Slashdot Mirror


Traces of Lost Society Found in 'Pristine' Cloud Forest (nationalgeographic.com)

Deep in Ecuador's lush Quijos Valley, a society thrived -- and then disappeared. But a lake preserved its story. From a report: In the 1850s, a team of botanists venturing into the cloud forest in the Quijos Valley of eastern Ecuador hacked their way through vegetation so thick they could barely make their way forward. This, they thought, was the heart of the pristine forest, a place where people had never gone. But they were very wrong. Indigenous Quijo groups had developed sophisticated agricultural settlements across the region, settlements that had been decimated with the arrival of Spanish explorers in the 1500s. In their absence, the forest sprung back. This process of societal collapse and forest reclamation is described in a new study published today in Nature Ecology and Evolution.

The Quijos Valley lies in one of the most biodiverse cloud forests in the world, along a pre-Columbian trade route that linked the rich Amazonian lowlands with the high Andes. Thousands of people lived there centuries before the Spanish arrived, farming maize, squash, beans, and even passionfruit in poor soil of the valley floor. The study's researchers found a tiny lake in the valley and dug down into the silt at the bottom, pulling up a plug of sediment that had built up over the last 1000 years -- and found evidence of human occupation going back to the very oldest part of the core. In the oldest layers, scientists found tiny pieces of pollen -- swept from the valley and the surrounding forest into the lake by wind -- from maize and other plants that only grow in open, airy conditions, which told them that humans were cultivating plants on the valley floor. They also found plenty of charcoal bits, indications that people had lit fires nearby.

88 comments

  1. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know it's a hard battle to win, but surely it's about time that Slashdot did something about this spam.

    Surely they have tools for controlling spammers other than moderation.

  2. ... hacked their way by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

    I don't think anything digital is meant by "... hacked their way through vegetation so thick they could barely make their way forward."

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    1. Re:... hacked their way by dryeo · · Score: 1

      They probably used their digits to hold the machetes they hacked with.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  3. Er...what's the "news"? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Er...what's the "news"?

    And who knew that "National Geographic" was still around? That was the yellow-spined magazine college-educated boomers kept stacked in their houses for some reason.

    1. Re:Er...what's the "news"? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Funny

      And also the first porn that young nerds ever encountered.

    2. Re:Er...what's the "news"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er...what's the "news"?

      This is Slashdot, an update from 1850 is downright speedy.

    3. Re:Er...what's the "news"? by turp182 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't knock Nat Geo, it is one of the best periodicals around. Recall the recent awareness around plastic straws? That was Nat Geo.

      The two issues I hold dear are:
      1982 - The Chip/Silicon Valley - Awesome article about the coming of the modern microprocessor and the rise of San Jose/Silicon Valley. Interviews with Steve Jobs, Marvin Minsky, and many others:
      http://blog.modernmechanix.com...
      1969 - Landing on the Moon

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    4. Re:Er...what's the "news"? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Recall the recent awareness around plastic straws? That was Nat Geo.

      So, fake news? Plastic straws are something like 0.03% of ocean plastic (and the US accounts for about 1% of ocean plastic). "Awareness" of them is feel-good hippie nonsense with no practical relevance. Ocean plastic itself is mostly the result of dumping trash at sea - that's the problem to fix.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:Er...what's the "news"? by turp182 · · Score: 1

      The actual news around non-decomposing straws is made clear by how many straws, per DAY, are used and disposed of in the United States alone.

      500,000,000, which is about 1.4 straws per person, per day.

      I found that surprisingly high when I read about it.

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    6. Re:Er...what's the "news"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      That number was made up by a 9-year old boy.

      No one has ever been able to validate it, and those that have tried have backed off the claim:

      CORRECTION (April 22, 2018, 4:52 p.m. ET): An earlier version of this article included an incorrect statistic, attributed to the National Park Service, that Americans throw away 500 million drinking straws a day, or 1.6 a day per person. That figure, which has since been debunked in several publications, originally came from the environmental group Be Straw Free, and does not appear to have been based on serious research. There does not appear to be any reliable figure on how many straws are used per day or per year.

    7. Re:Er...what's the "news"? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Please mod AC up - an informative AC is a unicorn on Slashdot!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    8. Re:Er...what's the "news"? by turp182 · · Score: 1

      This one plant makes 4 billion per year.

      https://www.manufacturing.net/...

      My original info may not have been correct, but that's a shitload of straws and only one plant.

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    9. Re:Er...what's the "news"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That "one facility" accounts for a huge percentage of straws used. And even if all their straws went to the US, which they don't, that would still lead to a figure 2 orders of magnitude smaller than the one presented by be straw free

  4. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see a way to prevent this without also nuking AC functionality. So, unfortunately, this is necessary evil to endure to protect greater good of AC posting.

  5. Fuck this spam bullshit by BlacKSacrificE · · Score: 1

    Flag it, flag it, and flag it some more. If we all do it hopefully they'll get sick enough of the giant queue of reports and do something. As much as the v2 ones break my balls, I would be happy with captchas at this point. Word and IP filters are useless now days.

    --
    [Sorry, this signature is unavailable in your country/region]
    1. Re:Fuck this spam bullshit by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Word filters can only do so much, sure, but they force the spammer to do stupid shit like this:

      remove spaces between characters & download

      Now, really, who out there is really going to copy a URL filled with spaces and remove them just to download some totally-not-suspicious program?

      And all they have to do is update the current anti-spam filter to check for strings after removing spaces to continue to block his URLs. Sure, it's an arm's race, but you'll end up with spam that is so obvious and odious, like what you see above, as to be practically useless to the spammer.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  6. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by olsmeister · · Score: 1

    If you browse at 1 or higher, it eliminates the garbage stuff.

  7. Traces by thejahn · · Score: 0

    This is a far fetch to prove a society existed. I am not saying it is not possible, but this evidence is hardly that. Traces of charcoal and a guess at finding pollen samples at the bottom of a small lake has many obvious problems. There are other ways for both to get there into the sample of a small plug. There is difficulty determining the actual time it took to get there.

    1. Re:Traces by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      You have pollen from cultivated crops. There's only one way they get there, somebody nearby was planting.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Traces by bws111 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I know this is slashdot, but RTFA. It is not just a few samples of pollen and charcoal, it is hundreds of years of pollen and charcoal. And then, right when the Spaniards arrived, there is even heavier charcoal. Then the maize pollen and charcoal disappear and are replaced by grasses and fast growing trees then slower growing trees for 130 years. Then there are traces of people again.

    3. Re:Traces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pollen in the lake swept by the wind from who knows where. "Cultivated" crops can also grow wild. And charcoal bits can be from lightning strikes. More evidence before you can say humans were there.

    4. Re:Traces by Gilgaron · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The relative amounts of such things are how you know humans were there. Your statement is like saying finding a human skeleton doesn't indicate a settlement because they could have been a vagrant who washed up from a Peloponnesian shipwreck and was dragged inland by a hungry jaguar. Surely the scientists can tell a puff of wild maize from the layer sustained agriculture would create...

    5. Re:Traces by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      You just like to jump into conclusion from pick-and-choose bits of presented information. Actually, the summary gave you the information that completely negates your statement.

      Just to point out the information from TFA in TFS, the analysis comes from plugging into the ground to find out the ground sediment layers. The matters they found (e.g. charcoal, pollen, etc.) exist in the layers of the sediment. They could also calculate/estimate the time period from the layers.

      If you don't know what process I'm talking about, think of plugging a long tube into the ground, and then pull the tube out which contains the ground layers inside the tube. The layers will represent what have been settled on the ground.

    6. Re:Traces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Hey, paleoarcheology isn't my strong point either, but at least I try to learn.) This isn't crackpot stuff; they're using well-established techniques to figure out what happened. It has its limits, but your "points" aren't among them.

      There is difficulty determining the actual time it took to get there.

      That's actually true, and is why paleoarcheology is a thing, instead of random fuckwits just finding things and then pulling numbers out of their asses.

    7. Re:Traces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pollen in the lake swept by the wind from who knows where.

      Then why have we never once seen that happen?

      Middle America grows crops, lots of them. Why has there never been thousands of tonnes of pollen from them covering all of the east and west coasts?

      Yes it would take that much or more for the amounts detected in the samples.

      "Cultivated" crops can also grow wild.

      Grow wild sure, but not grow random. This is a heavy forest area.
      If said pollen blew to the ocean and sank to the floor, it couldn't grow wild.
      Same if it blew to an area constantly under layers of snow fall, it just couldn't grow wild.

      Similarly pollen blown deep within a forest canopy where there is no air flow breeze to even get it there, can't grow there wild.

      Maize needs lots of sun, sun that is blotted out by the tree tops of the forest.
      It needs airflow, also blocked by the massive number of trees present.
      It also needs room so it doesn't have other large plants to contend with, which the forest itself is.

      If humans didn't clear out that part of the forest deep within it and plant this stuff, that would basically disprove thousands of years of observed agriculture.

      Humans, or *something*, actively and knowingly planning it there really is the only possibility.
      Humans being that something is the only likely and realistic one.

      If you suspect otherwise, it is you that needs to provide evidence that no crops existing today can be grown in the way they clearly are. There are billions of fields of crops doing right now what you claim is not possible to do, and it's on you to explain all of those in a way that matches with your claims that have never been observed.

      Or if you suspect it was non-humans that have the intelligence and ability to manipulate the world as well as we do whom were running mass grow farms, again its up to you to show any single piece of evidence of that, and why that is more likely than the something being a human.

    8. Re:Traces by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      "Cultivated" crops can also grow wild.

      Corn and beans can not. They need human assistance.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  8. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by BlacKSacrificE · · Score: 2

    But then you miss the interesting points which may fly in the face of Slashdot group think, but are valid nonetheless. I read at -1 and apply my own mental filters. I don't need the opinion of the collective to decide that for me.

    --
    [Sorry, this signature is unavailable in your country/region]
  9. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I would just eliminate AC posting entirely. Those who post interesting AC comments will just get accounts, which offer exactly the same anonymity.

  10. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    And you also eliminate the interesting AC comments.

  11. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by olsmeister · · Score: 1

    They will get modded up.

  12. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by olsmeister · · Score: 1

    That's what I do too. But there are other options.

  13. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by BlacKSacrificE · · Score: 1

    Other options than setting filters at +1, and still seeing everything under +1?

    I'm all ears.

    --
    [Sorry, this signature is unavailable in your country/region]
  14. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems it would be easiest to simply block select text strings, since it's the same copy/paste every time. I'm sure the spammer could edit details to get around it, but creating a new URL to link to every time or trying to deduce what phrases were triggering the spam filter would at least be discouraging and grant some slight reprieve.

  15. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AC posting is /. core functionality. It allows someone to post inside scoop without having to worry about getting doxed.

  16. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by olsmeister · · Score: 1

    No, no, no, I didn't say your other options would still allow you to see everything under +1. Stay with us here please.

  17. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    AC posting is /. core functionality. It allows someone to post inside scoop without having to worry about getting doxed.

    No it doesn't. You only need a throwaway email account to get a slashdot account, which is already enough to not worry about getting doxed so long as you don't use it anywhere else.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  18. But where is the valley of the Dinosaurs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We were promised dinosaurs. With feathers.

  19. Re: I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's exactly why eliminating AC isn't a helpful suggestion. There are plenty of troll accounts that are used for spamming, and it's very easy to create new ones. If the spammers use troll accounts, they might also post enough good comments to accumulate the karma to post with a starting score of 2. That would actually make the spam mote visible than it is now.

    The desktop interface does a pretty good job of making spam threads easy to ignore. Adding that functionality to the mobile interface would make the spam less annoying for mobile users. It would be interesting to train a spam filter to automatically flag potential spam comments, just like spam email is filtered. Add an option to suppress those comments from view, independent of moderation. Let moderators and editors decide whether the spam flag should be removed from those comments. Also, let new comments be recommended as spam to train the filter for new spam posts.

    It's easy to ignore a spam thread like this one. What's annoying is when there's individual fake creimer comments added to otherwise legitimate threads, intended to appear like non-spam comments. Those are more insidious than the fake APK posts.

  20. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    After the thirst time an identical post is submitted (globally tracked) rather than actually add it to the discussion store it in a cookie so only the poster sees it.

    Not perfect but if they did it quietly it'd probably nuke most of these.

  21. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I won't. The only reason I participate on Slashdot is because I can do so without an account.

  22. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They won't be posted in the first place. Honestly, I'm not going to make a one-time use throw away every time I post a comment.

    Look, I speak my mind on Slashdot. I bring in my personal experiences. Sometimes past, present, and possibly future employers might not be so keen on my making those comments, so I only post as AC.

    Slashdot has already removed AC submissions, so I will no longer submit stories. Taking away AC posting means I'll only lurk and never contribute.

    Not a great loss, but the Slashdot community is only getting smaller. Removing AC posting will only make it smaller still.

  23. So the takeaway should be? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Man once again spoils Pristine Mother Earth in his demonic quest for survival and dominance?

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  24. ...had been decimated with the arrival of Spanish? by Daemonik · · Score: 5, Informative

    Let's be honest, they were annihilated BY the Spanish. The Spanish get a bit too much "forgiveness" or is it just plain forgetfulness, of their history of destruction across the Americas these days. The Spanish owned slaves (African and natives), pretty much created the Atlantic slave trade, they pillaged whole societies for gold and silver to fund a religious war in Europe, they defined the very term "Love Christ or we'll cut you".

    One of the most hilarious cases of modern historical blindness are the groups in California that demand we return California to Mexico. Because we "stole" it from them. As if it just fell into their possession and wasn't stolen itself. Then there's the groups of African Mexicans descended from Mexico's slaves who didn't get officially recognized until 2016, even though they routinely would get deported because Mexicans didn't believe they existed.

  25. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AC posting isn't about anonymity. Its about convenience.

  26. msmash why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this on /.??

  27. We're like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're like stink on shit. We're everywhere and you can't get rid of us.

  28. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taking away AC posting means I'll only lurk and never contribute.

    Not a great loss

    As you said.

  29. Pedantic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >In their absence, the forest sprung back.

    The past tense of "spring" is "sprang." "Sprung" requires the other half of passive voice, which is missing from the quote - "has" or a suitable variation thereon.

    1. Re:Pedantic... by jofas · · Score: 1

      Thank you. It bothers the hell out of me that NatGeo can't keep their contractors within the very loose confines of ok English of any kind.

  30. Re:...had been decimated with the arrival of Spani by DavenH · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think the use of passive voice is to indicate that there was significant decimation by Spanish-borne diseases rather than than actual extermination by the conquistadors.

  31. Re:...had been decimated with the arrival of Spani by sinij · · Score: 2

    Let's be honest, they were annihilated BY the Spanish.

    They were annihilated by disease that Spanish accidentally brought over from Europe. I am certain Spanish killed some, but not 19 million people from multiple centralized and established nations that were stable prior to their arrival. The reason Spaniards had such astonishing success in conquests is because natives were in the midst of extremely fatal epidemic.

  32. Re:...had been decimated with the arrival of Spani by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Spare me your bullshit. The "peaceful" natives of the Americas were constructing literal towers of skulls, adults and infants alike. The Aztec Empire had been farming its neighbors for a century, by pushing them onto marginal land, then challenging the survivors to combat. The slaves they collected from these flower wars fed their cannibalistic cult of genocide.

    There is no way to negotiate with a society like that. For the sake of humanity, it must be shattered and blown to the wind. Had they not wallowed in their technological slump, they would have brought forth a reign of terror that would have make Genghis Khan look like a hippie. Thank God that Cortez was able to destroy the Aztec Empire.

  33. systemd by captbollocks · · Score: 1

    I bet it was forcing everyone to use the pre-computer version of systemd that caused their downfall.

  34. Re:...had been decimated with the arrival of Spani by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's be honest, they were annihilated BY the Spanish.

    I'd say yes and no. The Spanish hit them much harder than they were trying to. The Spanish brought harms (e.g. diseases) that they didn't even realize (at first) that they were bringing.

    Even if the Spanish had been nice guys instead of assholes, it still would have been pretty devastating. Then add the assholery on top of that...

  35. Re:...had been decimated with the arrival of Spani by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And as usual an informative post gets ruined by being used as a vehicle for hyperbolic political BS about fringe groups so others can pile on and whine more about how stupid everyone they disagree with politically is

  36. I've heard this story before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My father told me once that during World War II, he and some other men in his unit were hacking their way through dense underbrush in New Guinea, thinking they must be the first human beings to ever walk there, when they found a stone pillar with an inscription in English: "This stone marks the intersection of latitude ..." That's when they realized that not only had someone been there before, but it had been surveyed and marked.

  37. Re:...had been decimated with the arrival of Spani by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly...polishing turds.

  38. Re:...had been decimated with the arrival of Spani by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

    I don't think the article really gives them a free pass.

    When the Spanish arrived in the 1540s, they wreaked havoc on the indigenous Quijos, killing many and conscripting others to brutal forced labor. The Quijos revolted, but by 1578 most of them had been killed or driven away, and the Spanish eventually retreated out of the valley.

    "Possibly one of the worst tragedies in human histories occurred during this period," says Nick Loughlin, the lead author of the study, as millions of indigenous people across the region died after the arrival of European colonizers.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  39. Charcoal and Pollen by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

    My completely inept interpretation is that there was a devastating forest fire, precipitated by a years long drought, this created the charcoal. Now that the land is cleared by fire, plants that grow in the open field can now proliferate until the indigenous plant life grows back into a forest.

    1. Re:Charcoal and Pollen by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Or they burned the remains of the crop (stalks, leaves) to fertilize the next harvest. Not that I actually know if that was practiced by anyone.

  40. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 2

    Most of the interesting-but-unpopular comments end up modded to 0, not to -1. I think the unofficial rule is that *no* comment which actually relates to the topic should be modded to -1, even if the comment is idiotic, abusive, or offensive. (Note that if a comment consists entirely of abuse, e.g. a comment consisting only of the words "You're a moron", then it doesn't contain any material relevant to the topic and qualifies for the -1 rating).

    At least, that's the rule I follow when modding, and I get the sense that it's the rule most people follow. Look at the current thread: All but one of the spam comments have been modded to -1; there is not a single "unpopular-but-relevant" comment modded to -1.

    I know it's de rigueur for Slashdotters to complain about Slashdot, but I think the current moderation system has worked very well for 20+ years, and I would be hesitant to suggest messing with it. (Can you name a website that has a *better* moderation system?)

  41. Re:...had been decimated with the arrival of Spani by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why waste energy being angry at people that died many centuries ago? Why mourn for people that died many centuries ago?

    Can you change the past?

  42. Re:...had been decimated with the arrival of Spani by nmo.marques · · Score: 1

    The main cause behind anihilation from the Spanish was most likely biological and not militar. Spain had awesome infantry and weapons, but 200 men do not win any attriction war. On topic, sites like this should be explored. Graham Hancock is probably one of the top picks for this.

  43. Re: I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole point of the Slashdot karma system is to whore for karma, post at 2 by default, and then troll occasionally in a Jekyll-and-Hyde pattern. Bonus points if you have followers that mod your worst posts up anyway.

  44. Re:...had been decimated with the arrival of Spani by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, they weren't. They were annihilated mostly by deseases.

    "forgiveness"?? What are you talking about? So you mean more forgetfulness than with the belgian in Congo or the germans in Namibia or the british with native americans and the Indigenous Australians and the opium wars or the dutch in south africa?

    The portuguese were who created the Atlantic slave trade ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_slave_trade )

    The quinto real ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quinto_real ) was introduced in 1504. 80% gold and silver produced was reinvested in the Americas. When the british founded the first university in the states, Hardvard, there where already more than 23 in the spanish americas.

    How many people of mixed race were in other european conquered territories and how many were in spanish ones?

    Anglo-Saxon are probably the most racist and bloodthirsty people from the old continent, that's why they are blaming the spanish "conquistadores" the whole time, to hide their human misery.

  45. Decimated? by subk · · Score: 1

    Don't you mean "annihilated"? It surprises me how many people use the word "decimated" without actually knowing what it means.

    --
    Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
  46. Re:...had been decimated with the arrival of Spani by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    You have way too much emotion over events that happened 400 years ago. Spain today is not Spain of then.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  47. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by dryeo · · Score: 1

    (Can you name a website that has a *better* moderation system?)

    Soylentnews.org has extended the moderation system in interesting ways. Mods like disagree and touche that don't affect the score, a spam mod that involves the editors (might not work here as it requires editor review), mod points for every account and the capability to mod and post in the same discussion with limitations.
    It's based on the old open source slashcode.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  48. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by dryeo · · Score: 1

    No they don't, at least the ones that aren't posted instantly. At that most good comments don't get modded up if they're towards the bottom of the page.
    I've also seen numerous users actually comment that they don't mod AC's up as they seem to believe the moderation system is to reward users rather then promote good comments.
    I also don't mod a lot of the time due to wanting to have the option to post.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  49. Re:...had been decimated with the arrival of Spani by dryeo · · Score: 1

    The conquistadors also physically killed a lot of the natives. They had better technology and horses along with a moral framework that allowed them to act like total arseholes.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  50. Re:...had been decimated with the arrival of Spani by dryeo · · Score: 2

    Yep, the inventors of the Spanish Inquisition were quite moral, along with so many Europeans of the time. Look at Columbus, chopping the arms of the natives who didn't bring him enough gold (had to pay off his backers).

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  51. Re:...had been decimated with the arrival of Spani by dryeo · · Score: 2

    Why waste energy being angry at people that died many centuries ago? Why mourn for people that died many centuries ago?

    Can you change the past?

    Be nice if people could learn from the past.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  52. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    im huge benis - Applehu Akbar

    Thanks for making my point for me.

  53. Re:...had been decimated with the arrival of Spani by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    And as much as this is commonly laid at the feet of old-worlders, let's recognize that fundamentally it was going to happen at SOME time and the fact that new worlders hadn't much gotten past the stone age was ultimately (if you believe Jared Diamond) the reason they hadn't developed stronger general immunities.

    --
    -Styopa
  54. Not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll find anything in the Cloud these days..

  55. Re: Time to see you SQUIRM "lil' JOWIE" (lol) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're completely deranged
    Everyone on Slashdot, July 17, 2018

    I can't understand why people say mean things to me when I spend my entire life annoying everyone and setting up scripts to stalk anyone who's ever said anything bad about me.

    It's totally not creepy, and I think anyone who doesn't do the weirdest fucking shit is a stalker!

    It's all a conspiracy! It's just not possible that I'm actually a piece of shit!

    APK

    P.S.=> I'm actually a complete piece of shit

  56. Re: Fuck you you stalking little cunt... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm completely unhinged and delusional. Everything must be it to get me, because it can't possibly be MY behavior that's the problem.

    APK

    P.S.=>It's true, I lost my mind and I'm so full of myself that I genuinely believe anyone gives a shit about me more than 4 seconds after they call me a tool. I'm literally a bigger narcissistic baby than Donald Trump. I can't imagine the reality that nobody cares, because I'm fucking insane.

  57. Re: I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    That's exactly why eliminating AC isn't a helpful suggestion.

    Of course it is. The existence of the AC login means that even lazy people leave no trail of identity, so you have no context in which to take comments. The very laziest people would be screened out (no great loss) while the people in between the current userbase and the AC posters would get accounts. It won't affect trolls, but it will still increase utility.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  58. Re:I am God's gift to you rotten bastards... apk by AlejandroTejadaC · · Score: 1

    When I had 5 points for moderation, always start reading (and modding up) comments from bottom to top...