Apple Announces $300 Million China Clean Energy Fund (bloomberg.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg: The iPhone maker said it's creating the fund to boost the use of renewable energy in its supply chain, which is primarily spread across regions in China. The company and 10 of its key suppliers and manufacturing partners, including Corning Inc., Pegatron Corp., Wistron Corp. and Luxshare Precision Industry Co., will contribute to the fund over the next four years, the Cupertino, California-based company said Thursday in a statement. The money will go toward developing projects totaling a gigawatt of renewable energy in China, Apple said. In 2015, Apple committed to using clean energy in its supply chain and has said it hopes to create 4 gigawatts of renewable energy globally by 2020, an increase from a goal of 3 gigawatts announced earlier this year.
The American government recently is also pushing coal.
And this news article is about Apple investing in renewables in China which hopefully gives renewables in China a boost.
While Apple invests very little in manufacturing outside of China, they have invested a lot in campuses, data centres, software developers, retailers in America and other western cities - all of which are using renewable energy (or at least the usual allocation of renewable energy, an electron is an electron and all that).
There are plenty of good reasons that Apple might not be the company for you, but I don't think the reasons you just gave justifies it.
It's turtles all the way down.
The iPhone maker
Oooohhhhhhhh. I always wondered what Apple did for money.
and how many new coal plants is America building? ZERO.
How many old coal plants have been re-opened? ZERO.
Looks like a number of executives and governors are brighter than Trump and China.
I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
Apple sells far more to the west esp America. Yet rather than invest in western nations
Apple actually has factories in the U.S. producing computers. In fact it plans to contribute some 350 billion dollars to the U.S. over five years.
Compare that to whoever made whatever you are typing on. They treated Chinese's workers a lot worse than Apple. They probably will not contribute 1/100th of what Apple will to the American economy just this year...
You claims are laughable and your lack of self-awareness beyond belief.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Chinese Government is not "pushing coal", moron.
They are the leading nation installing renewables ... moron!
Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
Questions??
I can't help but wonder why. Usually businesses make the government build infrastructure for them on the taxpayer's dime. Why would Apple spend their own money? Sorry, but you're not going to convince me it's out of the goodness of their heart. And that's not because I hate Apple (I do, but that's because I keep having to buy their overpriced products for my kid's birthdays and X-Mas'), it's because no corporation spends money they don't have to.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
America already uses far more coal for electricity per person than China does.
Chinese coal plants produced 3,573 MT of CO2 in 2017
American coal plants produced 1,056 MT of CO2 in 2017
China has more than 4 times the population.
Then there is President Trump trying to actually push coal. As opposed to your lies about China.
And how much extra coal is China using? None it's using less than in 2013.
And how much more coal electricity does an American use compared to a Chinese person? Lots.
Looks like everyone is brighter than you.
Aren't their products made in Brazil's Foxconn factory, not China?
What if Apple stopped producing gizmos and the factory's no longer ran and we all went back to talking in person.
Traveling to talk in person generates a lot more CO2 and other pollutants than talking on the phone. It also takes a lot more time. There is a reason that productivity and living standards have increased over the last century: Technology.
This is a "gift" to Americans as much as it is to China, since we all share the same atmosphere.
Chinese manufacturers have a higher energy intensity than America, so more CO2 can be eliminated for the same money if it is invested there. What Apple is doing makes sense, and is better for everyone.
http://www.mining.com/chinese-...
I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
What has that to do with the topoic as in "pushing coal"?
Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
Hey moron, a nation that sells a lot more coal plants than they do renewables is NOT pushing renewables.
And if you can not see that installing 700 new coal plants esp in nations that do not even have coal, shows a real lack of logic, and intelligence.
I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
CoalSwarm
Aiqun Yu, an analyst with CoalSwarm, a think tank that tracks coal-fired electricity generation globally, said that in just the past two years, the Chinese government has essentially cancelled or suspended some 444 gigawatts of new coal-fired generation capacity. The program has been enforced rigorously, she said, and to the point that several completed coal plants have been barred from hooking up to the transmission grid, effectively placing them in mothball status. The policy has pushed down the amount of new coal capacity coming online from 60 gigawatts in 2015 to 34 gigawatts in 2017—the lowest number in more than a decade.
Moron yourself: http://www.dictionary.com/brow..., or better: https://www.google.de/search?s...
Hey moron, a nation that sells a lot more coal plants than they do renewables is NOT pushing renewables. If the customer wants a coal plant, the seller is not pushing coal plants but supplying the demand.
And if you can not see that installing 700 new coal plants esp in nations that do not even have coal
What has the question if a nation has coal to do with it? Were is _your_ logic and intelligence here?
Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.