Slashdot Mirror


Has Video Refereeing Ruined The World Cup? (npr.org)

An anonymous reader shares a report: This is the first time FIFA, soccer's governing body, has allowed video replay to be used to make penalty calls in a World Cup. And while fans of basketball and American football are used to the referees stopping the game to consult video footage, soccer purists say it's ruining everything. The major complaint is that it's making the matches much longer than the typical 90-minute games. Martin Rogers, a sports columnist for USA Today, says Video Assistant Referee (or VAR) is "slow, clunky and unpredictable." Over the phone from Russia, where he's reporting on the World Cup, he jokes, "I remember back in the day, when if a game kicked off at 3 o'clock in the afternoon, you'd be all wrapped up by 4:45."

Rogers says this type of technology works well for American football and basketball. "When you look at the calls that are used for replay, in basketball for example, it's normally factual. It's based on, 'Did a player get a shot off before the clock expired?' It's easy. You know. It's black and white." But soccer, Rogers says, is different. He's referring to one of the most hated and beloved qualities of the game: the endless drama. It's a thespian sport.

3 of 286 comments (clear)

  1. Re: Nah, 'diving' did that a long time ago. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What soccer needs are post game flop analysis and actual punishments if it's deemed you flopped

    Exactly this. A dive should be treated as a red card offense- and it should be allowed to be awarded after the game too- so the player is banned from the next fixture. 3 dives in a season and you are banned for one calendar year.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  2. Re:Nah, 'diving' did that a long time ago. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Yeah, I've tried watching soccer games these last couple of world matches....and while it is somewhat entertaining, the ability to finish a game tied or no score seems a bit of a let down.

    I've also not figured out YET...how they time the damned things.

    I've seen more than a couple of time, the clock run out...and they add more time...that ran out and they added more.

    It just seemed arbitrary. First time I saw this, was a few years back when the US was in it, and I think they were leading in a game...and with all the time add ons...they ended up losing in the end.

    Shouldn't time mean TIME..and when it runs out, it is over?

    IN case of ties....why not a sudden death thing in soccer like with US Football?

    I will admit I'm finding it more and more entertaining, but those two issues puzzle me.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  3. Re:Nah, 'diving' did that a long time ago. by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Many calls by a referee can seem arbitrary.

    It is very important that the team who loses can say "we woz robbed!" - it keeps up the spirits of the downhearted. it keeps supporters loyal to hopeless teams.

    Also, the fact that few goals are scored means that luck is more important than skill - also important given the chronic lack of skills possessed by some teams, and lack of team spirit in others. It is also great for the bookies.

    Soccer is not about playing the game, its about belonging to a group.

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII