Slashdot Mirror


Astronomers Discover 12 New Moons Orbiting Jupiter - One on Collision Course With the Others (theguardian.com)

One of a dozen new moons discovered around Jupiter is circling the planet on a suicide orbit that will inevitably lead to its violent destruction, astronomers say. From a report: Researchers in the US stumbled upon the new moons while hunting for a mysterious ninth planet that is postulated to lurk far beyond the orbit of Neptune, the most distant planet in the solar system. The team first glimpsed the moons in March last year from the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile, but needed more than a year to confirm that the bodies were locked in orbit around the gas giant. "It was a long process," said Scott Sheppard, who led the effort at the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington DC. Jupiter, the largest planet in the solar system, was hardly short of moons before the latest findings. The fresh haul of natural satellites brings the total number of Jovian moons to 79, more than are known to circle any other planet in our cosmic neighbourhood. A head-on collision between two Jovian moons would create a crash so large it would be visible from earth, astronomers said.

3 of 95 comments (clear)

  1. I don't care what you say... by magusxxx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We already have NINE planets.

    *mic drop*

    --
    Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
  2. Clueless by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That astrophysicists and astronomers are always explaining how the universe began, how it works, how many stars there are, where black holes are, estimating the numbers of "Earth-like" planets there are and how many likely support life... and then they discover 12 more moons around Jupiter or some other enormous hole in the knowledge of our own galactic neighborhood.

    And what exactly is your point? Little tiny hard to see dark things that are far away are hard to see. News at 11.

    Hell, they can't even determine with any real accuracy the number of stars in the Milky Way.

    It's a little hard to get an exact count when you have an immensely bright galactic core blocking your view of much of the galaxy. It's actually easier to count the stars in other galaxies because we can see more of them. Again, what exactly is your point?

    Maybe we should be less concerned with what may or may not have happened 13.8 billion years ago and start focusing on what's immediately around us.

    Thanks for setting the astrophysics community straight. I'm sure they'll be grateful for your help because you clearly know what's important to their jobs more than they do.

    Like going back to the moon and performing experiments there before playing around with sending people on a one-way trip to Mars.

    You have no idea what astrophysicists and astronomers actually do, do you? Here's a tip. They aren't the ones sending people to the moon or to mars. You might not want to get your job descriptions confused or you might seem ignorant in public.

    1. Re:Clueless by jeff4747 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think it states: "Maybe we should be less concerned with what may or may not have happened 13.8 billion years ago and start focusing on what's immediately around us. Like going back to the moon and performing experiments there before playing around with sending people on a one-way trip to Mars."

      Do you realize that going to the moon at this point requires exactly zero astronomy or astrophysics research? It is entirely a financial and engineering problem.

      That's why you are getting asked what exactly is your point. Because you give no reason why astronomers or astrophysicists should be involved in building a moon base.