Slashdot Mirror


Saudi Arabia Bans 47 Games In Response To Two Child Suicides (ign.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from IGN: Saudi Arabia is apparently banning 47 games in response to a pair of children committing suicide after allegedly being encouraged to do so while playing an online game. Per the Associated Press, the Saudi General Commission for Audio-Visual Media said yesterday that a 13-year-old girl and a 12-year-old boy have taken their own lives after playing a social media game known as Blue Whale. Also called the Blue Whale Challenge, the disturbing social media phenomenon is a form of extreme cyberbullying. It's not clear how the Saudi government believes this connects to more mainstream video games, but it nonetheless appears to have banned 47 popular indie and AAA games in response.The Saudi General Commission for Audio-Visual Media's website actually says the list of banned games was last updated on July 2, but the Associated Press' report claims the bans were just announced Monday.

98 comments

  1. any excuse will do by Revek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Backwards thinking people will look for any excuse to justify their lousy attitude.

    1. Re:any excuse will do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised they banned Saints Row IV. While all video games are just simulations, SRIV is a simulation inside of a simulation and within the context of the game universe, the enemies are all aliens or simulations of people.

    2. Re:any excuse will do by Kaenneth · · Score: 0

      Maybe beating people to death with a giant dildo.

    3. Re:any excuse will do by Narcocide · · Score: 0

      No really. WTF is Okami doing on this list with the rest of that trash? And that's not even the first country to ban GTA5.

    4. Re: any excuse will do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, this appears to be a classic case of executing a political adgenda by leveraging an unrelated crisis event.

    5. Re:any excuse will do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and forward thinking people play video games all day long....

    6. Re:any excuse will do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's probably for political/religious reasons, same as God of War 1-3. Anything depicting other deities is not going to be looked kindly upon in Saudi. More interesting to me is why Prison Architect has been banned, but thinking about it, it is probably for the same reason - it depicts punishments for criminals that are not inline with Sharia law.

    7. Re:any excuse will do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Backwards thinking people will look for any excuse to justify gun control.
      Backwards thinking people will look for any excuse to justify no gun control.
      Backwards thinking people will look for any excuse to justify abortion.
      Backwards thinking people will look for any excuse to justify anti-abortion.
      Backwards thinking people will look for any excuse to justify
      Backwards thinking people will look for any excuse to justify

      I think you actually mean,"All people will look for any excuse to justify...." The only people who don't are the ones willing to change their minds when they're wrong, and, statistically, they don't exist. (For those of you in the "not me" crowd, just shut it. I said you don't exist.)

    8. Re:any excuse will do by wtrmute · · Score: 1

      Okami is advertisement for Amaterasu, who is a dirty Pagan demoness, so obviously the Wahhabists are going to look at it as a step worse than Saints' Row or GTA, which merely glorify sociopathy and violence. At least the latter two games allow the clerics to point their fingers at the "decadence" of the infidel Westerners (while carefully pretending not to see the staunch alliance of their king with them).

    9. Re:any excuse will do by wtrmute · · Score: 1

      It beats the hell out of getting depressed by the news...

  2. Blue whale?!? by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

    I thought Blue Whale was an urban legend?!?

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:Blue whale?!? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It is. And even the Wikipedia link in TFS says that's it's bullshit.

    2. Re:Blue whale?!? by sexconker · · Score: 0

      Need's more typos'.

    3. Re:Blue whale?!? by alvinrod · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's just another fake societal panic that everyone is sure is real for some stupid reason, probably because the news keeps brining it up to sensationalize otherwise mundane stories. I remember when it used to be Dungeons & Dragons being evil and then daycares practicing satanic rituals and abusing children. After that it was rainbow parties (sucks that those weren't actually real) and other idiotic stuff like kids getting high on their own fermented feces and urine.

      I don't know why the Saudis banned video games since Blue Whale has nothing to do with video games, but they were part of another big panic in the 90's (remember Jack Thompson) where everyone was sure violent video games would turn little Billy into a killer. Maybe they're still hung up on that one as well.

    4. Re:Blue whale?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is but it can take a life of it's own.

      Slender man is another example of it. Some girls claim Slender man and news report it and all the sudden it becomes a 'real' concern

    5. Re:Blue whale?!? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course not! It's not as though growing up in a theocratic dystopia could possibly be causing the problem; so it must be interwebs games.

    6. Re:Blue whale?!? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      The sad part is that the kinds of bullying that "Blue Whale" promotes are encouraged by adults in the "real world" of sports and fraternity hazing and other adult-led or adult-tolerated organizations.. In high schools, faculty encourage bullying as a way to maintain social order mostly through inaction.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    7. Re:Blue whale?!? by Daralantan · · Score: 1

      I remember when it used to be Dungeons & Dragons being evil and then daycares practicing satanic rituals and abusing children.

      At least those days produced wonderful "articles" by unintentionally hilarious companies like Chick Publications.

      One of my favorites was the article where the guy claimed he was something like..... "An Alexandrian priest heavily involved in the worship of Satan," and that TSR came and took detailed notes so they could make sure D&D's Satanic rituals were as accurate as possible.

    8. Re:Blue whale?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you provided one. Good job!

    9. Re:Blue whale?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's be fair here. You don't kill yourself because a video game told you so any more than if a priest or imam or anyone else told you so. The only reasons anyone ever takes their own life is because of deep, long-lasting depression and a perceived total lack of support.

      Blaming a theocracy for suicide is just like blaming video games -- it misses the point. These kids should have had access to mental health support and their society should have been open enough to allow them that access without stigma or repercussions. Other cultures suffer from the same problem.

    10. Re:Blue whale?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      big panic in the 90's (remember Jack Thompson) where everyone was sure violent video games would turn little Billy into a killer. Maybe they're still hung up on that one as well.

      If that were true there would be a surge in deadly mass shootings.

  3. Trolling: Most Extreme Edition by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure which is more disturbing, that anyone would create a 'game' like this in the first place, or that there's anyone, even children, who would fall for it. :-(

    1. Re:Trolling: Most Extreme Edition by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind how stupid the media and children are.

      The Tide Pod Challenge was a joke until the media sensationalized it and pretended it was a real thing. THEN it became a real thing.

    2. Re: Trolling: Most Extreme Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Tide Pod Challenge was an outgrowth of accidents with said detergent packs that only gets blamed on the media because of the idiots who think they didn't come up with the dumbest shit without help.

      Then again, these idiots were snorting laundry detergent and mothballs for decades already.

      Probably a problem for cavemen parents too. Somebody had to be the first person to eat a rock.

    3. Re:Trolling: Most Extreme Edition by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      Nah. What's really disturbing is adults actually believing that children are falling for this, when there is not a single confirmed case of it.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    4. Re: Trolling: Most Extreme Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... Probably a problem for cavemen parents too. Somebody had to be the first person to eat a rock.

      That's not paleo? what?

  4. Yo-Kai Watch is pretty hard core.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understand banning Yo-Kai Watch, but what's the deal with the other games on the list!?!?

    1. Re:Yo-Kai Watch is pretty hard core.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they're games. duh. video games are dumb.

    2. Re:Yo-Kai Watch is pretty hard core.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt they have any problem with dragons.
      Dragon's Dogma - it is because of the Dogma
      Dragon Age: Inquisition - it is because of the Inquisition
      Witcher 3 - yay, witch..

      It is very likely these guys just used some cheap filter on words coming from Christianity.
      See, how they have no problem with Elder Scrolls: Skyrim.

  5. Just ban stupidity by kencurry · · Score: 1

    Would be better, no?

    --
    sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
    1. Re: Just ban stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want to empty the whole country ???

    2. Re: Just ban stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which country? I've been to dozens and the one thing they all have in common is that they're full of fucking idiots.

    3. Re: Just ban stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just proved my point , banned stupidity is emptying the country! Kappa

    4. Re: Just ban stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it is well known that banning something will make it disappear.

    5. Re: Just ban stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pay attention.

      This is why we need the yuge wall.

      We'll just build a wall around all the stupid people and make them pay for it.

      Failing that (not that it would ever), our dotard commander in chief can just sign another executive order banning all stupidity per OP, and poof, it will instantly be gone.

    6. Re:Just ban stupidity by PPH · · Score: 1

      Theocracies depend on stupidity. We could teach our kids critical thinking skills. But then this would be the end of religious authority.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  6. Some of these make no sense by FFOMelchior · · Score: 1

    Okami, Yo-Kai Watch, Prison Architect, The Nonary Game... what the hell?

    1. Re:Some of these make no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okami promotes Japanese mythology
      Yo-Kai Watch promotes Japanese mythology
      The Nonray Game involves suicide

      I am rather surprise Shin Megami series and Catherine did not get banned

    2. Re:Some of these make no sense by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

      Banning videogames like this makes no sense to begin with, so looking for logic there is your first mistake. Maybe it's just the list of games the kids had played. Better safe than sorry, right? Ban em all!

      Oh, and certainly don't investigate this case more deeply, looking for anything like abuse, bullying, or an actual trigger for the suicide. That might embarrass someone important.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    3. Re: Some of these make no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ban Islam!!

    4. Re:Some of these make no sense by Kaenneth · · Score: 1
    5. Re: Some of these make no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it does seem to be promoting suicide(bombing)...

  7. Whoa!!! The Nu-Millenial RECTUM Challange ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      !. LITERRALLY BUy a STARBUCS Mocha Choco Chomo Frou-Frou Latte
      2. Literaly put the cofe UP YOUR ASS
      3. Racord yourself saying "Im literrally literraling"
      4. Die like a bitch

    This shyttt is dope AF kydd! What!

    1. Re:Whoa!!! The Nu-Millenial RECTUM Challange ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, tried it. First I got a huge caffeine rush, then another type of rush...

    2. Re:Whoa!!! The Nu-Millenial RECTUM Challange ??? by f3rret · · Score: 1

      Only way to truely enjoy coffee.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    3. Re:Whoa!!! The Nu-Millenial RECTUM Challange ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what about covfefe?

  8. Why can't we ban Saudi Arabia? by Snotnose · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My bad. This backwards country has oil we need. So they're good, all good. Swallow your vomit and repeat after me: "Saudi Arabia is our friend".

    1. Re:Why can't we ban Saudi Arabia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except since fracking the USA is energy self sufficient , you DONT need their oil any more !!

    2. Re:Why can't we ban Saudi Arabia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oi mate, do you have a licence for that islamophobic hate speech?

    3. Re:Why can't we ban Saudi Arabia? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      Negative. America is just about self-sufficient in petroleum due to the shale oil revolution. Since around 2007 net US energy imports have been in sharp decline because we discovered how to process shale into oil and natural gas. And boy, do we have a LOT of shale. Within a year or two, the US will become a net energy exporter. Meaning we no longer give a fuck what's going on in the middle east. Meaning we can bring our troops back (Noticed the institutional outrage over Trump pulling troops out of Syria? This is why. They're terrified of the current world order collapsing.) To drive the point home, for the past half century or so, the USA has kept a naval carrier group in the gulf sea at all times in order to protect Saudi oil supplies. But more recently, the past few years, it's only been there about 6 months out of the year.

      No, we're in Saudi Arabia because Europe's oil comes from there. Well, there and Russia. The Syrian civil war? We're involved in that because before the Syrian civil war, two pipelines were proposed by Qatar to get gas to Europe. *Going through Syria.* Now, don't forget, Qatar are (were) major Clinton Foundation donors. Iran, a Russian ally, also proposed a pipeline. It also went through Syria. Guess which one Assad approved? This was in 2012 and the plans were disrupted due to the civil war. Next, Hillary Clinton demanded that Assad be removed from power. Assad is a longtime Russian ally. Guess who is supporting the rebel groups opposing Assad? That's right, the USA! And then the media campaign against Assad, always followed by a demand that he leave the country and give up power.

      https://youtu.be/Q8TE_QMa3fw?t=16m03s

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re: Why can't we ban Saudi Arabia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, the US loves those sweet petrodollars and being the world's de facto currency because of that.

    5. Re:Why can't we ban Saudi Arabia? by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Finally watched your video link. You watch this garbage? Sure, the gus has a British accent which sounds intellectual to many of us Americans but he drops the word "fuck" like a 13 year old trying to prove something. I couldn't take this guy seriously even if what he was saying wasn't rubbish.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    6. Re:Why can't we ban Saudi Arabia? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      It's all backed up with references, and what's more, it makes sense. It was obvious from the beginning that the only winners of the Syrian civil war were the ones who sat it out. And yet America *just had* to get involved. To the extent of giving weapons to Islamic jihadi headchoppers. WTF? Assad isn't a nice guy but allying with Islamists?

      What's the amazing prize that we win in Syria? Why's it so damn important? Why must America risk war with a nuclear power to enforce its will on a nowhere country in the middle of a Godforsaken region? Pipelines are very, very important globally. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIdUSqsz0Io.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:Why can't we ban Saudi Arabia? by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "It's all backed up with references"

      References are certainly nice but they don't make something true. I'm sure if I cherry picked the right references I could "prove" that the Nazi's won WWII.

      "and what's more, it makes sense"

      No it doesn't at all. The Clinton foundation conspiracy theories all rely on the foolish assumption that the Clinton's have some how managed to consolidate a completely unprecedented amount of political power under themselves, meanwhile Hillary can't even carry Pennsylvania in a presidential election against a reality TV star and is now largely irrelevant in the context of politics.

      "What's the amazing prize that we win in Syria? Why's it so damn important?"

      The most obvious answer to your question is not some conspiracy about the Clinton Foundation and a lame duck plan for a pipeline that barely stood a chance in hell of being adopted. It's that Syria has been an adversary of the US since the Clinton's were children and is allied to even more significant adversaries of the US (Russia's only Mediterranean Naval base is in Syria for instance). The US has a long history of using turmoil in country's we're not fond of as an excuse for sponsoring regime change and have funded all sorts of unsavory groups to do so over the years. We literally just did this in Libya only a few years ago and there have been no plans for pipelines through that country that I've ever heard of.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    8. Re:Why can't we ban Saudi Arabia? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      Syria wasn't an adversary of America. You hardly ever heard of them at all before the pipeline, and if it was it was in the context of Iraq (Saddam and Assad were mortal enemies). I've seen satellite photos of the "naval base", it is a dock in a harbor. That's it. Hardly Diego Garcia. And since when were we enemies of Russia in 2012? Remember Obama telling Medevev that he would have more flexibility after the election?

      The fact that Hillary lost the election in no way discredits the idea that the Clinton Foundation was a massive sink of corruption. Everyone expected her to win, so they wanted to be on the right side. So they became donors.

      Pennsylvania was all part of the strategy, Hillary was going to win with the Obama coalition, minorities and women, and the white working class could go fuck itself. After she was in office she was going to give citizenship to the illegals and open the floodgates of legal immigration to 4 million a year. After her first term, there would be 28 million brand new citizens who would mostly all vote Democrat. Of everything in the Wikileaks, the phrase "permanent Democrat majority" was the one I found the most chilling. Winning without the help of the traditional blue collar Democrat base wasn't a mistake, it was all part of the plan. That it failed is hardly an indictment of it. It was a very narrow margin that could have easily gone the other way. And if it had, you and your kind would be rejoicing that the Democrats played identity politics like a fiddle and finally broke the back of the awful, no good, deplorable American people forever.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re:Why can't we ban Saudi Arabia? by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "Syria wasn't an adversary of America."

      I'm not trying to insult you here but you're either being willfully ignorant or you don't know your modern Middle Eastern history very well. Syria has indeed been an adversarial nation to the US for decades. Russia's naval base in Syria was built by the Soviets in the early 70's and cemented them into the Soviet sphere in terms of the global order of the time. The naval base in Syria was essential to the Soviet positioning of it's 5th Operational Squadron in the Mediterranean to counter the US' 6th fleet based out of Italy. This base allowed the Soviets to open up a new potential front in the Mediterranean in the event war broke out between them and the West.

      Syria also quickly found common ground with Iran following the 79' revolution and built up an alliance from there. Much of the common ground revolved around them being antagonistic to US interests and allies with neither country recognizing (staunch US ally) Israel's statehood and both were enemies of Saddam in Iraq who was also a US ally until he was dumb enough to invade Kuwait.

      "Everyone expected her to win, so they wanted to be on the right side. So they became donors."

      Taking donations does not in any way, shape, or form equal corruption as long as the donations are legal.

      After that you ramble into conspiracy nonsense and I now have a sense of who I am talking to (something I was suspecting after watching that youtube video with the Brit swearing like he's 13 and trying to fool everyone into thinking he's an adult with adult opinions). Hillary was not going to "open the flood gates" to illegal immigrants and there is no hard evidence of such plans. Furthermore, doing this would have been political suicide for the Democratic party as a whole and for her as well as native voters would have fled the party in mass.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  9. Not the reason. by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

    The real reason is that women are now driving and oil prices were down for a bit.

  10. Prison Architect is banned... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL

  11. Forward Thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I salute Saudi Arabia and its forward thinking policies. We need more countries willing to take difficult decisions when it comes to combating social interactions that drive people to suicide. It is very clear that social pressures can be made very intense not only by peers locally or online but most of all by older and authoritative figures in society. It is for this reason, I am certain Saudi Arabia's next step to ban Islam. The call to violence by the dogmatic of any religion or belief system is no laughing matter, and I eagerly await Saudi Arabia's swift action to battle the scourge that is the threat of death and destruction set forth by so-called holy books and its followers.

  12. No, they didn't. by Pluvius · · Score: 4, Informative

    https://twitter.com/malekawt/s...

    These games, or at least most of them, were already banned by Saudi Arabia for various reasons just like other countries like Australia ban games. This specific news event had nothing to do with it. Just the media getting shit wrong again as usual.

    Rob

    1. Re:No, they didn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saudi Arabia is a totalitarian state run by hereditary plutocrats with state mandated monopolies, comparing it to Australia is disingenuous at best.

    2. Re:No, they didn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Comparing the banning of computer games to other countries that also ban computer games is perfectly valid. Any inference made between the two nations system of governmnet exists purely between your ears.

    3. Re:No, they didn't. by 1_brown_mouse · · Score: 1

      Wish I could mod you up. This is more noise that is genuinely "fake news."

    4. Re:No, they didn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, Australia disgusts me.
      Anybody else remember this "freedom" thing we're all supposed to be in favor of?

    5. Re:No, they didn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comparing the banning of computer games to other countries that also ban computer games is perfectly valid. Any inference made between the two nations system of governmnet exists purely between your ears.

      Nope. Comparing laws in a democracy vs a totalitarian state is false equivalence right from the get-go. It's a non useful case comparison and illuminates nothing about the respective nations. Such comparisons are only useful for boosters of the Saudi oligarchs.

  13. Nobody did by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    read the Wikipedia article. The "game" is just a moral panic in Russia. Remember Judas Priest Albums? The Satanic Panic and all that.

    Somebody in Saudi Arabia wanted to crack down on video games, probably because they're helping to secularize their society and there's lots of very wealthy and powerful men who don't want that. That's all this is.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Nobody did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the young men in prison in Russia who admitted to running it... the tween girls in Russia who killed themselves after posting the Blue Whale?

      They're what, total inventions? That's a little too conspiratorial even for Slashdot, I'd say.

    2. Re:Nobody did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually read more on Wikipedia. It's clear there is a reason these particular games were targeted for the ban as the listed games have an online component alleged to be a part of Blue Whale.

  14. Re: Hanging a traitor will do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. Stop whining. Life doesn't revolve around your political mental problems.

  15. fakenews shareware by nazsco · · Score: 1

    blue whale was nothing but a free demo from whoever is selling fake news as a service.

    It was a way to prove it worked for maybe a big client. That's why it spread so well and is so idiotic and completely baseless. 100% of the reports goes back to one single made-up tabloid article in russia.

    1. Re:fakenews shareware by sabbede · · Score: 1
      You think that's bad, the Wikipedia page linked at "Also called the Blue Whale Challenge" has this to say:

      "In the United States, one site, also called the "Blue Whale Challenge", does not identify as an effort to combat the game, but offers fifty days of challenges that promote mental health and well-being."

      So they really blew it with this article.

  16. Re: Hanging a traitor will do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump's life will revolve around a prison toilet, you treasonous faggot bitch. I'd kill you where you stand.

  17. Terrorist people do terrorist things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, those camel fuckers (read: terrorist people) love to banning anything eh?...

  18. Re:Hanging a traitor will do. by Revek · · Score: 1

    Sorry AC. I didn't vote donnie two scoops.

  19. Re: Hanging a traitor will do. by Revek · · Score: 1

    Clean the basement and stop abusing you're socks.

  20. What about cars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw those drifting videos. Saudis feel the need for speed.

  21. GTA5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NO grand theft auto 5. Well damn

  22. "CLEAN OIL" from the free peoples of Saudi Arabia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Such a good thing we trade and sell weapons with those enemies of democracy called The Kingdom.

    Fuck the House of Saud and all who bow before it.

  23. Re: Hanging a traitor will do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Learn you're from your, Ivan.

  24. YO-KAI WATCH by Darkling-MHCN · · Score: 1

    I looked at the list of titles as a list of games I probably need to check out... The last on the list Yo-kai watch... man oh man... that looks like pretty subversive stuff...

    https://www.google.com.au/sear...

  25. Cause, priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Blue Whale's threat has been taken seriously enough by U.S. officials that the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline is often the first Google result for searches on the keyword "Blue Whale Challenge".

    When video-games 'caused' high-school massacres, teen-aged players were interrogated and vilified by teachers. When it causes self-harm and suicide, the response is a strongly-worded message.

  26. Let's get rid of all sucide by Evtim · · Score: 1

    Looking at the PCA analysis of suicide, several risk factors can be identified that increase the rate. So, in order to bring the rate to practically zero we need to make sure that all people on Earth are:

    not very intelligent
    peasants
    with big families
    religious
    poor
    at war

    Careful what you wish for!

  27. AP fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "but the Associated Press' report claims the bans were just announced Monday."

    That's because the AP is full of shit and wont admit they got it wrong, and as it's the AP other media outlets will report it verbatim, then it will get a wikipedia write-up and become fact.

  28. This is why by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Saudi Arabia Bans 47 Games In Response To Two Child Suicides

    ... because the games didn't encourage them to bomb the infidels while they were about it

  29. Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it's definitely the fault of video games. Definitely not the fact they're females living in a veritable paradise like Saudi Arabia.

    No sirée!

  30. sound like a dream come true for many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    many democrats and republicans love the idea, blame any external factors for some ill in society. They should all move to Saudi Arabia and rejoice.

  31. Re: Hanging a traitor will do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would any God fearing patroit roll over as long as a liar and traitor were in office?

    Both candidates are liars and traitors. We were put in a lose/lose situation. It's time to stop complaining about whether Trump or Hillary won. We need to find a way to fix the real problem.

    captcha = absinthe

  32. Why these games? by sabbede · · Score: 1

    One would think that multiplayer games would be in their sights if social-media-induced-suicide had anything to do with their motivation, but single player only games are listed as well. Like The Witcher 3.

  33. Primary Claim (Blue Whale) has been retracted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IGN just posted an update saying that the father of the suicide victim has retracted his claim that "Blue Whale" was involved.

    Blue Whale isn't an app or a console game. It is more like D&D with a primary person calling all the shots. The leader doesn't die in the end.

  34. Nice Conspiracy Theory by skam240 · · Score: 1

    "The Syrian civil war? We're involved in that because before the Syrian civil war, two pipelines were proposed..."

    Nice lengthy conspiracy theory but Syria was regarded as a country antagonistic to the US for decades prior to the planning of these pipelines. The much simpler and more logical answer is the US saw the turmoil happening in Syria as an opportunity to get rid of an ally of two of our most significant adversaries, Russia and Iran.

    This Clinton Foundation shit just sounds ludicrous. I mean, if Hillary and the Clinton foundation are such puppet masters how did she lose an election to a hack like Trump?

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    1. Re:Nice Conspiracy Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She got trumped? **walks out**

  35. Philipp Budeiki by Martin+S. · · Score: 1

    While there is some hysteria surrounding this and the fact it is unfathomable doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

    There will always psychopaths that will seek to exploit these things for their own sick reasons.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/...

  36. Xtians (and you) aren't fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We were being fair. You aren't. You just used the "Fine people on both sides" argument. Fuck you. The only people who give me shit about being gay, the only people who scream at me to die, the only people to vandalize my property, are fucking xstians. (I wrote it that way on purp. I hear they hate that shit so fuck em). Care to guess if I perceive a total lack of support? I won't be killing myself tho...

  37. Journalism... by koaschten · · Score: 1

    ... should work at their best to inform the reader, then WHY are they linking to the arabian version of the Age Classification instead of the english? en: http://www.gcam.gov.sa/en/Abou... vs ar: http://www.gcam.gov.sa/ar/Abou... Also what would Deadpool think about being on the list of banned games...