Boston Globe Outs Secret TSA Tracking Program 'Quiet Skies' At Airports (bostonglobe.com)

The Boston Globe reports of a previously undisclosed program, called "Quiet Skies," that targets travelers who "are not under investigation by any agency and are not in the Terrorist Screening Data Base." The insights come from a TSA bulletin in March that describes the program's goal as thwarting threats to commercial aircraft "posed by unknown or partially known terrorists. The program "gives the agency broad discretion over which air travelers to focus on and how closely they are tracked," reports The Boston Globe. From the report: But some air marshals, in interviews and internal communications shared with the Globe, say the program has them tasked with shadowing travelers who appear to pose no real threat -- a businesswoman who happened to have traveled through a Mideast hot spot, in one case; a Southwest Airlines flight attendant, in another; a fellow federal law enforcement officer, in a third. It is a time-consuming and costly assignment, they say, which saps their ability to do more vital law enforcement work. TSA officials, in a written statement to the Globe, broadly defended the agency's efforts to deter potential acts of terror. But the agency declined to discuss whether Quiet Skies has intercepted any threats, or even to confirm that the program exists.

Already under Quiet Skies, thousands of unsuspecting Americans have been subjected to targeted airport and inflight surveillance, carried out by small teams of armed, undercover air marshals, government documents show. The teams document whether passengers fidget, use a computer, have a "jump" in their Adam's apple or a "cold penetrating stare," among other behaviors, according to the records. Air marshals note these observations -- minute-by-minute -- in two separate reports and send this information back to the TSA. All US citizens who enter the country are automatically screened for inclusion in Quiet Skies -- their travel patterns and affiliations are checked and their names run against a terrorist watch list and other databases, according to agency documents. The bulletin highlights 15 rules used to screen passengers. If someone is selected for surveillance, a team of air marshals will be placed on the person's next flight.

Comments

The TSA itself

[ArchieBunker]

has stopped exactly ZERO terrorist attacks. Congress has flat out asked them and the TSA claims they can't say for security reasons. Yeah that number is zero.

Re:"Partially known"

[Anonymous Coward]

Over 90% of all of the terrorist attacks in the West in the last several years have been perpetrated by "known wolves."

Complete bullshit.

More than 90% of the terrorist attacks in the US have been made by people who were "responsible gun owners" right to the point where they walked into a school and started shooting.

Re:Practicing for Nation-wide Implementation

[Anonymous Coward]

Well, to be fair, most countries in Europe do afaik require id-cards, which I believe is the US definition of fascist police state ;)
Of course, ID-cards are a better form of identification than utilities-bills.

Sadly, the state of the political climate nowadays do have a larger risk of turning into fascism, with US being closest, but also in Europe with the rise of the right-wing movements there. It has nothing to do with socialism though, quite the opposite.

Re: Practicing for Nation-wide Implementation

[houghi]

Correlation is not causation. And here it is even dangerous to say so, because people will think: we are not socialist, so we do not have to worry about this.
East-Germany was not socialist. North-Korea was not socialist. Yet both have/had high levels of spying on their people.
Germany now uis and does not have this level of general spying like the US has.

In the US companies can buy data from each other. Illegal in Socialist Europe. The UK is pretty well on its way.

So no not drag socialism into a discussion where it clearly does not belong. It distracts from the real issue. (But then, perhaps that is part of FUD)