Slashdot Mirror


118 All-Time Heat Records Set Around the Globe (miamiherald.com)

"It's so hot, even parts of the Arctic are on fire," reports Vox, citing wildfires in Sweden, while Greece "has declared a state of emergency as raging forest fires have killed at least 81 people and injured more than 190."

But heat-related disasters are happening around the world. In Japan 86 people have been killed by heatstroke, while another 23,000 people have been hospitalized -- about half of them over the age of 65 -- in a heat wave forecast to continue for another two weeks. "Japan hit 106 degrees on Monday, its hottest temperature ever," reports the Associated Press, adding that "So far this month, at least 118 of these all-time heat records have been set or tied across the globe." An anonymous reader quotes their report. "We now have very strong evidence that global warming has already put a thumb on the scales, upping the odds of extremes like severe heat and heavy rainfall," Stanford University climate scientist Noah Diffenbaugh said. "We find that global warming has increased the odds of record-setting hot events over more than 80 percent of the planet, and has increased the odds of record-setting wet events at around half of the planet..."

"The world is becoming warmer and so heat waves like this are becoming more common," said Friederike Otto, deputy director of the Environmental Change Institute at the University of Oxford.

"Death Valley, California, has set three consecutive daily record-high temperatures of 127 degrees," reports the Washington Post, adding that "Sometimes, like right now in the Western U.S., it's too hot for airplanes to fly" because of heat-related changes in air density at high-altitude airports. In Europe, nuclear power plants in Finland, Sweden, and German were forced to cut electricity production because high temperatures heated the seawater needed to cool reactors.

In northern California 38,000 people fled their homes as an 80,900-acre wildfire spread through the Shasta-Trinity area. Reuters reports the wildfire was caused "by hot, dry weather and high winds" -- and that it's one of 89 large wildfires currently burning in 14 U.S. states.

18 of 503 comments (clear)

  1. And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People are so fucking stupid it is infuriating.

    1. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by greenwow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But the longer you measure, and we haven't been measuring that long, you statistically expect new highs. That's just how the math works. You need wide-spread and decades-long measurements to make a conclusion.

    2. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Not a hoax, it's just not good science. We need about 200k years of detailed
      temperature data to really see how we're trending. We have less than 200 years,
      and it's only recently that we have data from many collection points around the world,
      so in reality, maybe 40 years of detailed data. Not even a drop in the bucket. I say
      this because when I was a kid, the big thing was the coming ice age in our life times
      preached by the science of the times.

      CAP === 'hissed'

    3. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Weather is not climate. There's plenty of proof of global warming, but this isn't part of it. "Global Warming" is a poor name, it's "Global Climate Change" and some places will actually get cooler, while others get hotter. Some places might stay the same temperature, just get more/less precipitation. The only thing known for sure is that it will suck for everyone, more if nothing is done, maybe less if we do something.

    4. Re: And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Long term data seems to show an increase, it is true, and logically we would expect some kind of increase after adding so much CO2 to the atmosphere, but this particular story is pure propaganda, and no attempt is made to calculate the likelihood of these temperatures being a result of AGW. No attempt is made to compare them with the thousands of cold temperature records made earlier this year. The purpose of this story is to hit people on an emotional level.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by davesag · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Climate change and global warming are not the same thing. Human industrial activity is causing a rapid buildup of greenhouse gasses. This is causing the planet to warm. That's global warming. The global rapid increase in mean temperature is causing climates to change as more and more energy is shoved into the system, historical temperature regulators like the gulf-stream slow, move, or just change, reflective snow melts, permafrost melts releasing more GHGs, suboceanic clathrates collapse due to increased water temperature (also releasing more GHGs), and so on. These changes lead to things like "arctic vortexes" and regional drops in temperatures as well as other weather extremes. But the overall global trend is increased temperatures.

      So to sum up:

      1. Humans are causing global warming.
      2. Global warming is causing climate change.

      Global warming and climate change are related but they are not the same.

      Increased levels GHGs are also causing the oceans to change PH, becoming more acidic. That's almost as serious an issue as climate change IMHO.

      --
      I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
  2. As we watch the world burn by JMJimmy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We bicker about every stupid issue under the sun instead of taking the action we know is necessary.

    1. Re:As we watch the world burn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We bicker about every stupid issue under the sun instead of taking the action we know is necessary.

      The Lone Ranger says to Tonto : "Tonto, we're surrounded by bloodthirsty Indians !"

      Tonto replies : "What do you mean "we", white man ?"

      The point is, some of us ARE taking action on a personal level. But we're not whining on Slashdot like you are, boy.

    2. Re:As we watch the world burn by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Massive reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Put less CO2 and methane in the air. And as a side effect you don't hear the oceans and fuck with their pH balance.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:As we watch the world burn by blindseer · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What action is necessary?

      More nuclear power.

      I can hear it now... "WTF? Nuclear power? But nuclear power plants had to reduce output because of the heat! Jackass!"

      If the problem is carbon emissions from electricity then the solution is more electricity from energy sources with the lowest carbon emissions. That would be nuclear power. The nuclear power plants had to reduce output but that's not the same as no output, they still produce power.

      Also, any power plant that uses a heat differential between the sea water and the heat source will see reduced output as temperatures rise. That would be true of nuclear, coal, natural gas, wood, cattle dung, or solar thermal. Reduced output from nuclear power because of the heat is for some reason a headline worth printing. Reduced output of solar and wind from the heat is not something any dinosaur news source is willing to write. Or rather not a headline Slashdot moderators would be wiling to bring up.

      It's not too hard to find sources giving the reduced output from PV panels and solar thermal systems in high heat, but that's not headline material for some reason. Maybe it's because we get so little of our energy from solar. But then why do we get so little of our energy from solar? Maybe because when we need it most the power isn't there?

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    4. Re:As we watch the world burn by MrKaos · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What action is necessary?

      More nuclear power.

      Relentless rhetoric from blindseer the rhetorician of Nuclear Ideology.

      I can hear it now... "WTF? Nuclear power? But nuclear power plants had to reduce output because of the heat! Jackass!"

      No, I would call you a Nuclear Idealist that transposes that idealism onto reality. A nuclear idealist that can't see people have woken up to the rhetoric from the nuclear industry as nothing more than a false reality. People aren't as naive as you need them to be to be receptive your Nuclear Ideology and events like these are just another nail in the coffin of your nuclear ideology.

      The nuclear power plants had to reduce output but that's not the same as no output, they still produce power.

      As the bogus Capacity Factor measurement goes down with the Availability Factor Nuclear Idealists never speak of. So much for the metric invented to make nuclear power look good.

      Also, any power plant that uses a heat differential between the sea water ...., or solar thermal.

      Except that Solar thermal for power doesn't use sea water. They're in deserts where no one wants to live and use molten salt as opposed to Nuclear power plants that like to be with the community on precious water front properties pumping waste heat into the environment because that's how nuclear works.

      Solar thermal near the sea is mainly used for producing drinking water, not power.

      Solar and wind are perfect solutions for reducing the heat load on the planet. Any portion of heat we can *remove* from the atmosphere and convert to electricity is a big step forward so that would call for larger deployments of solar and wind to remove larger portions of heat from the environment and convert that to electricity we can use because that's how solar and wind work.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  3. Meanwhile, in America by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hopefully the American public will start to realize that the GOP and their current president are not representing ordinary citizens, but influential corporations, especially the ethically flexible ones, such as those highly invested in military and oil.

    This is why the GOP and their friends at FOX have been climate change deniers, and the current president is calling it a hoax. It's all about protecting profits right up until the point the entire world goes to shit.
    The US is the only country in the world where a large percentage of the population still does not believe in climate change even though 99% of scientists support it. This sick situation thanks to GOP politicians, lobbyists and the media that supports them, especially FOX News.
    Can you please tell them to fuck off before it is too late?

    1. Re:Meanwhile, in America by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Go look up 'Dominionism' and 'Dominionists', but don't yell at me when you get sick to your stomach. That's what, in part, is driving this bullshit.

    2. Re:Meanwhile, in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, sure, it is only the fault of Republicans.

      The above is ( of course ) something only a simple-minded fool would either claim or believe.

      Plenty of Democrats have more than two children per family. Plenty of Democrats drive gas-hog vehicles. Plenty of Democrats live in houses which are much bigger than they need. Plenty of Democrats use air conditioning when a fan would suffice.

      The overly consumptive habits of western society would be a more realistic place to lay the blame. Of course if you were not a simple-minded idiotic knee-jerk leftist you'd already know that.

    3. Re:Meanwhile, in America by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is that these Christian supremacist types and the libertarians were for a long time Conservatives' useful idiots. And then the useful idiots took over the party, and every dog whistle slogan Republicans had been using for a couple of generations to get that base to the polls suddenly is political reality. Now they're stuck between the reality they know is happening and a base that took what was a load of bullshit seriously.

      Not that governments that take the reality of AGW seriously are doing that much either, but even acknowledgment is something. But we'll do what we've done before, basically hand it off to our children and grandchildren, make them pay the economic and social price.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:Meanwhile, in America by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Wonder whose modding me down. Dominionists or libertarians.

      Libertarians are dominionists. They just think that they personally are the most worthy, and thus will end up with the most wealth and the most slaves, instead of winding up slaves themselves.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  4. Re:The direct result of overpopulation by DavenH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You aren't using 'direct' correctly. More people are not heating the planet up directly, and hence your call to action about population is unsubstantiated. If you double population but quadruple resource efficiency, you do less environmental damage.

  5. Re:The direct result of overpopulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In either case, halving the population (lets say by having fewer offspring for a few generations, to avoid the ugly alternatives) would also do less environmental damage... Quadrupling resource efficiency, that is most likely the harder option.