat are 50 to 70 percent http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/. Trump was well in range, so ignorance to the times and its readers. If anything Trump is low because he was also talking about a new pipeline still in discussion that Russia is pushing for.

      That Germany is not captive of Russia: According to the Eurostat in addition to that 50 to 70 percent of natural gas Germany gets over 50 of their oil from Russia. The article then gives some opitions, I thought that was a news piece not editoral, however the new york times does not need facts. The "journalist" then ignores what happened in Ukraine when they were dependant on Russia for fuel. Also as trump said, and what he was talking about, they are planning for the new pipe which will increase the amount of energy that comes from Russia. Anyone with a free thinking mind that was in an economic condition where they were dependant on someone for 70% and they being pushed to increase that amount would say they are "have no freedom to choose alternatives" the very definition of captive.

    22. Re:Why? by Oceanplexian · · Score: 1

      Do you have a more impartial source for that than the New York Times. Preferably one that doesn't use language like "Not really", or "Yes, but not as much as the president said" with more definitive facts and figures?

    23. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, yes, the infamous "Germany is like a former Soviet Union State" fallacy. Let's face it, unlike the Ukraine and many other ex-Soviet states, Germany is paying normal market rates. It might be surprising to you and Trump, but that means in many cases still buying from Russia. There are other options around, but why pay more? It's bad enough that the German government still loves to perform a colonoscopy of the POTAS-in-office, but seriously...

    24. Re:Why? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      "Are you denying that Germany is dependent on Russian energy?"

      In general, yes.

      Fact Check - Germany Imports Gas From Russia. But Is It a 'Captive'?

      TL;DR: Trump was very incorrect (or lied, take your pick) about the amount of energy Germany gets from Russia. Germany does get _some_ of their energy from Russia, but it's not the majority of their energy, and despite that Germany has been far more willing to stand up to Russia and impose sanctions against than Trump is.

      So, John Kerry:

      https://112.international/ukra...

      https://twitter.com/EnergyAtSt...

      And Joe Biden:

      https://uk.reuters.com/article...

      Were wrong?

    25. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch as your post gets modded down into oblivion because anything that doesn't fit a particular political narrative must be wrong!

      Even smart people that are scientifically literate can succumb to the primitive thinking of tribalism and human fallibility. Just because you are a scientists or engineer does not mean that you understand human behavior and political theory on human organization based on that theory.

    26. Re:Why? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      So people only get their news from a select short list of news sites social media approves of.
      No showing most nations in NATO are not paying for mi budgetsl.
      No showing how much energy Germany imports and from what nations.
      Who Germany exports mil products to.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    27. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, John Kerry and Joe Biden were right. Trump was wrong.

      What's not to understand?

      Same facts, different judgement applied depending on who says it.

      Watch your response with three citations get ignored and the false parent upvoted. Welcome to the new religion heretic.

    28. Re:Why? by Smidge204 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > That Trump lied about the amount of natural gas using the numbers 60 to 70 percent : The journalist did not even try to do basic research, and kind of admits that.

      I'm having trouble finding the necessary data on the site you linked, mostly because you didn't link to anything relevant. You may as well linked to Google.com as supporting evidence for your claims. Care to walk us through the process to get the numbers you're citing?

      Meanwhile, the NYT article straight up states that 50% number ("nearly half") for natural gas imports, and links to a June 2018 report that shows Germany gets 48.5% of its total natural gas from Russia (51.1% of all *imported* natural gas).

      Trump doesn't know what the actual value is, and has overstated it significantly when trying to make his point (and overstating claims is literally his only shtick). The fact that you have repeated the 70% value - a complete fabrication as far as I can tell - is a dismal reminder of how effective Trump's lie has been.

      So good job on not doing your own research, and repeating a lie, I guess.
      =Smidge=

    29. Re:Why? by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      How about the 2018 report that the NYT article linked?

      https://www.bp.com/content/dam...

      Page 36: Germany's total gas imports in 2017 totaled 94.8 billion cubic meters of gas, of which 48.5 came from Russia. That's 51.16% if imported natural gas.
      =Smidge=

    30. Re:Why? by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Correction: The table is Billion Cubic Meters, not percentages. That's 48.5 billion cubic meters from Russia, not 48.5%.

      Still 51.1 percent though, not "60 to 70" percent.
      =Smidge=

    31. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump would have no grounds for criticisms if the majority of NATO members paid their fair share. Especially, if that country didn't hitch their energy dependence on an adversary/competitor. Just sayin.

      What exactly do you mean fair share?
      In the history of NATO US is the only country that has invoked article 5.
      Germany, France and the UK have all had casualties on behalf of the US.
      No other member state have asked for any similar support.
      Just sayin.

    32. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you finish watching Rachel Maddow each evening do you run straight outside to howl at the moon every time or only if it's a full moon?

    33. Re:Why? by WhiplashII · · Score: 0

      Um, moron, GERMANY IS A FORMER SOVIET UNION STATE"! No "like" about it. (OK, just half, but still, what a moronic post!)

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    34. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason Europe isn't the USSR is because of America, and it's dedication to NATO.

      Or are you forgetting how quickly the Europeans surrender, capitulate, and devolve into genocide when left to their own devices?

    35. Re:Why? by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 2

      The quote was about energy which since he also mentioned nuclear and coal so did he just mean fossil fuels?. If other forms of energy are considered the percentage is less than 20%.

      Germany is totally controlled by Russia They will be getting between 60 and 70 percent of their energy from Russia and a new pipeline, and you tell me if that is appropriate because I think it's not,

      Even with the new pipeline this will not raise their energy percentage that high. It may if only natural gas and oil are considered, but that would paint a very incomplete picture.

      Germany is a captive of Russia because they supply (energy). They got rid of their coal plants. They got rid of their nuclear. They’re getting so much of the oil and gas from Russia. I think it’s something that NATO has to look at.

      Of course they haven't gotten rid of coal or nuclear (yet anyway) and they're expanding renewable energy.

    36. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Youâ(TM)re entirely right. The EU should kick out the US and do NATO right without us American leeches.

      I wish I voted Trump but did not. However if I had known he would smash the fucking weenie euros and call them out on their shit so much I certainly would have.

    37. Re:Why? by DRJlaw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That doesn't address the point that if Russia is a threat why is Germany sending billions for energy sources.

      May as well ask why the U.S. is sending billions to China for goods. Or hundreds of millions to Venezuela for oil - even in 2018. Or tens millions to Russia for rides to the International Space Station.

    38. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And West Germany was under US control. Germany is really a US controlled puppet, gasp! Not that I trust those Americans, they're really just under a mixture of Europeans control.

      Yes, that is precisely how dumb you sound.

    39. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems that way... it's enough to make you ignore people who bitch about the other side now.

    40. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO, the numbers of eurostat are NOT 60 - 70 procent. Eurostat says that three quarters of the imports from Russia into the EU are gas products -- but that import only amounts to 7.8% of EU imports.

    41. Re: Why? by phantomfive · · Score: 0

      Mainly because we don't consider them a threat. Of course, Russia could hurt America if they wanted to, but we consider that they will not do so for various reasons. Germany most likely doesn't consider Russia a threat either.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    42. Re:Why? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Your post is a perfect example of why people should not trust random Slashdot posters.

      Your link to Eurostat goes to their home page. The actual data is here: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/s...

      That could have been a genuine mistake on your part, but unfortunately I've seen a lot of people using this trick where they post a link that they assume no-one will actually check to give their post credibility, even though the link is broken/wrong/doesn't support their argument.

      Note that it's 50-75% of Germany's *gas* imports. Trump said "energy", but gas makes up less than 20% of Germany's energy mix.

      Also, note that this doesn't mean Germany is "totally controlled" by Russia as Trump claims, any more than I am "totally controlled" by the supermarket I get 60% of my food from. It just means that if Russia did decide to squeeze Germany's natural gas supply I'd have to shop somewhere else or eat fewer avocados.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    43. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you put it that way, you're both wrong. A smaller part of Germany is a former Soviet Union state. And you can still see differences in various socioeconomic facets between West and East Germany. The majority of Germany however is a former US, UK and France state. You can find a map that should be fairly accurate here.

      Of course the reason why not all of Germany is a former Soviet Union State or might still be today is because of US involvement. Neither France nor the UK would have been able to stop the Soviet conquest of Europe on their own. But with the USA in Germany the Soviet expanse could be contained.

      As a European I do think we owe the US for this, because the Soviet Union would most certainly have raped the shit out of all those countries that were ravaged by the war with Nazi Germany. Therefore European countries ought to make their contribution to NATO. That is what we owe the US tax payers that fund NATO. But we certainly don't owe shit to Trump.

    44. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears /. doesn't like me using the a href tags. So here's the link to that mentioned map in plain text: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allied-occupied_Germany#/media/File:Deutschland_Besatzungszonen_8_Jun_1947_-_22_Apr_1949.svg

    45. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fascists are all in your head. You need help.

    46. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh how you hit the expletives when youve no argument. Russia does supply a great deal of fuel to the Germans.

      Russia is its largest country of import straight from your liberal Wikipedia.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_in_Germany

      Why would Germany want to risk its ties with the Vlad?? They need Vlad.

    47. Re:Why? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 0

      Yep. Same as being against gay marriage was absolutely fine when Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were, then suddenly was a sign of "hate" when they finally came around to Dick Cheney's long-held position on the subject.

      Or, ICE was fine separating families at the border 2 years ago but suddenly it's the worst thing that's ever happened since Barack Obama's no longer President.

      Yes, I know how it works.

    48. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought we considered Russia a threat? Everywhere theres an election, youll find Russia? I thought we were to fight Russia at every front? Those who ally with Russia? I cant keep up.

    49. Re: Why? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Russia has been trying to manipulate elections for decades.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    50. Re:Why? by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      > That Trump lied about the amount of natural gas using the numbers 60 to 70 percent ....

      Meanwhile, the NYT article straight up states that 50% number ("nearly half") for natural gas imports, and links to a June 2018 report that shows Germany gets 48.5% of its total natural gas from Russia (51.1% of all *imported* natural gas).

      This is why no one take people criticism of Trump seriously. By your own admission just about half of it's imported natural gas from Russia. 50 or 60 percent does not change the point that Trump was making.

      Everyone knows that Trump exaggerates (or lies - I don't care which word you use.) But the point of his comment remains true.

    51. Re: Why? by houghi · · Score: 1

      So has every other country in the history of the world. The results depend a bit. Lichtenstein was not that succesfull. The US was.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    52. Re:Why? by gettin2old · · Score: 1

      Kind of like the special kind of morons who think HRC was presidential material. We're a 2 party (bipolar) government. Things always swing back and forth. but now we can't even talk to each other. I have 2 or 3 democrat friends (who i completely disagree with) who i can have conversations about policy topics with. we go back and forth we hear everyone's points. we even agree on a large overlap on those points. we disagree on what is most important and maybe what the outcome of action "x" would be. the other dozens and dozens of democrats i interact with at best just tune out of the conversation or start name calling. i.e.- morons

    53. Re:Why? by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      You posted several links from people saying that Europe getting 33% of it's gas (not total energy, just gas) from Russia was a bad idea.

      Trump said that Germany "will be getting 60 to 70 percent of their energy from Russia" and that as a result Germany "is captive to Russia".

      One of those things is an opinion, which might or might not be correct, based on actual facts, and the other is an overreaction based on either a lie or a gross error.

      As usual i don't really know whether Trump is just stupid or intentionally spreading lies in order to promote an agenda, but just because it vaguely rhymes with something someone else said does not validate it.

      Imagine if two people saw someone littering, and one of those people said "hey, littering is bad, you shouldn't do that!", and the other said "you are single-handedly destroying this city and this planet!" and then shot them.

      The first person objecting to littering is not an endorsement or justification for the second person shooting them, but the second person's overreaction does not somehow negate the idea that littering is bad either.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    54. Re:Why? by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      > Everyone knows that Trump exaggerates (or lies - I don't care which word you use.)

      If you have to lie to make your point, then you don't actually have a point to make. There's actually a pretty big difference between 50, 60 and even 70 percent, especially when it comes to making up the difference should your supply become threatened.

      > But the point of his comment remains true.

      Except it isn't. Russia needs to sell that gas more than Germany needs to buy it, so any shenanigans by Russia to intimidate Germany by reducing supply or raising price would be very self-harming. Germany can shift to new energy sources (including alternate natural gas imports as well as alternative sources) but Russia would be SOL to find an alternate source of income as oil and gas exports are half their federal budget and about 70% if their total exports, especially if other nations go along and reduce their imports from Russia or act to decrease the price of fossil fuels (which has been kneecapping Russia's economy for the past decade already).
      =Smidge=

    55. Re:Why? by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      If it was 59.8 percent instead of 60 you'd be making the same point about lies. You're petty and can't admit it.

    56. Re:Why? by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      No, 59.8% is so close to 60% that it's an acceptable round-off. Nobody rounds 51.1% to 60% (much less 70%) unless they're straight up lying.

      This is pure hyperbole intended to undermine Germany, possibly at Russia's request/suggestion. You're an idiot for buying it and a dipshit for defending it.
      =Smidge=

    57. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, they only contribute 22% of the NATO operating budget. What a bunch of freeloaders those Germans are. *eyeroll* Maybe you should go after Canada for using less than 1% of their GDP for military spending.

      The only countries following through with significant NATO obligations are US, France, and U.K. in that order. So why are Trumptards shitting all over France? Maybe because Trumptards are puppets for an anti-NATO regime installed by Russian operatives.

      You retards should all be sterilized.

    58. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly Vladimir. President Putin is right on the money, as always.

    59. Re:Why? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      So people only get their news from a select short list of news sites social media approves of.

      Ideally you should get your news from vetted sources. How you determine what has been vetted is complicated because clearly you cannot trust an authority like the government to tell the whole truth all the time. Each person should be responsible to double-confirm information, and be prepared to change their own position as stories get debunked.

      At least that's how a rational person would operate. An irrational one would attach themselves to a particular ideology (left, right, up, down, in, out). And once they have made decisions based on faulty information they will shut down any further discussion contrary to their position. A life of perpetual cognitive dissonance is a stressful and unhappy way to live.

      The value of an article should be one of transparency, references, and citations. If a journalist shows me something and cites their sources, that's pretty compelling (hopefully I bother to follow those sources). Unfortunately many news articles are conjecture, hearsay, or outright misinformation. Probably because that's what gets clicks, and people would much rather hear stories that confirm their own beliefs than discuss dry boring facts.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    60. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although you're factually correct. The major part of the problem isn't only the fake links but the fact that we have two sides of the argument posted by essentially the same russian guy trying to stir up some contention. This type of shit is all over the internet and some fools get so riled up they end up on the street protesting because of some shit russian trolls stirred up. Folks need to get inoculated against outrage.

    61. Re:Why? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      West German and now Germany has accepted energy from the Soviet Union and now Russia going back many years.
      The only policy West Germany was not happy with was any East German control over such exports from the Soviet Union.
      Germany now accepts Russian energy due to price and the cost of an existing pipeline network.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  3. Not just the Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sinclair broadcast group owns many "local" stations, often multiple in a city. They force the "local" news shows to run their stories, commentators, and have the local hosts read corporate produced statements. They also force stations to run their national produced "news" shows like Full Measure.

    They even run commercials about how independent and reliable local new is. It's funny to see these same ones on multiple stations.

    1. Re:Not just the Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why do you think Sinclair isn't another Russian front?

  4. Re:Enough about the Russians already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sound like a Nazi.

  5. Re:Enough about the Russians already! by Calydor · · Score: 1

    I thought he sounded like a Russian.

    Are there Russian Nazis?

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  6. This is not going away. by RyanFenton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I see every time this comes up that political process hacking is somehow not seen as a big deal, because injustice in the name of conservatism is somehow sacred and above such considerations.

    Well, the digging won't stop. This isn't some 'Bengazi' investigation - this is about the heart of our election process, about how much influence foreign interference had.

    I know that conservatives have power over the mechanisms of power now - and plenty of folks like that idea, and want it to continue at all costs. But if it comes at a cost of ignoring damage to our democracy, it won't be remembered well at all.

    This is not going away.

    None of these issues are going away.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:This is not going away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It will after the midterm when Dem post huge losses instead of riding the fabled "Blue Wave", lol. Nobody is buying it.

      Putin 202.. er, Trump 2020!!

    2. Re:This is not going away. by ole_timer · · Score: 1, Funny

      yawn

      --
      nothing to see here - move along
    3. Re:This is not going away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      This isn't some 'Bengazi' investigation

      True. The Bengazi investigation was real based on real events and a real failure of the Obama administration. The Russian investigation is bullshit and a way for the Dem party to avoid having to discuss why it is imploding so badly. But please keep running Hillary, keep running self declared socialists, and keep acting like prissy little queens every time you don't get your way.

      Going full retard is not the way to win, lefties.

    4. Re:This is not going away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      I see every time this comes up that political process hacking is somehow not seen as a big deal, because injustice in the name of conservatism is somehow sacred and above such considerations.

      Well, the digging won't stop. This isn't some 'Bengazi' investigation - this is about the heart of our election process, about how much influence foreign interference had.

      I know that conservatives have power over the mechanisms of power now - and plenty of folks like that idea, and want it to continue at all costs. But if it comes at a cost of ignoring damage to our democracy, it won't be remembered well at all.

      This is not going away.

      None of these issues are going away.

      Ryan Fenton

      Gee, and to think it was Crooked Hillary! who said we were supposed to respect the results of the election...

      Because it's now "progressives" doing everything they can to overturn that very election - because they don't like the results.

      WHO is "ignoring damage to our democracy"?

      Because it isn't "conservatives" haranguing Democrats in public - it's "progressives" attacking Republicans.

      Hell, "progressive" have already taken to literally trying to assassinate elected Republicans.

      And after the assassination attempt on Steve Scalise and other Republicans by a "progressive", you actually have the unmitigated gall and utter stupidity to post

      I know that conservatives have power over the mechanisms of power now - and plenty of folks like that idea, and want it to continue at all costs. But if it comes at a cost of ignoring damage to our democracy, it won't be remembered well at all.

      WHAT FUCKING COLOR IS THE SKY ON PLANET STUPID?!?!?! BECAUSE IT SURE AS SHIT AIN'T BLUE.

    5. Re:This is not going away. by penandpaper · · Score: 0

      Too much innuendo and grandstanding like we saw with the Congressional hearings over Peter Strzok. Democrats are children. Republicans are outraged. And Strzok is a disgrace and a POS person.

      At least there is evidence for outrage toward the disgracful POS that is Peter Strzok. There is no excuse to act like a child. Ever.

      Democracy necessitates that voters can make their own opinion. If a few memes and the airing of dirty laundry is enough to subvert that premise then democracy is a failed form of government and we should yearn for the days of aristocratic monarchy.

    6. Re:This is not going away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I see every time this comes up that political process hacking is somehow not seen as a big deal

      Apparently you didn't read the part of the article that said: These accounts apparently never spread misinformation. In fact, they posted real local news

      I know that's a bummer for your narrative that tells you Hillary didn't lose on account of anything having to do with her war mongering in the Middle East, or the Democrat agenda of using the police power of the state to enforce the leftist version of Sharia law (you must bake cakes for gay people, you can't keep your firearms, and you have to hire people based on the color of their skin). No, it has to be this "hacking thing" that nobody can produce any evidence of despite years of investigation. It just has to be, right?

      I can't wait to see you guys pulling your hair out this November. It's going to be better than the replays of all the tears at Hillary's election night party.

    7. Re:This is not going away. by eaglesrule · · Score: 1, Troll

      "The campaign pays the DNC, DNC pays Democracy partners, Democracy Partners pays the Foval group, Foval Group goes and executes the shit on the ground.” -- Scott Foval

      Good, the digging shouldn't stop because there's plenty to clutch our pearls about. When you can cut a check and get a political rally shut down, it's only a matter of time before geopolitical adversaries start trying it themselves.

      "So the Chicago protest when they shut all that, that was us.” -- Aaron Minter, Foval Group deputy rapid response director

    8. Re:This is not going away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Russia Investigation is a "witch hunt" that has so far found several witches. With the number of indictments Mueller and produced and the number of guilty pleas I don't know how people can keep spouting this bullshit.

      Benghazi was a failure of the Obama Administration but it was not a scandal, it was investigated for many years, way longer than Republicans are now complaining about how long the Mueller investigation is taking. At the end of the investigation there were no indictments despite open hostile investigators. You do your argument a disservice comparing the two as there is a lot more going on with the Russia investigation in legal terms than the tragedy that was Benghazi.

    9. Re:This is not going away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really shouldn't call people stupid when you are on such shaky ground yourself. You understand that "Progressives" are going to have far far fewer examples than the "Conservatives" that have been bombing abortion clinics and shooting other people for decades.

      Besides that Trump has not ordered an investigation much less any mitigation into Russian meddling in the election. He is most definitely ignoring the problem as he won't even admit that Putin was involved despite all of his intelligence agencies providing him evidence.

      You fail in your understanding of the situation so profoundly that you don't even comprehend that nobody is trying to "overturn" the election. Mueller's growing list of indictments and guilty pleas should be enough for people to understand that there is a lot of corruption right now but with Trump's associates admitting guilt you still can't see what is happening and are attributing quite a lot to the few supporters of Hillary that there were. She lost because she didn't have enough supporters, those supporters have little or no power right now but are somehow trying to overturn and election which is already settled.

      In short, get over yourself.

    10. Re:This is not going away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean besides all the indictments and guilty pleas. Yeah, major lack of evidence. Besides that, they were never going to even attempt to take anyone's' firearms. That is a fear tactic you've fallen for hook line and sinker. They might have tried to make it harder to get ARs but they sure as shit would never have argued to take the ones I'm sure you already have.

      As for the Sharia law bit, that is just way out in left field and I'll not bother responding as I'm just repeating my point about you falling for fear tactics which is all the right stands on these days.

    11. Re:This is not going away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "The campaign pays the DNC, DNC pays Democracy partners, Democracy Partners pays the Foval group, Foval Group goes and executes the shit on the ground.” -- Scott Foval

      Good, the digging shouldn't stop because there's plenty to clutch our pearls about. When you can cut a check and get a political rally shut down, it's only a matter of time before geopolitical adversaries start trying it themselves.

      "So the Chicago protest when they shut all that, that was us.” -- Aaron Minter, Foval Group deputy rapid response director

      The nytimes article linked does not support you claim in any way whatsoever, and where did you get the texts that look like quotes?

    12. Re:This is not going away. by benjfowler · · Score: 1

      It was a long con -- typical sneaky Russian dick move to reel in an audience over years, and then deploy information attacks at the right time.

      The West understands completely what happened.

      Putin, however, doesn't understand the galaxy of hurt coming his way when we finally get our revenge.

    13. Re:This is not going away. by Straif · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The one 'witch' Mueller has found was simply a father being blackmailed into pleading guilty to a 'process crime' that even the FBI agents involved didn't believe happened because of threats of similar prosecution against his son (Flynn).

      Manafort is, was, and always has been a crook (while working with both parties) but none of the crimes he's being charged with, by Mueller's own admission, have anything to do with Trump or the Russian investigation.

      The Russian companies and citizens were just padding and no one, especially Mueller, expected them to ever show up for trial and his team was effectively slapped by the judge when a lawyer actually appeared to defend some of them and Mueller's team wasn't ready. It has to be one of the only times a prosecutor tried appealing for a continuance based on a their own bad summons while the target happily surrendered any extra rights they may have gained from the prosecutors mistakes.

      Benghazi was just terrible management and an even worse attempt at a cover up but nothing that really rose to a the level of a crime and really had no reason to be investigated as such. The families may be able to sue in civil court but I doubt any politician or bureaucrat will ever face any personal hardship over it.

      --
      Of course that's just my opinion...... you could be wrong!
    14. Re:This is not going away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really shouldn't call people stupid when you are on such shaky ground yourself. You understand that "Progressives" are going to have far far fewer examples than the "Conservatives" that have been bombing abortion clinics and shooting other people for decades.

      Besides that Trump has not ordered an investigation much less any mitigation into Russian meddling in the election. He is most definitely ignoring the problem as he won't even admit that Putin was involved despite all of his intelligence agencies providing him evidence.

      You fail in your understanding of the situation so profoundly that you don't even comprehend that nobody is trying to "overturn" the election. Mueller's growing list of indictments and guilty pleas should be enough for people to understand that there is a lot of corruption right now but with Trump's associates admitting guilt you still can't see what is happening and are attributing quite a lot to the few supporters of Hillary that there were. She lost because she didn't have enough supporters, those supporters have little or no power right now but are somehow trying to overturn and election which is already settled.

      In short, get over yourself.

      ORLY?

      Black Panthers?

      Weather Underground?

      Bill Ayers?

      Well, at least we know there's more than one person on Planet Stupid.

    15. Re:This is not going away. by argStyopa · · Score: 0

      Ryan Fenton apparently believes that this is the first time foreign states have tried to manipulate our elections. Ryan Fenton would be mistaken.

      Ryan Fenton probably believes that it's inconceivable that people could disagree with him without being manipulated or tricked into it. Ryan Fenton would be wrong. In fact, there are tens, if not hundreds of millions of people who disagree with Ryan.

      Ryan Fenton is objecting solely because the candidate he wished to win, didn't. She lost to Trump, perhaps the biggest buffoon in US politics. Perhaps Ryan Fenton should simply recognize this for what it is: his candidate was an evil hag whose dynastic goals of self-enrichment and self-aggrandizement were shattered by the puerile whims of millions of 'deplorables'.

      --
      -Styopa
    16. Re:This is not going away. by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      The nytimes article linked does not support you claim in any way whatsoever, and where did you get the texts that look like quotes?

      The quotes were orinally from transcripts of undercover video footage done by a conservative journalist named James O'Keefe, which were posted to youtube. O'Keefe's videos are often criticized for their editing, and have to be taken with a grain of salt, but the videos produce evidence of the provocateurs that were organized during the 2016 election to disrupt Trump rallies. This article highlights some of the quotes I referenced.

      The more that "threats to our democracy" narrative is driven by the likes of those that stage primaries, the better, because then their own tactics get brought to light. Rent-a-mobs used for intimidation and suppressing free speech and the right to peacefully assemble is a greater threat than any Russian twitter account.

    17. Re:This is not going away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for the Sharia law bit, that is just way out in left field and I'll not bother responding as I'm just repeating my point about you falling for fear tactics which is all the right stands on these days.

      Holy shit. You mean like the fear tactics of we are going to be in World War III after Trump was elected? Or that Trump was going to declare martial law? Or that Trump will never relinquish the Presidency if he loses the next election? I think you millennial nutjobs have your man-buns twisted too tight.

    18. Re: This is not going away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See if you can keep it up till the sentencing, Ivan.

    19. Re:This is not going away. by Uberbah · · Score: 2

      You mean besides all the indictments and guilty pleas that have nothing whatsoever to do with Russia interfering with the election or colluding with Trump to do so

      FTFY. Even in Mueller's embarrassing indictment of a Twitter troll farm, he admits it had no effect on the election. You Russiagaters are as sad as the Bushbots who still insist that Saddam had WMD's more than a decade after the Bush Administration itself gave up on any such claims.

    20. Re:This is not going away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm so old, I remember how W was going to use 9/11 as a pretense to establish a theocracy!

    21. Re: This is not going away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a few Twitter bots were able to overturn an election by posting REAL NEWS STORIES at the right time, maybe the other side didnâ(TM)t deserve to begin with? If telling the truth is a crime (if youâ(TM)re foreign) and act of treachery (if youâ(TM)re a citizen), then Iâ(TM)d rather be a traitor than a âoelaw abiding citizenâ.

    22. Re:This is not going away. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The good news is that the investigations are working. This attack was stopped in its tracks before it could be used to interfere with US democracy.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re: This is not going away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Witch hunts ALWAYS find witches. You don't think they burned innocent women at the stake back in the day, do you?

    24. Re:This is not going away. by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      You understand that "Progressives" are going to have far far fewer examples than the "Conservatives" that have been bombing abortion clinics and shooting other people for decades.

      I'm always curious if people are dumb enough to believe this or troll on purpose to get a reaction.

    25. Re:This is not going away. by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      You mean besides all the indictments and guilty pleas. Yeah, major lack of evidence

      Yep. Bankrupting people or jailing them until they confess to something really counts as evidence.

    26. Re: This is not going away. by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Notice how facts are met with empty rhetoric.

    27. Re:This is not going away. by Raenex · · Score: 1

      this is about the heart of our election process, about how much influence foreign interference had

      Huh, you mean like a foreign agent hired by the DNC and the Clinton campaign to conduct a smear campaign against the opposition candidate?

      "Steele, who is British, did far more than simply provide opposition research to the Democratic National Committee. He was able to make sure it reached the most influential people possible in politics, media and government to shape and influence the growing narrative of the 2016 presidential election. In other words, as a skilled professional intelligence officer, Steele ran a full-spectrum information operation against the United States. One could even call it information warfare."

      But let's not stop there! Did he have help from Obama's DOJ? Why, yes, he did!

      "The Nunes memo also showed then-associate deputy attorney general Bruce Ohr back-channeled additional material from Steele into the DOJ while working with Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates and her replacement, Rod Rosenstein. Ohr's wife Nellie Ohr worked for Fusion GPS, the firm that commissioned the dossier, on Steele's project. Ohr's wife would be especially valuable in that she would be able to clandestinely supply info to corroborate what Steele told the FBI and, via her husband, know to tailor what she passed to the questions DOJ had. The FBI did not disclose the role of Ohr's wife, who speaks Russian and has previously done contract work for the CIA, to the FISA court."

      None of these issues are going away.

      Indeed.

    28. Re:This is not going away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Democrats are children. Republicans are outraged.

      Did you bother to watch the behavior of the Republicans during the hearing? They LIED over and over. Even Goodlatte held a fake vote where he clearly heard the loud "NAYs" and then said "Yays have it" just to create a false record. The hearing demonstrated how horribly immoral and deceitful the Republicans have become, no behavior is too outrageous.

    29. Re:This is not going away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for the actual EVIDENCE against them. You think Mueller just made that up? It's all just a big conspiracy?

      You see, EVIDENCE is actual documents, meetings, phone calls that show the crimes being committed. People generally don't confess to crimes and turn states witness unless the mountain of evidence is hard to overcome.

    30. Re:This is not going away. by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Except for the actual EVIDENCE against them. You think Mueller just made that up? It's all just a big conspiracy?

      You see, EVIDENCE is actual documents, meetings, phone calls that show the crimes being committed.

      Really? We suddenly trust the police or government not to use coercion?

    31. Re:This is not going away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ryan: it's not just about the election process. It's about the entire political discourse across the spectrum being heavily influenced by russians to stir up outrage among us against each other. They're doing it all over the place to try to divide and conquer.

  7. Re:Enough about the Russians already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So it would be "honorable" and "decent" to ignore possible Russian meddling in our elections?

    How about this: no, we're not going to ignore it

  8. It's okay, Russia hates Democrats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Keep the GOP strong, support Russia.

  9. This is the weirdest shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes, Jesus Christ, we know the Russians are spying and up to no good. Thank you.

    They have been doing this for nearly a century now. Running this story every other day, OTOH, is destroying what little credibility the media has left. No, I'm going to automatically feel outrage and vote for whatever cunt piece of shit you favour. Please shut the fuck up about it. It's like being amazed that blue looks blue.

    Yes they are/have been/willcontinueto etc etc etc.

    Please. Shut the fuck up about it.

    1. Re:This is the weirdest shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How about we let Mueller do his job and see what the results are.

      Until then, take your own advice, mmm-k.

    2. Re:This is the weirdest shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never voting for any woman or spicano, so they can run ITS RUSHA FAULT until they collapse. IDGAF about russia. Sick of hearing about illegal mexicans and women's stupid feelings. They deserve to feel bad for being inferior. Fuck diversity and feminism.

    3. Re: This is the weirdest shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently his job is a modern day witchfinder general.

      Wonder if he'll investigate himself for his uranium one involvement.

    4. Re:This is the weirdest shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about we let Mueller do his job and see what the results are.

      Until then, take your own advice, mmm-k.

      OK.

      How about also telling us how many "informants" the FBI sent against the Trump campaign, and when they started doing that?

      How about also having the FBI actually turn over the documents Congressional committees have subpoenaed?

      If Trump's so fucking corrupt, SHOW US THE ACTUAL EVIDENCE.

      Gee, you'd think the FBI has something to hide....

    5. Re:This is the weirdest shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. That should be investigated as well. We can't afford to allow our elections to be compromised by criminals, domestic or foreign.

    6. Re:This is the weirdest shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No state or local municipality reported election tampering or fraud. There was no widspread before or after the election reported. But allegedly there were 4 people who voted twice across the entire country but there votes were only counted once. We had rock solid security at the ballot box for the 2016 elections. Unless the Russians used mind control devices it would be safe to say that you can let people make there own informed choices when they vote. Even if it doesn't fit into your narrative of reality.

    7. Re:This is the weirdest shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone is American or interested in your stupid political theatre you shithead.

      But that doesn't occur to a politics-obsessed, blinkered fuckface like you. Typical ugly progressive who thinks voting for diversity is gonna improve your chances, lol. { W R O N G }

    8. Re: This is the weirdest shit by snapsnap · · Score: 1

      But his illegal smuggling of Uranium was done under orders of the US State Department. I don't think he personally did wrong by breaking US and Russian laws since he was told to.

    9. Re:This is the weirdest shit by benjfowler · · Score: 1

      People forgot what vile, sneaky, barbaric cunts the Russians are. Big mistake. We won't be forgetting again in a hurry.

    10. Re: This is the weirdest shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something about nazis just doing their jobs...

    11. Re: This is the weirdest shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you focus more on remembering to take your meds, hmm?

    12. Re:This is the weirdest shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not just about the stupid Russia elections meddling probe. It's about you Russian pricks right here on this forum trying to frame every debate in a way that provokes maximum outrage with one "side" against the other.

  10. Russians exploited Americans' trust In local news? by najajomo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "The information operatives who worked out of the Internet Research Agency in St. Petersburg did not stop at posing as American social media users or spreading false information from purported news sources"

    This feeds into the MSN narrative as to how Putin influenced the US election through Facebook and Twitter posts. The truth being that across the board the media was totally opposed to Trump and fully positive for 'Hillary'. The American decided to not believe the MSM message and voted in Trump. This BS being designed to distract from the lobbying system that really influences things in Washington. No one believes your bullshit anymore.

    'The Alliance for Securing Democracy, a bipartisan, transatlantic initiative housed within The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF)'

  11. Curious.. by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Curious how deeply researchers dug into these accounts. Another possibility would be for them to have also posted 'fake news', allow it to get shared while relevant, and then delete those posts to continue the appearance of a semi-legit news source...? Very troubling either way. What would be really helpful now is news sources documenting how to detect these questionable sites....the willingness of people to trust what they see on Twitter and elsewhere is another side of the problem that needs attention.

    1. Re:Curious.. by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

      the willingness of people to trust what they see on Twitter and elsewhere is another side of the problem that needs attention

      What?!? You expect people to think for themselves? But we've trained them from school to only regurgitate facts and just expect that the internet (Google, Bing) can always accurately answer their questions. The computer is always right, and has been ever since green-bar paper.

      --
      If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
  12. Re:Enough about the Russians already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this just all of the Clinton supporters still looking for something to complain about as to why their supreme leader lost?! If you are swayed by simple local media then shame on you for not being more educated and educating the others around you. Have conversations, spread the message, stop blaming someone else for your lack of taking part of you all feel so strongly about it. Go out and do something but stop retweeting and sharing fake uneducated news.

  13. So Obama was WRONG about Russia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Barack Obama was fundamentally WRONG about Russia?

    And Mitt Romney was right?

    Who knew!

  14. Re:MuH rUsSiA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ivan!!!

  15. This just in: America learns about the internet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    News at 11:00

  16. Apathy to be Expected by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    this is about the heart of our election process

    Exactly, this is precisely the problem. People spreading lies and getting away with it has been at the heart of the election process in many democracies for far too long. The only change is that now foreign governments are getting involved - including the US government which got involved in the Brexit debate. It's going to be hard to elicit a big response from people about a torrent of lies from foreign agents when they are already used to listening to a torrent of lies from their local politicians.

    1. Re:Apathy to be Expected by Obfuscant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      this is about the heart of our election process

      Exactly, this is precisely the problem.

      Yes, it is. People who think Twitter is the heart of our election process are a big problem.

      Folks, Twitter is a social media thing. There is no validation of who posts what. It is DESIGNED for anyone to be able to say whatever they want. Just because someone calls themselves "OrlandoOfficialRealNewspaper" doesn't make them a newspaper, and it never has. Anyone who does not understand that shouldn't be allowed to view tweets from anyone.

      Now it is a big deal that people are saying whatever they want, and it is somehow ruining the "democratic process". Item number 1 in the Bill of Rights is "freedom of speech", which means freedom of speech. It's based on the idea that people are supposed to be critical readers. Abandoning freedom because some people can't handle the work of thinking about what they read is pathetic.

      It's going to be hard to elicit a big response from people about a torrent of lies from foreign agents when they are already used to listening to a torrent of lies from everyone else who has a political agenda to push.

      FTFY.

      I have yet to see anyone comment on the heart of this story. Russians created Twitter accounts to spread disinformation and then didn't use them to spread disinformation. From TFS:

      Another twist: These accounts apparently never spread misinformation. In fact, they posted real local news, ...

      Shocking abuse of our electoral process, Russian agents posting real news stories. Absolutely unthinkable and unacceptable!

    2. Re:Apathy to be Expected by Straif · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Foreign governments HAVE ALWAYS been involved in the democratic process. The only time they aren't is if your country has absolutely nothing of advantage for them which is rare.

      It may be as little as a nasty word or two about a particular politician or it could be an outright assassination but you'd be hard pressed to find any election in the past 200 years in which some foreign power wasn't involved either behind the curtain or outright on the streets.

      The 'Russian' thing is just sour grapes. China probably had more of an impact on the last election in the US.

      --
      Of course that's just my opinion...... you could be wrong!
    3. Re:Apathy to be Expected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, election meddling is part and parcel of great power politics. Democrats implored the USSR to meddle in 1984 because Ted Kennedy didn't like Reagan, Obama meddled in Israel's election because he didn't like Bibi, etc. My bggest question of the Russia!Russia!Russia! Folks is, "When, exactly, did you think they stopped?"

    4. Re:Apathy to be Expected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #BigFacts

    5. Re:Apathy to be Expected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think it's hilarious that everyone wants to focus on "russian meddling" but anytime anyone brings up the fact that the Chinese are way more involved in cyber-warfare against the united states, everyone ignores it (because it likely doesn't fit their current political agenda.) Anyone that works in IT (which should be all of us here,) knows that the Chinese are the real threat in the cyber world, not the russians. Anyone with a brain and knowledge of history also knows that the United States does a hell of a more than try to influence other countries' elections with facebook posts; we fund&train miltias and literally participate in violent conflicts to overthrow whole governments. Yet somehow the Russians are the issue, not the ignorance of our general populace :(

  17. Re:MuH rUsSiA by yuriklastalov · · Score: 1

    Yvgeny, get the bots to attacking!

  18. Russia Russia Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't you people give it a rest? Do you still not get it? Hillary Clinton was a deeply unpopular candidate, which caused some people to switch to Trump and a lot more people to just not bother to come out and vote. There was no need for any fake news - or any news for that matter - to have that happen. A neutral scarecrow would probably have defeated Trump - who got a lot less votes than Romney in 2012.

    1. Re:Russia Russia Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A neutral scarecrow would probably have defeated Trump - who got a lot less votes than Romney in 2012.

      That is a bald-faced lie.

      https://www.forbes.com/sites/r...

  19. OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another twist: These accounts apparently never spread misinformation. In fact, they posted real local news, serving as sleeper accounts building trust and readership for some future, unforeseen effort.

    In other words, no Russian "hacking," but they're sure these accounts were created by Russian trolls/bots and were up to no good. They just know it, dammit.

    1. Re: OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember kids being reputable is a sign of manipulation.

  20. Re:Said who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ugly fucking pieces of shit too. Like a big-eared fish-eyed gargoyle that whines and complains.

  21. Given that a single right wing media outlet by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    called Sinclair news just bought virtually all local stations (and were allowed to do it by our current FCC) that's not really an issue.

    I keep saying this, but when it comes to economics the media has a distinct right wing, pro-corporate bias.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Given that a single right wing media outlet by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 0

      I keep saying this, but when it comes to economics the media has a distinct right wing, pro-corporate bias.

      I hate to tell you, but when it comes to economics reality also has a distinct right wing, pro-corporate bias.

    2. Re:Given that a single right wing media outlet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're talking about a reality where a tiny fraction of a percent of humanity essentially owns the rest, economically - then yes, it has a right-wing bias - but that doesn't mean it's a GOOD THING.

  22. Re:MuH rUsSiA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You forgot to log off or click "post anonymously" Yuri.

  23. The sky is falling... Yet again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG! 48 examples! It's amazing! Those russians. So tenacious and dedicated. And 19,000 follower, no less. It's yuge. Will the russians never stop. Oh the horror! How will we ever resist the onslaught? We're doomed, I tell ya.

    1. Re:The sky is falling... Yet again by benjfowler · · Score: 1

      Yep, these sneaky barbarians do think they're so awfully clever... well, anybody can write a script, but it takes a special kind of sickness, moral disease and depravity to pull that Russia pulled on the free world in 2016.

      We know that Russia did far, far worse than has been made public, and that when the truth is revealed, Trump and his enablers will be tarred and feathered and run out of town. When the truth is out, all the free people of the West will be baying for Russian blood. And they'll get it.

    2. Re: The sky is falling... Yet again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol

    3. Re:The sky is falling... Yet again by superwiz · · Score: 1

      We do know it? I thought it was classified.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  24. Re:Said who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ugly fucking pieces of shit too. Like a big-eared fish-eyed gargoyle that whines and complains.

    They suck baby penises immediately after circumcision and also whirl chickens over their heads for their sins.

    They run your news. Get a grip. Who modded down -1 you need to fucking kys.

  25. Beyond fake news by manu0601 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These accounts apparently never spread misinformation

    There is no need for fake news or misinformation. Very good results are obtained by just choosing what subjects are covered or not. This is what mainstream media do andit works very well.

    1. Re:Beyond fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no need for fake news or misinformation. Very good results are obtained by just choosing what subjects are covered or not. This is what mainstream media do andit works very well.

      I assume you're referring to the most mainstream news outlet ever - Faux-"News".

      Yeah, gotta love the way they pick and choose minor stories that nobody really cares about, and try to hyper-inflate them in a sad attempt to support Trumps racist, fear-mongering, anti-immigrant rhetoric.

      Ever notice the the vast majority of the most watched, or "mainstream" "news" outllets are conservative?

      I wonder why conservatives so desperately need to be told what to think. Don't they know how to think for themselves? You'd think those tin-foil hat wearing conspiracy theorists would object to such mind control, wouldn't you? Yet every bit of evidence says otherwise. Perhaps their education is lacking?

  26. Re:Russians exploited Americans' trust In local ne by PseudoAnon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So you're claiming that additional evidence that Russia has an extensive framework set up to interfere with US democracy through manipulating citizens' knowledge and views somehow doesn't support the narrative that Putin influenced the 2016 US election through Facebook and Twitter posts? Sounds like you're too far gone to see the issue objectively.

    Side note: The media hardly ever talked about Hillary. They spent most of their time feeding into an underdog story for (privileged self-professed billionaire) Trump. And, sadly, this country values naive "thinking from the gut" over well-thought-out plans from people with experience and a proven record. The difference in detail (how goals could be accomplished) of plans for the country listed on their campaign pages was laughable as if Donald didn't want to win from the start.

    The lobbying system is absolutely a problem though. And people desperately wanted change. But hiring a rich grifter is not a very logical way to change that compared to electing a moderate liberal judge who could help overturn Citizens' United.

  27. Why bother by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    Sinclair Media has already done a pretty good job of making local news more distrustworthy than Fox News.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    1. Re: Why bother by akical0118 · · Score: 1

      Lol more like cnn and the rest of news media committed integrity suicide

  28. Re:Russians exploited Americans' trust In local ne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TROLLOLOLOLOLOL

    Fuck the fuck off Trump troll.

  29. Right, because national security matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    have always been made based on people's opinion.

  30. Seek & DESTROY - Metallica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all (for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.

    Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.

    This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):

    Mark Zuckerberg stole the Winklevoss twins' code for Fakebook (figures as he is a thieving low jew too).

    Maria Abramovic satanist spirit cooker pal of Hillary Clinton the Voodoo queen is a jew https://www.google.com/search?...

    Like Hillary Clinton's mentor Saul Alinsky author of rules for radicals book dedicated to Lucifer

    "Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer Â- so I wasnÂ't lying Â- and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much aliveÂ" Harold Rosenthal http://www.thetruthseeker.co.u...

    Jewish rabbi openly admits to satan worship use white children's blood they kill for passover bread, infiltrating and subverting the catholic church, creating the Jesuit order https://www.youtube.com/watch?... and https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Barbara Spectre, a jew, tells everyone it's jews orchestrating the muslim migrant problem in Europe https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFE0qAiofMQ/ . No migrant raping of women in Poland. Tons in Sweden. Do the math. Use common-sense. This is to get muslims and other goyim/gentiles to wipe one another out as incompatible cultures that will clash and always have.

    Rabbi A. Finkelstein ADMITS their greatest enemies are ARABS and WHITES (blacks too) whom they wish to kill one another in a 'theater of war' which they find AMUSING https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Finkelstein also admits JEWS DID 9/11 (perpetrated by the Mossad & Bebe Netanyahu of ISRAEL) https://www.youtube.com/watch?... profiting by it (and that 3,000 jews employed there did not show up for work that day knowing about it beforehand).

    Finkelstein also admits JEWS are going to destroy the U.S. Dollar and dumping it for other world currencies and gold to destroy the United States.

    George Soros who funds groups to create division in the USA?? A jew. One who sold his own jew people into death for the nazis.

    Zucker now FIRED @ CNN is another frying publicly for lying about "russians" and John Bonifield a producer @ CNN said it is bs. Van Jones did also.

    Bernie Madoff (who made off with everyone's money, especially construction union pensions) shows the thieving nature of the JUDEN!

    Eric Schmidt had to step down @ JEWgle (a jew).

    Adam Schiff (gosh s

  31. Re:Russians exploited Americans' trust In local ne by benjfowler · · Score: 1

    The truth is far, far worse.

    Don't worry Russia shills, keep digging that hole. Get plenty of practice, because soon, you'll be digging your own graves. Poka!

  32. Re:Russians exploited Americans' trust In local ne by Oceanplexian · · Score: 0

    Russia didn't manipulate anyone's vote.

    Russia may, or may not have had a hand in making social media posts or posting "Fake News" as the media calls it. But so what? It's a free country. You're allowed to publish whatever "News" you want, even if it's not true. CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, and so on do it all the time, and to a much wider audience with more perceived (but undeserved) credibility.

  33. Seek & DESTROY - Metallica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all (for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.

    Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.

    This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):

    Mark Zuckerberg stole the Winklevoss twins' code for Fakebook (figures as he is a thieving low jew too).

    Maria Abramovic satanist spirit cooker pal of Hillary Clinton the Voodoo queen is a jew https://www.google.com/search?...

    Like Hillary Clinton's mentor Saul Alinsky author of rules for radicals book dedicated to Lucifer

    "Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer Â- so I wasnÂ't lying Â- and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much aliveÂ" Harold Rosenthal http://www.thetruthseeker.co.u...

    Jewish rabbi openly admits to satan worship use white children's blood they kill for passover bread, infiltrating and subverting the catholic church, creating the Jesuit order https://www.youtube.com/watch?... and https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Barbara Spectre, a jew, tells everyone it's jews orchestrating the muslim migrant problem in Europe https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFE0qAiofMQ/ . No migrant raping of women in Poland. Tons in Sweden. Do the math. Use common-sense. This is to get muslims and other goyim/gentiles to wipe one another out as incompatible cultures that will clash and always have.

    Rabbi A. Finkelstein ADMITS their greatest enemies are ARABS and WHITES (blacks too) whom they wish to kill one another in a 'theater of war' which they find AMUSING https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Finkelstein also admits JEWS DID 9/11 (perpetrated by the Mossad & Bebe Netanyahu of ISRAEL) https://www.youtube.com/watch?... profiting by it (and that 3,000 jews employed there did not show up for work that day knowing about it beforehand).

    Finkelstein also admits JEWS are going to destroy the U.S. Dollar and dumping it for other world currencies and gold to destroy the United States.

    George Soros who funds groups to create division in the USA?? A jew. One who sold his own jew people into death for the nazis.

    Zucker now FIRED @ CNN is another frying publicly for lying about "russians" and John Bonifield a producer @ CNN said it is bs. Van Jones did also.

    Bernie Madoff (who made off with everyone's money, especially construction union pensions) shows the thieving nature of the JUDEN!

    Eric Schmidt had to step down @ JEWgle (a jew).

    Adam Schiff (gosh s

  34. It actually doesn't by rsilvergun · · Score: 0

    quite the opposite. The nations with the highest standards of living are Democratic Socialist nations (Sweden, Norway, France, Germany, Canada etc). America, with it's Dog-Eat-Dog capitalism ranks far down the lists in virtually everything (including infant mortality).

    I can already here a chorus of shouts yelling "But Venezuela!" to which I reply "But the American Great Depression!". If the entire basis of your entire economy collapse in on itself no political system in the universe will save you. Venezuela had the market drop out from under them, so did we. The difference is Venezuela is doing better than we did at that time and that's accounting for the sanctions we put on their country (which I have never once heard a good reason for why those exist. Seriously, why are we sanctioning a country that is no threat to us who isn't engaged in banned research on nuclear weapon? I'm just kidding, I know the answer, we can't bear to see Socialism work so we'll sabotage it every chance we get).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:It actually doesn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      quite the opposite. The nations with the highest standards of living are Democratic Socialist nations (Sweden, Norway, France, Germany, Canada etc). America, with it's Dog-Eat-Dog capitalism ranks far down the lists in virtually everything (including infant mortality).

      I can already here a chorus of shouts yelling "But Venezuela!" to which I reply "But the American Great Depression!". If the entire basis of your entire economy collapse in on itself no political system in the universe will save you. Venezuela had the market drop out from under them, so did we. The difference is Venezuela is doing better than we did at that time and that's accounting for the sanctions we put on their country (which I have never once heard a good reason for why those exist. Seriously, why are we sanctioning a country that is no threat to us who isn't engaged in banned research on nuclear weapon? I'm just kidding, I know the answer, we can't bear to see Socialism work so we'll sabotage it every chance we get).

      Seriously?

      At the height of the US Depression, people weren't fleeing the country. Toilet paper hadn't turned into a currency.

      Index of economic freedom rankings

      Sweden - 15
      Norway - 23
      France - 71
      Germany - 25
      Canada - 9
      US - 18

      And the dog-eat-dog capitalist hell-holes:
      New Zealand - 3
      Switzerland - 4

      Cuba - 178
      Venezuela - 179
      North Korea - 180

      Your examples of "socialist" countries really aren't socialist at all - they're freer economically than the US - which you characterized as "Dog-Eat-Dog capitalism".

      Ooopsie.

      And this is fucking hilarious:

      we can't bear to see Socialism work

      We can't bear to see unicorns either.

      Nobody's has ever seen those, either.

      I wonder why.

      Grow a brain.

    2. Re:It actually doesn't by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      > The nations with the highest standards of living are Democratic Socialist nations

      The nations are also physically smaller, have different histories, etc. There is no silver bullet to every society. Pretending there is one, is a problem on a different scale.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    3. Re:It actually doesn't by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      Sweden is only ahead of the US in that list because, get this, they have very low government debt due to actually having taxes and a great economy. It's not the best argument. But what can I expect from someone who says 23 (Norway), 25 (Germany), 71 (France) are higher than 18 (US)

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  35. Re:Enough about the Russians already! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Are there Russian Nazis?

    Oh yes, and they have the full support of the Russian government.

    https://www.theguardian.com/ne...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  36. Seek & DESTROY - Metallica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all (for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.

    Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.

    This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):

    Mark Zuckerberg stole the Winklevoss twins' code for Fakebook (figures as he is a thieving low jew too).

    Maria Abramovic satanist spirit cooker pal of Hillary Clinton the Voodoo queen is a jew https://www.google.com/search?...

    Like Hillary Clinton's mentor Saul Alinsky author of rules for radicals book dedicated to Lucifer

    "Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer Â- so I wasnÂ't lying Â- and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much aliveÂ" Harold Rosenthal http://www.thetruthseeker.co.u...

    Jewish rabbi openly admits to satan worship use white children's blood they kill for passover bread, infiltrating and subverting the catholic church, creating the Jesuit order https://www.youtube.com/watch?... and https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Barbara Spectre, a jew, tells everyone it's jews orchestrating the muslim migrant problem in Europe https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFE0qAiofMQ/ . No migrant raping of women in Poland. Tons in Sweden. Do the math. Use common-sense. This is to get muslims and other goyim/gentiles to wipe one another out as incompatible cultures that will clash and always have.

    Rabbi A. Finkelstein ADMITS their greatest enemies are ARABS and WHITES (blacks too) whom they wish to kill one another in a 'theater of war' which they find AMUSING https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Finkelstein also admits JEWS DID 9/11 (perpetrated by the Mossad & Bebe Netanyahu of ISRAEL) https://www.youtube.com/watch?... profiting by it (and that 3,000 jews employed there did not show up for work that day knowing about it beforehand).

    Finkelstein also admits JEWS are going to destroy the U.S. Dollar and dumping it for other world currencies and gold to destroy the United States.

    George Soros who funds groups to create division in the USA?? A jew. One who sold his own jew people into death for the nazis.

    Zucker now FIRED @ CNN is another frying publicly for lying about "russians" and John Bonifield a producer @ CNN said it is bs. Van Jones did also.

    Bernie Madoff (who made off with everyone's money, especially construction union pensions) shows the thieving nature of the JUDEN!

    Eric Schmidt had to step down @ JEWgle (a jew).

    Adam Schiff (gosh s

  37. So no local news on the internet by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    The links could provide facts from deep within the USA?
    Only a short list of trusted news sites that party political social media staff approve of?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  38. Re: Russians exploited Americans' trust In local n by akical0118 · · Score: 1

    Lol that's like your 10th Russia post, on slashdot? You worried or something? Cuz the way it reads your full of shiff

  39. Propaganda doesn't have to be profitable by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    it's a bonus if it is, but it doesn't have to be. That's not it's purpose.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  40. Did anyone actually read the linked article? by Swift+Kick · · Score: 1

    The article says these accounts never actually posted misinformation:

    Another twist: These accounts apparently never spread misinformation. In fact, they posted real local news, serving as sleeper accounts building trust and readership for some future, unforeseen effort.

    It's strange that Tim Mak opens the article with this:

    Russia's information attack against the United States during the 2016 election cycle sought to take advantage of the greater trust that Americans tend to place in local news..

    You can't have it both ways. Either the Russians did, or didn't, and the article itself says they actually didn't, an dthat it's likely they were playing the long game, waiting for the right time.
    However, the last presidential election doesn't look like it was what they were aiming to derail.

    --
    "We'll need 2000 crickets, 4 cans of Easy Cheese, and the fluid from 18 glowsticks for this plan to work...." - ph0n1c
  41. Eh yeah, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "media" here in the States did not need a muh russian wrench to damage trust in the media. The media folks did that all by themselves.

  42. Re:Russians exploited Americans' trust In local ne by PseudoAnon · · Score: 1

    Russian agents manipulated citizens' knowledge and views in ways that undeniably influenced votes. There is no "may or may not have." It is proven and accepted by the U.S. government. Even Trump has acknowledged it before (though he much more often downplays its significance or denies that it took place at all since he's the beneficiary and is accustomed to having an advantage in life instead of competing on an even playing field).

    Interesting how you dramatically overstated the frequency at which the news organizations you mentioned print incorrect stories. Also interesting that you left Fox and organizations like it off your list. Your bias is clear.

  43. Voice of America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who remembers that the United States did the same thing for most of the last century? Spreading our take on the news to the people of opposing governments. If these Russians can change an election for less than 1% of the cost of what the major political parties spent madison avenue is going be pulling semi trailers loaded with money up to their doors to come work for them

    1. Re:Voice of America by jszpilewski · · Score: 1

      I was listening to VoA in Poland in those days. Comparing to the present day trolling the most obvious differences are:

      - VoA acted in their own name and did not pretend to be a local commie insider.
      - They did not aim to affect elections as the voting results were "counted" independently of the votes being thrown.
      - They did not lie about the state of communism as the truth harmed the communism more than any artificial efforts.

      As it comes to the financial efficiency it is obvious that cheating and stealing are more cost effective than the traditional ways of producing wealth. Nothing to be impressed about.

    2. Re:Voice of America by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Not to beat this dead horse again, but how exactly did they try to throw an election? None of those claims have ever been substantiated. Any request for details is always met with either "it's classified" or "it's an ongoing investigation". Either you personally have access to classified information or you bought into this not-too-carefully-orchestrated hysteria which for a while has been feeling like a Big Lie.

      Now assuming that they were in it for profit, it's more likely that they would be planning a future astro-turf marketing campaign of some products. This would make them a commercial marketing firm. Albeit it would make them a commercial marketing firm which lacks any scruples. But that's still a far cry from what's being alleged.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  44. Wrong by rsilvergun · · Score: 1, Interesting

    the media gave Trump massive amount of coverage, much more than Hilary. What matters in an election as close as this is coverage, not the quality of the coverage. But even if we're talking quality Hilary stories were non-stop negative. How many hours were devoted to your emails? So many that it's become a meme ("But her emails...").

    The media didn't really care who got elected as long as it wasn't Bernie (they were caught doing a Bernie Blackout when the guy who runs the youtube Channel "The Young Turks" refused a sweet gig in exchange for shutting up about Bernie). The media sided with Trump because they wanted a horse race (so long as there was no risk of an anti-corportist getting elected). And they're loving the results. Hilary was a safe, boring choice. Trump is a ratings bonanza.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit! The tin foiled hat wrong is strong with this one! Not only are you a paranoid schizophrenic you are also completely and utterly wrong about everything you just said. Are you an American? Only a foreigner could so completely misunderstand America and her people.

    2. Re: Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The tin foiled hat wrong is strong with this one!

      Your imagination is adorable. Stay in school.

  45. Re:Russians exploited Americans' trust In local ne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russian agents manipulated citizens' knowledge

    Their total footprint, over years of "meddling" was less than 0.1% of the relevant MSM coverage and that of USA-based social media participants and blogosphere combined. The Russians' combined impact, when contrasted with that of the rest of the "citizen's knowledge" sources, was downright laughable in both quantity and quality. And no amount of wishful thinking and shifting of blame by some of those who feel deprived of their birth-right to the US levers of power will change that.

    The "russia-gate" narrative is literally the new edition of Saddam's "mushroom clouds", Vietnam's Gulf of Tonkin "incident", Spain's sinking of USS Maine etc and so on.

    And a perfect example of Americans' exceedingly short memories and their utter willingness to be duped as long as the "right" crowd gets to be righteously outraged at a properly convenient and profitable boogeyman de jeur.

  46. they tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russia didn't manipulate anyone's vote.

    You don't know that as a fact. I think there were 26 states that were notified that thier actual voting software and machines were at least subject to attempted hacking. Reports at the time claimed that they don't think the actual vote tally was changed but they don't know that for sure either. I know if I were a county/state employee who wanted to keep my cushy gov job, I'd say the machines were just fine too, no matter how many securtity holes were found. You seem to be doing the same thing.

    1. Re:they tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know that as a fact. I think there were 26 states that were notified that thier actual voting software and machines were at least subject to attempted hacking.

      None of which, of course, can be attributed to Russia any more as to China, North Korea, Israel or a veritable cornucopia of black-hats-for-hire.

      Then there are the exceedingly well financed and unscrupulous members of the so-called "deep state" with very vested interests in both the outcome and allocating blame abroad ... incidentally the very same people who you defer to as your unchangeable "authorities" and "investigators" of the issue, no actual technical evidence required.

      You would probably be surprised that among those who subscribe to sanity and the Scientific Method, simply saying "we know secret, profound things, trust us, Citizen! (and ignore our abysmal truth-telling record while you are at it - because we are the ever-so-important National Security Authorities! Defenders! Protectors! We wear Shining Armor! And feathers, lots of Righteous Bald Eagle Feathers! And stripes. And stars! We are Holy!)" does not constitute evidence of any sort. In fact in the old days of actually functioning democratic processes it wold have triggered an utterly sarcastic and skeptical response from every member of the so-called "free press" and be a butt of jokes among the educated citizenry.

      Albeit, The Age of Reason and Critical Thinking sadly departed decades ago, if it ever was.

    2. Re:they tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that some of the attacks targeted voting *rolls*, not voting *totals*. Known-democratic constituencies (made more easily identifiable by the Republicans' endemic loathing of any non WASP culture/ethnicity) finding themselves unable to vote because they were spontaneously knocked out of the system is as good as burning a box of ballots, and much easier to dance around.

  47. People weren't fleeing the country by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    because people _couldn't_ flee the country. Most of them were still using corn stalks to wipe their asses. Even the best educated couldn't just up and leave. What makes Venezuela odd is they're a modern nation that looks to be regressing. That probably wouldn't be the case without the sanctions. They could have just barely weathered the oil collapse. But as always we Americans have to stick our noses in where they don't belong and force our world view down everybody's throat (often at the barrel of a gun, RE: Iraq & Afghanistan).

    Imagine what would have become of America if, during the Great Depression, the most powerful nation on the world decided to take a dislike to us?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  48. Re:Russians exploited Americans' trust In local ne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russian agents manipulated citizens' knowledge and views in ways that undeniably influenced votes. There is no "may or may not have." It is proven and accepted by the U.S. government. .

    Yes. I am certain there are tens of voters that would have cast their ballot for Hillary had the Pizzagate story not convinced them to support Trump.

    The problem with the left is that they are self righteously convinced that they are the only ones capable to make a decision and see through all that Russian disinformation. Yet somehow, the simple minded deep in the blue corner who vote "D" every election no matter who runs are perfectly wonderful electorate exemplars.

    You still do not understand that one of the biggest reasons Hillary lost was because she is the same kind of condescending asshole that most of you are. You will never win trying to convince anyone that they should vote your way because you are SOOOO smart and everyone else is SOOOO dumb. It's not a winning message.

  49. Re:Russians exploited Americans' trust In local ne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So you're claiming that additional evidence that Russia has an extensive framework set up..

    The "extent" of the "extensive" network is supposed to be up to a total of 1000 employees of one company (Internet Research Agency) with a budget of about $500,000, whose tasks included a large portion of non-political commercial promotional efforts.

    Top US-based PR outfits employ in excess of 5000 people and have budgets measured in tens of millions of dollars each. And there are literally hundreds of them active during election time.

    US Political ads alone during 2016 elections totaled in excess $10 BILLION dollars.

    "russia-gate" cultists are simply insane.

  50. Re:Russians exploited Americans' trust In local ne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, No - you are just plain wrong.
    Your bias and futile grappling at a withering Russia narrative is still showing.

  51. Re: Seek & DESTROY - Metallica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess we can add this rambling anti-Jewish copypasta to the list of the Putinbots' armory of deflection.

  52. Re:Russians exploited Americans' trust In local ne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you even read the summary? None of the news posted was fake, it was all true. Russia doesn't have to lie, just expose the maleficence of our own institutions, you know, what the media should actually do? The American people should thank Putin, if you listen to the "fake" news and watch CNN you might actually be informed what both parties are doing.

    If you want to suppress the truth because you don't want it influencing elections I have no idea what to say.

  53. Re:Russians exploited Americans' trust In local ne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you want to suppress the truth because you don't want it influencing elections I have no idea what to say.

    Actually this is the crux of the matter. The US (and many other Western countries) Political scene is ready for wholesale silencing of "inconvenient" and "disruptive" and "hateful" truths for the sake of preserving cherished social illusions and National Myths. Many in the halls of power eye China with envy.

    And while it is the Democrats at preset who are the torch-bearers of this "innovation", make no mistake, the whole of US corrupt political machinery, from the deep-state operatives, through the MSM corporations, lobbyists, government contractors and the Republican party profiteers, would be very glad if this is met with success.

    All those close to the veins of power all love the idea.

    In fact, some ancient dude had something to say about this ... something about power and corruption...

  54. Re:Russians exploited Americans' trust In local ne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no "may or may not have."

    Yes, but to what extent did that interference have any measurable effect and how would you isolate that effect from other things that may or may not have influenced the decisions of individual voters. It's essentially unknowable, but I for one find it hard to believe that the Russian election hacking was the deciding factor in the election. It's a question of degree really, but shouldn't the burden of proof be on those claiming that the Russian hacking was the "smoking gun" without which Hillary would have won?

  55. Re: Enough about the Russians already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Kremlin panicked after the broadcast of a BBC documentary last year called Russia's Hooligan Army - in which the then-leader of the Spartak firm, Gladiators, Vasily "The Killer" Stepanov, was secretly filmed saying that the Moscow hooligans were Putin's foot soldiers.

  56. Re:Russians exploited Americans' trust In local ne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but shouldn't the burden of proof be on those claiming that the Russian hacking was the "smoking gun" without which Hillary would have won?

    That would be true if the object of the game was determination of the truth. As you probably noticed however most of the Western MSM has long since moved past questioning of the idea of the election results being essentially set by the Russians and, having determined Russian culpability to be 100% certain, albeit evidence free, are now well into discussing what horrible things must be done in retaliation for this travesty and how is the Trump Administration failing in doing so, while also pontificating and speculating on the extent of Trump's involvement with the Russian Election Stealing Conspiracy and how soon can he and everyone close to him be brought to account for the dastardly Russian machinations. Which, according to the MSM, Russians are expanding in an effort to steal all the elections around the globe. All the while corrupting Americans' Precious Bodily Fluids. Such is the evil Comm... Russian Nature.

    Anyone who disagrees is clearly a Russian employee of the Internet Research Agency, a Russian bot, a Traitor, or better yet all three at once and is to be dismissed out of hand. And banned. All posts removed. Just to be sure the heresy does not infect the Holy scripture.

    Not only is the burden of proof on the detractors of the claims so extraordinary that no evidence needs to be provided, but the very attempt to bring any sort of contrary, dirty, unholy "facts" into light is automatically considered a guaranteed proof of complicity in the works of the Great Enemy of Freedom and clearly wrong-think, on principle.

    Any similarity to totalitarian cults of the past, be it religious, or ironically, draped in swastikas or red flags with hammers and sickles is purely coincidental...

  57. Re:Russians exploited Americans' trust In local ne by Uberbah · · Score: 0

    So you're claiming that additional evidence

    We are still at zero evidence so far for Russiagate, which is the dumbest conspiracy theory of all time. It posits that Putin was so clever and crafty that he knew years in advance that a racist professional wrestling game show host could be president, yet was so unbelievably incompetent that he couldn't anticipate any blowback, or collude with someone as dumb as Trump. Because if Trump knew, that means that the CIA/NSA/FBI would know. Which means that President Elect Hillary would also know, as the race was hers to lose right up until November, and she had already campaigned on shooting down Russian jets over Syria.

    All your "evidence" is as solid as a Birther seizing on a picture of Obama eating humus and insisting that was proof that he really was a muslim born in Kenya. Yes, Russiagate is that bad.

    Dumbest.

    Conspiracy.

    Theory.

    Of.

    All.

    Time.

  58. Russia hasn't done shit, McCarythite by Uberbah · · Score: 0

    The way you guys carry on you think it was Russia that boasted about inteferring in the 1996 election and then doubled the size of the Warsaw Pact, all the way to America's borders, after promising not one inch of expansion in the 80's. All the whining about Ukraine and Crimea is just Swiftboating, as it was the U.S. that overthrew the elected government of Ukraine and is busy arming literal neo-nazies, along with Israel.

  59. Re:Enough about the Russians already! by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    That story would be so much more credible if it was delivered by Glenn Beck with a chalkboard.

  60. I really hate the paid writers spamming /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously? That's your plan? To keep spamming a fake news story? Hillary lost as she (and the DNC) are AWFUL.

    Didn't work with your fake news networks (CNN etc) which during the election only acted like the propaganda arm of DNC, won't work in the future.

    Paid writers on /. - Sblue etc - You're on the side of evil - you can say you don't care, but you can't say you never knew.

  61. Re:Russians exploited Americans' trust In local ne by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    The media hardly ever talked about Hillary.

    They spent decades attacking her and her husband and gave massive amounts of coverage to the FBI investigations right before the election that ultimately went nowhere.

    Not saying they were necessarily nicer to Trump, they certainly called out a lot of his bullshit, but Hilary didn't get an easy ride by any stretch of the imagination.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  62. Simple Anser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seeing as how...

    Clinton and the DNC literally RIGGED the primary against Sanders, and not a single person who supports the DNC has an issue with it.
    Clinton literally PAID Russia for dirt on Trump, which is illegal, and we have a 20 month investigation into Trump doing the same thing with no evidence.

    I believe those two facts will answer your question. Rigging elections is not a issue for liberals, Russian interference with elections is not an issue for liberals.
    If you all said anything about the above 2, we might listen to you. Instead we believe you are a bunch of morons that are throwing a fit because your girl lost an election.

  63. I'll just leave this here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A little snipped of wisdom from a little show called Futurama:

    "When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all."

    Think about that.

  64. Here's Tatiana With Your Weather Forecast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The homosexual zionist conspirators at the NOAA call for the impending end of the world and a flood of central american illegals to come flooding over the border, aided by George Soros. Winds light to variable. Here's Yuri with traffic...

    1. Re:Here's Tatiana With Your Weather Forecast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean Tatiana just resigned? She's has another update in 10 minutes!!!

  65. Not one example of a 'meddling' tweet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... or have I missed it? Where are all these 'meddling' Facebook posts, and Tweets, that the JEWISH media keeps telling us 'interfered' with the election?

    Did you not SEE the size of the crowds at Trump's campaign rallies, compared to Clinton's? Oh wait, the Jewish media wouldn't pan the cameras around, when Trump asked them, over and over again, because they don't want you to see reality.

  66. Re:Russians exploited Americans' trust In local ne by Talderas · · Score: 1

    Conspiracy theories too often lack any affirmative evidence to swat it away. It doesn't matter if Mueller comes up with no indictments of individuals soliciting Russian aid. If the investigation ends like that then people will just insist that it was kept well hidden or that people are lying.

    --
    "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  67. Anonymity by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    There is a case to be made that anonymity online is not desirable. I don't necessarily agree, but things like this point out the drawbacks of allowing anonymity. Usually opponents of anonymity say something like 'we don't allow people to anonymously drive cars, so..'

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    1. Re:Anonymity by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      it will not help. Anybody can crack another system and post from there.
      However, vetted certificates would help, and at the least, make it hard for foreigners to take over ppl's IDs.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  68. Re:Russians exploited Americans' trust In local ne by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    It just shows what she thinks of her supporters that they could be so easily swayed by "fake news."

  69. Now vs. the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What Trump said was a projection about what things WILL BE with the pipeline.

    If you're going to go on about partisan mistakes, start with that one? Do words not mean things to you any more? Hint: "WILL BE" is referring to the future.

    1. Re:Now vs. the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does he really believe that Germany will change substantial parts of their energy industry to using natural gas once that pipeline is built?

      Take a look at how Germany produces its energy. Fortunately there are institutions in Germany who monitor these things and put them into diagrams. https://www.energy-charts.de/power.htm

      For Trump's assessment to be even plausible Russia would have to have total control over Germany's energy economy already.

      To me that sounds like circular reasoning as the factual data does not back that up. Looking at the bar chart (https://www.energy-charts.de/energy.htm) for February this year, which is where we see the peak gas consumption for energy we can take those 5.62 TWh produces by gas and divide it through the 46.87 THw produced in total. That makes 12% of Germany's total electricity generation during a peak-gas month. In January 2017 7.25 TWh of 59.31 TWh the were produced by gas. Again only around 12.2%.

      And Trump expects that to become 60% to 70%? That's unrealistic. Given that there's a strong lobby for coal and renewable energy in Germany, with infrastructure in place. While fossil fuels are phased out renewables are still on the rise.

  70. I said it many times by superwiz · · Score: 1

    The way to both respect freedom of association and freedom of speech while disarming foreign propaganda is simple. Force all media companies offering content to the public to publish what geographic area the comments (or media content) is coming from. Knowing which city/country comments are coming from would not violate anyone's privacy.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    1. Re:I said it many times by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Again, it will not help. Anybody can crack another system and post from there.
      However, vetted certificates would help, and at the least, make it hard for foreigners to take over ppl's IDs.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  71. Re:Enough about the Russians already! by superwiz · · Score: 1

    It would be dishonorable and indecent to claim it without presenting strong evidence for it. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  72. Splitting the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Brother In Law has recently worked for the State Department, he was an analyst. According to him the Russians weren't all that interested in who won the election. The goal was to fracture the United States politically in order to weaken it. Every time I read news on either side of political issues or during election years or read the comments to any story I realize how effective they have been. There seems to be a lot of hatred for the other side politically in the United States. Not just disagreement anymore, but pure hatred. At the risk of sounding like Yoda here, that hatred then justifies what we tolerate our side doing to the other side. The kind of mentality that leads us to say, "Its OK if one of my team is rude/violent/dishonest with someone from the other team because so-and-so politician is so awful I can't blame them." My conservative friends absolutely hated Hilary Clinton, and the way they felt about those who supported her was pretty bad, and the more progressive friends are even worse on the Trump side. My observation does indeed prove my Brother in Law's theory in my mind. Russia hit the nail on the head.

    Well played Russia, well played.

  73. Re:Russians exploited Americans' trust In local ne by najajomo · · Score: 1

    PseudoAnon: "So you're claiming that additional evidence that Russia has an extensive framework"

    What 'evidence', that story concocted by some front organization being funded by the neocons, follow the money :]

  74. More Mockingbird Malarki by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who you fooling? Russians are the flavor of the day....our latest in a long
    line of boogieman to create pretexts for war profiteering and investment in the military industrial complex...

    1. Re:More Mockingbird Malarki by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good one comrade. good one.

  75. yeah . So what? You see it at /. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I have to think that a number of the trolls here are coming from places like Russia and China.
    The problem is that many of them are manipulators and ppl need to read in-between the lines.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:yeah . So what? You see it at /. by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      No one needs to read between any lines to spot your continuing lies about China. Surely you are the troll aren't you?

  76. And some people just peddle lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And some people just peddle lies. And hate being call out on them. Usually troll is their first response to being caught out.

  77. No mention of your favourite country India as usul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The world’s single largest coal-plant developer is India’s National Thermal Power Corporation, which plans to build more than 38,000 megawatts of new coal capacity in India and Bangladesh.

  78. Re:No mention of your favourite country India as u by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Look, red tide/porky, India is adding 38 GW of new coal for 2 undeveloped nations. Personally, I am opposed to that. BUT, India is saying that they will replace these with Nuclear power plants. And that is the ONLY company in India that adds coal.
    OTOH, China has LOADS of companies that are adding over 300+ new coal plants in china alone, along with another 350+ coal plants in other nations, most of which does not have a lick of coal. IOW, China is setting it up so as to export their coal to these nations when ppl REALLY take this seriously and force China to shut down their coal plants. It would be far far better for CHina to quit installing these coal plants ANYWHERE, and instead, use that funding for putting in wind/solar/hydro/etc.

    The world’s largest coal plant developer, India’s National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC), is planning to build over 38,000 MW of new coal capacity in India and Bangladesh.
    Next in line are the Chinese companies SPIC (31,587 MW), China Datang (28,945 MW), Shenhua (26,014 MW), China Huadian (25,810 MW), China Huaneng (20,750 MW) and China Guodian (17,250 MW). All in all, Chinese companies account for 45% of the projects in Urgewald’s database, but around 1/7 of these projects are located outside of China. “If the Chinese government truly wants to position itself as a global climate leader, it needs to rein in its state-owned companies that are flooding the world with new coal power plants,” says Trusha Reddy, Coordinator of the International Coal Network.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  79. you missed your other favourites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Companies from other Asian countries such as South Korea and Japan also play a prominent role in the coal power pipeline. Japan’s Marubeni is the 26 th largest coal plant developer worldwide and is involved in joint ventures totaling over 13,000 MW of new coal in 9 countries. Among these are many projects in ‘frontier’ countries like Botswana, Egypt, Mongolia and Myanmar.

    You missed the next bit about your other favourite Asian countries who also always get a free pass.

  80. Pull your head out of your arse Windy by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1
    Cut'n'paste

    Again with the anti China lies WindTroll. CoalSwarm

    Aiqun Yu, an analyst with CoalSwarm, a think tank that tracks coal-fired electricity generation globally, said that in just the past two years, the Chinese government has essentially cancelled or suspended some 444 gigawatts of new coal-fired generation capacity. The program has been enforced rigorously, she said, and to the point that several completed coal plants have been barred from hooking up to the transmission grid, effectively placing them in mothball status. The policy has pushed down the amount of new coal capacity coming online from 60 gigawatts in 2015 to 34 gigawatts in 2017—the lowest number in more than a decade.

    Still trolling your anti-China nonsense. Even when the very study you cite no longer says what you want it to say.
    You still constantly lie and claim China's government is pushing coal.

    1. Re: Pull your head out of your arse Windy by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      34 gw is 34 gw. You constantly lie because your nation cut back a bit, but still is building massive numbers of coal plants in both China and other nations. Nothing I said was a lie, while you constantly lie.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re: Pull your head out of your arse Windy by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      If China builds new coal plants in both China and other nations, then they are pushing it.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re: Pull your head out of your arse Windy by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      If China builds the most Wind and Solar then they are pushing renweables. Even little kids understand this, why are you so thick?

  81. You constantly lie Windy. It's kind of your thing by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

    How can you say with a straight face that a country that halved its coal use to the lowest level in a decade is pushing coal?

    Is this your idea of pushing coal?

    China is the world's leading country in electricity production from renewable energy sources, with over double the generation of the second-ranking country, the United States.

    China's renewable energy sector is growing faster than its fossil fuels and nuclear power capacity.

    China added 35 gigawatts of new solar generation in 2016 alone. “That’s almost equal to Germany’s total capacity, just in one year,” Myllyvirta says.

    Certainly sounds like China is pushing coal. No, wait, it sounds like China is pushing renewables, and you are pushing lies.

    China isn't my country, but you knew that already too didn't you...

  82. Re:You constantly lie Windy. It's kind of your thi by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

    halved its coal use

    Sorry not halved coal use, that would be nonsense. Halved the number of new coal capacity, still to the lowest level in a decade.
    Hardly pushing coal. If they were pushing coal they would be increasing coal faster not the slowest in a decade. And certainly wouldn't have cancelled or suspended some 444 gigawatts of new coal-fired generation capacity.

  83. Stop with the lies Windy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America is the only country in the world where it's leader is actively pushing for more coal to be burned. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/2...
    https://www.politico.com/story...
    Don't take my word for it, stick 'Trump' and 'coal' into Google, pull your head out of your arse and enlighten yourself.