Slashdot Mirror
Telescope Offers 'Clearest View Yet' of Milky Way - Including Plasma Filaments (ska.ac.za)
Chris Reeve writes: The MeerKAT radio telescope was inaugurated in South Africa this past Friday, revealing the clearest view yet of the center of the Milky Way. What is especially surprising about the produced image are the numerous prominent filaments which seem to appear in the foreground.
Herschel made a similar announcement just three years prior that "Observations with ESA's Herschel space observatory have revealed that our Galaxy is threaded with filamentary structures on every length scale." Intriguingly, close inspection of yesterday's SKA image show these filaments twisting around one another, yet without combining — a phenomenon observable in most novelty plasma globes when the filaments are conducting electricity... The SKA telescopes is one of the first telescopes to witness these filaments because it is 50 times more powerful than any former telescope, but also because it is apparently one of the few telescopes which can observe dark mode plasmas. For these reasons, the SKA telescope will inevitably revive the debate over the underlying physical reasons for filaments which exhibit coherent thin magnetic structure over light-year distances.
The original submission included a comment with more information about the theory of a plasma universe.
Herschel made a similar announcement just three years prior that "Observations with ESA's Herschel space observatory have revealed that our Galaxy is threaded with filamentary structures on every length scale." Intriguingly, close inspection of yesterday's SKA image show these filaments twisting around one another, yet without combining — a phenomenon observable in most novelty plasma globes when the filaments are conducting electricity... The SKA telescopes is one of the first telescopes to witness these filaments because it is 50 times more powerful than any former telescope, but also because it is apparently one of the few telescopes which can observe dark mode plasmas. For these reasons, the SKA telescope will inevitably revive the debate over the underlying physical reasons for filaments which exhibit coherent thin magnetic structure over light-year distances.
The original submission included a comment with more information about the theory of a plasma universe.
Youâ(TM)ve over simplified it a bit. Stars are globaly nuetral, bit localy charged. Moreover, its a plasma, and it rotates. If the charge distribution is right it can create a self sustaining magnetic field. This solar magnetic field could potentially interact with sufficiently strong galactic magnetic fields to produce some of the effects attributed to dark matter.
You do know that all visible phenomena, on earth and in the universe, are created by the propagation and interaction of electrical charges - what a common would call electricity. There does appear to be a huge bias for gravitation only cosmology, which is wierd because electric phenomena make everything in the iniverse actually work the way it does - otherwise the universe wouls be one huge singularity - there would be nothing to oppose mass colapse, nothing turning gravitational potential energy into fusion, light, life.
You must not read much. Pick up any planetary dymanics or solar system mechanics text written in the last 80 years and youâ(TM)ll be confronted by the reality of solar magnetic fields. These photos are interesting because they may show evidence of high concentrations of interstellar plasma, which if present, could account for SOME of the properties presently attributed to dark matter. The rest is likely neutrinos. If anything is quackery science it as to be dark matter. Even the name is quackery.
Einstein being right doesnâ(TM)t contradict the (potential) impact of plasma physics on the formation and evolution of galaxies. Nor does the reverse. I donâ(TM)t know who you mean by EU guys, but your attacks on valid plasma physics research show you to be completely ignorant of real science.
Truth as been spoken. "Show me the math." Funny how they can never do this.
that's funny. a solid theory should predict things. yet real science routinely says they are wrong on their own predictions. you can google all wal thornhills predictions, they come true. yet dark matter and dark energy, which cannot be proven, are made up to suit previous beliefs. you are so fucking wrong it is funny. keep making up new theories, prtty soon we will have pseudo-dark energy anti-dark matter etc...anything to not admit your foundations you base your science on is incorrect.
do us a favor, show us some plasma universe predictions that were shown to be wrong.
how about cometary predictions. name a single prediction made by mainstream science about the comet composition, and where are all these giant ice bodies that are supposed to be comets? why are comets made up of rock, as predicted by the electric universe. show me your math, and explain why you need to make up new forces instead of using the ones we know. why is it that galaxy formations can be modeled perfectly using only electromagnetic force, but using gravity it does not work and you then need to fabricate new, unprovable forces, just to resemble something somewhat like we see through a telescope.
it's easier to fool someone than to make them believe they have been fooled.