Slashdot Mirror


Open Gov't Advocates Fear that Private Messaging Apps Are Being Misused by Public Officials To Conduct Business in Secret (pbs.org)

The proliferation of digital tools that make text and email messages vanish may be welcome to Americans seeking to guard their privacy. But open government advocates fear they are being misused by public officials to conduct business in secret and evade transparency laws. From a report: Whether communications on those platforms should be part of the public record is a growing but unsettled debate in states across the country. Updates to transparency laws lag behind rapid technological advances, and the public and private personas of state officials overlap on private smartphones and social media accounts. "Those kind of technologies literally undermine, through the technology itself, state open government laws and policies," said Daniel Bevarly, executive director of the National Freedom of Information Coalition. "And they come on top of the misuse of other technologies, like people using their own private email and cellphones to conduct business." Some government officials have argued that public employees should be free to communicate on private, non-governmental cellphones and social media platforms without triggering open records requirements.

6 of 125 comments (clear)

  1. Re:You can’t have it both ways by mrbester · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, because government is accountable to the people, not the other way around.

    --
    "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
  2. Re:Ironic, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, not ironic.

    And rest assured: they will still have strong encryption long after you've lost your ability to use it

  3. Re:You can’t have it both ways by king+neckbeard · · Score: 3, Informative

    This isn't me wanting to spy on my neighbor, but not wanting my neighbor to spy on me. This is the relationship between a people and their government, which is by it's very nature, asymmetrical.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  4. Re:You can’t have it both ways by Holi · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, this is wanting governments to follow the laws they passed. Open government laws require that records are kept and trying to get around that is illegal.

    What we need are stronger punishments for this activity as we already have decided that these acts are against the law.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  5. Exactly. The states and people delegated power to by raymorris · · Score: 4, Informative

    Exactly, the US government is expressly empowered by the people to act for the people, in specific ways. We don't have the Divine Right of Kings here.

    The Constitution explicitly delegates certain specific powers to the federal government, and reserves all other powers to the states and the people. Powers are preserved with the people because that's where they come from. Washington politicians work for us, at our pleasure not the other way around.

  6. Re:Before the digital age ... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's nothing illegal about a government official buying a burner phone to call people with.

    But it is illegal to use that phone for government business.