Slashdot Mirror
Facebook Has Identified Ongoing Political Influence Campaign (nytimes.com)
Facebook is preparing to announce that it has identified a coordinated political influence campaign, with dozens of inauthentic accounts and pages that are believed to be engaging in political activity ahead of November's midterm elections, The New York Times reported Tuesday, citing three people briefed on the matter. From the report: In a series of briefings on Capitol Hill this week, the company told lawmakers that it detected the influence campaign as part of its investigations into election interference. It has been unable to tie the accounts to Russia, whose Internet Research Agency was at the center of an indictment earlier this year for interfering in the 2016 election, but company officials told Capitol Hill that Russia was possibly involved, according to two of the officials. Facebook is expected to announce its findings on Tuesday afternoon. The company has been working with the F.B.I. to investigate the activity. Like the Russian interference campaign in 2016, the recently detected campaign dealt with divisive social issues. Update: Facebook has confirmed the story, adding: Today we removed 32 Pages and accounts from Facebook and Instagram because they were involved in coordinated inauthentic behavior. This kind of behavior is not allowed on Facebook because we don't want people or organizations creating networks of accounts to mislead others about who they are, or what they're doing. We're still in the very early stages of our investigation and don't have all the facts -- including who may be behind this. But we are sharing what we know today given the connection between these bad actors and protests that are planned in Washington next week. We will update this post with more details when we have them, or if the facts we have change. It's clear that whoever set up these accounts went to much greater lengths to obscure their true identities than the Russian-based Internet Research Agency (IRA) has in the past. We believe this could be partly due to changes we've made over the last year to make this kind of abuse much harder.
Generally, most people agree that there is a huge difference between people eligible to vote in an election trying to influence each other, and foreigners who aren't supposed to be involved in the election doing it.
I wonder why it is you didn't know that?
They are for FB. But why they need to try to tie everything to Russia is beyond me. Why don't we care about all the other countries and/or intenational groups or individuals that are also attempting the same stuff. Why not a single story that talks about anyone but Russia?
The saddest part of all of this is the idea that people are forming political opinions based on what they read on FB. That to me is the biggest problem we have.
Would be nice if we could collectively be intelligent enough to form our own opinions.
Would be nicer if we could collectively be intelligent enough to not use social media as a source of news and information.
I wondered, why is it that the summary mentions not just what kinds of false organizations were present that had to be removed?
Following the story link you can see for yourself:
"Aztlan Warriors", "Black Elevation", "Mindful Being", and "Resisters."
Huh! That's odd, not one of those groups represent Trump or Republicans in any way. Kind of funny that was not mentioned in the summary. I'm sure it was just an oversight.
It makes you wonder if groups are going to all the trouble to create false fronts on Facebook, how many people you see at protests are really there because what they are protesting, or how many are there to be paid to stir up trouble - I have thought a lot of Antifa people are probably not really wanting to burn cars/buildings, but that there are selected individuals added to stir up the mob just to create chaos.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Which American pled guilty to collusion with Russia? None, you fuck wat.
Hillary Clinton, on the other hand used a lawfirm, to funnel money to FusionGPS (which is illegal FEC rules wise) that went to a UK national to get dirt on a political opponent. That IS collusion with a foreign entity using campaign money, and is EXACTLY what Muller is looking for in the Trump campaign. Funny how he isn't looking at Clinton's campaign where it did happen.
BTW. Steel likely used that money on Russian informants, which would mean Clinton ILLEGALLY COLLUDED WITH RUSSIA in the election. Literally the EXACT thing Muller is looking for.
Until Clinton is charged, we all know Muller, and you, are full of shit.
You mean when Hillary Clinton paid Russians to make up fake dirt on Trump, so Roseinstein could use it to make a fake FISA warrant to spy on Trump during the campaign and give info to Clinton?
Is that the collusion you are referring to? I can prove the above. You can't prove your claims. Lets keep yelling talking to Russians is bad, and I'll start listening to you the moment Clinton is in jail for doing what you say is illegal. Claiming Trump did it without evidence is slander and illegal on YOUR PART. So why would I listen to a criminal like you trying to cover for another criminal like Clinton?