Slashdot Mirror
Trump Slams EU Over $5 Billion Fine on Google (reuters.com)
U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday criticized the European Union and said the bloc was taking advantage of the United States, pointing to the record $5 billion fine European antitrust regulators imposed on Google. From a report: European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker is scheduled to meet with Trump at the White House next Wednesday to discuss trade and other issues. "I told you so! The European Union just slapped a Five Billion Dollar fine on one of our great companies, Google. They truly have taken advantage of the U.S., but not for long!" Trump said in a post on Twitter .
Also, enough posts about trump making asinine comments, it stopped being funny in 2016. I am outside US, I am sick of comment section filled with right vs left.
Yeah Google are such patriots they moved their whole operations to Ireland to avoid contributing anything to the USA, combined with their little Luxembourg sandwiches meaning Trumps secretary probably contributes more, hence your infrastructure is crumbling around you while certain individuals make out like the bandits they are
LOL MAGA
Google can still give one version with crap apps away for free and a license for a crap-free version. I'd gladly pay extra for more choice. The problem is that Google tried to force the shit version on everyone.
"What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us." Ralph Waldo Emerson
Post WW2, where they turned up late, the US has preferred fighting wars against small countries who can't fight back like Panama or Grenada. Anything bigger and it tends to get its ass whipped, eg. Korea, Vietnam, Somalia, Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan, okay, even small countries can whip the US of A's ass. All those tax dollars spent on weapons and they still can't win. Sad!
Yeah. That really saved Microsoft from being fined.
Oh Wait... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
In Soviet Russia, Trojan exploits YOU!
EU has always been tough on companies. They do the same to EU companies. It is just that the US companies somehow like to do this much more in public than the EU companies who like to keep this behind closed doors.
In July 2016, the Commission fined MAN, Volvo/Renault, Daimler, Iveco, and DAF a total of 2.93 billion euros for forming a cartel and colluding on truck prices for 14 years
In November 2008, several car glass producers were hit with a cartel fine for illegal market sharing and exchanging commercially sensitive information.
French firm Saint-Gobain received the largest fine of 880 million euros, while U.K. firm Pilkington was hit with a fine of 357 million euros. Japanese company Asahi's fine was reduced by 50 percent to 113.5 million due to leniency, while Blegium's Soliver received a fine of just 4.4 million euros.
Spanish telecom Telfonica received a fine of 151 million euros in July 2007 for setting unfair prices for five years in the Spanish broadband market, according to the Commission.
French drugs giant Servier, Teva and five other drug companies were fined â427.7 million in July 2014 for colluding to delay the introduction of a generic version of perindopril, a popular blood pressure treatment.
And there are more.
That said, the fines are also based on the companies revenue and as the US ones are generally bigger, they get the bigger fines.
Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
The problem here is Samsung, not Google. Android has had the ability to use the SD card as extended storage, rather than a separate drive, since version 7 (maybe 6, can't remember the exact version); Samsung purposely disabled the feature claiming (wrongly, I use it) that it leads to performance issues.
Google implemented exactly what you want. They just didn't force Samsung to not disable the feature.
You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
In this day and age, 8GB *is* nothing for a phone. That barely holds the OS. I have a 16GB Android tablet and the damn thing only had 6GB free after the OS and the non-removable apps when it came out of the package. These days for an Android device 32GB is what I would consider bare minimum if you intend to use it for anything other than phone calls and texts.
I take it you're not a citizen of the United States? I am, born and lived here my entire life, and I'll tell you right now, if you didn't guess already: Donald Trump does not speak for all Americans, he only speaks for some of them, and of that subset, most of us have little to no respect for them -- or Donald Trump, either. He's a loudmouth, uncouth, misogynistic, probably racist asshole, definitely un-Presidential, and quite frankly he was elected by frustrated people with low IQs and severe myopia (if you catch my drift) who were only really interested in 'pissing off liberals' and not in what's best for the United States. So whatever else you think or do, don't lump all 300,000,000+ of us together in the same group, we're just as appalled as the rest of the world is.
..and now, as typical for Trump supporters, I'll be down-modded into the basement, marked as a 'Troll', and generally have the most vile insults imagineable thrown at me for daring to speak against the Pussy-Grabber-in-Chief, Orange Julius Caesar Trump. Do your worst, you bastards.
I don't think you're right.
Base level phones these days generally come with 2G of RAM, and usually more. That's more than enough for the most memory intensive mobile apps. But even if it wasn't, the usual response of Android is to kill idle apps, not "page" them, largely because there are major technical problems with that. This isn't hypothetical, it's been true on every device I have. If I load a large number of apps, eventually trying to go to an app loaded much earlier in the day results in the app being loaded from scratch, revealing that it was terminated.
But on top that, the entire concept of paging is complex given how Android works.
In a normal operating system, paging is done in two ways: read only data from executables (including stored libraries) is paged in directly from the file system, and the application's working storage may be paged to and from a swapfile. Both are, for practical purposes, not relevant in Android. Android's "executables" are APK files, zip'd files of non-native bytecode. And swapfiles (or swap disks) would be a disaster in a flash storage environment because they're constantly being written to.
So, in practice, what you're left with is time taken to load an app. And quite honestly, I'm not seeing any practical difference between apps loaded from SD card, and from internal storage. I don't doubt it's technically slower, but it's not slow enough to be an issue.
And it certainly isn't slow enough for Samsung to be justified in disabling the feature.
You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.